The population is growing slower than in Laarbeek. Homes cost more than the average in the municipality of Laarbeek, and registered crime per resident is lower.
The average WOZ value in Lieshout is €482,000, 10% higher than in Laarbeek (€439,000). Between 2014 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 66%, against a rise of 74% in Laarbeek. 75% of the homes are owner-occupied, 5 percentage points more than in Laarbeek (70%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€482,000
▲10% higher than Laarbeek (€439,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2014
+66%
▼lower than Laarbeek (+74%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
75%
▲5 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (70%)
Social housing
18%
▼4 percentage points lower than Laarbeek (22%)
Private rent
7%
▼1 percentage point lower than Laarbeek (8%)
Single-family dwellings
92%
▲4 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (88%)
Built 2006–2015
4%
▼5 percentage points lower than Laarbeek (9%)
Built 1965–1974
22%
▲3 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (19%)
Built 1945–1964
15%
▲1 percentage point higher than Laarbeek (14%)
Average WOZ value
€482,000
▲10% higher than Laarbeek (€439,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2014
+66%
▼lower than Laarbeek (+74%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
75%
▲5 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (70%)
Social housing
18%
▼4 percentage points lower than Laarbeek (22%)
Private rent
7%
▼1 percentage point lower than Laarbeek (8%)
Single-family dwellings
92%
▲4 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (88%)
Built 2006–2015
4%
▼5 percentage points lower than Laarbeek (9%)
Built 1965–1974
22%
▲3 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (19%)
Built 1945–1964
15%
▲1 percentage point higher than Laarbeek (14%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 66% between 2014 and 2025, to €482,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€482,000▲ 10% above Laarbeek
+66% since 2014
Laarbeek +74%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€338 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€338/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
155 m² · estimated gemeente average
WOZ €482,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€126NL median
Water board levy€45–
Property tax (OZB)€39€42
Sewage levy€24€22
Waste levy€18€27
Costs to set aside€212
Maintenance reserve€198–
Buildings insurance€14–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Laarbeek's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 61st of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 155 m² (estimated gemeente average) with the average WOZ value here, €482,000.
Levies: Laarbeek's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Lieshout has the 2nd-highest WOZ value of the 4 wijken in the municipality of Laarbeek.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €482,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Lieshout
482,000
1,898
–
Beek en Donk
402,000
4,867
–
Aarle-Rixtel
454,000
2,494
–
Mariahout
519,000
779
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 75% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied75%
Social housing18%
Private rent7%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
92% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes92%
Multi-family homes8%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
31% of dwellings were built between 1975 and 1991, against 27% in the municipality of Laarbeek.
Before 19457.5%
1945-196415.1%
1965-197421.7%
1975-199130.6%
1992-200513.3%
2006-20154.3%
2016 and later7.5%
Explanation
Based on 1,888 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
Less registered crime per resident than the Laarbeek average.
In 2025, 19 crimes per 1,000 residents were registered in Lieshout, 21% lower than in Laarbeek (24). Since 2021 the registered rate per 1,000 residents fell 13%, against a fall of 18% in Laarbeek. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
19
▼21% lower than Laarbeek (24)
Change since 2021
-13%
▲higher than Laarbeek (-18%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
3.3
▲22% higher than Laarbeek (2.7)
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
19
▼21% lower than Laarbeek (24)
Change since 2021
-13%
▲higher than Laarbeek (-18%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
3.3
▲22% higher than Laarbeek (2.7)
Registered crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
In 2025, Lieshout registered 19 crimes per 1,000 residents, against 24 in the municipality of Laarbeek.
Lieshout19
The municipality of Laarbeek24
Explanation
Crime is counted where it happens and divided by the number of residents, so places with many visitors — city centres, nightlife, stations — score higher.
The largest category in Lieshout is 'Theft and burglary': 6.9 per 1,000 residents in 2025, against 7.4 in the municipality of Laarbeek.
