The population is shrinking slower than in Landgraaf. Homes cost less than the average in the municipality of Landgraaf, and registered crime per resident is higher.
The average WOZ value in Op de Kamp is €227,000, 14% lower than in Landgraaf (€265,000). Between 2021 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 38%, against a rise of 35% in Landgraaf. 46% of the homes are owner-occupied, 17 percentage points less than in Landgraaf (63%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€227,000
▼14% lower than Landgraaf (€265,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+38%
▲higher than Landgraaf (+35%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
46%
▼17 percentage points lower than Landgraaf (63%)
Social housing
43%
▲15 percentage points higher than Landgraaf (28%)
Private rent
11%
▲2 percentage points higher than Landgraaf (9%)
Single-family dwellings
45%
▼31 percentage points lower than Landgraaf (76%)
Built 1945–1964
4%
▼20 percentage points lower than Landgraaf (24%)
Built 1965–1974
0%
▼18 percentage points lower than Landgraaf (18%)
Built before 1945
3%
▼11 percentage points lower than Landgraaf (14%)
Average WOZ value
€227,000
▼14% lower than Landgraaf (€265,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+38%
▲higher than Landgraaf (+35%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
46%
▼17 percentage points lower than Landgraaf (63%)
Social housing
43%
▲15 percentage points higher than Landgraaf (28%)
Private rent
11%
▲2 percentage points higher than Landgraaf (9%)
Single-family dwellings
45%
▼31 percentage points lower than Landgraaf (76%)
Built 1945–1964
4%
▼20 percentage points lower than Landgraaf (24%)
Built 1965–1974
0%
▼18 percentage points lower than Landgraaf (18%)
Built before 1945
3%
▼11 percentage points lower than Landgraaf (14%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 38% between 2021 and 2025, to €227,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€227,000▼ 14% below Landgraaf
+38% since 2021
Landgraaf +35%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€251 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€251/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
99 m² · measured buurt average
WOZ €227,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€116NL median
Water board levy€38–
Waste levy€28€27
Property tax (OZB)€26€20
Sewage levy€24€22
Costs to set aside€135
Maintenance reserve€126–
Buildings insurance€9–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Landgraaf's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 260th of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 99 m² (measured average in this buurt) with the average WOZ value here, €227,000.
Levies: Landgraaf's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Op de Kamp has the 2nd-lowest WOZ value of the 6 buurten in Nieuwenhagen.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €227,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Op de Kamp
227,000
471
–
Nieuwenhagerheide
249,000
1,533
–
Oud Nieuwenhagen
222,000
1,837
–
Hoefveld
337,000
630
–
Exdel
423,000
247
–
Buitengebied Brunssumerheide (2)
558,000
44
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 46% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied46%
Social housing43%
Private rent11%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
55% of the dwelling stock is multi-family homes.
Single-family homes45%
Multi-family homes55%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
68% of dwellings were built between 1975 and 1991, against 25% in the municipality of Landgraaf.
Before 19453.4%
1945-19644.5%
1965-19740.4%
1975-199167.9%
1992-200519.3%
2016 and later4.5%
Explanation
Based on 471 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
More registered crime per resident than the Landgraaf average.
In 2025, 83 crimes per 1,000 residents were registered in Op de Kamp, 2.2 times as high as in Landgraaf (37). Since 2021 the registered rate per 1,000 residents fell 16%, against a rise of 1% in Landgraaf. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
83
▲2.2 times as high as Landgraaf (37)
Change since 2021
-16%
▼lower than Landgraaf (+1%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
2.8
▲8% higher than Landgraaf (2.6)
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
83
▲2.2 times as high as Landgraaf (37)
Change since 2021
-16%
▼lower than Landgraaf (+1%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
2.8
▲8% higher than Landgraaf (2.6)
Registered crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
In 2025, Op de Kamp registered 83 crimes per 1,000 residents, against 37 in the municipality of Landgraaf.
Op de Kamp83
The municipality of Landgraaf37
Explanation
Crime is counted where it happens and divided by the number of residents, so places with many visitors — city centres, nightlife, stations — score higher.
The largest category in Op de Kamp is 'Theft and burglary': 39.0 per 1,000 residents in 2025, against 12.6 in the municipality of Landgraaf.
