The population is shrinking, while it grows in Leiderdorp. Homes cost more than the average in the municipality of Leiderdorp, and registered crime per resident is higher.
The average WOZ value in 01 is €555,000, 23% higher than in Leiderdorp (€450,000). Between 2014 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 87%, against a rise of 88% in Leiderdorp. 82% of the homes are owner-occupied, 17 percentage points more than in Leiderdorp (65%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€555,000
▲23% higher than Leiderdorp (€450,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2014
+87%
▼lower than Leiderdorp (+88%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
82%
▲17 percentage points higher than Leiderdorp (65%)
Social housing
11%
▼13 percentage points lower than Leiderdorp (24%)
Private rent
6%
▼5 percentage points lower than Leiderdorp (11%)
Single-family dwellings
81%
▲23 percentage points higher than Leiderdorp (58%)
Built 1975–1991
7%
▼26 percentage points lower than Leiderdorp (33%)
Built 1965–1974
3%
▼20 percentage points lower than Leiderdorp (23%)
Built before 1945
14%
▲8 percentage points higher than Leiderdorp (6%)
Average WOZ value
€555,000
▲23% higher than Leiderdorp (€450,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2014
+87%
▼lower than Leiderdorp (+88%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
82%
▲17 percentage points higher than Leiderdorp (65%)
Social housing
11%
▼13 percentage points lower than Leiderdorp (24%)
Private rent
6%
▼5 percentage points lower than Leiderdorp (11%)
Single-family dwellings
81%
▲23 percentage points higher than Leiderdorp (58%)
Built 1975–1991
7%
▼26 percentage points lower than Leiderdorp (33%)
Built 1965–1974
3%
▼20 percentage points lower than Leiderdorp (23%)
Built before 1945
14%
▲8 percentage points higher than Leiderdorp (6%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 87% between 2014 and 2025, to €555,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€555,000▲ 23% above Leiderdorp
+87% since 2014
Leiderdorp +88%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€313 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€313/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
113 m² · estimated gemeente average
WOZ €555,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€159NL median
Property tax (OZB)€56€49
Water board levy€47–
Waste levy€40€27
Sewage levy€16€22
Costs to set aside€154
Maintenance reserve€144–
Buildings insurance€10–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Leiderdorp's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 277th of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 113 m² (estimated gemeente average) with the average WOZ value here, €555,000.
Levies: Leiderdorp's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
01 has the highest WOZ value of the 3 wijken in the municipality of Leiderdorp.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €555,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
01
555,000
1,398
–
00
422,000
7,773
–
02
471,000
3,527
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 82% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied82%
Social housing11%
Private rent6%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
81% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes81%
Multi-family homes19%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
53% of dwellings were built between 1945 and 1964, against 12% in the municipality of Leiderdorp.
Before 194513.8%
1945-196453.2%
1965-19743.2%
1975-19917.3%
1992-200512.6%
2006-20159.1%
2016 and later0.8%
Explanation
Based on 1,400 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
More registered crime per resident than the Leiderdorp average.
In 2025, 35 crimes per 1,000 residents were registered in 01, 9% higher than in Leiderdorp (32). Since 2021 the registered rate per 1,000 residents fell 16%, against a rise of 3% in Leiderdorp. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
35
▲9% higher than Leiderdorp (32)
Change since 2021
-16%
▼lower than Leiderdorp (+3%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
3.6
▲80% higher than Leiderdorp (2.0)
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
35
▲9% higher than Leiderdorp (32)
Change since 2021
-16%
▼lower than Leiderdorp (+3%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
3.6
▲80% higher than Leiderdorp (2.0)
Registered crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
In 2025, 01 registered 35 crimes per 1,000 residents, against 32 in the municipality of Leiderdorp.
0135
The municipality of Leiderdorp32
Explanation
Crime is counted where it happens and divided by the number of residents, so places with many visitors — city centres, nightlife, stations — score higher.
The largest category in 01 is 'Theft and burglary': 15.0 per 1,000 residents in 2025, against 13.7 in the municipality of Leiderdorp.
01Leiderdorp
Theft and burglary15.0
Leiderdorp 13.7▲ +9% vs Leiderdorp
Traffic11.4
Leiderdorp 6.5▲ +75% vs Leiderdorp
Fraud and scams3.6
Leiderdorp 4.1▼ −12% vs Leiderdorp
Vandalism and public order2.7
Leiderdorp 3.4▼ −21% vs Leiderdorp
Violence and threats2.1
Leiderdorp 2.7▼ −22% vs Leiderdorp
Other and withheld0.6
Leiderdorp 1.4▼ −57% vs Leiderdorp
Environmental0.0
Leiderdorp 0.0
Explanation
Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2024, police in 01 registered 67 traffic accidents, of which 10 with injury and none fatal.
