Living in Verspreide huizen Overdinkel (Losser): WOZ, prices & safety
Neighbourhood · Losser
Living in Verspreide huizen Overdinkel
The population is shrinking, while it grows in Losser. Homes cost more than the average in the municipality of Losser, and registered crime per resident is higher.
The average WOZ value in Verspreide huizen Overdinkel is €503,000, 32% higher than in Losser (€381,000). Between 2021 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 41%, against a rise of 43% in Losser. 87% of the homes are owner-occupied, 16 percentage points more than in Losser (71%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€503,000
▲32% higher than Losser (€381,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+41%
▼lower than Losser (+43%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
87%
▲16 percentage points higher than Losser (71%)
Social housing
0%
▼19 percentage points lower than Losser (19%)
Private rent
13%
▲2 percentage points higher than Losser (11%)
Single-family dwellings
80%
▼4 percentage points lower than Losser (84%)
Built 1965–1974
8%
▼12 percentage points lower than Losser (20%)
Built 1975–1991
16%
▼8 percentage points lower than Losser (24%)
Built 1945–1964
9%
▼5 percentage points lower than Losser (14%)
Average WOZ value
€503,000
▲32% higher than Losser (€381,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+41%
▼lower than Losser (+43%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
87%
▲16 percentage points higher than Losser (71%)
Social housing
0%
▼19 percentage points lower than Losser (19%)
Private rent
13%
▲2 percentage points higher than Losser (11%)
Single-family dwellings
80%
▼4 percentage points lower than Losser (84%)
Built 1965–1974
8%
▼12 percentage points lower than Losser (20%)
Built 1975–1991
16%
▼8 percentage points lower than Losser (24%)
Built 1945–1964
9%
▼5 percentage points lower than Losser (14%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 41% between 2021 and 2025, to €503,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€503,000▲ 32% above Losser
+41% since 2021
Losser +43%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€411 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€411/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
190 m² · measured buurt average
WOZ €503,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€151NL median
Property tax (OZB)€48€44
Water board levy€46–
Sewage levy€36€22
Waste levy€21€27
Costs to set aside€260
Maintenance reserve€243–
Buildings insurance€17–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Losser's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 260th of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 190 m² (measured average in this buurt) with the average WOZ value here, €503,000.
Levies: Losser's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Verspreide huizen Overdinkel has the highest WOZ value of the 2 buurten in Overdinkel.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €503,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Verspreide huizen Overdinkel
503,000
225
–
Overdinkel kern
295,000
1,617
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 87% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied87%
Private rent13%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
80% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes80%
Multi-family homes20%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
38% of dwellings were built before 1945, against 12% in the municipality of Losser.
Before 194538.2%
1945-19648.9%
1965-19748.4%
1975-199116%
1992-200516%
2006-20155.3%
2016 and later7.1%
Explanation
Based on 225 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
More registered crime per resident than the Losser average.
In 2025, 28 crimes per 1,000 residents were registered in Verspreide huizen Overdinkel, 8% higher than in Losser (26). Since 2021 the registered rate per 1,000 residents rose 13%, against a rise of 21% in Losser. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
28
▲8% higher than Losser (26)
Change since 2021
+13%
▼lower than Losser (+21%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
1.5
▼12% lower than Losser (1.7)
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
28
▲8% higher than Losser (26)
Change since 2021
+13%
▼lower than Losser (+21%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
1.5
▼12% lower than Losser (1.7)
Registered crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
In 2025, Verspreide huizen Overdinkel registered 28 crimes per 1,000 residents, against 26 in the municipality of Losser.
Verspreide huizen Overdinkel28
The municipality of Losser26
Explanation
Crime is counted where it happens and divided by the number of residents, so places with many visitors — city centres, nightlife, stations — score higher.
The largest category in Verspreide huizen Overdinkel is 'Theft and burglary': 10.5 per 1,000 residents in 2025, against 8.6 in the municipality of Losser.
Verspreide huizen OverdinkelLosser
Theft and burglary10.5
Losser 8.6▲ +22% vs Losser
Traffic7.0
Losser 7.7▼ −9% vs Losser
Vandalism and public order3.5
Losser 2.4▲ +46% vs Losser
Fraud and scams3.5
Losser 3.6≈ Losser
Other and withheld3.5
Losser 1.2▲ +192% vs Losser
Violence and threats0.0
Losser 2.0▼ −100% vs Losser
Environmental0.0
Losser 0.2≈ Losser
Explanation
Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2024, police in Verspreide huizen Overdinkel registered 5 traffic accidents, of which 1 with injury and none fatal.
