The population is shrinking about as fast as in Landgraaf. Homes cost about the same as the average in the municipality of Landgraaf, and registered crime per resident is higher.
Homes cost about the same as the Landgraaf average.
The average WOZ value in Schaesberg is €264,000, about the same as in Landgraaf (€265,000). Between 2014 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 78%, against a rise of 77% in Landgraaf. 62% of the homes are owner-occupied, 1 percentage point less than in Landgraaf (63%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€264,000
=about the same as Landgraaf (€265,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2014
+78%
▲higher than Landgraaf (+77%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
62%
▼1 percentage point lower than Landgraaf (63%)
Social housing
28%
=about the same as Landgraaf (28%)
Private rent
9%
=about the same as Landgraaf (9%)
Single-family dwellings
74%
▼2 percentage points lower than Landgraaf (76%)
Built 2006–2015
9%
▲4 percentage points higher than Landgraaf (5%)
Built 1992–2005
7%
▼4 percentage points lower than Landgraaf (11%)
Built before 1945
12%
▼2 percentage points lower than Landgraaf (14%)
Average WOZ value
€264,000
=about the same as Landgraaf (€265,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2014
+78%
▲higher than Landgraaf (+77%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
62%
▼1 percentage point lower than Landgraaf (63%)
Social housing
28%
=about the same as Landgraaf (28%)
Private rent
9%
=about the same as Landgraaf (9%)
Single-family dwellings
74%
▼2 percentage points lower than Landgraaf (76%)
Built 2006–2015
9%
▲4 percentage points higher than Landgraaf (5%)
Built 1992–2005
7%
▼4 percentage points lower than Landgraaf (11%)
Built before 1945
12%
▼2 percentage points lower than Landgraaf (14%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 78% between 2014 and 2025, to €264,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€264,000– about the same as Landgraaf
+78% since 2014
Landgraaf +77%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€301 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€301/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
132 m² · estimated gemeente average
WOZ €264,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€121NL median
Water board levy€39–
Property tax (OZB)€30€23
Waste levy€28€27
Sewage levy€24€22
Costs to set aside€180
Maintenance reserve€168–
Buildings insurance€12–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Landgraaf's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 266th of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 132 m² (estimated gemeente average) with the average WOZ value here, €264,000.
Levies: Landgraaf's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Schaesberg has the 2nd-highest WOZ value of the 3 wijken in the municipality of Landgraaf.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €264,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Schaesberg
264,000
7,754
–
Nieuwenhagen
260,000
4,762
–
Ubach over Worms
271,000
5,775
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 62% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied62%
Social housing28%
Private rent9%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
74% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes74%
Multi-family homes26%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
27% of dwellings were built between 1975 and 1991, against 25% in the municipality of Landgraaf.
Before 194511.7%
1945-196425.7%
1965-197416.8%
1975-199127.4%
1992-20057.4%
2006-20159.3%
2016 and later1.8%
Explanation
Based on 7,757 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
More registered crime per resident than the Landgraaf average.
In 2025, 46 crimes per 1,000 residents were registered in Schaesberg, 24% higher than in Landgraaf (37). Since 2021 the registered rate per 1,000 residents rose 16%, against a rise of 1% in Landgraaf. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
46
▲24% higher than Landgraaf (37)
Change since 2021
+16%
▲higher than Landgraaf (+1%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
3.3
▲27% higher than Landgraaf (2.6)
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
46
▲24% higher than Landgraaf (37)
Change since 2021
+16%
▲higher than Landgraaf (+1%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
3.3
▲27% higher than Landgraaf (2.6)
Registered crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
In 2025, Schaesberg registered 46 crimes per 1,000 residents, against 37 in the municipality of Landgraaf.
Schaesberg46
The municipality of Landgraaf37
Explanation
Crime is counted where it happens and divided by the number of residents, so places with many visitors — city centres, nightlife, stations — score higher.
The largest category in Schaesberg is 'Theft and burglary': 17.7 per 1,000 residents in 2025, against 12.6 in the municipality of Landgraaf.
SchaesbergLandgraaf
Theft and burglary17.7
Landgraaf 12.6▲ +40% vs Landgraaf
Traffic9.3
Landgraaf 7.3▲ +27% vs Landgraaf
Vandalism and public order6.5
Landgraaf 5.4▲ +20% vs Landgraaf
Violence and threats5.5
Landgraaf 4.3▲ +28% vs Landgraaf
Other and withheld3.8
Landgraaf 3.3▲ +15% vs Landgraaf
Fraud and scams3.5
Landgraaf 4.2▼ −17% vs Landgraaf
Environmental0.2
Landgraaf 0.2≈ Landgraaf
Explanation
Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2024, police in Schaesberg registered 70 traffic accidents, of which 11 with injury and none fatal.
