The average WOZ value in Verspreide huizen Heel is €517,000, 49% higher than in Maasgouw (€348,000). Between 2021 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 21%, against a rise of 38% in Maasgouw. 82% of the homes are owner-occupied, 7 percentage points more than in Maasgouw (75%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€517,000
▲49% higher than Maasgouw (€348,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+21%
▼lower than Maasgouw (+38%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
82%
▲7 percentage points higher than Maasgouw (75%)
Social housing
0%
▼16 percentage points lower than Maasgouw (16%)
Private rent
14%
▲5 percentage points higher than Maasgouw (9%)
Single-family dwellings
100%
▲13 percentage points higher than Maasgouw (87%)
Built before 1945
31%
▲19 percentage points higher than Maasgouw (12%)
Built 1965–1974
9%
▼12 percentage points lower than Maasgouw (21%)
Built 2016 and later
14%
▲7 percentage points higher than Maasgouw (7%)
Average WOZ value
€517,000
▲49% higher than Maasgouw (€348,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+21%
▼lower than Maasgouw (+38%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
82%
▲7 percentage points higher than Maasgouw (75%)
Social housing
0%
▼16 percentage points lower than Maasgouw (16%)
Private rent
14%
▲5 percentage points higher than Maasgouw (9%)
Single-family dwellings
100%
▲13 percentage points higher than Maasgouw (87%)
Built before 1945
31%
▲19 percentage points higher than Maasgouw (12%)
Built 1965–1974
9%
▼12 percentage points lower than Maasgouw (21%)
Built 2016 and later
14%
▲7 percentage points higher than Maasgouw (7%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 21% between 2021 and 2025, to €517,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€517,000▲ 49% above Maasgouw
+21% since 2021
Maasgouw +38%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€570 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€570/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
309 m² · measured buurt average
WOZ €517,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€148NL median
Property tax (OZB)€48€45
Water board levy€46–
Sewage levy€29€22
Waste levy€25€27
Costs to set aside€422
Maintenance reserve€394–
Buildings insurance€28–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Maasgouw's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 228th of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 309 m² (measured average in this buurt) with the average WOZ value here, €517,000.
Levies: Maasgouw's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Verspreide huizen Heel has the highest WOZ value of the 3 buurten in Heel.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €517,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Verspreide huizen Heel
517,000
28
–
Heel
381,000
1,800
–
Panheel
419,000
96
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 82% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied82%
Private rent14%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
100% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes100%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
37% of dwellings were built between 1945 and 1964, against 19% in the municipality of Maasgouw.
Before 194531.4%
1945-196437.1%
1965-19748.6%
1992-20055.7%
2006-20152.9%
2016 and later14.3%
Explanation
Based on 35 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
Too few residents for a rate per resident: these are counts.
Verspreide huizen Heel has too few residents for a reliable rate per 1,000 residents (under 200), so counts are shown instead of a comparison. In 2025, 27 crimes were registered, against 36 in 2021. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Registered crimes, 2025
27
▼down from 36 in 2021
Home burglary
1
2023–2025
Registered crimes, 2025
27
▼down from 36 in 2021
Home burglary
1
2023–2025
Registered crime per year
27 crimes were registered in Verspreide huizen Heel in 2025 (36 in 2021).
Registered crimes, 2025
27
down from 36 in 2021
Explanation
Too few residents for a reliable per-1,000 figure (threshold 200) — registered crime, not all crime — CBS/Politie 47018NED.
The largest category in Verspreide huizen Heel is 'Theft and burglary': 8 in 2025.
Theft and burglary8
Traffic8
Other and withheld7
Fraud and scams2
Vandalism and public order1
Violence and threats1
Environmental0
Explanation
Too few residents for a reliable per-1,000 figure (threshold 200). Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2024, police in Verspreide huizen Heel registered 7 traffic accidents, of which 0 with injury and none fatal.
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2024
03 · Living environment
Residents rate their health below the Maasgouw average; green space is above the Maasgouw average.
