We're pulling the figures from public sources. This usually takes a few seconds.
Area and its neighbourhoodsCBS key figures for districts and neighbourhoods
Residents and householdsCBS
Homes and WOZ valueCBS · Kadaster BAG
Housing marketNVM market overview
Municipal leviesMunicipal budgets · CBS
SafetyCBS and Police
HealthRIVM Health Monitor
Land use and amenitiesCBS land use · proximity statistics
Road safety and electionsRijkswaterstaat · Kiesraad
Comparing with the municipality and the countryRankings and comparisons
District · Capelle aan den IJssel
Living in Schenkel
The population is growing faster than in Capelle aan den IJssel. Homes cost more than the average in the municipality of Capelle aan den IJssel, and registered crime per resident is higher.
Homes cost more than the Capelle aan den IJssel average.
The average WOZ value in Schenkel is €400,000, 10% higher than in Capelle aan den IJssel (€362,000). Between 2014 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 152%, against a rise of 106% in Capelle aan den IJssel. 49% of the homes are owner-occupied, 5 percentage points less than in Capelle aan den IJssel (54%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€400,000
▲10% higher than Capelle aan den IJssel (€362,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2014
+152%
▲higher than Capelle aan den IJssel (+106%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
49%
▼5 percentage points lower than Capelle aan den IJssel (54%)
Social housing
43%
▲9 percentage points higher than Capelle aan den IJssel (34%)
Private rent
8%
▼3 percentage points lower than Capelle aan den IJssel (11%)
Single-family dwellings
45%
▲1 percentage point higher than Capelle aan den IJssel (44%)
Built 1975–1991
19%
▼22 percentage points lower than Capelle aan den IJssel (41%)
Built 1992–2005
8%
▼8 percentage points lower than Capelle aan den IJssel (16%)
Built 1945–1964
14%
▲7 percentage points higher than Capelle aan den IJssel (7%)
Average WOZ value
€400,000
▲10% higher than Capelle aan den IJssel (€362,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2014
+152%
▲higher than Capelle aan den IJssel (+106%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
49%
▼5 percentage points lower than Capelle aan den IJssel (54%)
Social housing
43%
▲9 percentage points higher than Capelle aan den IJssel (34%)
Private rent
8%
▼3 percentage points lower than Capelle aan den IJssel (11%)
Single-family dwellings
45%
▲1 percentage point higher than Capelle aan den IJssel (44%)
Built 1975–1991
19%
▼22 percentage points lower than Capelle aan den IJssel (41%)
Built 1992–2005
8%
▼8 percentage points lower than Capelle aan den IJssel (16%)
Built 1945–1964
14%
▲7 percentage points higher than Capelle aan den IJssel (7%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 152% between 2014 and 2025, to €400,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€400,000▲ 10% above Capelle aan den IJssel
+152% since 2014
Capelle aan den IJssel +106%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€252 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€252/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
103 m² · estimated gemeente average
WOZ €400,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€112NL median
Water board levy€43–
Property tax (OZB)€29€35
Waste levy€26€27
Sewage levy€14€22
Costs to set aside€140
Maintenance reserve€131–
Buildings insurance€9–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Capelle aan den IJssel's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 14th of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 103 m² (estimated gemeente average) with the average WOZ value here, €400,000.
Levies: Capelle aan den IJssel's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Schenkel has the 3rd-highest WOZ value of the 9 wijken in the municipality of Capelle aan den IJssel.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €400,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Schenkel
400,000
2,943
–
Capelle West en 's Gravenland
454,000
3,791
–
Middelwatering West
341,000
3,824
–
Middelwatering Oost
331,000
4,365
–
Oostgaarde Zuid
384,000
3,836
–
Oostgaarde Noord
300,000
3,185
–
Schollevaar Zuid
332,000
6,769
–
Schollevaar Noord
340,000
1,671
–
Rivium
447,000
1,509
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 49% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied49%
Social housing43%
Private rent8%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
55% of the dwelling stock is multi-family homes.
