The average WOZ value in Verspreide huizen Rijswijk is €559,000, 18% higher than in Buren (€473,000). Between 2021 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 22%, against a rise of 37% in Buren. 82% of the homes are owner-occupied, 7 percentage points more than in Buren (75%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€559,000
▲18% higher than Buren (€473,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+22%
▼lower than Buren (+37%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
82%
▲7 percentage points higher than Buren (75%)
Social housing
0%
▼19 percentage points lower than Buren (19%)
Private rent
18%
▲12 percentage points higher than Buren (6%)
Single-family dwellings
91%
▼1 percentage point lower than Buren (92%)
Built 1975–1991
7%
▼13 percentage points lower than Buren (20%)
Built 1992–2005
4%
▼11 percentage points lower than Buren (15%)
Built 1945–1964
23%
▲12 percentage points higher than Buren (11%)
Average WOZ value
€559,000
▲18% higher than Buren (€473,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+22%
▼lower than Buren (+37%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
82%
▲7 percentage points higher than Buren (75%)
Social housing
0%
▼19 percentage points lower than Buren (19%)
Private rent
18%
▲12 percentage points higher than Buren (6%)
Single-family dwellings
91%
▼1 percentage point lower than Buren (92%)
Built 1975–1991
7%
▼13 percentage points lower than Buren (20%)
Built 1992–2005
4%
▼11 percentage points lower than Buren (15%)
Built 1945–1964
23%
▲12 percentage points higher than Buren (11%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 22% between 2021 and 2025, to €559,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€559,000▲ 18% above Buren
+22% since 2021
Buren +37%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€416 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€416/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
210 m² · measured buurt average
WOZ €559,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€130NL median
Property tax (OZB)€58€49
Water board levy€48–
Sewage levy€24€22
Waste levy not included: a joint body (in Rivierenland, Avri) raises it on Buren's behalf, not the gemeente itself. Not counted in the total.
Costs to set aside€286
Maintenance reserve€267–
Buildings insurance€19–
Model estimates, not bills.
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 210 m² (measured average in this buurt) with the average WOZ value here, €559,000.
Levies: Buren's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Verspreide huizen Rijswijk has the 3rd-highest WOZ value of the 7 buurten in Maurik.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €559,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Verspreide huizen Rijswijk
559,000
82
–
Maurik
403,000
1,412
–
Rijswijk
418,000
157
–
Eck en Wiel
419,000
413
–
Ganzert
666,000
80
–
Verspreide huizen Maurik
511,000
522
–
Verspreide huizen Eck en Wiel
594,000
257
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 82% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied82%
Private rent18%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
91% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes91%
Multi-family homes9%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
46% of dwellings were built before 1945, against 18% in the municipality of Buren.
Before 194545.8%
1945-196422.9%
1965-19749.6%
1975-19917.2%
1992-20053.6%
2006-20154.8%
2016 and later6%
Explanation
Based on 83 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
Too few residents for a rate per resident: these are counts.
Verspreide huizen Rijswijk has too few residents for a reliable rate per 1,000 residents (under 200), so counts are shown instead of a comparison. In 2025, 5 crimes were registered, against 9 in 2021. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Registered crimes, 2025
5
▼down from 9 in 2021
Home burglary
1
2023–2025
Registered crimes, 2025
5
▼down from 9 in 2021
Home burglary
1
2023–2025
Registered crime per year
5 crimes were registered in Verspreide huizen Rijswijk in 2025 (9 in 2021).
Registered crimes, 2025
5
down from 9 in 2021
Explanation
Too few residents for a reliable per-1,000 figure (threshold 200) — registered crime, not all crime — CBS/Politie 47018NED.
The largest category in Verspreide huizen Rijswijk is 'Theft and burglary': 5 in 2025.
Theft and burglary5
Vandalism and public order0
Violence and threats0
Fraud and scams0
Traffic0
Environmental0
Other and withheld0
Explanation
Too few residents for a reliable per-1,000 figure (threshold 200). Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2024, police in Verspreide huizen Rijswijk registered 3 traffic accidents, of which 1 with injury and none fatal.
2022
2023
2024
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2024
03 · Living environment
Residents rate their health above the Buren average; green space is above the Buren average.
An estimated 81% of adults in Verspreide huizen Rijswijk rate their own health as good, 5 percentage points more than in Buren. Fewer adults feel lonely (32% against 40%), fewer report anxiety or depression (36% against 42%) and fewer are overweight (50% against 54%), but more meet the physical activity guideline (47% against 43%). Agricultural land is the largest land use in Verspreide huizen Rijswijk, covering 59% of the area, against 77% in Buren. Green space such as parks, sports fields, forest and nature covers 18% of the area, 10 percentage points above the 8% in Buren.
