The population is shrinking, while it grows in Harlingen. Homes cost more than the average in the municipality of Harlingen, and registered crime per resident is higher.
The average WOZ value in Midlum is €272,000, 3% higher than in Harlingen (€263,000). Between 2014 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 58%, against a rise of 72% in Harlingen. 72% of the homes are owner-occupied, 16 percentage points more than in Harlingen (56%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€272,000
▲3% higher than Harlingen (€263,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2014
+58%
▼lower than Harlingen (+72%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
72%
▲16 percentage points higher than Harlingen (56%)
Social housing
25%
▼7 percentage points lower than Harlingen (32%)
Private rent
3%
▼9 percentage points lower than Harlingen (12%)
Single-family dwellings
99%
▲23 percentage points higher than Harlingen (76%)
Built 1945–1964
19%
▲10 percentage points higher than Harlingen (9%)
Built 1975–1991
13%
▼7 percentage points lower than Harlingen (20%)
Built 1992–2005
20%
▲8 percentage points higher than Harlingen (12%)
Average WOZ value
€272,000
▲3% higher than Harlingen (€263,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2014
+58%
▼lower than Harlingen (+72%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
72%
▲16 percentage points higher than Harlingen (56%)
Social housing
25%
▼7 percentage points lower than Harlingen (32%)
Private rent
3%
▼9 percentage points lower than Harlingen (12%)
Single-family dwellings
99%
▲23 percentage points higher than Harlingen (76%)
Built 1945–1964
19%
▲10 percentage points higher than Harlingen (9%)
Built 1975–1991
13%
▼7 percentage points lower than Harlingen (20%)
Built 1992–2005
20%
▲8 percentage points higher than Harlingen (12%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 58% between 2014 and 2025, to €272,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€272,000▲ 3% above Harlingen
+58% since 2014
Harlingen +72%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€279 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€279/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
125 m² · estimated gemeente average
WOZ €272,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€109NL median
Water board levy€39–
Waste levy€26€27
Property tax (OZB)€23€24
Sewage levy€21€22
Costs to set aside€170
Maintenance reserve€159–
Buildings insurance€11–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Harlingen's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 106th of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 125 m² (estimated gemeente average) with the average WOZ value here, €272,000.
Levies: Harlingen's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Midlum has the 2nd-highest WOZ value of the 3 wijken in the municipality of Harlingen.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €272,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Midlum
272,000
286
–
Harlingen
261,000
7,618
–
Wijnaldum
307,000
220
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 72% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied72%
Social housing25%
Private rent3%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
99% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes99%
Multi-family homes1%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
28% of dwellings were built between 1965 and 1974, against 18% in the municipality of Harlingen.
Before 194515.7%
1945-196418.9%
1965-197427.6%
1975-199112.9%
1992-200519.6%
2006-20151%
2016 and later4.2%
Explanation
Based on 286 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
More registered crime per resident than the Harlingen average.
In 2025, 79 crimes per 1,000 residents were registered in Midlum, 2.8 times as high as in Harlingen (28). Since 2021 the registered rate per 1,000 residents rose 13%, against a rise of 3% in Harlingen. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
79
▲2.8 times as high as Harlingen (28)
Change since 2021
+13%
▲higher than Harlingen (+3%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
1.2
▲9% higher than Harlingen (1.1)
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
79
▲2.8 times as high as Harlingen (28)
Change since 2021
+13%
▲higher than Harlingen (+3%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
1.2
▲9% higher than Harlingen (1.1)
Registered crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
In 2025, Midlum registered 79 crimes per 1,000 residents, against 28 in the municipality of Harlingen.
Midlum79
The municipality of Harlingen28
Explanation
Crime is counted where it happens and divided by the number of residents, so places with many visitors — city centres, nightlife, stations — score higher.
The largest category in Midlum is 'Traffic': 40.3 per 1,000 residents in 2025, against 6.4 in the municipality of Harlingen.
MidlumHarlingen
Traffic40.3
Harlingen 6.4▲ +530% vs Harlingen
Theft and burglary11.3
Harlingen 9.0▲ +26% vs Harlingen
Fraud and scams11.3
Harlingen 4.1▲ +176% vs Harlingen
Violence and threats8.1
Harlingen 2.9▲ +179% vs Harlingen
Vandalism and public order6.5
Harlingen 3.6▲ +81% vs Harlingen
Other and withheld1.6
Harlingen 1.5▲ +7% vs Harlingen
Environmental0.0
Harlingen 0.0
Explanation
Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2024, police in Midlum registered 7 traffic accidents, of which 0 with injury and none fatal.
