The average WOZ value in Beckum is €540,000, 42% higher than in Haaksbergen (€380,000). Between 2018 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 102%, against a rise of 72% in Haaksbergen. 83% of the homes are owner-occupied, 13 percentage points more than in Haaksbergen (70%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€540,000
▲42% higher than Haaksbergen (€380,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2018
+102%
▲higher than Haaksbergen (+72%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
83%
▲13 percentage points higher than Haaksbergen (70%)
Social housing
0%
▼21 percentage points lower than Haaksbergen (21%)
Private rent
17%
▲7 percentage points higher than Haaksbergen (10%)
Single-family dwellings
88%
▲6 percentage points higher than Haaksbergen (82%)
Built 1992–2005
8%
▼12 percentage points lower than Haaksbergen (20%)
Built 1965–1974
17%
▼5 percentage points lower than Haaksbergen (22%)
Built 2006–2015
2%
▼4 percentage points lower than Haaksbergen (6%)
Average WOZ value
€540,000
▲42% higher than Haaksbergen (€380,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2018
+102%
▲higher than Haaksbergen (+72%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
83%
▲13 percentage points higher than Haaksbergen (70%)
Social housing
0%
▼21 percentage points lower than Haaksbergen (21%)
Private rent
17%
▲7 percentage points higher than Haaksbergen (10%)
Single-family dwellings
88%
▲6 percentage points higher than Haaksbergen (82%)
Built 1992–2005
8%
▼12 percentage points lower than Haaksbergen (20%)
Built 1965–1974
17%
▼5 percentage points lower than Haaksbergen (22%)
Built 2006–2015
2%
▼4 percentage points lower than Haaksbergen (6%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 102% between 2018 and 2025, to €540,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€540,000▲ 42% above Haaksbergen
+102% since 2018
Haaksbergen +72%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€353 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€353/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
145 m² · estimated gemeente average
WOZ €540,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€155NL median
Property tax (OZB)€56€47
Water board levy€47–
Sewage levy€32€22
Waste levy€20€27
Costs to set aside€198
Maintenance reserve€185–
Buildings insurance€13–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Haaksbergen's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 265th of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 145 m² (estimated gemeente average) with the average WOZ value here, €540,000.
Levies: Haaksbergen's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Beckum has the 3rd-highest WOZ value of the 8 wijken in the municipality of Haaksbergen.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €540,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Beckum
540,000
64
–
Haaksbergen (dorp)
353,000
7,900
–
Haaksbergen (buitengebied)
559,000
940
–
Sint Isidorushoeve
448,000
498
–
Buurse
471,000
515
–
Rietmolen
533,000
82
–
Hengevelde
648,000
53
–
Haaksbergen-kern
281,000
701
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 83% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied83%
Private rent17%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
88% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes88%
Multi-family homes13%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
29% of dwellings were built before 1945, against 10% in the municipality of Haaksbergen.
Before 194529.2%
1945-196412.3%
1965-197416.9%
1975-199124.6%
1992-20057.7%
2006-20151.5%
2016 and later7.7%
Explanation
Based on 65 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
Too few residents for a rate per resident: these are counts.
Beckum has too few residents for a reliable rate per 1,000 residents (under 200), so counts are shown instead of a comparison. In 2025, 3 crimes were registered, against 0 in 2021. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Registered crimes, 2025
3
▲up from 0 in 2021
Home burglary
0
2023–2025
Registered crimes, 2025
3
▲up from 0 in 2021
Home burglary
0
2023–2025
Registered crime per year
3 crimes were registered in Beckum in 2025 (0 in 2021).
Registered crimes, 2025
3
up from 0 in 2021
Explanation
Too few residents for a reliable per-1,000 figure (threshold 200) — registered crime, not all crime — CBS/Politie 47018NED.
The largest category in Beckum is 'Traffic': 2 in 2025.
Traffic2
Fraud and scams1
Theft and burglary0
Vandalism and public order0
Violence and threats0
Environmental0
Other and withheld0
Explanation
Too few residents for a reliable per-1,000 figure (threshold 200). Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2023, police in Beckum registered 3 traffic accidents, of which 0 with injury and none fatal.
2020
2021
2022
2023
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2023
03 · Living environment
Residents rate their health above the Haaksbergen average; green space is below the Haaksbergen average.
