We're pulling the figures from public sources. This usually takes a few seconds.
Area and its neighbourhoodsCBS key figures for districts and neighbourhoods
Residents and householdsCBS
Homes and WOZ valueCBS · Kadaster BAG
Housing marketNVM market overview
Municipal leviesMunicipal budgets · CBS
SafetyCBS and Police
HealthRIVM Health Monitor
Land use and amenitiesCBS land use · proximity statistics
Road safety and electionsRijkswaterstaat · Kiesraad
Comparing with the municipality and the countryRankings and comparisons
Living in Stompwijk (Leidschendam-Voorburg): WOZ, prices & areas
District · Leidschendam-Voorburg
Living in Stompwijk
The population is growing slower than in Leidschendam-Voorburg. Homes cost more than the average in the municipality of Leidschendam-Voorburg, and registered crime per resident is higher.
Homes cost more than the Leidschendam-Voorburg average.
The average WOZ value in Stompwijk is €524,000, 18% higher than in Leidschendam-Voorburg (€443,000). Between 2014 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 58%, against a rise of 91% in Leidschendam-Voorburg. 72% of the homes are owner-occupied, 13 percentage points more than in Leidschendam-Voorburg (59%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€524,000
▲18% higher than Leidschendam-Voorburg (€443,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2014
+58%
▼lower than Leidschendam-Voorburg (+91%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
72%
▲13 percentage points higher than Leidschendam-Voorburg (59%)
Social housing
20%
▼5 percentage points lower than Leidschendam-Voorburg (25%)
Private rent
8%
▼9 percentage points lower than Leidschendam-Voorburg (17%)
Single-family dwellings
89%
▲50 percentage points higher than Leidschendam-Voorburg (39%)
Built 1945–1964
10%
▼14 percentage points lower than Leidschendam-Voorburg (24%)
Built 1992–2005
19%
▲8 percentage points higher than Leidschendam-Voorburg (11%)
Built 1975–1991
19%
▲3 percentage points higher than Leidschendam-Voorburg (16%)
Average WOZ value
€524,000
▲18% higher than Leidschendam-Voorburg (€443,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2014
+58%
▼lower than Leidschendam-Voorburg (+91%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
72%
▲13 percentage points higher than Leidschendam-Voorburg (59%)
Social housing
20%
▼5 percentage points lower than Leidschendam-Voorburg (25%)
Private rent
8%
▼9 percentage points lower than Leidschendam-Voorburg (17%)
Single-family dwellings
89%
▲50 percentage points higher than Leidschendam-Voorburg (39%)
Built 1945–1964
10%
▼14 percentage points lower than Leidschendam-Voorburg (24%)
Built 1992–2005
19%
▲8 percentage points higher than Leidschendam-Voorburg (11%)
Built 1975–1991
19%
▲3 percentage points higher than Leidschendam-Voorburg (16%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 58% between 2014 and 2025, to €524,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€524,000▲ 18% above Leidschendam-Voorburg
+58% since 2014
Leidschendam-Voorburg +91%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€283 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€283/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
106 m² · estimated gemeente average
WOZ €524,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€138NL median
Water board levy€47–
Waste levy€35€27
Property tax (OZB)€33€46
Sewage levy€23€22
Costs to set aside€145
Maintenance reserve€135–
Buildings insurance€10–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Leidschendam-Voorburg's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 107th of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 106 m² (estimated gemeente average) with the average WOZ value here, €524,000.
Levies: Leidschendam-Voorburg's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Stompwijk has the 4th-highest WOZ value of the 13 wijken in the municipality of Leidschendam-Voorburg.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €524,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Stompwijk
524,000
1,004
–
De Zijde / Duivenvoorde / Park Veursehou
487,000
2,549
–
Prinsenhof
287,000
2,676
–
't Lien / De Rietvink
459,000
3,392
–
Leidschendam - Zuid en omgeving
424,000
2,968
–
De Heuvel / Amstelwijk
267,000
1,795
–
Damsigt en omgeving
561,000
3,148
–
Essesteijn
444,000
2,868
–
Voorburg Midden
383,000
4,437
–
Bovenveen
362,000
4,092
–
Voorburg Noord
371,000
3,553
–
Voorburg West / Park Leeuwenbergh
650,000
2,171
–
Voorburg Oud
625,000
3,208
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 72% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied72%
Social housing20%
Private rent8%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
89% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes89%
Multi-family homes11%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
24% of dwellings were built before 1945, against 23% in the municipality of Leidschendam-Voorburg.