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2024
03 · Living environment
Residents rate their health above the Leiderdorp average; green space is about the Leiderdorp average.
An estimated 79% of adults in 01 rate their own health as good, 5 percentage points more than in Leiderdorp. Fewer adults feel lonely (39% against 45%), fewer report anxiety or depression (42% against 46%) and fewer are overweight (48% against 51%), but more meet the physical activity guideline (54% against 49%). Agricultural land is the largest land use in 01, covering 71% of the area, against 48% in Leiderdorp. Green space such as parks, sports fields, forest and nature covers 8% of the area, in line with the 8% in Leiderdorp.
Key figures
Self-rated health (estimated)
79%
▲5 percentage points higher than Leiderdorp (74%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
8%
=about the same as Leiderdorp (8%)
More figures
Lonely
39%
▼6 percentage points lower than Leiderdorp (45%)
Meets physical activity guideline
54%
▲5 percentage points higher than Leiderdorp (49%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
42%
▼4 percentage points lower than Leiderdorp (46%)
Overweight
48%
▼3 percentage points lower than Leiderdorp (51%)
Built-up, share of the area
9%
▼24 percentage points lower than Leiderdorp (33%)
Agriculture, share of the area
71%
▲23 percentage points higher than Leiderdorp (48%)
Water, share of the area
7%
▲1 percentage point higher than Leiderdorp (6%)
Self-rated health (estimated)
79%
▲5 percentage points higher than Leiderdorp (74%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
8%
=about the same as Leiderdorp (8%)
More figures
Lonely
39%
▼6 percentage points lower than Leiderdorp (45%)
Meets physical activity guideline
54%
▲5 percentage points higher than Leiderdorp (49%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
42%
▼4 percentage points lower than Leiderdorp (46%)
Overweight
48%
▼3 percentage points lower than Leiderdorp (51%)
Built-up, share of the area
9%
▼24 percentage points lower than Leiderdorp (33%)
Agriculture, share of the area
71%
▲23 percentage points higher than Leiderdorp (48%)
Water, share of the area
7%
▲1 percentage point higher than Leiderdorp (6%)
Health
An estimated 79% of adults rate their own health as good, against 74% in the municipality of Leiderdorp (2024).
This areaThe municipality of Leiderdorp
Good self-rated health
79.2%
74.5%
Smokes
12.8%
13.7%
Excessive drinking
5.8%
5.2%
Overweight
48%
51%
Lonely
39.4%
45.4%
Anxiety or depression feelings
42.5%
45.9%
Meets physical activity guideline
53.6%
49.2%
Explanation
An RIVM model estimate (small-area estimation from the 2024 Health Monitor for Adults and Elderly), not a direct tabulation — even a buurt that was not itself surveyed gets an estimate. Figures cover adults aged 18 and over.
Source: RIVM/CBS Gezondheidsmonitor Volwassenen en Ouderen (kleine-gebieden-schatting) 2024
Land use
8% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 8% in the municipality of Leiderdorp.
Traffic4.9%
Built-up9%
Recreation7.7%
Agriculture70.7%
Forest and nature0.7%
Water7%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
04 · Residents
The population is shrinking, while it grows in Leiderdorp.
01 has 3,305 inhabitants (2026), or 579 per km² (76% lower than in Leiderdorp). Between 2014 and 2026 the population fell 16%, against a rise of 4% in Leiderdorp. In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Leiderdorp was 83%, 5 percentage points above the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, D66 had the highest share there: 22% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2014
-16%
▼lower than Leiderdorp (+4%)
Turnout, municipality of Leiderdorp
83%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
-10%
▼lower than Leiderdorp (+7%)
Aged 45 to 65
31%
▲5 percentage points higher than Leiderdorp (26%)
Never married
47%
=about the same as Leiderdorp (47%)
Dutch origin
81%
▲9 percentage points higher than Leiderdorp (72%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
42%
▲5 percentage points higher than Leiderdorp (37%)
D66, share of the vote
22%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2014
-16%
▼lower than Leiderdorp (+4%)
Turnout, municipality of Leiderdorp
83%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
-10%
▼lower than Leiderdorp (+7%)
Aged 45 to 65
31%
▲5 percentage points higher than Leiderdorp (26%)
Never married
47%
=about the same as Leiderdorp (47%)
Dutch origin
81%
▲9 percentage points higher than Leiderdorp (72%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
42%
▲5 percentage points higher than Leiderdorp (37%)
D66, share of the vote
22%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population shrank 16% between 2014 and 2026, to 3,305.
