The population is growing slower than in Kampen. Homes cost more than the average in the municipality of Kampen, and registered crime per resident is lower.
The average WOZ value in Wilsum is €424,000, 17% higher than in Kampen (€361,000). Between 2014 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 84%, against a rise of 83% in Kampen. 80% of the homes are owner-occupied, 16 percentage points more than in Kampen (64%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€424,000
▲17% higher than Kampen (€361,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2014
+84%
=about the same as Kampen (+83%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
80%
▲16 percentage points higher than Kampen (64%)
Social housing
14%
▼11 percentage points lower than Kampen (25%)
Private rent
6%
▼6 percentage points lower than Kampen (12%)
Single-family dwellings
98%
▲22 percentage points higher than Kampen (76%)
Built 1975–1991
15%
▼6 percentage points lower than Kampen (21%)
Built 1945–1964
14%
▲6 percentage points higher than Kampen (8%)
Built 2016 and later
14%
▲4 percentage points higher than Kampen (10%)
Average WOZ value
€424,000
▲17% higher than Kampen (€361,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2014
+84%
=about the same as Kampen (+83%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
80%
▲16 percentage points higher than Kampen (64%)
Social housing
14%
▼11 percentage points lower than Kampen (25%)
Private rent
6%
▼6 percentage points lower than Kampen (12%)
Single-family dwellings
98%
▲22 percentage points higher than Kampen (76%)
Built 1975–1991
15%
▼6 percentage points lower than Kampen (21%)
Built 1945–1964
14%
▲6 percentage points higher than Kampen (8%)
Built 2016 and later
14%
▲4 percentage points higher than Kampen (10%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 84% between 2014 and 2025, to €424,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€424,000▲ 17% above Kampen
+84% since 2014
Kampen +83%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€297 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€297/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
127 m² · estimated gemeente average
WOZ €424,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€124NL median
Water board levy€44–
Property tax (OZB)€39€37
Waste levy€22€27
Sewage levy€19€22
Costs to set aside€173
Maintenance reserve€162–
Buildings insurance€11–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Kampen's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 72nd of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 127 m² (estimated gemeente average) with the average WOZ value here, €424,000.
Levies: Kampen's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Wilsum has the 3rd-lowest WOZ value of the 9 wijken in the municipality of Kampen.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €424,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Wilsum
424,000
367
–
Kampen
333,000
17,217
–
Reeve
647,000
78
–
IJsselmuiden
416,000
4,866
–
Zalk
516,000
286
–
Grafhorst
436,000
341
–
Kamperveen
558,000
299
–
's-Heerenbroek
507,000
234
–
Mastenbroek
560,000
46
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 80% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied80%
Social housing14%
Private rent6%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
98% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes98%
Multi-family homes2%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
25% of dwellings were built before 1945, against 24% in the municipality of Kampen.
Before 194524.6%
1945-196414.3%
1965-197411.1%
1975-199114.9%
1992-200513.2%
2006-20157.6%
2016 and later14.3%
Explanation
Based on 370 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
Less registered crime per resident than the Kampen average.
In 2025, 8 crimes per 1,000 residents were registered in Wilsum, 70% lower than in Kampen (27). Since 2021 the registered rate per 1,000 residents fell 49%, against a fall of 13% in Kampen. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
8
▼70% lower than Kampen (27)
Change since 2021
-49%
▼lower than Kampen (-13%)
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
8
▼70% lower than Kampen (27)
Change since 2021
-49%
▼lower than Kampen (-13%)
Registered crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
In 2025, Wilsum registered 8 crimes per 1,000 residents, against 27 in the municipality of Kampen.
Wilsum8
The municipality of Kampen27
Explanation
Crime is counted where it happens and divided by the number of residents, so places with many visitors — city centres, nightlife, stations — score higher.
The largest category in Wilsum is 'Theft and burglary': 3.2 per 1,000 residents in 2025, against 9.1 in the municipality of Kampen.