Before 194523.8%
1945-19649.6%
1965-197416.5%
1975-199119.5%
1992-200519%
2006-20153.6%
2016 and later8.1%
Explanation
Based on 1,006 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
More registered crime per resident than the Leidschendam-Voorburg average.
In 2025, 59 crimes per 1,000 residents were registered in Stompwijk, 13% higher than in Leidschendam-Voorburg (52). Since 2021 the registered rate per 1,000 residents rose 4%, against a rise of 26% in Leidschendam-Voorburg. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
59
▲13% higher than Leidschendam-Voorburg (52)
Change since 2021
+4%
▼lower than Leidschendam-Voorburg (+26%)
More figures
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
2.3
▼38% lower than Leidschendam-Voorburg (3.7)
Injury accidents per 1,000 residents (2024)
16.99
▲6.9 times as high as Leidschendam-Voorburg (2.47)
Change since 2020
+82%
▲higher than Leidschendam-Voorburg (+56%)
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
59
▲13% higher than Leidschendam-Voorburg (52)
Change since 2021
+4%
▼lower than Leidschendam-Voorburg (+26%)
More figures
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
2.3
▼38% lower than Leidschendam-Voorburg (3.7)
Injury accidents per 1,000 residents (2024)
16.99
▲6.9 times as high as Leidschendam-Voorburg (2.47)
Change since 2020
+82%
▲higher than Leidschendam-Voorburg (+56%)
Registered crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
In 2025, Stompwijk registered 59 crimes per 1,000 residents, against 52 in the municipality of Leidschendam-Voorburg.
Stompwijk59
The municipality of Leidschendam-Voorburg52
Explanation
Crime is counted where it happens and divided by the number of residents, so places with many visitors — city centres, nightlife, stations — score higher.
The largest category in Stompwijk is 'Traffic': 28.0 per 1,000 residents in 2025, against 8.8 in the municipality of Leidschendam-Voorburg.
StompwijkLeidschendam-Voorburg
Traffic28.0
Leidschendam-Voorburg 8.8▲ +218% vs Leidschendam-Voorburg
Theft and burglary16.9
Leidschendam-Voorburg 25.4▼ −33% vs Leidschendam-Voorburg
Vandalism and public order3.7
Leidschendam-Voorburg 5.7▼ −35% vs Leidschendam-Voorburg
Violence and threats3.7
Leidschendam-Voorburg 5.2▼ −29% vs Leidschendam-Voorburg
Other and withheld3.7
Leidschendam-Voorburg 1.6▲ +131% vs Leidschendam-Voorburg
Fraud and scams3.3
Leidschendam-Voorburg 5.2▼ −37% vs Leidschendam-Voorburg
Environmental0.0
Leidschendam-Voorburg 0.3≈ Leidschendam-Voorburg
Explanation
Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2024, police in Stompwijk registered 206 traffic accidents, of which 40 with injury and none fatal.
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2024
03 · Living environment
Residents rate their health above the Leidschendam-Voorburg average; green space is below the Leidschendam-Voorburg average.
An estimated 77% of adults in Stompwijk rate their own health as good, 3 percentage points more than in Leidschendam-Voorburg. Fewer adults feel lonely (39% against 49%), fewer report anxiety or depression (42% against 48%) and fewer smoke (13% against 16%), but more drink excessively (6% against 5%). Agricultural land is the largest land use in Stompwijk, covering 69% of the area, against 45% in Leidschendam-Voorburg. Green space such as parks, sports fields, forest and nature covers 9% of the area, 3 percentage points below the 12% in Leidschendam-Voorburg.
