We're pulling the figures from public sources. This usually takes a few seconds.
Area and its neighbourhoodsCBS key figures for districts and neighbourhoods
Residents and householdsCBS
Homes and WOZ valueCBS · Kadaster BAG
Housing marketNVM market overview
Municipal leviesMunicipal budgets · CBS
SafetyCBS and Police
HealthRIVM Health Monitor
Land use and amenitiesCBS land use · proximity statistics
Road safety and electionsRijkswaterstaat · Kiesraad
Comparing with the municipality and the countryRankings and comparisons
Neighbourhood · Laarbeek
Living in Lieshout
The population is growing slower than in Laarbeek. Homes cost less than the average in the municipality of Laarbeek, and registered crime per resident is lower.
The average WOZ value in Lieshout is €433,000, 1% lower than in Laarbeek (€439,000). Between 2021 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 45%, against a rise of 43% in Laarbeek. 73% of the homes are owner-occupied, 3 percentage points more than in Laarbeek (70%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€433,000
▼1% lower than Laarbeek (€439,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+45%
▲higher than Laarbeek (+43%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
73%
▲3 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (70%)
Rented from a housing corporation
21%
▼1 percentage point lower than Laarbeek (22%)
Rented from another landlord
6%
▼2 percentage points lower than Laarbeek (8%)
Single-family dwellings
91%
▲3 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (88%)
Built 2006–2015
4%
▼5 percentage points lower than Laarbeek (9%)
Built 1965–1974
23%
▲4 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (19%)
Built before 1945
5%
▼4 percentage points lower than Laarbeek (9%)
Average WOZ value
€433,000
▼1% lower than Laarbeek (€439,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+45%
▲higher than Laarbeek (+43%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
73%
▲3 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (70%)
Rented from a housing corporation
21%
▼1 percentage point lower than Laarbeek (22%)
Rented from another landlord
6%
▼2 percentage points lower than Laarbeek (8%)
Single-family dwellings
91%
▲3 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (88%)
Built 2006–2015
4%
▼5 percentage points lower than Laarbeek (9%)
Built 1965–1974
23%
▲4 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (19%)
Built before 1945
5%
▼4 percentage points lower than Laarbeek (9%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 45% between 2021 and 2025, to €433,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€433,000▼ 1% below Laarbeek
+45% since 2021
Laarbeek +43%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€321 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€321/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
147 m² · measured buurt average
WOZ €433,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€121NL median
Water board levy€44–
Property tax (OZB)€35€38
Sewage levy€24€22
Waste levy€18€27
Costs to set aside€200
Maintenance reserve€187–
Buildings insurance€13–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Laarbeek's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 59th of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 147 m² (measured average in this buurt) with the average WOZ value here, €433,000.
Levies: Laarbeek's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Lieshout has the lowest WOZ value of the 2 buurten in Lieshout.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €433,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Lieshout
433,000
1,610
–
Verspreide huizen Lieshout
763,000
278
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Who owns the homes
The largest group: owner-occupied, 73% of homes.
Owner-occupied
Lieshout
73%
Laarbeek
70%
the Netherlands
57%
Rented from a housing corporation
Lieshout
21%
Laarbeek
22%
the Netherlands
28%
Rented from another landlord
Lieshout
6%
Laarbeek
8%
the Netherlands
14%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a rounded share of the dwelling stock, so the parts do not always add up to 100.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
What kind of homes
The largest group: single-family houses, 91% of homes.
Single-family houses
Lieshout
91%
Laarbeek
88%
the Netherlands
63%
Apartments and other multi-family homes
Lieshout
9%
Laarbeek
12%
the Netherlands
37%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a rounded share of the dwelling stock, so the parts do not always add up to 100.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
32% of dwellings were built between 1975 and 1991, against 27% in the municipality of Laarbeek.
Before 19455.1%
1945-196413.9%
1965-197423.4%
1975-199131.7%
1992-200514%
2006-20154.2%
2016 and later7.8%
Explanation
Based on 1,597 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
Less registered crime per resident than the Laarbeek average.
In 2025, 14 crimes per 1,000 residents were registered in Lieshout, 42% lower than in Laarbeek (24). Since 2021 the registered rate per 1,000 residents fell 8%, against a fall of 18% in Laarbeek. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
14
▼42% lower than Laarbeek (24)
Change since 2021
-8%
▲higher than Laarbeek (-18%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
3.7
▲37% higher than Laarbeek (2.7)
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
14
▼42% lower than Laarbeek (24)
Change since 2021
-8%
▲higher than Laarbeek (-18%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
3.7
▲37% higher than Laarbeek (2.7)
Registered crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
In 2025, Lieshout registered 14 crimes per 1,000 residents, against 24 in the municipality of Laarbeek.
Lieshout14
The municipality of Laarbeek24
Explanation
Crime is counted where it happens and divided by the number of residents, so places with many visitors — city centres, nightlife, stations — score higher.
