The population is shrinking slower than in Landgraaf. Homes cost less than the average in the municipality of Landgraaf, and registered crime per resident is higher.
The average WOZ value in Leenhof is €232,000, 12% lower than in Landgraaf (€265,000). Between 2021 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 31%, against a rise of 35% in Landgraaf. 92% of the homes are owner-occupied, 29 percentage points more than in Landgraaf (63%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€232,000
▼12% lower than Landgraaf (€265,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+31%
▼lower than Landgraaf (+35%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
92%
▲29 percentage points higher than Landgraaf (63%)
Social housing
3%
▼25 percentage points lower than Landgraaf (28%)
Private rent
5%
▼4 percentage points lower than Landgraaf (9%)
Single-family dwellings
97%
▲21 percentage points higher than Landgraaf (76%)
Built 1975–1991
3%
▼22 percentage points lower than Landgraaf (25%)
Built 1945–1964
3%
▼21 percentage points lower than Landgraaf (24%)
Built 1965–1974
1%
▼17 percentage points lower than Landgraaf (18%)
Average WOZ value
€232,000
▼12% lower than Landgraaf (€265,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+31%
▼lower than Landgraaf (+35%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
92%
▲29 percentage points higher than Landgraaf (63%)
Social housing
3%
▼25 percentage points lower than Landgraaf (28%)
Private rent
5%
▼4 percentage points lower than Landgraaf (9%)
Single-family dwellings
97%
▲21 percentage points higher than Landgraaf (76%)
Built 1975–1991
3%
▼22 percentage points lower than Landgraaf (25%)
Built 1945–1964
3%
▼21 percentage points lower than Landgraaf (24%)
Built 1965–1974
1%
▼17 percentage points lower than Landgraaf (18%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 31% between 2021 and 2025, to €232,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€232,000▼ 12% below Landgraaf
+31% since 2021
Landgraaf +35%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€307 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€307/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
139 m² · measured buurt average
WOZ €232,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€117NL median
Water board levy€38–
Waste levy€28€27
Property tax (OZB)€27€20
Sewage levy€24€22
Costs to set aside€190
Maintenance reserve€177–
Buildings insurance€13–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Landgraaf's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 261st of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 139 m² (measured average in this buurt) with the average WOZ value here, €232,000.
Levies: Landgraaf's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Leenhof has the 3rd-lowest WOZ value of the 13 buurten in Schaesberg.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €232,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Leenhof
232,000
352
–
Kakert
314,000
810
–
Lichtenberg
227,000
880
–
De Dormig
360,000
399
–
De Streep
254,000
570
–
Klinkerkwartier
268,000
411
–
Achter de Haesen
201,000
289
–
Schaesberg Centrum
239,000
1,594
–
Achter den Winkel
273,000
603
–
Mijnbuurt
257,000
839
–
Eikske
247,000
753
–
Heistraat
426,000
227
–
Gravenrode
377,000
27
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 92% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied92%
Social housing3%
Private rent5%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
97% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes97%
Multi-family homes3%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
89% of dwellings were built before 1945, against 14% in the municipality of Landgraaf.
Before 194589.2%
1945-19643.4%
1965-19740.6%
1975-19913.4%
2006-20153.4%
Explanation
Based on 352 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
More registered crime per resident than the Landgraaf average.
In 2025, 42 crimes per 1,000 residents were registered in Leenhof, 14% higher than in Landgraaf (37). Since 2021 the registered rate per 1,000 residents fell 10%, against a rise of 1% in Landgraaf. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
42
▲14% higher than Landgraaf (37)
Change since 2021
-10%
▼lower than Landgraaf (+1%)
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
42
▲14% higher than Landgraaf (37)
Change since 2021
-10%
▼lower than Landgraaf (+1%)
Registered crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
In 2025, Leenhof registered 42 crimes per 1,000 residents, against 37 in the municipality of Landgraaf.
Leenhof42
The municipality of Landgraaf37
Explanation
Crime is counted where it happens and divided by the number of residents, so places with many visitors — city centres, nightlife, stations — score higher.
The largest category in Leenhof is 'Theft and burglary': 17.9 per 1,000 residents in 2025, against 12.6 in the municipality of Landgraaf.
LeenhofLandgraaf
Theft and burglary17.9
Landgraaf 12.6▲ +42% vs Landgraaf
Traffic11.9
Landgraaf 7.3▲ +63% vs Landgraaf
Vandalism and public order9.0
Landgraaf 5.4▲ +67% vs Landgraaf
Violence and threats1.5
Landgraaf 4.3▼ −65% vs Landgraaf
Other and withheld1.5
Landgraaf 3.3▼ −55% vs Landgraaf
Fraud and scams0.0
Landgraaf 4.2▼ −100% vs Landgraaf
Environmental0.0
Landgraaf 0.2≈ Landgraaf
Explanation
Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2024, police in Leenhof registered 11 traffic accidents, of which 0 with injury and none fatal.
