The population is shrinking, while it grows in Losser. Homes cost less than the average in the municipality of Losser, and registered crime per resident is higher.
The average WOZ value in Overdinkel is €320,000, 16% lower than in Losser (€381,000). Between 2014 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 87%, against a rise of 85% in Losser. 65% of the homes are owner-occupied, 6 percentage points less than in Losser (71%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€320,000
▼16% lower than Losser (€381,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2014
+87%
▲higher than Losser (+85%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
65%
▼6 percentage points lower than Losser (71%)
Social housing
27%
▲8 percentage points higher than Losser (19%)
Private rent
8%
▼3 percentage points lower than Losser (11%)
Single-family dwellings
88%
▲4 percentage points higher than Losser (84%)
Built 1975–1991
20%
▼4 percentage points lower than Losser (24%)
Built 2016 and later
5%
▼3 percentage points lower than Losser (8%)
Built 1992–2005
13%
▼2 percentage points lower than Losser (15%)
Average WOZ value
€320,000
▼16% lower than Losser (€381,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2014
+87%
▲higher than Losser (+85%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
65%
▼6 percentage points lower than Losser (71%)
Social housing
27%
▲8 percentage points higher than Losser (19%)
Private rent
8%
▼3 percentage points lower than Losser (11%)
Single-family dwellings
88%
▲4 percentage points higher than Losser (84%)
Built 1975–1991
20%
▼4 percentage points lower than Losser (24%)
Built 2016 and later
5%
▼3 percentage points lower than Losser (8%)
Built 1992–2005
13%
▼2 percentage points lower than Losser (15%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 87% between 2014 and 2025, to €320,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€320,000▼ 16% below Losser
+87% since 2014
Losser +85%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€341 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€341/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
155 m² · estimated gemeente average
WOZ €320,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€129NL median
Water board levy€41–
Sewage levy€36€22
Property tax (OZB)€31€28
Waste levy€21€27
Costs to set aside€212
Maintenance reserve€198–
Buildings insurance€14–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Losser's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 264th of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 155 m² (estimated gemeente average) with the average WOZ value here, €320,000.
Levies: Losser's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Overdinkel has the lowest WOZ value of the 5 wijken in the municipality of Losser.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €320,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Overdinkel
320,000
1,842
–
Losser
357,000
6,118
–
Glane
443,000
210
–
De Lutte
496,000
1,645
–
Beuningen
527,000
395
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 65% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied65%
Social housing27%
Private rent8%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
88% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes88%
Multi-family homes12%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
22% of dwellings were built before 1945, against 12% in the municipality of Losser.
Before 194522%
1945-196414.5%
1965-197420.3%
1975-199120%
1992-200513.1%
2006-20155.1%
2016 and later5%
Explanation
Based on 1,876 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
More registered crime per resident than the Losser average.
In 2025, 33 crimes per 1,000 residents were registered in Overdinkel, 27% higher than in Losser (26). Since 2021 the registered rate per 1,000 residents rose 44%, against a rise of 21% in Losser. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
33
▲27% higher than Losser (26)
Change since 2021
+44%
▲higher than Losser (+21%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
1.6
▼6% lower than Losser (1.7)
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
33
▲27% higher than Losser (26)
Change since 2021
+44%
▲higher than Losser (+21%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
1.6
▼6% lower than Losser (1.7)
Registered crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
In 2025, Overdinkel registered 33 crimes per 1,000 residents, against 26 in the municipality of Losser.
Overdinkel33
The municipality of Losser26
Explanation
Crime is counted where it happens and divided by the number of residents, so places with many visitors — city centres, nightlife, stations — score higher.
The largest category in Overdinkel is 'Theft and burglary': 12.0 per 1,000 residents in 2025, against 8.6 in the municipality of Losser.
OverdinkelLosser
Theft and burglary12.0
Losser 8.6▲ +40% vs Losser
Traffic7.0
Losser 7.7▼ −9% vs Losser
Fraud and scams5.3
Losser 3.6▲ +47% vs Losser
Vandalism and public order4.1
Losser 2.4▲ +71% vs Losser
Violence and threats2.4
Losser 2.0▲ +20% vs Losser
Other and withheld1.9
Losser 1.2▲ +58% vs Losser
Environmental0.0
Losser 0.2≈ Losser
Explanation
Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2024, police in Overdinkel registered 11 traffic accidents, of which 3 with injury and none fatal.
