We're pulling the figures from public sources. This usually takes a few seconds.
Area and its neighbourhoodsCBS key figures for districts and neighbourhoods
Residents and householdsCBS
Homes and WOZ valueCBS · Kadaster BAG
Housing marketNVM market overview
Municipal leviesMunicipal budgets · CBS
SafetyCBS and Police
HealthRIVM Health Monitor
Land use and amenitiesCBS land use · proximity statistics
Road safety and electionsRijkswaterstaat · Kiesraad
Comparing with the municipality and the countryRankings and comparisons
District · Haaksbergen
Living in Sint Isidorushoeve
The population is growing, while it shrinks in Haaksbergen. Homes cost more than the average in the municipality of Haaksbergen, and registered crime per resident is lower.
The average WOZ value in Sint Isidorushoeve is €448,000, 18% higher than in Haaksbergen (€380,000). Between 2014 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 61%, against a rise of 77% in Haaksbergen. 87% of the homes are owner-occupied, 17 percentage points more than in Haaksbergen (70%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€448,000
▲18% higher than Haaksbergen (€380,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2014
+61%
▼lower than Haaksbergen (+77%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
87%
▲17 percentage points higher than Haaksbergen (70%)
Social housing
2%
▼19 percentage points lower than Haaksbergen (21%)
Private rent
11%
▲1 percentage point higher than Haaksbergen (10%)
Single-family dwellings
85%
▲3 percentage points higher than Haaksbergen (82%)
Built 2016 and later
17%
▲11 percentage points higher than Haaksbergen (6%)
Built 1965–1974
12%
▼10 percentage points lower than Haaksbergen (22%)
Built before 1945
18%
▲8 percentage points higher than Haaksbergen (10%)
Average WOZ value
€448,000
▲18% higher than Haaksbergen (€380,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2014
+61%
▼lower than Haaksbergen (+77%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
87%
▲17 percentage points higher than Haaksbergen (70%)
Social housing
2%
▼19 percentage points lower than Haaksbergen (21%)
Private rent
11%
▲1 percentage point higher than Haaksbergen (10%)
Single-family dwellings
85%
▲3 percentage points higher than Haaksbergen (82%)
Built 2016 and later
17%
▲11 percentage points higher than Haaksbergen (6%)
Built 1965–1974
12%
▼10 percentage points lower than Haaksbergen (22%)
Built before 1945
18%
▲8 percentage points higher than Haaksbergen (10%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 61% between 2014 and 2025, to €448,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€448,000▲ 18% above Haaksbergen
+61% since 2014
Haaksbergen +77%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€341 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€341/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
145 m² · estimated gemeente average
WOZ €448,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€143NL median
Property tax (OZB)€47€39
Water board levy€44–
Sewage levy€32€22
Waste levy€20€27
Costs to set aside€198
Maintenance reserve€185–
Buildings insurance€13–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Haaksbergen's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 259th of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 145 m² (estimated gemeente average) with the average WOZ value here, €448,000.
Levies: Haaksbergen's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Sint Isidorushoeve has the 3rd-lowest WOZ value of the 8 wijken in the municipality of Haaksbergen.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €448,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Sint Isidorushoeve
448,000
498
–
Haaksbergen (dorp)
353,000
7,900
–
Haaksbergen (buitengebied)
559,000
940
–
Buurse
471,000
515
–
Rietmolen
533,000
82
–
Hengevelde
648,000
53
–
Beckum
540,000
64
–
Haaksbergen-kern
281,000
701
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 87% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied87%
Social housing2%
Private rent11%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
85% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes85%
Multi-family homes15%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
21% of dwellings were built between 1975 and 1991, against 23% in the municipality of Haaksbergen.
Before 194518.1%
1945-196411.2%
1965-197411.6%
1975-199121.1%
1992-200513.6%
2006-20157.3%
2016 and later17%
Explanation
Based on 507 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
Less registered crime per resident than the Haaksbergen average.
In 2025, 21 crimes per 1,000 residents were registered in Sint Isidorushoeve, 12% lower than in Haaksbergen (24). Since 2021 the registered rate per 1,000 residents rose 28%, against a rise of 11% in Haaksbergen. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
21
▼12% lower than Haaksbergen (24)
Change since 2021
+28%
▲higher than Haaksbergen (+11%)
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
21
▼12% lower than Haaksbergen (24)
Change since 2021
+28%
▲higher than Haaksbergen (+11%)
Registered crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
In 2025, Sint Isidorushoeve registered 21 crimes per 1,000 residents, against 24 in the municipality of Haaksbergen.
Sint Isidorushoeve21
The municipality of Haaksbergen24
Explanation
Crime is counted where it happens and divided by the number of residents, so places with many visitors — city centres, nightlife, stations — score higher.
The largest category in Sint Isidorushoeve is 'Traffic': 15.0 per 1,000 residents in 2025, against 10.8 in the municipality of Haaksbergen.