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2024
03 · Living environment
Residents rate their health below the Losser average; green space is below the Losser average.
An estimated 72% of adults in Verspreide huizen Overdinkel rate their own health as good, 3 percentage points less than in Losser. Fewer adults are overweight (54% against 60%), fewer feel lonely (37% against 40%) and fewer smoke (14% against 16%), but more meet the physical activity guideline (59% against 53%). Agricultural land is the largest land use in Verspreide huizen Overdinkel, covering 87% of the area, against 66% in Losser. Green space such as parks, sports fields, forest and nature covers 8% of the area, 17 percentage points below the 25% in Losser.
Key figures
Self-rated health (estimated)
72%
▼3 percentage points lower than Losser (75%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
8%
▼17 percentage points lower than Losser (25%)
More figures
Meets physical activity guideline
59%
▲6 percentage points higher than Losser (53%)
Overweight
54%
▼6 percentage points lower than Losser (60%)
Lonely
37%
▼3 percentage points lower than Losser (40%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
36%
▼2 percentage points lower than Losser (38%)
Agriculture, share of the area
87%
▲21 percentage points higher than Losser (66%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
8%
▼15 percentage points lower than Losser (23%)
Built-up, share of the area
0%
▼6 percentage points lower than Losser (6%)
Self-rated health (estimated)
72%
▼3 percentage points lower than Losser (75%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
8%
▼17 percentage points lower than Losser (25%)
More figures
Meets physical activity guideline
59%
▲6 percentage points higher than Losser (53%)
Overweight
54%
▼6 percentage points lower than Losser (60%)
Lonely
37%
▼3 percentage points lower than Losser (40%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
36%
▼2 percentage points lower than Losser (38%)
Agriculture, share of the area
87%
▲21 percentage points higher than Losser (66%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
8%
▼15 percentage points lower than Losser (23%)
Built-up, share of the area
0%
▼6 percentage points lower than Losser (6%)
Health
An estimated 72% of adults rate their own health as good, against 75% in the municipality of Losser (2024).
This areaThe municipality of Losser
Good self-rated health
72.4%
74.9%
Smokes
13.8%
16%
Excessive drinking
9.8%
7.9%
Overweight
54.3%
59.5%
Lonely
37%
40.2%
Anxiety or depression feelings
36.3%
38.5%
Meets physical activity guideline
58.6%
52.7%
Explanation
An RIVM model estimate (small-area estimation from the 2024 Health Monitor for Adults and Elderly), not a direct tabulation — even a buurt that was not itself surveyed gets an estimate. Figures cover adults aged 18 and over.
Source: RIVM/CBS Gezondheidsmonitor Volwassenen en Ouderen (kleine-gebieden-schatting) 2024
Land use
8% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 25% in the municipality of Losser.
Traffic2%
Built-up0.1%
Other built-up2.3%
Agriculture87.3%
Forest and nature7.9%
Water0.3%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
Distance to amenities
A primary school lies here at an average road distance of 1300 m.
Distance
Value
Large supermarket
1,600 m
–
GP practice
4,300 m
–
Primary school
1,300 m
–
Daycare
1,500 m
–
Large supermarkets
–
0.1
GP practices
–
0
Daycares
–
0.2
Explanation
Average road distance from every address in this buurt to the nearest amenity, and the average count within 1 km — a buurt average, not a distance from one address.
Source: CBS proximity statistics 2025
04 · Residents
The population is shrinking, while it grows in Losser.
Verspreide huizen Overdinkel has 555 inhabitants (2026), or 65 per km² (73% lower than in Losser). Between 2021 and 2026 the population fell 2%, against a rise of 3% in Losser. In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Losser was 83%, 5 percentage points above the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) had the highest share there: 22% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2021
-2%
▼lower than Losser (+3%)
Turnout, municipality of Losser
83%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+2%
▼lower than Losser (+4%)
Aged 45 to 65
32%
▲5 percentage points higher than Losser (27%)
Married
47%
▲2 percentage points higher than Losser (45%)
Dutch origin
84%
=about the same as Losser (84%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
47%
▼1 percentage point lower than Losser (48%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
22%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2021
-2%
▼lower than Losser (+3%)
Turnout, municipality of Losser
83%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+2%
▼lower than Losser (+4%)
Aged 45 to 65
32%
▲5 percentage points higher than Losser (27%)
Married
47%
▲2 percentage points higher than Losser (45%)
Dutch origin
84%
=about the same as Losser (84%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
47%
▼1 percentage point lower than Losser (48%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
22%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population shrank 2% between 2021 and 2026, to 555.