Single-family homes45%
Multi-family homes55%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
43% of dwellings were built between 1965 and 1974, against 23% in the municipality of Capelle aan den IJssel.
Before 19458.7%
1945-196414.1%
1965-197443.2%
1975-199118.9%
1992-20058.3%
2006-20153%
2016 and later3.8%
Explanation
Based on 2,993 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
More registered crime per resident than the Capelle aan den IJssel average.
In 2025, 50 crimes per 1,000 residents were registered in Schenkel, 19% higher than in Capelle aan den IJssel (42). Since 2021 the registered rate per 1,000 residents rose 28%, against a rise of 4% in Capelle aan den IJssel. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
50
▲19% higher than Capelle aan den IJssel (42)
Change since 2021
+28%
▲higher than Capelle aan den IJssel (+4%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
4.3
▲48% higher than Capelle aan den IJssel (2.9)
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
50
▲19% higher than Capelle aan den IJssel (42)
Change since 2021
+28%
▲higher than Capelle aan den IJssel (+4%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
4.3
▲48% higher than Capelle aan den IJssel (2.9)
Registered crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
In 2025, Schenkel registered 50 crimes per 1,000 residents, against 42 in the municipality of Capelle aan den IJssel.
Schenkel50
The municipality of Capelle aan den IJssel42
Explanation
Crime is counted where it happens and divided by the number of residents, so places with many visitors — city centres, nightlife, stations — score higher.
The largest category in Schenkel is 'Theft and burglary': 15.2 per 1,000 residents in 2025, against 15.1 in the municipality of Capelle aan den IJssel.
SchenkelCapelle aan den IJssel
Theft and burglary15.2
Capelle aan den IJssel 15.1≈ Capelle aan den IJssel
Violence and threats11.0
Capelle aan den IJssel 5.6▲ +96% vs Capelle aan den IJssel
Traffic9.4
Capelle aan den IJssel 7.7▲ +22% vs Capelle aan den IJssel
Vandalism and public order6.1
Capelle aan den IJssel 5.1▲ +20% vs Capelle aan den IJssel
Fraud and scams5.2
Capelle aan den IJssel 6.2▼ −16% vs Capelle aan den IJssel
Other and withheld3.1
Capelle aan den IJssel 1.8▲ +72% vs Capelle aan den IJssel
Environmental0.0
Capelle aan den IJssel 0.1≈ Capelle aan den IJssel
Explanation
Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2024, police in Schenkel registered 18 traffic accidents, of which 7 with injury and 1 fatal.
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2024
03 · Living environment
Residents rate their health below the Capelle aan den IJssel average; green space is above the Capelle aan den IJssel average.
An estimated 68% of adults in Schenkel rate their own health as good, 1 percentage point less than in Capelle aan den IJssel. Fewer adults are overweight (55% against 57%), but more report anxiety or depression (51% against 50%) and more meet the physical activity guideline (41% against 40%). Recreational land is the largest land use in Schenkel, covering 46% of the area, against 22% in Capelle aan den IJssel. Green space such as parks, sports fields, forest and nature covers 46% of the area, 24 percentage points above the 22% in Capelle aan den IJssel.
Key figures
Self-rated health (estimated)
68%
▼1 percentage point lower than Capelle aan den IJssel (69%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
46%
▲24 percentage points higher than Capelle aan den IJssel (22%)
More figures
Overweight
55%
▼2 percentage points lower than Capelle aan den IJssel (57%)
Meets physical activity guideline
41%
▲1 percentage point higher than Capelle aan den IJssel (40%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
51%
▲1 percentage point higher than Capelle aan den IJssel (50%)
Smokes
18%
=about the same as Capelle aan den IJssel (18%)
Recreation, share of the area
46%
▲24 percentage points higher than Capelle aan den IJssel (22%)
Built-up, share of the area
42%
▼19 percentage points lower than Capelle aan den IJssel (61%)
Water, share of the area
4%
▼4 percentage points lower than Capelle aan den IJssel (8%)
Self-rated health (estimated)
68%
▼1 percentage point lower than Capelle aan den IJssel (69%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
46%
▲24 percentage points higher than Capelle aan den IJssel (22%)
More figures
Overweight
55%
▼2 percentage points lower than Capelle aan den IJssel (57%)
Meets physical activity guideline
41%
▲1 percentage point higher than Capelle aan den IJssel (40%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
51%
▲1 percentage point higher than Capelle aan den IJssel (50%)
Smokes
18%
=about the same as Capelle aan den IJssel (18%)
Recreation, share of the area
46%
▲24 percentage points higher than Capelle aan den IJssel (22%)
Built-up, share of the area
42%
▼19 percentage points lower than Capelle aan den IJssel (61%)
Water, share of the area
4%
▼4 percentage points lower than Capelle aan den IJssel (8%)
Health
An estimated 68% of adults rate their own health as good, against 69% in the municipality of Capelle aan den IJssel (2024).