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2024
03 · Living environment
Residents rate their health below the Losser average; green space is below the Losser average.
An estimated 67% of adults in Overdinkel rate their own health as good, 8 percentage points less than in Losser. More adults are overweight (66% against 60%), more smoke (20% against 16%) and more feel lonely (44% against 40%), but fewer meet the physical activity guideline (48% against 53%). Agricultural land is the largest land use in Overdinkel, covering 78% of the area, against 66% in Losser. Green space such as parks, sports fields, forest and nature covers 8% of the area, 17 percentage points below the 25% in Losser.
Key figures
Self-rated health (estimated)
67%
▼8 percentage points lower than Losser (75%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
8%
▼17 percentage points lower than Losser (25%)
More figures
Overweight
66%
▲6 percentage points higher than Losser (60%)
Meets physical activity guideline
48%
▼5 percentage points lower than Losser (53%)
Smokes
20%
▲4 percentage points higher than Losser (16%)
Lonely
44%
▲4 percentage points higher than Losser (40%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
7%
▼16 percentage points lower than Losser (23%)
Agriculture, share of the area
78%
▲12 percentage points higher than Losser (66%)
Built-up, share of the area
9%
▲3 percentage points higher than Losser (6%)
Self-rated health (estimated)
67%
▼8 percentage points lower than Losser (75%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
8%
▼17 percentage points lower than Losser (25%)
More figures
Overweight
66%
▲6 percentage points higher than Losser (60%)
Meets physical activity guideline
48%
▼5 percentage points lower than Losser (53%)
Smokes
20%
▲4 percentage points higher than Losser (16%)
Lonely
44%
▲4 percentage points higher than Losser (40%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
7%
▼16 percentage points lower than Losser (23%)
Agriculture, share of the area
78%
▲12 percentage points higher than Losser (66%)
Built-up, share of the area
9%
▲3 percentage points higher than Losser (6%)
Health
An estimated 67% of adults rate their own health as good, against 75% in the municipality of Losser (2024).
This areaThe municipality of Losser
Good self-rated health
67%
74.9%
Smokes
19.6%
16%
Excessive drinking
9.1%
7.9%
Overweight
66.5%
59.5%
Lonely
43.8%
40.2%
Anxiety or depression feelings
40.4%
38.5%
Meets physical activity guideline
48%
52.7%
Explanation
An RIVM model estimate (small-area estimation from the 2024 Health Monitor for Adults and Elderly), not a direct tabulation — even a buurt that was not itself surveyed gets an estimate. Figures cover adults aged 18 and over.
Source: RIVM/CBS Gezondheidsmonitor Volwassenen en Ouderen (kleine-gebieden-schatting) 2024
Land use
8% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 25% in the municipality of Losser.
Traffic2.1%
Built-up8.7%
Other built-up2.6%
Recreation0.9%
Agriculture78.3%
Forest and nature7.2%
Water0.3%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
04 · Residents
The population is shrinking, while it grows in Losser.
Overdinkel has 4,160 inhabitants (2026), or 416 per km² (75% higher than in Losser). Between 2014 and 2026 the population fell 1%, against a rise of 4% in Losser. In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Losser was 83%, 5 percentage points above the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) had the highest share there: 22% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2014
-1%
▼lower than Losser (+4%)
Turnout, municipality of Losser
83%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+4%
▼lower than Losser (+8%)
Aged 45 to 65
29%
▲2 percentage points higher than Losser (27%)
Married
44%
▼1 percentage point lower than Losser (45%)
Dutch origin
78%
▼6 percentage points lower than Losser (84%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
51%
▲3 percentage points higher than Losser (48%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
22%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2014
-1%
▼lower than Losser (+4%)
Turnout, municipality of Losser
83%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+4%
▼lower than Losser (+8%)
Aged 45 to 65
29%
▲2 percentage points higher than Losser (27%)
Married
44%
▼1 percentage point lower than Losser (45%)
Dutch origin
78%
▼6 percentage points lower than Losser (84%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
51%
▲3 percentage points higher than Losser (48%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
22%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population held steady between 2014 and 2026, at 4,160.