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2024
03 · Living environment
Residents rate their health about average; green space is above the Landgraaf average.
An estimated 65% of adults in Leenhof rate their own health as good, about the same as in Landgraaf. More adults meet the physical activity guideline (42% against 36%), more drink excessively (7% against 5%), more smoke (19% against 18%) and more report anxiety or depression (49% against 48%). Recreational land is the largest land use in Leenhof, covering 33% of the area, against 11% in Landgraaf. Green space such as parks, sports fields, forest and nature covers 56% of the area, 29 percentage points above the 27% in Landgraaf.
Key figures
Self-rated health (estimated)
65%
=about the same as Landgraaf (65%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
56%
▲29 percentage points higher than Landgraaf (27%)
More figures
Meets physical activity guideline
42%
▲6 percentage points higher than Landgraaf (36%)
Excessive drinking
7%
▲2 percentage points higher than Landgraaf (5%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
49%
▲1 percentage point higher than Landgraaf (48%)
Smokes
19%
▲1 percentage point higher than Landgraaf (18%)
Agriculture, share of the area
6%
▼23 percentage points lower than Landgraaf (29%)
Recreation, share of the area
33%
▲22 percentage points higher than Landgraaf (11%)
Built-up, share of the area
30%
▼7 percentage points lower than Landgraaf (37%)
Self-rated health (estimated)
65%
=about the same as Landgraaf (65%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
56%
▲29 percentage points higher than Landgraaf (27%)
More figures
Meets physical activity guideline
42%
▲6 percentage points higher than Landgraaf (36%)
Excessive drinking
7%
▲2 percentage points higher than Landgraaf (5%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
49%
▲1 percentage point higher than Landgraaf (48%)
Smokes
19%
▲1 percentage point higher than Landgraaf (18%)
Agriculture, share of the area
6%
▼23 percentage points lower than Landgraaf (29%)
Recreation, share of the area
33%
▲22 percentage points higher than Landgraaf (11%)
Built-up, share of the area
30%
▼7 percentage points lower than Landgraaf (37%)
Health
An estimated 65% of adults rate their own health as good, against 65% in the municipality of Landgraaf (2024).
This areaThe municipality of Landgraaf
Good self-rated health
65.2%
65.2%
Smokes
18.9%
18.2%
Excessive drinking
7.1%
4.9%
Overweight
61.1%
60.6%
Lonely
49.5%
50%
Anxiety or depression feelings
48.8%
48%
Meets physical activity guideline
42.4%
36.4%
Explanation
An RIVM model estimate (small-area estimation from the 2024 Health Monitor for Adults and Elderly), not a direct tabulation — even a buurt that was not itself surveyed gets an estimate. Figures cover adults aged 18 and over.
Source: RIVM/CBS Gezondheidsmonitor Volwassenen en Ouderen (kleine-gebieden-schatting) 2024
Land use
56% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 27% in the municipality of Landgraaf.
Traffic5.7%
Built-up30%
Other built-up1.4%
Recreation32.9%
Agriculture5.7%
Forest and nature22.9%
Water1.4%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
Distance to amenities
A daycare lies here at an average road distance of 800 m.
Distance
Value
Large supermarket
900 m
–
GP practice
1,100 m
–
Primary school
900 m
–
Daycare
800 m
–
Large supermarkets
–
1.9
GP practices
–
0.3
Daycares
–
2.1
Explanation
Average road distance from every address in this buurt to the nearest amenity, and the average count within 1 km — a buurt average, not a distance from one address.
Source: CBS proximity statistics 2025
04 · Residents
The population is shrinking slower than the Landgraaf average.
Leenhof has 655 inhabitants (2026), or 956 per km² (36% lower than in Landgraaf). Between 2021 and 2026 the population fell 8%, against a fall of 1% in Landgraaf. In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Landgraaf was 73%, 5 percentage points below the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) had the highest share there: 35% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2021
-8%
▼lower than Landgraaf (-1%)
Turnout, municipality of Landgraaf
73%
▼5 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
-0%
▼lower than Landgraaf (+1%)
Aged 45 to 65
32%
▲4 percentage points higher than Landgraaf (28%)
Married
44%
▲2 percentage points higher than Landgraaf (42%)
Dutch origin
78%
▲3 percentage points higher than Landgraaf (75%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
65%
▲22 percentage points higher than Landgraaf (43%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
35%
▲18 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2021
-8%
▼lower than Landgraaf (-1%)
Turnout, municipality of Landgraaf
73%
▼5 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
-0%
▼lower than Landgraaf (+1%)
Aged 45 to 65
32%
▲4 percentage points higher than Landgraaf (28%)
Married
44%
▲2 percentage points higher than Landgraaf (42%)
Dutch origin
78%
▲3 percentage points higher than Landgraaf (75%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
65%
▲22 percentage points higher than Landgraaf (43%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
35%
▲18 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population shrank 8% between 2021 and 2026, to 655.