An estimated 69% of adults in Verspreide huizen Heel rate their own health as good, 3 percentage points less than in Maasgouw. More adults feel lonely (53% against 46%), more smoke (18% against 14%), more drink excessively (7% against 5%) and more meet the physical activity guideline (46% against 44%). Agricultural land is the largest land use in Verspreide huizen Heel, covering 37% of the area, against 40% in Maasgouw. Green space such as parks, sports fields, forest and nature covers 33% of the area, 15 percentage points above the 18% in Maasgouw.
Key figures
Self-rated health (estimated)
69%
▼3 percentage points lower than Maasgouw (72%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
33%
▲15 percentage points higher than Maasgouw (18%)
More figures
Lonely
53%
▲7 percentage points higher than Maasgouw (46%)
Smokes
18%
▲4 percentage points higher than Maasgouw (14%)
Meets physical activity guideline
46%
▲2 percentage points higher than Maasgouw (44%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
44%
▲1 percentage point higher than Maasgouw (43%)
Built-up, share of the area
0%
▼16 percentage points lower than Maasgouw (16%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
23%
▲11 percentage points higher than Maasgouw (12%)
Water, share of the area
28%
▲7 percentage points higher than Maasgouw (21%)
Self-rated health (estimated)
69%
▼3 percentage points lower than Maasgouw (72%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
33%
▲15 percentage points higher than Maasgouw (18%)
More figures
Lonely
53%
▲7 percentage points higher than Maasgouw (46%)
Smokes
18%
▲4 percentage points higher than Maasgouw (14%)
Meets physical activity guideline
46%
▲2 percentage points higher than Maasgouw (44%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
44%
▲1 percentage point higher than Maasgouw (43%)
Built-up, share of the area
0%
▼16 percentage points lower than Maasgouw (16%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
23%
▲11 percentage points higher than Maasgouw (12%)
Water, share of the area
28%
▲7 percentage points higher than Maasgouw (21%)
Health
An estimated 69% of adults rate their own health as good, against 72% in the municipality of Maasgouw (2024).
This areaThe municipality of Maasgouw
Good self-rated health
69.4%
72%
Smokes
17.8%
14.1%
Excessive drinking
6.6%
5.1%
Overweight
53.7%
54.4%
Lonely
53%
46%
Anxiety or depression feelings
44.5%
42.9%
Meets physical activity guideline
46.2%
44.5%
Explanation
An RIVM model estimate (small-area estimation from the 2024 Health Monitor for Adults and Elderly), not a direct tabulation — even a buurt that was not itself surveyed gets an estimate. Figures cover adults aged 18 and over.
Source: RIVM/CBS Gezondheidsmonitor Volwassenen en Ouderen (kleine-gebieden-schatting) 2024
Land use
33% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 18% in the municipality of Maasgouw.
Traffic1.7%
Built-up0.1%
Other built-up0.4%
Recreation9.6%
Agriculture37.2%
Forest and nature23.3%
Water27.6%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
Distance to amenities
A primary school lies here at an average road distance of 1900 m.
Distance
Value
Large supermarket
2,000 m
–
GP practice
2,000 m
–
Primary school
1,900 m
–
Daycare
1,900 m
–
Large supermarkets
–
0
GP practices
–
0
Daycares
–
0
Explanation
Average road distance from every address in this buurt to the nearest amenity, and the average count within 1 km — a buurt average, not a distance from one address.
Source: CBS proximity statistics 2025
04 · Residents
The population is shrinking, while it grows in Maasgouw.
Verspreide huizen Heel has 190 inhabitants (2026), or 38 per km² (93% lower than in Maasgouw). In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Maasgouw was 76%, 2 percentage points below the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) had the highest share there: 27% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2021
-19%
▼lower than Maasgouw (+2%)
Turnout, municipality of Maasgouw
76%
▼2 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+0%
▼lower than Maasgouw (+3%)
Aged 45 to 65
37%
▲9 percentage points higher than Maasgouw (28%)
Married
44%
▲1 percentage point higher than Maasgouw (43%)
Dutch origin
68%
▼14 percentage points lower than Maasgouw (82%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
27%
▲10 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2021
-19%
▼lower than Maasgouw (+2%)
Turnout, municipality of Maasgouw
76%
▼2 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+0%
▼lower than Maasgouw (+3%)
Aged 45 to 65
37%
▲9 percentage points higher than Maasgouw (28%)
Married
44%
▲1 percentage point higher than Maasgouw (43%)
Dutch origin
68%
▼14 percentage points lower than Maasgouw (82%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
27%
▲10 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population shrank 19% between 2021 and 2026, to 190.
