The average WOZ value in Provinciale weg (ged.) De Hem en Hogedij is €833,000, 2.0 times as high as in Krimpenerwaard (€414,000). Between 2021 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 40%, the same as in Krimpenerwaard. 92% of the homes are owner-occupied, 25 percentage points more than in Krimpenerwaard (67%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€833,000
▲2.0 times as high as Krimpenerwaard (€414,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+40%
=about the same as Krimpenerwaard (+40%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
92%
▲25 percentage points higher than Krimpenerwaard (67%)
Social housing
0%
▼26 percentage points lower than Krimpenerwaard (26%)
Private rent
8%
▲1 percentage point higher than Krimpenerwaard (7%)
Single-family dwellings
92%
▲13 percentage points higher than Krimpenerwaard (79%)
Built 1965–1974
4%
▼19 percentage points lower than Krimpenerwaard (23%)
Built 1945–1964
20%
▲9 percentage points higher than Krimpenerwaard (11%)
Built 1975–1991
12%
▼8 percentage points lower than Krimpenerwaard (20%)
Average WOZ value
€833,000
▲2.0 times as high as Krimpenerwaard (€414,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+40%
=about the same as Krimpenerwaard (+40%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
92%
▲25 percentage points higher than Krimpenerwaard (67%)
Social housing
0%
▼26 percentage points lower than Krimpenerwaard (26%)
Private rent
8%
▲1 percentage point higher than Krimpenerwaard (7%)
Single-family dwellings
92%
▲13 percentage points higher than Krimpenerwaard (79%)
Built 1965–1974
4%
▼19 percentage points lower than Krimpenerwaard (23%)
Built 1945–1964
20%
▲9 percentage points higher than Krimpenerwaard (11%)
Built 1975–1991
12%
▼8 percentage points lower than Krimpenerwaard (20%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 40% between 2021 and 2025, to €833,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€833,000▲ 2.0 times as high as Krimpenerwaard
+40% since 2021
Krimpenerwaard +40%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€454 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€454/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
209 m² · measured buurt average
WOZ €833,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€169NL median
Property tax (OZB)€64€73
Water board levy€55–
Waste levy€26€27
Sewage levy€24€22
Costs to set aside€285
Maintenance reserve€266–
Buildings insurance€19–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Krimpenerwaard's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 95th of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 209 m² (measured average in this buurt) with the average WOZ value here, €833,000.
Levies: Krimpenerwaard's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Provinciale weg (ged.) De Hem en Hogedij has the highest WOZ value of the 5 buurten in Bergstoep.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €833,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Provinciale weg (ged.) De Hem en Hogedij
833,000
26
–
Bergstoep
468,000
561
–
Lekdijk-West en Provinciale weg (ged.)
807,000
59
–
Lekdijk-Oost en Provinciale weg (ged.)
679,000
22
–
Bovenstad
575,000
73
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 92% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied92%
Private rent8%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
92% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes92%
Multi-family homes8%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
32% of dwellings were built before 1945, against 18% in the municipality of Krimpenerwaard.
Before 194532%
1945-196420%
1965-19744%
1975-199112%
1992-20058%
2006-20158%
2016 and later16%
Explanation
Based on 25 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
Too few residents for a rate per resident: these are counts.
Provinciale weg (ged.) De Hem en Hogedij has too few residents for a reliable rate per 1,000 residents (under 200), so counts are shown instead of a comparison. In 2025, 0 crimes were registered, against 5 in 2021. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Registered crimes, 2025
0
▼down from 5 in 2021
Home burglary
0
2023–2025
Registered crimes, 2025
0
▼down from 5 in 2021
Home burglary
0
2023–2025
Registered crime per year
0 crimes were registered in Provinciale weg (ged.) De Hem en Hogedij in 2025 (5 in 2021).
Registered crimes, 2025
0
down from 5 in 2021
Explanation
Too few residents for a reliable per-1,000 figure (threshold 200) — registered crime, not all crime — CBS/Politie 47018NED.
In 2024, police in Provinciale weg (ged.) De Hem en Hogedij registered 3 traffic accidents, of which 1 with injury and none fatal.
2020
2022
2023
2024
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2024
03 · Living environment
Green space is above the Krimpenerwaard average.
Agricultural land is the largest land use in Provinciale weg (ged.) De Hem en Hogedij, covering 90% of the area, against 80% in Krimpenerwaard. Green space such as parks, sports fields, forest and nature covers 4% of the area, 1 percentage point above the 3% in Krimpenerwaard.
Key figures
Green (parks, sport, nature)
4%
▲1 percentage point higher than Krimpenerwaard (3%)
Agriculture, share of the area
90%
▲10 percentage points higher than Krimpenerwaard (80%)
Built-up, share of the area
1%
▼6 percentage points lower than Krimpenerwaard (7%)
Water, share of the area
2%
▼6 percentage points lower than Krimpenerwaard (8%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
4%
▲1 percentage point higher than Krimpenerwaard (3%)
Agriculture, share of the area
90%
▲10 percentage points higher than Krimpenerwaard (80%)
Built-up, share of the area
1%
▼6 percentage points lower than Krimpenerwaard (7%)
Water, share of the area
2%
▼6 percentage points lower than Krimpenerwaard (8%)
Land use
4% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 3% in the municipality of Krimpenerwaard.