Residents, 2026
3,305
-16% since 2014
Leiderdorp +4%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 579 residents per km², this wijk is 76% less densely populated than the municipality of Leiderdorp.
Residents per km²579
Dwellings per km²244.8
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, 9.0 children were born per 1,000 residents; 6.0 died per 1,000.
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
31% of residents are between 45 and 65.
0 to 15530
15 to 25375
25 to 45695
45 to 651,020
65 to 80535
80 and over150
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
47% of residents are never married.
Never married1,560
Married1,400
Divorced200
Widowed150
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
81% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands2,690
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)200
Outside Europe415
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Education level of residents aged 15 to 75
42% of residents have a havo, vwo or mbo2-4 level education.
Primary, vmbo, mbo1440
Havo, vwo, mbo2-41,050
Higher professional, university1,010
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2024
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Leiderdorp; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 83% of eligible voters in Leiderdorp voted. The largest party was D66 with 22% of the valid votes.
Municipality of LeiderdorpThe Netherlands
D66
21.7%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
13.6%
16.7%
VVD
15.3%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
15.3%
12.8%
CDA
11.6%
11.8%
JA21
6.1%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
3.2%
4.5%
BBB
1.5%
2.6%
Other
11.6%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
01 has an average of 1.2 cars per household, 20% higher than in Leiderdorp (1.0). 22% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), about the same as in Leiderdorp (22%).
Key figures
Government, education and care, share of businesses
16%
▼7 percentage points lower than Leiderdorp (23%)
Industry and energy, share of businesses
20%
▲7 percentage points higher than Leiderdorp (13%)
Business services, share of businesses
28%
▲2 percentage points higher than Leiderdorp (26%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.2
▲20% higher than Leiderdorp (1.0)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
22%
=about the same as Leiderdorp (22%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2014
+9 pp
▲higher than Leiderdorp (+8 pp)
Industrial, share of addresses
4%
▲3 percentage points higher than Leiderdorp (1%)
Residential, share of addresses
88%
▲1 percentage point higher than Leiderdorp (87%)
Retail, share of addresses
1%
▼1 percentage point lower than Leiderdorp (2%)
Private rent
6%
▼8 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Multi-family dwellings
19%
▼18 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (37%)
Owner-occupied dwellings
82%
▲25 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (57%)
Government, education and care, share of businesses
16%
▼7 percentage points lower than Leiderdorp (23%)
Industry and energy, share of businesses
20%
▲7 percentage points higher than Leiderdorp (13%)
Business services, share of businesses
28%
▲2 percentage points higher than Leiderdorp (26%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.2
▲20% higher than Leiderdorp (1.0)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
22%
=about the same as Leiderdorp (22%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2014
+9 pp
▲higher than Leiderdorp (+8 pp)
Industrial, share of addresses
4%
▲3 percentage points higher than Leiderdorp (1%)
Residential, share of addresses
88%
▲1 percentage point higher than Leiderdorp (87%)
Retail, share of addresses
1%
▼1 percentage point lower than Leiderdorp (2%)
Private rent
6%
▼8 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Multi-family dwellings
19%
▼18 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (37%)
Owner-occupied dwellings
82%
▲25 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (57%)
Business establishments by sector
Zakelijke dienstverlening is the largest sector, with 145 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij10
Nijverheid en energie105
Handel en horeca65
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie40
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed25
Zakelijke dienstverlening145
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg80
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten45
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
22% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 22% in the municipality of Leiderdorp (2025).
Petrol77.6%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)22.4%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 14% to 22% between 2014 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
22%– about the same as Leiderdorp (22%)
+8 pp since 2014
Leiderdorp +7 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 1,660 passenger cars and 225 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars1,660
Motorcycles225
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
88% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is industrial (4%).
Residential88.5%
Retail0.9%
Office2%
Assembly0.8%
Healthcare0.3%
Industrial4.2%
Lodging0.3%
Education0.1%
Sports0.1%
Other4.4%
Explanation
Based on 1,582 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
11% social housing, against 28% nationally.
This areaThe Netherlands
Social housing11%
NL 28%▼ −61% vs NL
Private rent6%
NL 14%▼ −57% vs NL
Multi-family dwellings19%
NL 37%▼ −49% vs NL
Owner-occupied dwellings82%
NL 57%▲ +44% vs NL
Average WOZ value€555,000
NL €398,000▲ +39% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025