The largest category in Lieshout is 'Fraud and scams': 5.5 per 1,000 residents in 2025, against 4.4 in the municipality of Laarbeek.
LieshoutLaarbeek
Fraud and scams5.5
Laarbeek 4.4▲ +25% vs Laarbeek
Theft and burglary5.0
Laarbeek 7.4▼ −32% vs Laarbeek
Traffic2.2
Laarbeek 6.0▼ −63% vs Laarbeek
Vandalism and public order0.6
Laarbeek 2.1▼ −71% vs Laarbeek
Violence and threats0.6
Laarbeek 2.7▼ −78% vs Laarbeek
Environmental0.3
Laarbeek 0.0
Other and withheld0.3
Laarbeek 0.9≈ Laarbeek
Explanation
Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2024, police in Lieshout registered 4 traffic accidents, of which 2 with injury and none fatal.
2020
2021
2023
2024
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2024
03 · Living environment
Residents rate their health above the Laarbeek average; green space is below the Laarbeek average.
An estimated 75% of adults in Lieshout rate their own health as good, 1 percentage point more than in Laarbeek. Fewer adults smoke (13% against 14%), fewer feel lonely (40% against 41%), fewer report anxiety or depression (42% against 43%) and fewer meet the physical activity guideline (46% against 47%). Built-up land is the largest land use in Lieshout, covering 87% of the area, against 13% in Laarbeek. Green space such as parks, sports fields, forest and nature covers 2% of the area, 12 percentage points below the 14% in Laarbeek.
Key figures
Self-rated health (estimated)
75%
▲1 percentage point higher than Laarbeek (74%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
2%
▼12 percentage points lower than Laarbeek (14%)
More figures
Smokes
13%
▼1 percentage point lower than Laarbeek (14%)
Meets physical activity guideline
46%
▼1 percentage point lower than Laarbeek (47%)
Lonely
40%
▼1 percentage point lower than Laarbeek (41%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
42%
▼1 percentage point lower than Laarbeek (43%)
Built-up, share of the area
87%
▲74 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (13%)
Agriculture, share of the area
8%
▼60 percentage points lower than Laarbeek (68%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
0%
▼10 percentage points lower than Laarbeek (10%)
Self-rated health (estimated)
75%
▲1 percentage point higher than Laarbeek (74%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
2%
▼12 percentage points lower than Laarbeek (14%)
More figures
Smokes
13%
▼1 percentage point lower than Laarbeek (14%)
Meets physical activity guideline
46%
▼1 percentage point lower than Laarbeek (47%)
Lonely
40%
▼1 percentage point lower than Laarbeek (41%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
42%
▼1 percentage point lower than Laarbeek (43%)
Built-up, share of the area
87%
▲74 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (13%)
Agriculture, share of the area
8%
▼60 percentage points lower than Laarbeek (68%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
0%
▼10 percentage points lower than Laarbeek (10%)
Health
An estimated 75% of adults rate their own health as good, against 74% in the municipality of Laarbeek (2024).
This areaThe municipality of Laarbeek
Good self-rated health
74.8%
74.5%
Smokes
12.8%
13.8%
Excessive drinking
5.8%
5.9%
Overweight
54.1%
53.8%
Lonely
40.3%
41.2%
Anxiety or depression feelings
42%
42.7%
Meets physical activity guideline
46.1%
47.1%
Explanation
An RIVM model estimate (small-area estimation from the 2024 Health Monitor for Adults and Elderly), not a direct tabulation — even a buurt that was not itself surveyed gets an estimate. Figures cover adults aged 18 and over.
Source: RIVM/CBS Gezondheidsmonitor Volwassenen en Ouderen (kleine-gebieden-schatting) 2024
Land use
2% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 14% in the municipality of Laarbeek.
Traffic3.4%
Built-up87.3%
Recreation1.7%
Agriculture7.6%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
Distance to amenities
A gp practice lies here at an average road distance of 600 m.
Distance
Value
Large supermarket
700 m
–
GP practice
600 m
–
Primary school
600 m
–
Daycare
600 m
–
Large supermarkets
–
0.8
GP practices
–
1.8
Daycares
–
1.6
Explanation
Average road distance from every address in this buurt to the nearest amenity, and the average count within 1 km — a buurt average, not a distance from one address.
Source: CBS proximity statistics 2025
04 · Residents
The population is growing slower than the Laarbeek average.