LieshoutLaarbeek
Theft and burglary6.9
Laarbeek 7.4▼ −7% vs Laarbeek
Fraud and scams5.1
Laarbeek 4.4▲ +16% vs Laarbeek
Traffic4.8
Laarbeek 6.0▼ −20% vs Laarbeek
Vandalism and public order1.2
Laarbeek 2.1▼ −43% vs Laarbeek
Violence and threats0.7
Laarbeek 2.7▼ −74% vs Laarbeek
Other and withheld0.5
Laarbeek 0.9≈ Laarbeek
Environmental0.2
Laarbeek 0.0
Explanation
Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2024, police in Lieshout registered 26 traffic accidents, of which 5 with injury and 2 fatal.
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2024
03 · Living environment
Residents rate their health above the Laarbeek average; green space is above the Laarbeek average.
An estimated 76% of adults in Lieshout rate their own health as good, 2 percentage points more than in Laarbeek. Fewer adults smoke (12% against 14%), fewer report anxiety or depression (41% against 43%), fewer are overweight (53% against 54%) and fewer feel lonely (40% against 41%). Agricultural land is the largest land use in Lieshout, covering 60% of the area, against 68% in Laarbeek. Green space such as parks, sports fields, forest and nature covers 21% of the area, 7 percentage points above the 14% in Laarbeek.
Key figures
Self-rated health (estimated)
76%
▲2 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (74%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
21%
▲7 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (14%)
More figures
Anxiety or depression feelings
41%
▼2 percentage points lower than Laarbeek (43%)
Lonely
40%
▼1 percentage point lower than Laarbeek (41%)
Smokes
12%
▼2 percentage points lower than Laarbeek (14%)
Overweight
53%
▼1 percentage point lower than Laarbeek (54%)
Agriculture, share of the area
60%
▼8 percentage points lower than Laarbeek (68%)
Recreation, share of the area
10%
▲6 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (4%)
Built-up, share of the area
15%
▲2 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (13%)
Self-rated health (estimated)
76%
▲2 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (74%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
21%
▲7 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (14%)
More figures
Anxiety or depression feelings
41%
▼2 percentage points lower than Laarbeek (43%)
Lonely
40%
▼1 percentage point lower than Laarbeek (41%)
Smokes
12%
▼2 percentage points lower than Laarbeek (14%)
Overweight
53%
▼1 percentage point lower than Laarbeek (54%)
Agriculture, share of the area
60%
▼8 percentage points lower than Laarbeek (68%)
Recreation, share of the area
10%
▲6 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (4%)
Built-up, share of the area
15%
▲2 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (13%)
Health
An estimated 76% of adults rate their own health as good, against 74% in the municipality of Laarbeek (2024).
This areaThe municipality of Laarbeek
Good self-rated health
75.6%
74.5%
Smokes
12.5%
13.8%
Excessive drinking
5.9%
5.9%
Overweight
53.3%
53.8%
Lonely
39.8%
41.2%
Anxiety or depression feelings
41.2%
42.7%
Meets physical activity guideline
47.3%
47.1%
Explanation
An RIVM model estimate (small-area estimation from the 2024 Health Monitor for Adults and Elderly), not a direct tabulation — even a buurt that was not itself surveyed gets an estimate. Figures cover adults aged 18 and over.
Source: RIVM/CBS Gezondheidsmonitor Volwassenen en Ouderen (kleine-gebieden-schatting) 2024
Land use
21% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 14% in the municipality of Laarbeek.
Traffic2.6%
Built-up15.3%
Other built-up0.3%
Recreation10.5%
Agriculture59.5%
Forest and nature10.7%
Water1.2%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
04 · Residents
The population is growing slower than the Laarbeek average.
Lieshout has 4,300 inhabitants (2026), or 372 per km² (13% lower than in Laarbeek). Between 2014 and 2026 the population rose 1%, against a rise of 8% in Laarbeek. In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Laarbeek was 81%, 3 percentage points above the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) had the highest share there: 23% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2014
+1%
▼lower than Laarbeek (+8%)
Turnout, municipality of Laarbeek
81%
▲3 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+8%
▼lower than Laarbeek (+10%)
Aged 45 to 65
29%
▲2 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (27%)
Married
47%
▲4 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (43%)
Dutch origin
89%
▲2 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (87%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
43%
▼2 percentage points lower than Laarbeek (45%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
23%
▲6 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2014
+1%
▼lower than Laarbeek (+8%)
Turnout, municipality of Laarbeek
81%
▲3 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+8%
▼lower than Laarbeek (+10%)
Aged 45 to 65
29%
▲2 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (27%)
Married
47%
▲4 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (43%)
Dutch origin
89%
▲2 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (87%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
43%
▼2 percentage points lower than Laarbeek (45%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
23%
▲6 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population held steady between 2014 and 2026, at 4,300.