This areaThe municipality of Capelle aan den IJssel
Good self-rated health
68%
69.1%
Smokes
17.9%
17.7%
Excessive drinking
4.5%
4.5%
Overweight
55.1%
56.9%
Lonely
51.2%
51.1%
Anxiety or depression feelings
50.6%
49.7%
Meets physical activity guideline
41.4%
39.7%
Explanation
An RIVM model estimate (small-area estimation from the 2024 Health Monitor for Adults and Elderly), not a direct tabulation — even a buurt that was not itself surveyed gets an estimate. Figures cover adults aged 18 and over.
Source: RIVM/CBS Gezondheidsmonitor Volwassenen en Ouderen (kleine-gebieden-schatting) 2024
Land use
46% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 22% in the municipality of Capelle aan den IJssel.
Traffic5.9%
Built-up42.2%
Other built-up1.6%
Recreation45.7%
Agriculture0.8%
Water3.9%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
04 · Residents
The population is growing faster than the Capelle aan den IJssel average.
Schenkel has 6,570 inhabitants (2026), or 2,679 per km² (45% lower than in Capelle aan den IJssel). Between 2014 and 2026 the population rose 16%, against a rise of 5% in Capelle aan den IJssel. In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Capelle aan den IJssel was 69%, 9 percentage points below the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) had the highest share there: 18% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2014
+16%
▲higher than Capelle aan den IJssel (+5%)
Turnout, municipality of Capelle aan den IJssel
69%
▼9 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+12%
▲higher than Capelle aan den IJssel (+4%)
Aged 45 to 65
24%
▼1 percentage point lower than Capelle aan den IJssel (25%)
Never married
51%
▲1 percentage point higher than Capelle aan den IJssel (50%)
Dutch origin
57%
▲1 percentage point higher than Capelle aan den IJssel (56%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
43%
▲1 percentage point higher than Capelle aan den IJssel (42%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
18%
▲1 percentage point higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2014
+16%
▲higher than Capelle aan den IJssel (+5%)
Turnout, municipality of Capelle aan den IJssel
69%
▼9 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+12%
▲higher than Capelle aan den IJssel (+4%)
Aged 45 to 65
24%
▼1 percentage point lower than Capelle aan den IJssel (25%)
Never married
51%
▲1 percentage point higher than Capelle aan den IJssel (50%)
Dutch origin
57%
▲1 percentage point higher than Capelle aan den IJssel (56%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
43%
▲1 percentage point higher than Capelle aan den IJssel (42%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
18%
▲1 percentage point higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population grew 16% between 2014 and 2026, to 6,570.
Residents, 2026
6,570
+16% since 2014
Capelle aan den IJssel +5%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 2,679 residents per km², this wijk is 45% less densely populated than the municipality of Capelle aan den IJssel.
Residents per km²2,679
Dwellings per km²1,201.2
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, 11.0 children were born per 1,000 residents; 5.5 died per 1,000.
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
24% of residents are between 45 and 65.
0 to 151,060
15 to 25920
25 to 451,460
45 to 651,605
65 to 801,180
80 and over350
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
51% of residents are never married.
Never married3,375
Married2,280
Divorced630
Widowed285
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
57% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands3,740
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)540
Outside Europe2,290
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Education level of residents aged 15 to 75
43% of residents have a havo, vwo or mbo2-4 level education.