Traffic3%
Built-up1%
Agriculture90.1%
Forest and nature4%
Water2%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
Distance to amenities
A gp practice lies here at an average road distance of 1700 m.
Distance
Value
Large supermarket
1,900 m
–
GP practice
1,700 m
–
Primary school
2,000 m
–
Daycare
1,900 m
–
Large supermarkets
–
0
GP practices
–
0
Daycares
–
0
Explanation
Average road distance from every address in this buurt to the nearest amenity, and the average count within 1 km — a buurt average, not a distance from one address.
Source: CBS proximity statistics 2025
04 · Residents
The population is growing faster than the Krimpenerwaard average.
Provinciale weg (ged.) De Hem en Hogedij has 90 inhabitants (2026), or 92 per km² (76% lower than in Krimpenerwaard). In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Krimpenerwaard was 84%, 6 percentage points above the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) had the highest share there: 16% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2021
+38%
▲higher than Krimpenerwaard (+2%)
Turnout, municipality of Krimpenerwaard
84%
▲6 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+13%
▲higher than Krimpenerwaard (+3%)
Aged 45 to 65
26%
=about the same as Krimpenerwaard (26%)
Never married
56%
▲12 percentage points higher than Krimpenerwaard (44%)
Dutch origin
83%
▼3 percentage points lower than Krimpenerwaard (86%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
16%
▼1 percentage point lower than the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2021
+38%
▲higher than Krimpenerwaard (+2%)
Turnout, municipality of Krimpenerwaard
84%
▲6 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+13%
▲higher than Krimpenerwaard (+3%)
Aged 45 to 65
26%
=about the same as Krimpenerwaard (26%)
Never married
56%
▲12 percentage points higher than Krimpenerwaard (44%)
Dutch origin
83%
▼3 percentage points lower than Krimpenerwaard (86%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
16%
▼1 percentage point lower than the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population grew 38% between 2021 and 2026, to 90.
Residents, 2026
90
+38% since 2021
Krimpenerwaard +2%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 92 residents per km², this buurt is 76% less densely populated than the municipality of Krimpenerwaard.
Residents per km²92
Dwellings per km²26.3
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, 55.6 children were born per 1,000 residents; almost no one died.
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
26% of residents are between 45 and 65.
0 to 1520
15 to 2510
25 to 4520
45 to 6525
65 to 8010
80 and over10
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
56% of residents are never married.
Never married50
Married35
Divorced5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
83% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands75
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)15
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Krimpenerwaard; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 84% of eligible voters in Krimpenerwaard voted. The largest party was PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) with 16% of the valid votes.
Municipality of KrimpenerwaardThe Netherlands
D66
12.3%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
15.6%
16.7%
VVD
14.6%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
7.4%
12.8%
CDA
13.8%
11.8%
JA21
8.3%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
5.3%
4.5%
BBB
3%
2.6%
Other
19.7%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
29% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 7 percentage points more than in Krimpenerwaard (22%).
Key figures
Cars not on petrol (2025)
33%
▲11 percentage points higher than Krimpenerwaard (22%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
0 pp
▼lower than Krimpenerwaard (+7 pp)
Industrial, share of addresses
19%
▲13 percentage points higher than Krimpenerwaard (6%)
Residential, share of addresses
81%
▼7 percentage points lower than Krimpenerwaard (88%)
Lodging, share of addresses
3%
▲3 percentage points higher than Krimpenerwaard (0%)
Multi-family dwellings
8%
▼29 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (37%)
Average WOZ value
€833,000
▲2.1 times as high as the Netherlands (€398,000)
Private rent
8%
▼6 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
33%
▲11 percentage points higher than Krimpenerwaard (22%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
0 pp
▼lower than Krimpenerwaard (+7 pp)
Industrial, share of addresses
19%
▲13 percentage points higher than Krimpenerwaard (6%)
Residential, share of addresses
81%
▼7 percentage points lower than Krimpenerwaard (88%)
Lodging, share of addresses
3%
▲3 percentage points higher than Krimpenerwaard (0%)
Multi-family dwellings
8%
▼29 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (37%)
Average WOZ value
€833,000
▲2.1 times as high as the Netherlands (€398,000)
Private rent
8%
▼6 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Passenger cars by fuel type
33% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 22% in the municipality of Krimpenerwaard (2025).
Petrol66.7%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)33.3%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 33% to 33% between 2021 and 2025.
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 35 passenger cars and 0 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars35
Motorcycles0
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
81% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is industrial (19%).
Residential80.6%
Healthcare3.2%
Industrial19.4%
Lodging3.2%
Explanation
Based on 31 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
92 residents per km²: 83% less densely populated than the Dutch average.
This areaThe Netherlands
Residents per km²92
NL 539▼ −83% vs NL
Multi-family dwellings8%
NL 37%▼ −78% vs NL
Average WOZ value€833,000
NL €398,000▲ +109% vs NL
Private rent8%
NL 14%▼ −43% vs NL
Owner-occupied dwellings92%
NL 57%▲ +61% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026