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2024
03 · Living environment
Residents rate their health about average; green space is above the Landgraaf average.
An estimated 65% of adults in Schaesberg rate their own health as good, about the same as in Landgraaf. Fewer adults are overweight (60% against 61%), but more report anxiety or depression (49% against 48%) and more meet the physical activity guideline (37% against 36%). Built-up land is the largest land use in Schaesberg, covering 45% of the area, against 37% in Landgraaf. Green space such as parks, sports fields, forest and nature covers 38% of the area, 11 percentage points above the 27% in Landgraaf.
Key figures
Self-rated health (estimated)
65%
=about the same as Landgraaf (65%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
38%
▲11 percentage points higher than Landgraaf (27%)
More figures
Meets physical activity guideline
37%
▲1 percentage point higher than Landgraaf (36%)
Overweight
60%
▼1 percentage point lower than Landgraaf (61%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
49%
▲1 percentage point higher than Landgraaf (48%)
Smokes
18%
=about the same as Landgraaf (18%)
Agriculture, share of the area
12%
▼17 percentage points lower than Landgraaf (29%)
Recreation, share of the area
21%
▲10 percentage points higher than Landgraaf (11%)
Built-up, share of the area
45%
▲8 percentage points higher than Landgraaf (37%)
Self-rated health (estimated)
65%
=about the same as Landgraaf (65%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
38%
▲11 percentage points higher than Landgraaf (27%)
More figures
Meets physical activity guideline
37%
▲1 percentage point higher than Landgraaf (36%)
Overweight
60%
▼1 percentage point lower than Landgraaf (61%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
49%
▲1 percentage point higher than Landgraaf (48%)
Smokes
18%
=about the same as Landgraaf (18%)
Agriculture, share of the area
12%
▼17 percentage points lower than Landgraaf (29%)
Recreation, share of the area
21%
▲10 percentage points higher than Landgraaf (11%)
Built-up, share of the area
45%
▲8 percentage points higher than Landgraaf (37%)
Health
An estimated 65% of adults rate their own health as good, against 65% in the municipality of Landgraaf (2024).
This areaThe municipality of Landgraaf
Good self-rated health
65.2%
65.2%
Smokes
17.8%
18.2%
Excessive drinking
4.7%
4.9%
Overweight
59.8%
60.6%
Lonely
50.1%
50%
Anxiety or depression feelings
48.6%
48%
Meets physical activity guideline
37.4%
36.4%
Explanation
An RIVM model estimate (small-area estimation from the 2024 Health Monitor for Adults and Elderly), not a direct tabulation — even a buurt that was not itself surveyed gets an estimate. Figures cover adults aged 18 and over.
Source: RIVM/CBS Gezondheidsmonitor Volwassenen en Ouderen (kleine-gebieden-schatting) 2024
Land use
38% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 27% in the municipality of Landgraaf.
Traffic4.3%
Built-up44.7%
Other built-up0.6%
Recreation20.6%
Agriculture12.1%
Forest and nature17.4%
Water0.5%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
04 · Residents
The population is shrinking about as fast as the Landgraaf average.
Schaesberg has 15,630 inhabitants (2026), or 1,804 per km² (21% higher than in Landgraaf). Between 2014 and 2026 the population fell 1%, against a fall of 2% in Landgraaf. In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Landgraaf was 73%, 5 percentage points below the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) had the highest share there: 35% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2014
-1%
=about the same as Landgraaf (-2%)
Turnout, municipality of Landgraaf
73%
▼5 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+2%
=about the same as Landgraaf (+2%)
Aged 45 to 65
27%
▼1 percentage point lower than Landgraaf (28%)
Never married
42%
▲1 percentage point higher than Landgraaf (41%)
Dutch origin
75%
=about the same as Landgraaf (75%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
42%
▼1 percentage point lower than Landgraaf (43%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
35%
▲18 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2014
-1%
=about the same as Landgraaf (-2%)
Turnout, municipality of Landgraaf
73%
▼5 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+2%
=about the same as Landgraaf (+2%)
Aged 45 to 65
27%
▼1 percentage point lower than Landgraaf (28%)
Never married
42%
▲1 percentage point higher than Landgraaf (41%)
Dutch origin
75%
=about the same as Landgraaf (75%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
42%
▼1 percentage point lower than Landgraaf (43%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
35%
▲18 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population shrank 1% between 2014 and 2026, to 15,630.