Op de KampLandgraaf
Theft and burglary39.0
Landgraaf 12.6▲ +210% vs Landgraaf
Traffic16.4
Landgraaf 7.3▲ +125% vs Landgraaf
Vandalism and public order11.3
Landgraaf 5.4▲ +109% vs Landgraaf
Violence and threats8.8
Landgraaf 4.3▲ +105% vs Landgraaf
Other and withheld5.0
Landgraaf 3.3▲ +52% vs Landgraaf
Fraud and scams2.5
Landgraaf 4.2▼ −40% vs Landgraaf
Environmental0.0
Landgraaf 0.2≈ Landgraaf
Explanation
Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2024, police in Op de Kamp registered 3 traffic accidents, of which 2 with injury and none fatal.
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2024
03 · Living environment
Residents rate their health below the Landgraaf average; green space is below the Landgraaf average.
An estimated 58% of adults in Op de Kamp rate their own health as good, 7 percentage points less than in Landgraaf. Fewer adults meet the physical activity guideline (27% against 36%), but more are overweight (67% against 61%), more feel lonely (56% against 50%) and more report anxiety or depression (50% against 48%). Built-up land is the largest land use in Op de Kamp, covering 94% of the area, against 37% in Landgraaf.
Key figures
Self-rated health (estimated)
58%
▼7 percentage points lower than Landgraaf (65%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
0%
▼27 percentage points lower than Landgraaf (27%)
More figures
Meets physical activity guideline
27%
▼9 percentage points lower than Landgraaf (36%)
Overweight
67%
▲6 percentage points higher than Landgraaf (61%)
Lonely
56%
▲6 percentage points higher than Landgraaf (50%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
50%
▲2 percentage points higher than Landgraaf (48%)
Built-up, share of the area
94%
▲57 percentage points higher than Landgraaf (37%)
Agriculture, share of the area
0%
▼29 percentage points lower than Landgraaf (29%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
0%
▼16 percentage points lower than Landgraaf (16%)
Self-rated health (estimated)
58%
▼7 percentage points lower than Landgraaf (65%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
0%
▼27 percentage points lower than Landgraaf (27%)
More figures
Meets physical activity guideline
27%
▼9 percentage points lower than Landgraaf (36%)
Overweight
67%
▲6 percentage points higher than Landgraaf (61%)
Lonely
56%
▲6 percentage points higher than Landgraaf (50%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
50%
▲2 percentage points higher than Landgraaf (48%)
Built-up, share of the area
94%
▲57 percentage points higher than Landgraaf (37%)
Agriculture, share of the area
0%
▼29 percentage points lower than Landgraaf (29%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
0%
▼16 percentage points lower than Landgraaf (16%)
Health
An estimated 58% of adults rate their own health as good, against 65% in the municipality of Landgraaf (2024).
This areaThe municipality of Landgraaf
Good self-rated health
57.5%
65.2%
Smokes
16.6%
18.2%
Excessive drinking
4.9%
4.9%
Overweight
67.2%
60.6%
Lonely
56.3%
50%
Anxiety or depression feelings
50.5%
48%
Meets physical activity guideline
27.3%
36.4%
Explanation
An RIVM model estimate (small-area estimation from the 2024 Health Monitor for Adults and Elderly), not a direct tabulation — even a buurt that was not itself surveyed gets an estimate. Figures cover adults aged 18 and over.
Source: RIVM/CBS Gezondheidsmonitor Volwassenen en Ouderen (kleine-gebieden-schatting) 2024
Land use
0% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 27% in the municipality of Landgraaf.
Traffic5.9%
Built-up94.1%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
Distance to amenities
A large supermarket lies here at an average road distance of 300 m.
Distance
Value
Large supermarket
300 m
–
GP practice
300 m
–
Primary school
500 m
–
Daycare
500 m
–
Large supermarkets
–
3
GP practices
–
3
Daycares
–
2.4
Explanation
Average road distance from every address in this buurt to the nearest amenity, and the average count within 1 km — a buurt average, not a distance from one address.
Source: CBS proximity statistics 2025
04 · Residents
The population is shrinking slower than the Landgraaf average.
Op de Kamp has 750 inhabitants (2026), or 4,485 per km² (3.0 times as high as in Landgraaf). Between 2021 and 2026 the population fell 9%, against a fall of 1% in Landgraaf. In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Landgraaf was 73%, 5 percentage points below the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) had the highest share there: 35% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2021
-9%
▼lower than Landgraaf (-1%)
Turnout, municipality of Landgraaf
73%
▼5 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+0%
=about the same as Landgraaf (+1%)
Married
45%
▲3 percentage points higher than Landgraaf (42%)
Dutch origin
74%
▼1 percentage point lower than Landgraaf (75%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
41%
▼2 percentage points lower than Landgraaf (43%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
35%
▲18 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2021
-9%
▼lower than Landgraaf (-1%)
Turnout, municipality of Landgraaf
73%
▼5 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+0%
=about the same as Landgraaf (+1%)
Married
45%
▲3 percentage points higher than Landgraaf (42%)
Dutch origin
74%
▼1 percentage point lower than Landgraaf (75%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
41%
▼2 percentage points lower than Landgraaf (43%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
35%
▲18 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population shrank 9% between 2021 and 2026, to 750.