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2024
03 · Living environment
Residents rate their health above the Harlingen average; green space is above the Harlingen average.
An estimated 74% of adults in Midlum rate their own health as good, 2 percentage points more than in Harlingen. More adults are overweight (59% against 56%) and more feel lonely (46% against 45%), but fewer smoke (17% against 18%) and fewer report anxiety or depression (39% against 40%). Agricultural land is the largest land use in Midlum, covering 61% of the area, against 4% in Harlingen. Green space such as parks, sports fields, forest and nature covers 3% of the area, 3 percentage points above the 0% in Harlingen.
Key figures
Self-rated health (estimated)
74%
▲2 percentage points higher than Harlingen (72%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
3%
▲3 percentage points higher than Harlingen (0%)
More figures
Overweight
59%
▲3 percentage points higher than Harlingen (56%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
39%
▼1 percentage point lower than Harlingen (40%)
Lonely
46%
▲1 percentage point higher than Harlingen (45%)
Smokes
17%
▼1 percentage point lower than Harlingen (18%)
Water, share of the area
2%
▼92 percentage points lower than Harlingen (94%)
Agriculture, share of the area
61%
▲57 percentage points higher than Harlingen (4%)
Built-up, share of the area
26%
▲25 percentage points higher than Harlingen (1%)
Self-rated health (estimated)
74%
▲2 percentage points higher than Harlingen (72%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
3%
▲3 percentage points higher than Harlingen (0%)
More figures
Overweight
59%
▲3 percentage points higher than Harlingen (56%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
39%
▼1 percentage point lower than Harlingen (40%)
Lonely
46%
▲1 percentage point higher than Harlingen (45%)
Smokes
17%
▼1 percentage point lower than Harlingen (18%)
Water, share of the area
2%
▼92 percentage points lower than Harlingen (94%)
Agriculture, share of the area
61%
▲57 percentage points higher than Harlingen (4%)
Built-up, share of the area
26%
▲25 percentage points higher than Harlingen (1%)
Health
An estimated 74% of adults rate their own health as good, against 72% in the municipality of Harlingen (2024).
This areaThe municipality of Harlingen
Good self-rated health
73.5%
72.3%
Smokes
16.9%
17.8%
Excessive drinking
5.6%
5.6%
Overweight
58.6%
56%
Lonely
46.2%
45.3%
Anxiety or depression feelings
38.8%
39.9%
Meets physical activity guideline
50.9%
50.1%
Explanation
An RIVM model estimate (small-area estimation from the 2024 Health Monitor for Adults and Elderly), not a direct tabulation — even a buurt that was not itself surveyed gets an estimate. Figures cover adults aged 18 and over.
Source: RIVM/CBS Gezondheidsmonitor Volwassenen en Ouderen (kleine-gebieden-schatting) 2024
Land use
3% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 0.3% in the municipality of Harlingen.
Traffic5%
Built-up26.3%
Other built-up3.2%
Recreation1.7%
Agriculture61.3%
Forest and nature0.9%
Water1.5%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
04 · Residents
The population is shrinking, while it grows in Harlingen.
Midlum has 640 inhabitants (2026), or 140 per km² (79% lower than in Harlingen). Between 2014 and 2026 the population fell 2%, against a rise of 3% in Harlingen. In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Harlingen was 79%, 1 percentage point above the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) had the highest share there: 19% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2014
-2%
▼lower than Harlingen (+3%)
Turnout, municipality of Harlingen
79%
▲1 percentage point higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
-1%
▼lower than Harlingen (+9%)
Aged 45 to 65
29%
▲2 percentage points higher than Harlingen (27%)
Never married
46%
▲1 percentage point higher than Harlingen (45%)
Dutch origin
84%
=about the same as Harlingen (84%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
55%
▲8 percentage points higher than Harlingen (47%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
19%
▲2 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2014
-2%
▼lower than Harlingen (+3%)
Turnout, municipality of Harlingen
79%
▲1 percentage point higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
-1%
▼lower than Harlingen (+9%)
Aged 45 to 65
29%
▲2 percentage points higher than Harlingen (27%)
Never married
46%
▲1 percentage point higher than Harlingen (45%)
Dutch origin
84%
=about the same as Harlingen (84%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
55%
▲8 percentage points higher than Harlingen (47%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
19%
▲2 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population shrank 2% between 2014 and 2026, to 640.