Residents, 2026
15,630
-1% since 2014
Landgraaf -2%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 1,804 residents per km², this wijk is 21% more densely populated than the municipality of Landgraaf.
Residents per km²1,804
Dwellings per km²894.3
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, 7.0 children were born per 1,000 residents; 13.0 died per 1,000.
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
27% of residents are between 45 and 65.
0 to 151,975
15 to 251,410
25 to 453,525
45 to 654,235
65 to 803,435
80 and over1,050
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
42% of residents are never married.
Never married6,535
Married6,500
Divorced1,555
Widowed1,045
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
75% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands11,705
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)2,330
Outside Europe1,595
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Education level of residents aged 15 to 75
42% of residents have a havo, vwo or mbo2-4 level education.
Primary, vmbo, mbo13,890
Havo, vwo, mbo2-44,940
Higher professional, university3,050
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2024
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Landgraaf; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 73% of eligible voters in Landgraaf voted. The largest party was PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) with 35% of the valid votes.
Municipality of LandgraafThe Netherlands
D66
10.7%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
34.7%
16.7%
VVD
11.9%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
9.9%
12.8%
CDA
10.4%
11.8%
JA21
5.5%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
6.1%
4.5%
BBB
2%
2.6%
Other
8.8%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
Schaesberg has an average of 1.2 cars per household, about the same as in Landgraaf (1.2). 18% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 1 percentage point more than in Landgraaf (17%).
Key figures
Business services, share of businesses
22%
▲2 percentage points higher than Landgraaf (20%)
Government, education and care, share of businesses
19%
▼1 percentage point lower than Landgraaf (20%)
Industry and energy, share of businesses
15%
▼1 percentage point lower than Landgraaf (16%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.2
=about the same as Landgraaf (1.2)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
18%
▲1 percentage point higher than Landgraaf (17%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2014
+7 pp
=about the same as Landgraaf (+7 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
90%
=about the same as Landgraaf (90%)
Healthcare, share of addresses
1%
=about the same as Landgraaf (1%)
Office, share of addresses
1%
=about the same as Landgraaf (1%)
Private rent
9%
▼5 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Average WOZ value
€264,000
▼34% lower than the Netherlands (€398,000)
Multi-family dwellings
26%
▼11 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (37%)
Business services, share of businesses
22%
▲2 percentage points higher than Landgraaf (20%)
Government, education and care, share of businesses
19%
▼1 percentage point lower than Landgraaf (20%)
Industry and energy, share of businesses
15%
▼1 percentage point lower than Landgraaf (16%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.2
=about the same as Landgraaf (1.2)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
18%
▲1 percentage point higher than Landgraaf (17%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2014
+7 pp
=about the same as Landgraaf (+7 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
90%
=about the same as Landgraaf (90%)
Healthcare, share of addresses
1%
=about the same as Landgraaf (1%)
Office, share of addresses
1%
=about the same as Landgraaf (1%)
Private rent
9%
▼5 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Average WOZ value
€264,000
▼34% lower than the Netherlands (€398,000)
Multi-family dwellings
26%
▼11 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (37%)
Business establishments by sector
Zakelijke dienstverlening is the largest sector, with 290 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij10
Nijverheid en energie195
Handel en horeca250
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie65
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed45
Zakelijke dienstverlening290
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg250
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten200
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
18% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 17% in the municipality of Landgraaf (2025).
Petrol82.1%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)17.9%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 11% to 18% between 2014 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
18%▲ 1 percentage point above Landgraaf (17%)
+7 pp since 2014
Landgraaf +7 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 9,015 passenger cars and 700 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars9,015
Motorcycles700
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
90% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is retail (2%).
Residential89.7%
Retail1.8%
Office0.8%
Assembly0.9%
Healthcare0.7%
Industrial1.7%
Lodging0.1%
Education0.1%
Sports0.2%
Other5.8%
Explanation
Based on 8,645 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
1,804 residents per km²: 3.3 times as densely populated as the Dutch average.
This areaThe Netherlands
Residents per km²1,804
NL 539▲ +235% vs NL
Private rent9%
NL 14%▼ −36% vs NL
Average WOZ value€264,000
NL €398,000▼ −34% vs NL
Multi-family dwellings26%
NL 37%▼ −30% vs NL
Single-family dwellings74%
NL 63%▲ +18% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026