An estimated 82% of adults in Beckum rate their own health as good, 5 percentage points more than in Haaksbergen. Fewer adults report anxiety or depression (30% against 39%), fewer are overweight (47% against 55%) and fewer feel lonely (33% against 40%), but more meet the physical activity guideline (56% against 51%). Agricultural land is the largest land use in Beckum, covering 82% of the area, against 64% in Haaksbergen. Green space such as parks, sports fields, forest and nature covers 15% of the area, 11 percentage points below the 26% in Haaksbergen.
Key figures
Self-rated health (estimated)
82%
▲5 percentage points higher than Haaksbergen (77%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
15%
▼11 percentage points lower than Haaksbergen (26%)
More figures
Anxiety or depression feelings
30%
▼9 percentage points lower than Haaksbergen (39%)
Overweight
47%
▼8 percentage points lower than Haaksbergen (55%)
Lonely
33%
▼7 percentage points lower than Haaksbergen (40%)
Meets physical activity guideline
56%
▲5 percentage points higher than Haaksbergen (51%)
Agriculture, share of the area
82%
▲18 percentage points higher than Haaksbergen (64%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
15%
▼9 percentage points lower than Haaksbergen (24%)
Built-up, share of the area
0%
▼6 percentage points lower than Haaksbergen (6%)
Self-rated health (estimated)
82%
▲5 percentage points higher than Haaksbergen (77%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
15%
▼11 percentage points lower than Haaksbergen (26%)
More figures
Anxiety or depression feelings
30%
▼9 percentage points lower than Haaksbergen (39%)
Overweight
47%
▼8 percentage points lower than Haaksbergen (55%)
Lonely
33%
▼7 percentage points lower than Haaksbergen (40%)
Meets physical activity guideline
56%
▲5 percentage points higher than Haaksbergen (51%)
Agriculture, share of the area
82%
▲18 percentage points higher than Haaksbergen (64%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
15%
▼9 percentage points lower than Haaksbergen (24%)
Built-up, share of the area
0%
▼6 percentage points lower than Haaksbergen (6%)
Health
An estimated 82% of adults rate their own health as good, against 77% in the municipality of Haaksbergen (2024).
This areaThe municipality of Haaksbergen
Good self-rated health
81.8%
76.6%
Smokes
11.5%
13.7%
Excessive drinking
11.3%
7.3%
Overweight
47.2%
55%
Lonely
32.6%
40.3%
Anxiety or depression feelings
30.3%
38.9%
Meets physical activity guideline
55.6%
51.1%
Explanation
An RIVM model estimate (small-area estimation from the 2024 Health Monitor for Adults and Elderly), not a direct tabulation — even a buurt that was not itself surveyed gets an estimate. Figures cover adults aged 18 and over.
Source: RIVM/CBS Gezondheidsmonitor Volwassenen en Ouderen (kleine-gebieden-schatting) 2024
Land use
15% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 26% in the municipality of Haaksbergen.
Traffic2.3%
Built-up0.3%
Agriculture82.4%
Forest and nature15%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
04 · Residents
The population is growing, while it shrinks in Haaksbergen.
Beckum has 180 inhabitants (2026), or 46 per km² (80% lower than in Haaksbergen). In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Haaksbergen was 85%, 7 percentage points above the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, CDA had the highest share there: 18% of the vote, against 12% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2014
+3%
▲higher than Haaksbergen (-0%)
Turnout, municipality of Haaksbergen
85%
▲7 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+2%
▼lower than Haaksbergen (+7%)
Aged 45 to 65
34%
▲6 percentage points higher than Haaksbergen (28%)
Married
49%
▲6 percentage points higher than Haaksbergen (43%)
Dutch origin
97%
▲12 percentage points higher than Haaksbergen (85%)
CDA, share of the vote
18%
▲6 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (12%)
Population growth since 2014
+3%
▲higher than Haaksbergen (-0%)
Turnout, municipality of Haaksbergen
85%
▲7 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+2%
▼lower than Haaksbergen (+7%)
Aged 45 to 65
34%
▲6 percentage points higher than Haaksbergen (28%)
Married
49%
▲6 percentage points higher than Haaksbergen (43%)
Dutch origin
97%
▲12 percentage points higher than Haaksbergen (85%)
CDA, share of the vote
18%
▲6 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (12%)
Population per year
The population grew 3% between 2014 and 2026, to 180.