WilsumKampen
Theft and burglary3.2
Kampen 9.1▼ −65% vs Kampen
Fraud and scams2.2
Kampen 4.3▼ −49% vs Kampen
Vandalism and public order1.1
Kampen 2.7▼ −59% vs Kampen
Traffic1.1
Kampen 6.7▼ −84% vs Kampen
Violence and threats0.0
Kampen 2.9▼ −100% vs Kampen
Environmental0.0
Kampen 0.1≈ Kampen
Other and withheld0.0
Kampen 1.2▼ −100% vs Kampen
Explanation
Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2023, police in Wilsum registered 1 traffic accidents, of which 1 with injury and none fatal.
2021
2023
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2023
03 · Living environment
Residents rate their health above the Kampen average; green space is above the Kampen average.
An estimated 81% of adults in Wilsum rate their own health as good, 5 percentage points more than in Kampen. Fewer adults feel lonely (36% against 43%), fewer report anxiety or depression (38% against 43%), fewer smoke (14% against 17%) and fewer meet the physical activity guideline (44% against 47%). Agricultural land is the largest land use in Wilsum, covering 49% of the area, against 66% in Kampen. Green space such as parks, sports fields, forest and nature covers 37% of the area, 27 percentage points above the 10% in Kampen.
Key figures
Self-rated health (estimated)
81%
▲5 percentage points higher than Kampen (76%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
37%
▲27 percentage points higher than Kampen (10%)
More figures
Lonely
36%
▼7 percentage points lower than Kampen (43%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
38%
▼5 percentage points lower than Kampen (43%)
Smokes
14%
▼3 percentage points lower than Kampen (17%)
Meets physical activity guideline
44%
▼3 percentage points lower than Kampen (47%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
35%
▲27 percentage points higher than Kampen (8%)
Agriculture, share of the area
49%
▼17 percentage points lower than Kampen (66%)
Built-up, share of the area
3%
▼4 percentage points lower than Kampen (7%)
Self-rated health (estimated)
81%
▲5 percentage points higher than Kampen (76%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
37%
▲27 percentage points higher than Kampen (10%)
More figures
Lonely
36%
▼7 percentage points lower than Kampen (43%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
38%
▼5 percentage points lower than Kampen (43%)
Smokes
14%
▼3 percentage points lower than Kampen (17%)
Meets physical activity guideline
44%
▼3 percentage points lower than Kampen (47%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
35%
▲27 percentage points higher than Kampen (8%)
Agriculture, share of the area
49%
▼17 percentage points lower than Kampen (66%)
Built-up, share of the area
3%
▼4 percentage points lower than Kampen (7%)
Health
An estimated 81% of adults rate their own health as good, against 76% in the municipality of Kampen (2024).
This areaThe municipality of Kampen
Good self-rated health
80.8%
75.7%
Smokes
14.2%
17.1%
Excessive drinking
6.4%
5.4%
Overweight
53.7%
53.4%
Lonely
36.5%
43.2%
Anxiety or depression feelings
38.3%
42.9%
Meets physical activity guideline
44%
46.7%
Explanation
An RIVM model estimate (small-area estimation from the 2024 Health Monitor for Adults and Elderly), not a direct tabulation — even a buurt that was not itself surveyed gets an estimate. Figures cover adults aged 18 and over.
Source: RIVM/CBS Gezondheidsmonitor Volwassenen en Ouderen (kleine-gebieden-schatting) 2024
Land use
37% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 10% in the municipality of Kampen.
Traffic1.4%
Built-up3.2%
Recreation1.3%
Agriculture48.6%
Forest and nature35.4%
Water10.1%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
04 · Residents
The population is growing slower than the Kampen average.
Wilsum has 930 inhabitants (2026), or 164 per km² (60% lower than in Kampen). Between 2014 and 2026 the population rose 9%, against a rise of 11% in Kampen. In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Kampen was 84%, 6 percentage points above the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, CDA had the highest share there: 17% of the vote, against 12% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2014
+9%
▼lower than Kampen (+11%)
Turnout, municipality of Kampen
84%
▲6 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+14%
=about the same as Kampen (+13%)
Aged 45 to 65
25%
=about the same as Kampen (25%)
Married
50%
▲6 percentage points higher than Kampen (44%)
Dutch origin
96%
▲10 percentage points higher than Kampen (86%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
45%
=about the same as Kampen (45%)
CDA, share of the vote
17%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (12%)
Population growth since 2014
+9%
▼lower than Kampen (+11%)
Turnout, municipality of Kampen
84%
▲6 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+14%
=about the same as Kampen (+13%)
Aged 45 to 65
25%
=about the same as Kampen (25%)
Married
50%
▲6 percentage points higher than Kampen (44%)
Dutch origin
96%
▲10 percentage points higher than Kampen (86%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
45%
=about the same as Kampen (45%)
CDA, share of the vote
17%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (12%)
Population per year
The population grew 9% between 2014 and 2026, to 930.