Residents, 2026
4,300
+1% since 2014
Laarbeek +8%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 372 residents per km², this wijk is 13% less densely populated than the municipality of Laarbeek.
Residents per km²372
Dwellings per km²163.9
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, 10.4 children were born per 1,000 residents; 9.2 died per 1,000.
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
29% of residents are between 45 and 65.
0 to 15550
15 to 25480
25 to 45880
45 to 651,265
65 to 80865
80 and over270
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
47% of residents are married.
Never married1,810
Married2,015
Divorced235
Widowed245
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
89% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands3,840
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)215
Outside Europe250
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Education level of residents aged 15 to 75
42% of residents have a havo, vwo or mbo2-4 level education.
Primary, vmbo, mbo1980
Havo, vwo, mbo2-41,390
Higher professional, university900
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2024
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Laarbeek; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 81% of eligible voters in Laarbeek voted. The largest party was PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) with 23% of the valid votes.
Municipality of LaarbeekThe Netherlands
D66
14.8%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
22.5%
16.7%
VVD
16.1%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
7.1%
12.8%
CDA
16.2%
11.8%
JA21
7.8%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
4.3%
4.5%
BBB
3.6%
2.6%
Other
7.5%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
Lieshout has an average of 1.4 cars per household, 8% higher than in Laarbeek (1.3). 26% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 4 percentage points more than in Laarbeek (22%).
Key figures
Business services, share of businesses
26%
▲2 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (24%)
Industry and energy, share of businesses
18%
▼3 percentage points lower than Laarbeek (21%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.4
▲8% higher than Laarbeek (1.3)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
26%
▲4 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (22%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2014
+5 pp
▲higher than Laarbeek (+3 pp)
Industrial, share of addresses
3%
▼1 percentage point lower than Laarbeek (4%)
Office, share of addresses
5%
▲1 percentage point higher than Laarbeek (4%)
Healthcare, share of addresses
2%
▲1 percentage point higher than Laarbeek (1%)
Private rent
7%
▼7 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Social housing
18%
▼10 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (28%)
Single-family dwellings
92%
▲29 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Business services, share of businesses
26%
▲2 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (24%)
Industry and energy, share of businesses
18%
▼3 percentage points lower than Laarbeek (21%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.4
▲8% higher than Laarbeek (1.3)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
26%
▲4 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (22%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2014
+5 pp
▲higher than Laarbeek (+3 pp)
Industrial, share of addresses
3%
▼1 percentage point lower than Laarbeek (4%)
Office, share of addresses
5%
▲1 percentage point higher than Laarbeek (4%)
Healthcare, share of addresses
2%
▲1 percentage point higher than Laarbeek (1%)
Private rent
7%
▼7 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Social housing
18%
▼10 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (28%)
Single-family dwellings
92%
▲29 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Business establishments by sector
Zakelijke dienstverlening is the largest sector, with 165 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij35
Nijverheid en energie115
Handel en horeca100
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie30
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed25
Zakelijke dienstverlening165
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg90
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten65
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
26% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 22% in the municipality of Laarbeek (2025).
Petrol74.4%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)25.6%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 21% to 26% between 2014 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
26%▲ 4 percentage points above Laarbeek (22%)
+5 pp since 2014
Laarbeek +3 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 2,615 passenger cars and 265 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars2,615
Motorcycles265
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
90% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is office (5%).
Residential89.8%
Retail1.3%
Office5.3%
Assembly0.5%
Healthcare2.1%
Industrial3%
Lodging0.5%
Education0.1%
Sports0.1%
Other3.1%
Explanation
Based on 2,102 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
8% multi-family dwellings, against 37% nationally.
This areaThe Netherlands
Multi-family dwellings8%
NL 37%▼ −78% vs NL
Private rent7%
NL 14%▼ −50% vs NL
Social housing18%
NL 28%▼ −36% vs NL
Single-family dwellings92%
NL 63%▲ +46% vs NL
Residents per km²372
NL 539▼ −31% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025