Sint IsidorushoeveHaaksbergen
Traffic15.0
Haaksbergen 10.8▲ +39% vs Haaksbergen
Theft and burglary3.8
Haaksbergen 5.4▼ −30% vs Haaksbergen
Fraud and scams2.3
Haaksbergen 3.9▼ −41% vs Haaksbergen
Vandalism and public order0.0
Haaksbergen 1.5▼ −100% vs Haaksbergen
Violence and threats0.0
Haaksbergen 1.7▼ −100% vs Haaksbergen
Environmental0.0
Haaksbergen 0.0
Other and withheld0.0
Haaksbergen 0.8≈ Haaksbergen
Explanation
Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2024, police in Sint Isidorushoeve registered 9 traffic accidents, of which 1 with injury and none fatal.
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2024
03 · Living environment
Residents rate their health above the Haaksbergen average; green space is below the Haaksbergen average.
An estimated 81% of adults in Sint Isidorushoeve rate their own health as good, 4 percentage points more than in Haaksbergen. Fewer adults feel lonely (34% against 40%), fewer report anxiety or depression (35% against 39%) and fewer are overweight (52% against 55%), but more drink excessively (10% against 7%). Agricultural land is the largest land use in Sint Isidorushoeve, covering 91% of the area, against 64% in Haaksbergen. Green space such as parks, sports fields, forest and nature covers 3% of the area, 23 percentage points below the 26% in Haaksbergen.
Key figures
Self-rated health (estimated)
81%
▲4 percentage points higher than Haaksbergen (77%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
3%
▼23 percentage points lower than Haaksbergen (26%)
More figures
Lonely
34%
▼6 percentage points lower than Haaksbergen (40%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
35%
▼4 percentage points lower than Haaksbergen (39%)
Excessive drinking
10%
▲3 percentage points higher than Haaksbergen (7%)
Overweight
52%
▼3 percentage points lower than Haaksbergen (55%)
Agriculture, share of the area
91%
▲27 percentage points higher than Haaksbergen (64%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
2%
▼22 percentage points lower than Haaksbergen (24%)
Built-up, share of the area
2%
▼4 percentage points lower than Haaksbergen (6%)
Self-rated health (estimated)
81%
▲4 percentage points higher than Haaksbergen (77%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
3%
▼23 percentage points lower than Haaksbergen (26%)
More figures
Lonely
34%
▼6 percentage points lower than Haaksbergen (40%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
35%
▼4 percentage points lower than Haaksbergen (39%)
Excessive drinking
10%
▲3 percentage points higher than Haaksbergen (7%)
Overweight
52%
▼3 percentage points lower than Haaksbergen (55%)
Agriculture, share of the area
91%
▲27 percentage points higher than Haaksbergen (64%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
2%
▼22 percentage points lower than Haaksbergen (24%)
Built-up, share of the area
2%
▼4 percentage points lower than Haaksbergen (6%)
Health
An estimated 81% of adults rate their own health as good, against 77% in the municipality of Haaksbergen (2024).
This areaThe municipality of Haaksbergen
Good self-rated health
81.4%
76.6%
Smokes
12%
13.7%
Excessive drinking
10.4%
7.3%
Overweight
52.4%
55%
Lonely
34.3%
40.3%
Anxiety or depression feelings
34.6%
38.9%
Meets physical activity guideline
51.1%
51.1%
Explanation
An RIVM model estimate (small-area estimation from the 2024 Health Monitor for Adults and Elderly), not a direct tabulation — even a buurt that was not itself surveyed gets an estimate. Figures cover adults aged 18 and over.
Source: RIVM/CBS Gezondheidsmonitor Volwassenen en Ouderen (kleine-gebieden-schatting) 2024
Land use
3% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 26% in the municipality of Haaksbergen.
Traffic3.3%
Built-up2.3%
Other built-up0.1%
Recreation0.8%
Agriculture91.1%
Forest and nature2.5%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
04 · Residents
The population is growing, while it shrinks in Haaksbergen.
Sint Isidorushoeve has 1,350 inhabitants (2026), or 92 per km² (60% lower than in Haaksbergen). Between 2014 and 2026 the population rose 13%, against no real change in Haaksbergen. In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Haaksbergen was 85%, 7 percentage points above the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, CDA had the highest share there: 18% of the vote, against 12% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2014
+13%
▲higher than Haaksbergen (-0%)
Turnout, municipality of Haaksbergen
85%
▲7 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+21%
▲higher than Haaksbergen (+7%)
Aged 45 to 65
27%
▼1 percentage point lower than Haaksbergen (28%)
Never married
50%
▲6 percentage points higher than Haaksbergen (44%)
Dutch origin
94%
▲9 percentage points higher than Haaksbergen (85%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
53%
▲7 percentage points higher than Haaksbergen (46%)
CDA, share of the vote
18%
▲6 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (12%)
Population growth since 2014
+13%
▲higher than Haaksbergen (-0%)
Turnout, municipality of Haaksbergen
85%
▲7 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+21%
▲higher than Haaksbergen (+7%)
Aged 45 to 65
27%
▼1 percentage point lower than Haaksbergen (28%)
Never married
50%
▲6 percentage points higher than Haaksbergen (44%)
Dutch origin
94%
▲9 percentage points higher than Haaksbergen (85%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
53%
▲7 percentage points higher than Haaksbergen (46%)
CDA, share of the vote
18%
▲6 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (12%)
Population per year
The population grew 13% between 2014 and 2026, to 1,350.