Lieshout has 3,585 inhabitants (2026), or 3,032 per km² (7.1 times as high as in Laarbeek). Between 2021 and 2026 the population rose 1%, against a rise of 3% in Laarbeek. In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Laarbeek was 81%, 3 percentage points above the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) had the highest share there: 23% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2021
+1%
▼lower than Laarbeek (+3%)
Turnout, municipality of Laarbeek
81%
▲3 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+4%
▲higher than Laarbeek (+3%)
Aged 45 to 65
28%
▲1 percentage point higher than Laarbeek (27%)
Married
47%
▲4 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (43%)
Dutch origin
89%
▲2 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (87%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
41%
▼4 percentage points lower than Laarbeek (45%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
23%
▲6 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2021
+1%
▼lower than Laarbeek (+3%)
Turnout, municipality of Laarbeek
81%
▲3 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+4%
▲higher than Laarbeek (+3%)
Aged 45 to 65
28%
▲1 percentage point higher than Laarbeek (27%)
Married
47%
▲4 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (43%)
Dutch origin
89%
▲2 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (87%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
41%
▼4 percentage points lower than Laarbeek (45%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
23%
▲6 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population held steady between 2021 and 2026, at 3,585.
Residents, 2026
3,585
+1% since 2021
Laarbeek +3%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 3,032 residents per km², this buurt is 7.1 times as densely populated as the municipality of Laarbeek.
Residents per km²3,032
Dwellings per km²1,364.4
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, 11.1 children were born per 1,000 residents; 9.7 died per 1,000.
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
28% of residents are between 45 and 65.
0 to 15465
15 to 25390
25 to 45765
45 to 651,020
65 to 80725
80 and over215
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
47% of residents are married.
Never married1,510
Married1,670
Divorced190
Widowed210
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
89% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands3,195
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)190
Outside Europe200
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Education level of residents aged 15 to 75
41% of residents have a havo, vwo or mbo2-4 level education.
Primary, vmbo, mbo1860
Havo, vwo, mbo2-41,130
Higher professional, university740
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2024
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Laarbeek; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 81% of eligible voters in Laarbeek voted. The largest party was PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) with 23% of the valid votes.
Municipality of LaarbeekThe Netherlands
D66
14.8%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
22.5%
16.7%
VVD
16.1%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
7.1%
12.8%
CDA
16.2%
11.8%
JA21
7.8%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
4.3%
4.5%
BBB
3.6%
2.6%
Other
7.5%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
Lieshout has an average of 1.4 cars per household, 8% higher than in Laarbeek (1.3). 23% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 1 percentage point more than in Laarbeek (22%).
Key figures
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
1%
▼5 percentage points lower than Laarbeek (6%)
Government, education and care, share of businesses
17%
▲3 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (14%)
Business services, share of businesses
26%
▲2 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (24%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.4
▲8% higher than Laarbeek (1.3)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
23%
▲1 percentage point higher than Laarbeek (22%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+6 pp
=about the same as Laarbeek (+5 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
94%
▲5 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (89%)
Industrial, share of addresses
0%
▼4 percentage points lower than Laarbeek (4%)
Office, share of addresses
1%
▼3 percentage points lower than Laarbeek (4%)
Multi-family dwellings
9%
▼28 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (37%)
Rented from another landlord
6%
▼8 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Single-family dwellings
91%
▲28 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
1%
▼5 percentage points lower than Laarbeek (6%)
Government, education and care, share of businesses
17%
▲3 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (14%)
Business services, share of businesses
26%
▲2 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (24%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.4
▲8% higher than Laarbeek (1.3)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
23%
▲1 percentage point higher than Laarbeek (22%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+6 pp
=about the same as Laarbeek (+5 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
94%
▲5 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (89%)
Industrial, share of addresses
0%
▼4 percentage points lower than Laarbeek (4%)
Office, share of addresses
1%
▼3 percentage points lower than Laarbeek (4%)
Multi-family dwellings
9%
▼28 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (37%)
Rented from another landlord
6%
▼8 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Single-family dwellings
91%
▲28 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Business establishments by sector
Zakelijke dienstverlening is the largest sector, with 115 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij5
Nijverheid en energie85
Handel en horeca65
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie20
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed15
Zakelijke dienstverlening115
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg75
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten55
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
23% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 22% in the municipality of Laarbeek (2025).
Petrol76.6%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)23.4%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 18% to 23% between 2021 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
23%▲ 1 percentage point above Laarbeek (22%)
+5 pp since 2021
Laarbeek +5 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 2,090 passenger cars and 215 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars2,090
Motorcycles215
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
94% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is healthcare (2%).
Residential94%
Retail1.4%
Office0.9%
Assembly0.4%
Healthcare2.4%
Industrial0.1%
Lodging0.1%
Education0.2%
Sports0.1%
Other3.5%
Explanation
Based on 1,699 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
3,032 residents per km²: 5.6 times as densely populated as the Dutch average.
This areaThe Netherlands
Residents per km²3,032
NL 539▲ +463% vs NL
Multi-family dwellings9%
NL 37%▼ −76% vs NL
Rented from another landlord6%
NL 14%▼ −57% vs NL
Single-family dwellings91%
NL 63%▲ +44% vs NL
Rented from a housing corporation21%
NL 28%▼ −25% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026