Residents, 2026
180
+3% since 2014
Haaksbergen +0%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 46 residents per km², this wijk is 80% less densely populated than the municipality of Haaksbergen.
Residents per km²46
Dwellings per km²16.3
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, almost no children were born; almost no one died.
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
34% of residents are between 45 and 65.
0 to 1520
15 to 2535
25 to 4530
45 to 6560
65 to 8020
80 and over10
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
49% of residents are married.
Never married85
Married90
Divorced5
Widowed5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
97% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands175
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Haaksbergen; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 85% of eligible voters in Haaksbergen voted. The largest party was CDA with 18% of the valid votes.
Municipality of HaaksbergenThe Netherlands
D66
13.6%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
17.7%
16.7%
VVD
16.6%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
6.4%
12.8%
CDA
18.4%
11.8%
JA21
8%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
6.2%
4.5%
BBB
5.8%
2.6%
Other
7.2%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
Beckum has an average of 1.9 cars per household, 46% higher than in Haaksbergen (1.3). 18% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 2 percentage points less than in Haaksbergen (20%).
Key figures
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
43%
▲33 percentage points higher than Haaksbergen (10%)
Culture, recreation and other services, share of businesses
0%
▼10 percentage points lower than Haaksbergen (10%)
Business services, share of businesses
14%
▼6 percentage points lower than Haaksbergen (20%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.9
▲46% higher than Haaksbergen (1.3)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
18%
▼2 percentage points lower than Haaksbergen (20%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2014
−3 pp
▼lower than Haaksbergen (+4 pp)
Industrial, share of addresses
23%
▲16 percentage points higher than Haaksbergen (7%)
Residential, share of addresses
94%
▲7 percentage points higher than Haaksbergen (87%)
Healthcare, share of addresses
4%
▲2 percentage points higher than Haaksbergen (2%)
Multi-family dwellings
13%
▼24 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (37%)
Owner-occupied dwellings
83%
▲26 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (57%)
Single-family dwellings
88%
▲25 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
43%
▲33 percentage points higher than Haaksbergen (10%)
Culture, recreation and other services, share of businesses
0%
▼10 percentage points lower than Haaksbergen (10%)
Business services, share of businesses
14%
▼6 percentage points lower than Haaksbergen (20%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.9
▲46% higher than Haaksbergen (1.3)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
18%
▼2 percentage points lower than Haaksbergen (20%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2014
−3 pp
▼lower than Haaksbergen (+4 pp)
Industrial, share of addresses
23%
▲16 percentage points higher than Haaksbergen (7%)
Residential, share of addresses
94%
▲7 percentage points higher than Haaksbergen (87%)
Healthcare, share of addresses
4%
▲2 percentage points higher than Haaksbergen (2%)
Multi-family dwellings
13%
▼24 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (37%)
Owner-occupied dwellings
83%
▲26 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (57%)
Single-family dwellings
88%
▲25 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Business establishments by sector
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij is the largest sector, with 15 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij15
Nijverheid en energie5
Handel en horeca5
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie0
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed0
Zakelijke dienstverlening5
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg5
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten0
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
18% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 20% in the municipality of Haaksbergen (2025).
Petrol81.8%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)18.2%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 21% to 18% between 2014 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
18%▼ 2 percentage points below Haaksbergen (20%)
-3 pp since 2014
Haaksbergen +4 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 110 passenger cars and 10 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars110
Motorcycles10
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
94% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is industrial (23%).
Residential94.2%
Assembly1.4%
Healthcare4.3%
Industrial23.2%
Lodging1.4%
Other4.3%
Explanation
Based on 69 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
46 residents per km²: 91% less densely populated than the Dutch average.
This areaThe Netherlands
Residents per km²46
NL 539▼ −91% vs NL
Multi-family dwellings13%
NL 37%▼ −65% vs NL
Owner-occupied dwellings83%
NL 57%▲ +46% vs NL
Single-family dwellings88%
NL 63%▲ +40% vs NL
Average WOZ value€540,000
NL €398,000▲ +36% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026