Key figures
Self-rated health (estimated)
77%
▲3 percentage points higher than Leidschendam-Voorburg (74%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
9%
▼3 percentage points lower than Leidschendam-Voorburg (12%)
More figures
Lonely
39%
▼10 percentage points lower than Leidschendam-Voorburg (49%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
42%
▼6 percentage points lower than Leidschendam-Voorburg (48%)
Smokes
13%
▼3 percentage points lower than Leidschendam-Voorburg (16%)
Overweight
51%
▲1 percentage point higher than Leidschendam-Voorburg (50%)
Built-up, share of the area
3%
▼24 percentage points lower than Leidschendam-Voorburg (27%)
Agriculture, share of the area
69%
▲24 percentage points higher than Leidschendam-Voorburg (45%)
Water, share of the area
16%
▲5 percentage points higher than Leidschendam-Voorburg (11%)
Self-rated health (estimated)
77%
▲3 percentage points higher than Leidschendam-Voorburg (74%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
9%
▼3 percentage points lower than Leidschendam-Voorburg (12%)
More figures
Lonely
39%
▼10 percentage points lower than Leidschendam-Voorburg (49%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
42%
▼6 percentage points lower than Leidschendam-Voorburg (48%)
Smokes
13%
▼3 percentage points lower than Leidschendam-Voorburg (16%)
Overweight
51%
▲1 percentage point higher than Leidschendam-Voorburg (50%)
Built-up, share of the area
3%
▼24 percentage points lower than Leidschendam-Voorburg (27%)
Agriculture, share of the area
69%
▲24 percentage points higher than Leidschendam-Voorburg (45%)
Water, share of the area
16%
▲5 percentage points higher than Leidschendam-Voorburg (11%)
Health
An estimated 77% of adults rate their own health as good, against 74% in the municipality of Leidschendam-Voorburg (2024).
This areaThe municipality of Leidschendam-Voorburg
Good self-rated health
77.4%
73.5%
Smokes
13.4%
15.6%
Excessive drinking
5.7%
4.9%
Overweight
51.1%
49.6%
Lonely
39.4%
48.8%
Anxiety or depression feelings
42.1%
48.4%
Meets physical activity guideline
50.2%
49.2%
Explanation
An RIVM model estimate (small-area estimation from the 2024 Health Monitor for Adults and Elderly), not a direct tabulation — even a buurt that was not itself surveyed gets an estimate. Figures cover adults aged 18 and over.
Source: RIVM/CBS Gezondheidsmonitor Volwassenen en Ouderen (kleine-gebieden-schatting) 2024
Land use
9% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 12% in the municipality of Leidschendam-Voorburg.
Traffic2.8%
Built-up2.5%
Other built-up0.3%
Recreation4.4%
Agriculture69.5%
Forest and nature4.3%
Water16.1%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
04 · Residents
The population is growing slower than the Leidschendam-Voorburg average.
Stompwijk has 2,420 inhabitants (2026), or 135 per km² (95% lower than in Leidschendam-Voorburg). Between 2014 and 2026 the population rose 5%, against a rise of 8% in Leidschendam-Voorburg. In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Leidschendam-Voorburg was 79%, 1 percentage point above the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, D66 had the highest share there: 23% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2014
+5%
▼lower than Leidschendam-Voorburg (+8%)
Turnout, municipality of Leidschendam-Voorburg
79%
▲1 percentage point higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+7%
▲higher than Leidschendam-Voorburg (+5%)
Aged 45 to 65
30%
▲4 percentage points higher than Leidschendam-Voorburg (26%)
Never married
48%
▼2 percentage points lower than Leidschendam-Voorburg (50%)
Dutch origin
87%
▲26 percentage points higher than Leidschendam-Voorburg (61%)
D66, share of the vote
23%
▲6 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2014
+5%
▼lower than Leidschendam-Voorburg (+8%)
Turnout, municipality of Leidschendam-Voorburg
79%
▲1 percentage point higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+7%
▲higher than Leidschendam-Voorburg (+5%)
Aged 45 to 65
30%
▲4 percentage points higher than Leidschendam-Voorburg (26%)
Never married
48%
▼2 percentage points lower than Leidschendam-Voorburg (50%)
Dutch origin
87%
▲26 percentage points higher than Leidschendam-Voorburg (61%)
D66, share of the vote
23%
▲6 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population grew 5% between 2014 and 2026, to 2,420.
Residents, 2026
2,420
+5% since 2014
Leidschendam-Voorburg +8%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 135 residents per km², this wijk is 95% less densely populated than the municipality of Leidschendam-Voorburg.
Residents per km²135
Dwellings per km²55.8
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, 8.2 children were born per 1,000 residents; 8.2 died per 1,000.