Residents, 2026
555
-2% since 2021
Losser +3%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 65 residents per km², this buurt is 73% less densely populated than the municipality of Losser.
Residents per km²65
Dwellings per km²26.3
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, 8.8 children were born per 1,000 residents; 8.8 died per 1,000.
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
32% of residents are between 45 and 65.
0 to 1570
15 to 2570
25 to 45100
45 to 65175
65 to 80110
80 and over25
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
47% of residents are married.
Never married235
Married260
Divorced30
Widowed25
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
84% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands465
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)65
Outside Europe25
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Education level of residents aged 15 to 75
47% of residents have a havo, vwo or mbo2-4 level education.
Primary, vmbo, mbo1110
Havo, vwo, mbo2-4210
Higher professional, university130
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2024
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Losser; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 83% of eligible voters in Losser voted. The largest party was PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) with 22% of the valid votes.
Municipality of LosserThe Netherlands
D66
11%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
22.2%
16.7%
VVD
16.2%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
6.3%
12.8%
CDA
17.4%
11.8%
JA21
8.4%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
6.1%
4.5%
BBB
5.8%
2.6%
Other
6.6%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
Verspreide huizen Overdinkel has an average of 1.7 cars per household, 31% higher than in Losser (1.3). 26% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 5 percentage points more than in Losser (21%).
Key figures
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
24%
▲14 percentage points higher than Losser (10%)
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
12%
▼9 percentage points lower than Losser (21%)
Financial services and real estate, share of businesses
12%
▲7 percentage points higher than Losser (5%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.7
▲31% higher than Losser (1.3)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
26%
▲5 percentage points higher than Losser (21%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+3 pp
▼lower than Losser (+5 pp)
Industrial, share of addresses
13%
▲8 percentage points higher than Losser (5%)
Lodging, share of addresses
4%
▲2 percentage points higher than Losser (2%)
Residential, share of addresses
92%
▲2 percentage points higher than Losser (90%)
Multi-family dwellings
20%
▼17 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (37%)
Owner-occupied dwellings
87%
▲30 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (57%)
Single-family dwellings
80%
▲17 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
24%
▲14 percentage points higher than Losser (10%)
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
12%
▼9 percentage points lower than Losser (21%)
Financial services and real estate, share of businesses
12%
▲7 percentage points higher than Losser (5%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.7
▲31% higher than Losser (1.3)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
26%
▲5 percentage points higher than Losser (21%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+3 pp
▼lower than Losser (+5 pp)
Industrial, share of addresses
13%
▲8 percentage points higher than Losser (5%)
Lodging, share of addresses
4%
▲2 percentage points higher than Losser (2%)
Residential, share of addresses
92%
▲2 percentage points higher than Losser (90%)
Multi-family dwellings
20%
▼17 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (37%)
Owner-occupied dwellings
87%
▲30 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (57%)
Single-family dwellings
80%
▲17 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Business establishments by sector
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij is the largest sector, with 20 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij20
Nijverheid en energie10
Handel en horeca10
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie0
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed10
Zakelijke dienstverlening20
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg10
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
26% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 21% in the municipality of Losser (2025).
Petrol74.3%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)25.7%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 22% to 26% between 2021 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
26%▲ 5 percentage points above Losser (21%)
+4 pp since 2021
Losser +5 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 365 passenger cars and 40 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars365
Motorcycles40
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
92% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is industrial (13%).
Residential91.8%
Retail0.8%
Office0.4%
Assembly1.6%
Industrial13.5%
Lodging4.1%
Sports0.4%
Other0.4%
Explanation
Based on 245 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
65 residents per km²: 88% less densely populated than the Dutch average.
This areaThe Netherlands
Residents per km²65
NL 539▼ −88% vs NL
Multi-family dwellings20%
NL 37%▼ −46% vs NL
Owner-occupied dwellings87%
NL 57%▲ +53% vs NL
Single-family dwellings80%
NL 63%▲ +27% vs NL
Average WOZ value€503,000
NL €398,000▲ +26% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026