Residents, 2026
4,160
-1% since 2014
Losser +4%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 416 residents per km², this wijk is 75% more densely populated than the municipality of Losser.
Residents per km²416
Dwellings per km²184.2
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, 6.0 children were born per 1,000 residents; 10.8 died per 1,000.
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
29% of residents are between 45 and 65.
0 to 15590
15 to 25480
25 to 45890
45 to 651,200
65 to 80820
80 and over185
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
44% of residents are married.
Never married1,805
Married1,815
Divorced300
Widowed245
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
78% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands3,230
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)555
Outside Europe375
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Education level of residents aged 15 to 75
51% of residents have a havo, vwo or mbo2-4 level education.
Primary, vmbo, mbo11,000
Havo, vwo, mbo2-41,620
Higher professional, university530
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2024
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Losser; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 83% of eligible voters in Losser voted. The largest party was PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) with 22% of the valid votes.
Municipality of LosserThe Netherlands
D66
11%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
22.2%
16.7%
VVD
16.2%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
6.3%
12.8%
CDA
17.4%
11.8%
JA21
8.4%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
6.1%
4.5%
BBB
5.8%
2.6%
Other
6.6%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
Overdinkel has an average of 1.3 cars per household, about the same as in Losser (1.3). 18% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 3 percentage points less than in Losser (21%).
Key figures
Industry and energy, share of businesses
19%
▲5 percentage points higher than Losser (14%)
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
7%
▼3 percentage points lower than Losser (10%)
Financial services and real estate, share of businesses
3%
▼2 percentage points lower than Losser (5%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.3
=about the same as Losser (1.3)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
18%
▼3 percentage points lower than Losser (21%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2014
+5 pp
=about the same as Losser (+5 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
94%
▲4 percentage points higher than Losser (90%)
Industrial, share of addresses
2%
▼3 percentage points lower than Losser (5%)
Lodging, share of addresses
1%
▼1 percentage point lower than Losser (2%)
Private rent
8%
▼6 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Single-family dwellings
88%
▲25 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Residents per km²
416
▼23% lower than the Netherlands (539)
Industry and energy, share of businesses
19%
▲5 percentage points higher than Losser (14%)
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
7%
▼3 percentage points lower than Losser (10%)
Financial services and real estate, share of businesses
3%
▼2 percentage points lower than Losser (5%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.3
=about the same as Losser (1.3)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
18%
▼3 percentage points lower than Losser (21%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2014
+5 pp
=about the same as Losser (+5 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
94%
▲4 percentage points higher than Losser (90%)
Industrial, share of addresses
2%
▼3 percentage points lower than Losser (5%)
Lodging, share of addresses
1%
▼1 percentage point lower than Losser (2%)
Private rent
8%
▼6 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Single-family dwellings
88%
▲25 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Residents per km²
416
▼23% lower than the Netherlands (539)
Business establishments by sector
Handel en horeca is the largest sector, with 85 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij25
Nijverheid en energie70
Handel en horeca85
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie20
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed10
Zakelijke dienstverlening65
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg60
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten30
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
18% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 21% in the municipality of Losser (2025).
Petrol82.3%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)17.7%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 13% to 18% between 2014 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
18%▼ 3 percentage points below Losser (21%)
+5 pp since 2014
Losser +5 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 2,350 passenger cars and 220 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars2,350
Motorcycles220
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
94% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is industrial (2%).
Residential93.9%
Retail1.7%
Office0.3%
Assembly1.3%
Healthcare0.3%
Industrial2.5%
Lodging0.5%
Education0.2%
Sports0.4%
Other2.1%
Explanation
Based on 1,998 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
12% multi-family dwellings, against 37% nationally.
This areaThe Netherlands
Multi-family dwellings12%
NL 37%▼ −68% vs NL
Private rent8%
NL 14%▼ −43% vs NL
Single-family dwellings88%
NL 63%▲ +40% vs NL
Residents per km²416
NL 539▼ −23% vs NL
Average WOZ value€320,000
NL €398,000▼ −20% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025