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
30% of residents are between 45 and 65.
0 to 15345
15 to 25320
25 to 45480
45 to 65735
65 to 80425
80 and over120
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
48% of residents are never married.
Never married1,155
Married1,015
Divorced135
Widowed115
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
87% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands2,110
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)105
Outside Europe210
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Education level of residents aged 15 to 75
47% of residents have a havo, vwo or mbo2-4 level education.
Primary, vmbo, mbo1480
Havo, vwo, mbo2-4860
Higher professional, university480
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2024
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Leidschendam-Voorburg; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 79% of eligible voters in Leidschendam-Voorburg voted. The largest party was D66 with 23% of the valid votes.
Municipality of Leidschendam-VoorburgThe Netherlands
D66
23.2%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
13.3%
16.7%
VVD
17.6%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
13.4%
12.8%
CDA
11.2%
11.8%
JA21
5.6%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
3.5%
4.5%
BBB
1.5%
2.6%
Other
10.7%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
Stompwijk has an average of 1.4 cars per household, 40% higher than in Leidschendam-Voorburg (1.0). 21% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 4 percentage points less than in Leidschendam-Voorburg (25%).
Key figures
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
14%
▲13 percentage points higher than Leidschendam-Voorburg (1%)
Industry and energy, share of businesses
21%
▲9 percentage points higher than Leidschendam-Voorburg (12%)
Business services, share of businesses
21%
▼8 percentage points lower than Leidschendam-Voorburg (29%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.4
▲40% higher than Leidschendam-Voorburg (1.0)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
21%
▼4 percentage points lower than Leidschendam-Voorburg (25%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2014
+9 pp
▼lower than Leidschendam-Voorburg (+12 pp)
Industrial, share of addresses
14%
▲13 percentage points higher than Leidschendam-Voorburg (1%)
Residential, share of addresses
84%
▼6 percentage points lower than Leidschendam-Voorburg (90%)
Retail, share of addresses
1%
▼1 percentage point lower than Leidschendam-Voorburg (2%)
Multi-family dwellings
11%
▼26 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (37%)
Private rent
8%
▼6 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Single-family dwellings
89%
▲26 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
14%
▲13 percentage points higher than Leidschendam-Voorburg (1%)
Industry and energy, share of businesses
21%
▲9 percentage points higher than Leidschendam-Voorburg (12%)
Business services, share of businesses
21%
▼8 percentage points lower than Leidschendam-Voorburg (29%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.4
▲40% higher than Leidschendam-Voorburg (1.0)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
21%
▼4 percentage points lower than Leidschendam-Voorburg (25%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2014
+9 pp
▼lower than Leidschendam-Voorburg (+12 pp)
Industrial, share of addresses
14%
▲13 percentage points higher than Leidschendam-Voorburg (1%)
Residential, share of addresses
84%
▼6 percentage points lower than Leidschendam-Voorburg (90%)
Retail, share of addresses
1%
▼1 percentage point lower than Leidschendam-Voorburg (2%)
Multi-family dwellings
11%
▼26 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (37%)
Private rent
8%
▼6 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Single-family dwellings
89%
▲26 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Business establishments by sector
Nijverheid en energie is the largest sector, with 100 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij65
Nijverheid en energie100
Handel en horeca60
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie25
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed20
Zakelijke dienstverlening100
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg65
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten45
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
21% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 25% in the municipality of Leidschendam-Voorburg (2025).
Petrol78.6%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)21.4%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 13% to 21% between 2014 and 2025.
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 1,380 passenger cars and 220 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars1,380
Motorcycles220
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
84% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is industrial (14%).
Residential83.6%
Retail0.9%
Office1%
Assembly1.2%
Healthcare0.2%
Industrial13.9%
Lodging0.4%
Education0.2%
Sports0.3%
Other4.6%
Explanation
Based on 1,203 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
135 residents per km²: 75% less densely populated than the Dutch average.
This areaThe Netherlands
Residents per km²135
NL 539▼ −75% vs NL
Multi-family dwellings11%
NL 37%▼ −70% vs NL
Private rent8%
NL 14%▼ −43% vs NL
Single-family dwellings89%
NL 63%▲ +41% vs NL
Social housing20%
NL 28%▼ −29% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026