Residents, 2026
750
-9% since 2021
Landgraaf -1%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 4,485 residents per km², this buurt is 3.0 times as densely populated as the municipality of Landgraaf.
Residents per km²4,485
Dwellings per km²2,770.6
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, almost no children were born; 6.3 died per 1,000.
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
33% of residents are between 65 and 80.
0 to 1540
15 to 2545
25 to 45105
45 to 65195
65 to 80245
80 and over120
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
45% of residents are married.
Never married225
Married340
Divorced100
Widowed90
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
74% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands555
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)125
Outside Europe75
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Education level of residents aged 15 to 75
41% of residents have a havo, vwo or mbo2-4 level education.
Primary, vmbo, mbo1220
Havo, vwo, mbo2-4230
Higher professional, university110
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2024
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Landgraaf; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 73% of eligible voters in Landgraaf voted. The largest party was PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) with 35% of the valid votes.
Municipality of LandgraafThe Netherlands
D66
10.7%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
34.7%
16.7%
VVD
11.9%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
9.9%
12.8%
CDA
10.4%
11.8%
JA21
5.5%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
6.1%
4.5%
BBB
2%
2.6%
Other
8.8%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
Op de Kamp has an average of 1.0 cars per household, 17% lower than in Landgraaf (1.2). 14% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 3 percentage points less than in Landgraaf (17%).
Key figures
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
44%
▲24 percentage points higher than Landgraaf (20%)
Industry and energy, share of businesses
6%
▼10 percentage points lower than Landgraaf (16%)
Business services, share of businesses
11%
▼9 percentage points lower than Landgraaf (20%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.0
▼17% lower than Landgraaf (1.2)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
14%
▼3 percentage points lower than Landgraaf (17%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+8 pp
▲higher than Landgraaf (+7 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
82%
▼8 percentage points lower than Landgraaf (90%)
Retail, share of addresses
7%
▲5 percentage points higher than Landgraaf (2%)
Assembly, share of addresses
1%
=about the same as Landgraaf (1%)
Average WOZ value
€227,000
▼43% lower than the Netherlands (€398,000)
Social housing
43%
▲15 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (28%)
Multi-family dwellings
55%
▲18 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (37%)
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
44%
▲24 percentage points higher than Landgraaf (20%)
Industry and energy, share of businesses
6%
▼10 percentage points lower than Landgraaf (16%)
Business services, share of businesses
11%
▼9 percentage points lower than Landgraaf (20%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.0
▼17% lower than Landgraaf (1.2)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
14%
▼3 percentage points lower than Landgraaf (17%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+8 pp
▲higher than Landgraaf (+7 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
82%
▼8 percentage points lower than Landgraaf (90%)
Retail, share of addresses
7%
▲5 percentage points higher than Landgraaf (2%)
Assembly, share of addresses
1%
=about the same as Landgraaf (1%)
Average WOZ value
€227,000
▼43% lower than the Netherlands (€398,000)
Social housing
43%
▲15 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (28%)
Multi-family dwellings
55%
▲18 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (37%)
Business establishments by sector
Handel en horeca is the largest sector, with 40 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij0
Nijverheid en energie5
Handel en horeca40
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie0
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed5
Zakelijke dienstverlening10
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg15
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten15
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
14% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 17% in the municipality of Landgraaf (2025).
Petrol85.7%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)14.3%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 7% to 14% between 2021 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
14%▼ 3 percentage points below Landgraaf (17%)
+7 pp since 2021
Landgraaf +7 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 455 passenger cars and 45 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars455
Motorcycles45
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
82% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is retail (7%).
Residential82.1%
Retail7.1%
Office0.9%
Assembly0.5%
Other9.8%
Explanation
Based on 574 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
4,485 residents per km²: 8.3 times as densely populated as the Dutch average.
This areaThe Netherlands
Residents per km²4,485
NL 539▲ +732% vs NL
Average WOZ value€227,000
NL €398,000▼ −43% vs NL
Social housing43%
NL 28%▲ +54% vs NL
Multi-family dwellings55%
NL 37%▲ +49% vs NL
Single-family dwellings45%
NL 63%▼ −29% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026