Residents, 2026
640
-2% since 2014
Harlingen +3%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 140 residents per km², this wijk is 79% less densely populated than the municipality of Harlingen.
Residents per km²140
Dwellings per km²62.7
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, 8.1 children were born per 1,000 residents; almost no one died.
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
29% of residents are between 45 and 65.
0 to 1590
15 to 2565
25 to 45150
45 to 65185
65 to 80110
80 and over35
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
46% of residents are never married.
Never married290
Married255
Divorced60
Widowed30
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
84% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands535
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)65
Outside Europe35
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Education level of residents aged 15 to 75
55% of residents have a havo, vwo or mbo2-4 level education.
Primary, vmbo, mbo1110
Havo, vwo, mbo2-4260
Higher professional, university100
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2024
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Harlingen; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 79% of eligible voters in Harlingen voted. The largest party was PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) with 19% of the valid votes.
Municipality of HarlingenThe Netherlands
D66
13.6%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
19.3%
16.7%
VVD
14.7%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
13%
12.8%
CDA
12%
11.8%
JA21
5.7%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
6.7%
4.5%
BBB
3.2%
2.6%
Other
11.8%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
Midlum has an average of 1.3 cars per household, 30% higher than in Harlingen (1.0). 32% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 6 percentage points more than in Harlingen (26%).
Key figures
Transport, information and communication, share of businesses
22%
▲12 percentage points higher than Harlingen (10%)
Government, education and care, share of businesses
6%
▼8 percentage points lower than Harlingen (14%)
Culture, recreation and other services, share of businesses
6%
▼4 percentage points lower than Harlingen (10%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.3
▲30% higher than Harlingen (1.0)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
32%
▲6 percentage points higher than Harlingen (26%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2014
+4 pp
▲higher than Harlingen (+1 pp)
Industrial, share of addresses
55%
▲45 percentage points higher than Harlingen (10%)
Residential, share of addresses
42%
▼41 percentage points lower than Harlingen (83%)
Office, share of addresses
8%
▲6 percentage points higher than Harlingen (2%)
Private rent
3%
▼11 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Residents per km²
140
▼74% lower than the Netherlands (539)
Single-family dwellings
99%
▲36 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Transport, information and communication, share of businesses
22%
▲12 percentage points higher than Harlingen (10%)
Government, education and care, share of businesses
6%
▼8 percentage points lower than Harlingen (14%)
Culture, recreation and other services, share of businesses
6%
▼4 percentage points lower than Harlingen (10%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.3
▲30% higher than Harlingen (1.0)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
32%
▲6 percentage points higher than Harlingen (26%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2014
+4 pp
▲higher than Harlingen (+1 pp)
Industrial, share of addresses
55%
▲45 percentage points higher than Harlingen (10%)
Residential, share of addresses
42%
▼41 percentage points lower than Harlingen (83%)
Office, share of addresses
8%
▲6 percentage points higher than Harlingen (2%)
Private rent
3%
▼11 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Residents per km²
140
▼74% lower than the Netherlands (539)
Single-family dwellings
99%
▲36 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Business establishments by sector
Nijverheid en energie is the largest sector, with 35 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij10
Nijverheid en energie35
Handel en horeca25
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie35
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed5
Zakelijke dienstverlening30
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg10
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten10
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
32% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 26% in the municipality of Harlingen (2025).
Petrol68.4%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)31.6%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 28% to 32% between 2014 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
32%▲ 6 percentage points above Harlingen (26%)
+4 pp since 2014
Harlingen +1 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 380 passenger cars and 50 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars380
Motorcycles50
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
42% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is industrial (55%).
Residential42.4%
Retail0.3%
Office7.9%
Assembly0.7%
Healthcare0.1%
Industrial54.5%
Education0.1%
Other2.2%
Explanation
Based on 675 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
1% multi-family dwellings, against 37% nationally.
This areaThe Netherlands
Multi-family dwellings1%
NL 37%▼ −97% vs NL
Private rent3%
NL 14%▼ −79% vs NL
Residents per km²140
NL 539▼ −74% vs NL
Single-family dwellings99%
NL 63%▲ +57% vs NL
Average WOZ value€272,000
NL €398,000▼ −32% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025