Residents, 2026
1,350
+13% since 2014
Haaksbergen +0%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 92 residents per km², this wijk is 60% less densely populated than the municipality of Haaksbergen.
Residents per km²92
Dwellings per km²34
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, 15.0 children were born per 1,000 residents; 7.5 died per 1,000.
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
27% of residents are between 45 and 65.
0 to 15230
15 to 25155
25 to 45305
45 to 65360
65 to 80235
80 and over60
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
50% of residents are never married.
Never married670
Married565
Divorced50
Widowed65
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
94% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands1,270
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)60
Outside Europe15
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Education level of residents aged 15 to 75
53% of residents have a havo, vwo or mbo2-4 level education.
Primary, vmbo, mbo1240
Havo, vwo, mbo2-4540
Higher professional, university240
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2024
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Haaksbergen; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 85% of eligible voters in Haaksbergen voted. The largest party was CDA with 18% of the valid votes.
Municipality of HaaksbergenThe Netherlands
D66
13.6%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
17.7%
16.7%
VVD
16.6%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
6.4%
12.8%
CDA
18.4%
11.8%
JA21
8%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
6.2%
4.5%
BBB
5.8%
2.6%
Other
7.2%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
Sint Isidorushoeve has an average of 1.8 cars per household, 38% higher than in Haaksbergen (1.3). 20% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), about the same as in Haaksbergen (20%).
Key figures
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
26%
▲16 percentage points higher than Haaksbergen (10%)
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
11%
▼8 percentage points lower than Haaksbergen (19%)
Business services, share of businesses
13%
▼7 percentage points lower than Haaksbergen (20%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.8
▲38% higher than Haaksbergen (1.3)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
20%
=about the same as Haaksbergen (20%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2014
+3 pp
=about the same as Haaksbergen (+4 pp)
Industrial, share of addresses
22%
▲15 percentage points higher than Haaksbergen (7%)
Residential, share of addresses
92%
▲5 percentage points higher than Haaksbergen (87%)
Healthcare, share of addresses
0%
▼2 percentage points lower than Haaksbergen (2%)
Residents per km²
92
▼83% lower than the Netherlands (539)
Multi-family dwellings
15%
▼22 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (37%)
Owner-occupied dwellings
87%
▲30 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (57%)
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
26%
▲16 percentage points higher than Haaksbergen (10%)
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
11%
▼8 percentage points lower than Haaksbergen (19%)
Business services, share of businesses
13%
▼7 percentage points lower than Haaksbergen (20%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.8
▲38% higher than Haaksbergen (1.3)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
20%
=about the same as Haaksbergen (20%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2014
+3 pp
=about the same as Haaksbergen (+4 pp)
Industrial, share of addresses
22%
▲15 percentage points higher than Haaksbergen (7%)
Residential, share of addresses
92%
▲5 percentage points higher than Haaksbergen (87%)
Healthcare, share of addresses
0%
▼2 percentage points lower than Haaksbergen (2%)
Residents per km²
92
▼83% lower than the Netherlands (539)
Multi-family dwellings
15%
▼22 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (37%)
Owner-occupied dwellings
87%
▲30 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (57%)
Business establishments by sector
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij is the largest sector, with 70 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij70
Nijverheid en energie55
Handel en horeca30
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie5
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed15
Zakelijke dienstverlening35
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg30
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten30
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
20% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 20% in the municipality of Haaksbergen (2025).
Petrol80.2%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)19.8%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 17% to 20% between 2014 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
20%– about the same as Haaksbergen (20%)
+3 pp since 2014
Haaksbergen +4 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 860 passenger cars and 120 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars860
Motorcycles120
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
92% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is industrial (22%).
Residential91.7%
Retail0.9%
Office0.2%
Assembly0.9%
Healthcare0.2%
Industrial21.9%
Lodging0.9%
Education0.2%
Sports0.2%
Other2.2%
Explanation
Based on 553 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
2% social housing, against 28% nationally.
This areaThe Netherlands
Social housing2%
NL 28%▼ −93% vs NL
Residents per km²92
NL 539▼ −83% vs NL
Multi-family dwellings15%
NL 37%▼ −59% vs NL
Owner-occupied dwellings87%
NL 57%▲ +53% vs NL
Single-family dwellings85%
NL 63%▲ +35% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025