Primary, vmbo, mbo11,310
Havo, vwo, mbo2-42,020
Higher professional, university1,400
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2024
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Capelle aan den IJssel; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 69% of eligible voters in Capelle aan den IJssel voted. The largest party was PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) with 18% of the valid votes.
Municipality of Capelle aan den IJsselThe Netherlands
D66
15.5%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
17.7%
16.7%
VVD
12.4%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
11.4%
12.8%
CDA
9.9%
11.8%
JA21
8.5%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
4.6%
4.5%
BBB
1.1%
2.6%
Other
18.8%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
Schenkel has an average of 0.9 cars per household, about the same as in Capelle aan den IJssel (0.9). 21% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 1 percentage point less than in Capelle aan den IJssel (22%).
Key figures
Industry and energy, share of businesses
9%
▼4 percentage points lower than Capelle aan den IJssel (13%)
Financial services and real estate, share of businesses
6%
▲1 percentage point higher than Capelle aan den IJssel (5%)
Business services, share of businesses
25%
▼2 percentage points lower than Capelle aan den IJssel (27%)
Cars per household (2025)
0.9
=about the same as Capelle aan den IJssel (0.9)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
21%
▼1 percentage point lower than Capelle aan den IJssel (22%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2014
+11 pp
▲higher than Capelle aan den IJssel (+7 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
87%
▼3 percentage points lower than Capelle aan den IJssel (90%)
Office, share of addresses
1%
▼1 percentage point lower than Capelle aan den IJssel (2%)
Industrial, share of addresses
0%
▼1 percentage point lower than Capelle aan den IJssel (1%)
Private rent
8%
▼6 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Social housing
43%
▲15 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (28%)
Multi-family dwellings
55%
▲18 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (37%)
Industry and energy, share of businesses
9%
▼4 percentage points lower than Capelle aan den IJssel (13%)
Financial services and real estate, share of businesses
6%
▲1 percentage point higher than Capelle aan den IJssel (5%)
Business services, share of businesses
25%
▼2 percentage points lower than Capelle aan den IJssel (27%)
Cars per household (2025)
0.9
=about the same as Capelle aan den IJssel (0.9)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
21%
▼1 percentage point lower than Capelle aan den IJssel (22%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2014
+11 pp
▲higher than Capelle aan den IJssel (+7 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
87%
▼3 percentage points lower than Capelle aan den IJssel (90%)
Office, share of addresses
1%
▼1 percentage point lower than Capelle aan den IJssel (2%)
Industrial, share of addresses
0%
▼1 percentage point lower than Capelle aan den IJssel (1%)
Private rent
8%
▼6 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Social housing
43%
▲15 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (28%)
Multi-family dwellings
55%
▲18 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (37%)
Business establishments by sector
Zakelijke dienstverlening is the largest sector, with 220 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij5
Nijverheid en energie80
Handel en horeca150
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie80
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed55
Zakelijke dienstverlening220
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg185
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten90
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
21% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 22% in the municipality of Capelle aan den IJssel (2025).
Petrol79.4%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)20.6%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 10% to 21% between 2014 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
21%▼ 1 percentage point below Capelle aan den IJssel (22%)
+11 pp since 2014
Capelle aan den IJssel +7 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 2,600 passenger cars and 135 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars2,600
Motorcycles135
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
87% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is retail (2%).
Residential87%
Retail1.6%
Office1.3%
Assembly0.8%
Healthcare1%
Industrial0.3%
Education0.1%
Sports0.3%
Other9.4%
Explanation
Based on 3,440 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
2,679 residents per km²: 5.0 times as densely populated as the Dutch average.
This areaThe Netherlands
Residents per km²2,679
NL 539▲ +397% vs NL
Private rent8%
NL 14%▼ −43% vs NL
Social housing43%
NL 28%▲ +54% vs NL
Multi-family dwellings55%
NL 37%▲ +49% vs NL
Single-family dwellings45%
NL 63%▼ −29% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026