Residents, 2026
190
-19% since 2021
Maasgouw +2%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 38 residents per km², this buurt is 93% less densely populated than the municipality of Maasgouw.
Residents per km²38
Dwellings per km²5.6
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, almost no children were born; 25.6 died per 1,000.
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
37% of residents are between 45 and 65.
0 to 1520
15 to 2510
25 to 4535
45 to 6570
65 to 8045
80 and over10
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
44% of residents are married.
Never married70
Married85
Divorced30
Widowed10
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
68% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands130
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)45
Outside Europe15
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Maasgouw; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 76% of eligible voters in Maasgouw voted. The largest party was PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) with 27% of the valid votes.
Municipality of MaasgouwThe Netherlands
D66
13.5%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
26.6%
16.7%
VVD
16.2%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
7.7%
12.8%
CDA
14.7%
11.8%
JA21
6.8%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
5.2%
4.5%
BBB
2.4%
2.6%
Other
7%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
Verspreide huizen Heel has an average of 1.1 cars per household, 15% lower than in Maasgouw (1.3). 21% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 1 percentage point less than in Maasgouw (22%).
Key figures
Government, education and care, share of businesses
0%
▼17 percentage points lower than Maasgouw (17%)
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
33%
▲16 percentage points higher than Maasgouw (17%)
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
17%
▲15 percentage points higher than Maasgouw (2%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.1
▼15% lower than Maasgouw (1.3)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
22%
=about the same as Maasgouw (22%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+2 pp
▼lower than Maasgouw (+5 pp)
Lodging, share of addresses
91%
▲83 percentage points higher than Maasgouw (8%)
Residential, share of addresses
8%
▼77 percentage points lower than Maasgouw (85%)
Office, share of addresses
0%
▼2 percentage points lower than Maasgouw (2%)
Single-family dwellings
100%
▲37 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Owner-occupied dwellings
82%
▲25 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (57%)
Average WOZ value
€517,000
▲30% higher than the Netherlands (€398,000)
Government, education and care, share of businesses
0%
▼17 percentage points lower than Maasgouw (17%)
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
33%
▲16 percentage points higher than Maasgouw (17%)
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
17%
▲15 percentage points higher than Maasgouw (2%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.1
▼15% lower than Maasgouw (1.3)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
22%
=about the same as Maasgouw (22%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+2 pp
▼lower than Maasgouw (+5 pp)
Lodging, share of addresses
91%
▲83 percentage points higher than Maasgouw (8%)
Residential, share of addresses
8%
▼77 percentage points lower than Maasgouw (85%)
Office, share of addresses
0%
▼2 percentage points lower than Maasgouw (2%)
Single-family dwellings
100%
▲37 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Owner-occupied dwellings
82%
▲25 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (57%)
Average WOZ value
€517,000
▲30% higher than the Netherlands (€398,000)
Business establishments by sector
Handel en horeca is the largest sector, with 10 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij5
Nijverheid en energie0
Handel en horeca10
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie0
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed0
Zakelijke dienstverlening10
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg0
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
22% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 22% in the municipality of Maasgouw (2025).
Petrol78.3%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)21.7%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 20% to 22% between 2021 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
22%– about the same as Maasgouw (22%)
+2 pp since 2021
Maasgouw +5 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 120 passenger cars and 0 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars120
Motorcycles0
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
8% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is lodging (91%).
Residential7.6%
Office0.2%
Assembly0.4%
Industrial3%
Lodging91.3%
Other0.2%
Explanation
Based on 462 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
38 residents per km²: 93% less densely populated than the Dutch average.
This areaThe Netherlands
Residents per km²38
NL 539▼ −93% vs NL
Single-family dwellings100%
NL 63%▲ +59% vs NL
Owner-occupied dwellings82%
NL 57%▲ +44% vs NL
Average WOZ value€517,000
NL €398,000▲ +30% vs NL
Private rent14%
NL 14%≈ NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026