Residents, 2026
930
+9% since 2014
Kampen +11%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 164 residents per km², this wijk is 60% less densely populated than the municipality of Kampen.
Residents per km²164
Dwellings per km²64.5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, 10.8 children were born per 1,000 residents; 5.4 died per 1,000.
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
25% of residents are between 45 and 65.
0 to 15175
15 to 25125
25 to 45215
45 to 65235
65 to 80150
80 and over30
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
50% of residents are married.
Never married385
Married465
Divorced40
Widowed35
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
96% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands890
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)10
Outside Europe30
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Education level of residents aged 15 to 75
45% of residents have a havo, vwo or mbo2-4 level education.
Primary, vmbo, mbo1200
Havo, vwo, mbo2-4300
Higher professional, university170
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2024
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Kampen; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 84% of eligible voters in Kampen voted. The largest party was CDA with 17% of the valid votes.
Municipality of KampenThe Netherlands
D66
9.2%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
16.8%
16.7%
VVD
9.1%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
7.3%
12.8%
CDA
17%
11.8%
JA21
5.8%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
5.7%
4.5%
BBB
3.5%
2.6%
Other
25.7%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
Wilsum has an average of 1.4 cars per household, 27% higher than in Kampen (1.1). 22% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), about the same as in Kampen (22%).
Key figures
Industry and energy, share of businesses
30%
▲13 percentage points higher than Kampen (17%)
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
15%
▲8 percentage points higher than Kampen (7%)
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
10%
▼8 percentage points lower than Kampen (18%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.4
▲27% higher than Kampen (1.1)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
22%
=about the same as Kampen (22%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2014
0 pp
▲higher than Kampen (−1 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
95%
▲9 percentage points higher than Kampen (86%)
Industrial, share of addresses
3%
▼3 percentage points lower than Kampen (6%)
Assembly, share of addresses
2%
▲1 percentage point higher than Kampen (1%)
Residents per km²
164
▼70% lower than the Netherlands (539)
Private rent
6%
▼8 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Social housing
14%
▼14 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (28%)
Industry and energy, share of businesses
30%
▲13 percentage points higher than Kampen (17%)
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
15%
▲8 percentage points higher than Kampen (7%)
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
10%
▼8 percentage points lower than Kampen (18%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.4
▲27% higher than Kampen (1.1)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
22%
=about the same as Kampen (22%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2014
0 pp
▲higher than Kampen (−1 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
95%
▲9 percentage points higher than Kampen (86%)
Industrial, share of addresses
3%
▼3 percentage points lower than Kampen (6%)
Assembly, share of addresses
2%
▲1 percentage point higher than Kampen (1%)
Residents per km²
164
▼70% lower than the Netherlands (539)
Private rent
6%
▼8 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Social housing
14%
▼14 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (28%)
Business establishments by sector
Nijverheid en energie is the largest sector, with 30 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij15
Nijverheid en energie30
Handel en horeca10
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie5
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed5
Zakelijke dienstverlening15
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg10
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten10
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
22% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 22% in the municipality of Kampen (2025).
Petrol78.4%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)21.6%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 22% to 22% between 2014 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
22%– about the same as Kampen (22%)
+0 pp since 2014
Kampen -1 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 485 passenger cars and 45 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars485
Motorcycles45
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
95% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is industrial (3%).
Residential94.9%
Retail1%
Office0.3%
Assembly2.1%
Industrial3.1%
Education0.3%
Sports0.3%
Other1.8%
Explanation
Based on 390 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
2% multi-family dwellings, against 37% nationally.
This areaThe Netherlands
Multi-family dwellings2%
NL 37%▼ −95% vs NL
Residents per km²164
NL 539▼ −70% vs NL
Private rent6%
NL 14%▼ −57% vs NL
Social housing14%
NL 28%▼ −50% vs NL
Single-family dwellings98%
NL 63%▲ +56% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025