Residents, 2026
655
-8% since 2021
Landgraaf -1%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 956 residents per km², this buurt is 36% less densely populated than the municipality of Landgraaf.
Residents per km²956
Dwellings per km²510.1
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, 7.5 children were born per 1,000 residents; 7.5 died per 1,000.
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
32% of residents are between 45 and 65.
0 to 1570
15 to 2555
25 to 45135
45 to 65210
65 to 80165
80 and over20
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
44% of residents are married.
Never married255
Married290
Divorced70
Widowed40
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
78% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands515
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)100
Outside Europe45
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Education level of residents aged 15 to 75
65% of residents have a havo, vwo or mbo2-4 level education.
Primary, vmbo, mbo1150
Havo, vwo, mbo2-4280
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2024
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Landgraaf; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 73% of eligible voters in Landgraaf voted. The largest party was PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) with 35% of the valid votes.
Municipality of LandgraafThe Netherlands
D66
10.7%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
34.7%
16.7%
VVD
11.9%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
9.9%
12.8%
CDA
10.4%
11.8%
JA21
5.5%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
6.1%
4.5%
BBB
2%
2.6%
Other
8.8%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
Leenhof has an average of 1.2 cars per household, about the same as in Landgraaf (1.2). 13% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 4 percentage points less than in Landgraaf (17%).
Key figures
Culture, recreation and other services, share of businesses
27%
▲12 percentage points higher than Landgraaf (15%)
Government, education and care, share of businesses
27%
▲7 percentage points higher than Landgraaf (20%)
Industry and energy, share of businesses
9%
▼7 percentage points lower than Landgraaf (16%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.2
=about the same as Landgraaf (1.2)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
13%
▼4 percentage points lower than Landgraaf (17%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+3 pp
▼lower than Landgraaf (+7 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
96%
▲6 percentage points higher than Landgraaf (90%)
Retail, share of addresses
1%
▼1 percentage point lower than Landgraaf (2%)
Assembly, share of addresses
2%
▲1 percentage point higher than Landgraaf (1%)
Social housing
3%
▼25 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (28%)
Private rent
5%
▼9 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Residents per km²
956
▲77% higher than the Netherlands (539)
Culture, recreation and other services, share of businesses
27%
▲12 percentage points higher than Landgraaf (15%)
Government, education and care, share of businesses
27%
▲7 percentage points higher than Landgraaf (20%)
Industry and energy, share of businesses
9%
▼7 percentage points lower than Landgraaf (16%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.2
=about the same as Landgraaf (1.2)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
13%
▼4 percentage points lower than Landgraaf (17%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+3 pp
▼lower than Landgraaf (+7 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
96%
▲6 percentage points higher than Landgraaf (90%)
Retail, share of addresses
1%
▼1 percentage point lower than Landgraaf (2%)
Assembly, share of addresses
2%
▲1 percentage point higher than Landgraaf (1%)
Social housing
3%
▼25 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (28%)
Private rent
5%
▼9 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Residents per km²
956
▲77% higher than the Netherlands (539)
Business establishments by sector
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg is the largest sector, with 15 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij0
Nijverheid en energie5
Handel en horeca10
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie0
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed0
Zakelijke dienstverlening10
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg15
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten15
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
13% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 17% in the municipality of Landgraaf (2025).
Petrol86.9%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)13.1%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 10% to 13% between 2021 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
13%▼ 4 percentage points below Landgraaf (17%)
+3 pp since 2021
Landgraaf +7 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 420 passenger cars and 45 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars420
Motorcycles45
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
96% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is assembly (2%).
Residential95.7%
Retail0.8%
Office0.5%
Assembly1.6%
Healthcare0.5%
Industrial1.1%
Sports0.3%
Other1.1%
Explanation
Based on 368 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
3% multi-family dwellings, against 37% nationally.
This areaThe Netherlands
Multi-family dwellings3%
NL 37%▼ −92% vs NL
Social housing3%
NL 28%▼ −89% vs NL
Private rent5%
NL 14%▼ −64% vs NL
Residents per km²956
NL 539▲ +77% vs NL
Average WOZ value€232,000
NL €398,000▼ −42% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025