Key figures
Self-rated health (estimated)
81%
▲5 percentage points higher than Buren (76%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
18%
▲10 percentage points higher than Buren (8%)
More figures
Lonely
32%
▼8 percentage points lower than Buren (40%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
36%
▼6 percentage points lower than Buren (42%)
Overweight
50%
▼4 percentage points lower than Buren (54%)
Meets physical activity guideline
47%
▲4 percentage points higher than Buren (43%)
Agriculture, share of the area
59%
▼18 percentage points lower than Buren (77%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
18%
▲13 percentage points higher than Buren (5%)
Water, share of the area
19%
▲12 percentage points higher than Buren (7%)
Self-rated health (estimated)
81%
▲5 percentage points higher than Buren (76%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
18%
▲10 percentage points higher than Buren (8%)
More figures
Lonely
32%
▼8 percentage points lower than Buren (40%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
36%
▼6 percentage points lower than Buren (42%)
Overweight
50%
▼4 percentage points lower than Buren (54%)
Meets physical activity guideline
47%
▲4 percentage points higher than Buren (43%)
Agriculture, share of the area
59%
▼18 percentage points lower than Buren (77%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
18%
▲13 percentage points higher than Buren (5%)
Water, share of the area
19%
▲12 percentage points higher than Buren (7%)
Health
An estimated 81% of adults rate their own health as good, against 76% in the municipality of Buren (2024).
This areaThe municipality of Buren
Good self-rated health
81%
75.7%
Smokes
12%
15%
Excessive drinking
5.3%
5.3%
Overweight
49.5%
54%
Lonely
31.7%
39.5%
Anxiety or depression feelings
35.8%
42.2%
Meets physical activity guideline
47.4%
43.3%
Explanation
An RIVM model estimate (small-area estimation from the 2024 Health Monitor for Adults and Elderly), not a direct tabulation — even a buurt that was not itself surveyed gets an estimate. Figures cover adults aged 18 and over.
Source: RIVM/CBS Gezondheidsmonitor Volwassenen en Ouderen (kleine-gebieden-schatting) 2024
Land use
18% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 8% in the municipality of Buren.
Traffic1.9%
Built-up2.7%
Agriculture58.5%
Forest and nature17.7%
Water19.2%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
Distance to amenities
A primary school lies here at an average road distance of 1300 m.
Distance
Value
Large supermarket
4,000 m
–
GP practice
4,100 m
–
Primary school
1,300 m
–
Daycare
2,600 m
–
Large supermarkets
–
0
GP practices
–
0
Daycares
–
0
Explanation
Average road distance from every address in this buurt to the nearest amenity, and the average count within 1 km — a buurt average, not a distance from one address.
Source: CBS proximity statistics 2025
04 · Residents
The population is growing slower than the Buren average.
Verspreide huizen Rijswijk has 195 inhabitants (2026), or 50 per km² (76% lower than in Buren). In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Buren was 85%, 7 percentage points above the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) had the highest share there: 23% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2021
+3%
▼lower than Buren (+4%)
Turnout, municipality of Buren
85%
▲7 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+6%
▲higher than Buren (+3%)
Aged 45 to 65
38%
▲8 percentage points higher than Buren (30%)
Married
50%
▲5 percentage points higher than Buren (45%)
Dutch origin
95%
▲7 percentage points higher than Buren (88%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
55%
▲12 percentage points higher than Buren (43%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
23%
▲6 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2021
+3%
▼lower than Buren (+4%)
Turnout, municipality of Buren
85%
▲7 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+6%
▲higher than Buren (+3%)
Aged 45 to 65
38%
▲8 percentage points higher than Buren (30%)
Married
50%
▲5 percentage points higher than Buren (45%)
Dutch origin
95%
▲7 percentage points higher than Buren (88%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
55%
▲12 percentage points higher than Buren (43%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
23%
▲6 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population grew 3% between 2021 and 2026, to 195.
Residents, 2026
195
+3% since 2021
Buren +4%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 50 residents per km², this buurt is 76% less densely populated than the municipality of Buren.
Residents per km²50
Dwellings per km²21.4
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, almost no children were born; almost no one died.
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
38% of residents are between 45 and 65.
0 to 1520
15 to 2525
25 to 4530
45 to 6575
65 to 8045
80 and over5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
50% of residents are married.
Never married70
Married95
Divorced15
Widowed10
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
95% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands180
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)5
Outside Europe5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Education level of residents aged 15 to 75
55% of residents have a havo, vwo or mbo2-4 level education.
Primary, vmbo, mbo150
Havo, vwo, mbo2-460
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2024
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Buren; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 85% of eligible voters in Buren voted. The largest party was PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) with 23% of the valid votes.
Municipality of BurenThe Netherlands
D66
12%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
23.3%
16.7%
VVD
18%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
7.1%
12.8%
CDA
10%
11.8%
JA21
7.3%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
5.9%
4.5%
BBB
4.2%
2.6%
Other
12.2%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
Verspreide huizen Rijswijk has an average of 1.6 cars per household, 14% higher than in Buren (1.4). 29% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 4 percentage points more than in Buren (25%).
Key figures
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
9%
▼8 percentage points lower than Buren (17%)
Financial services and real estate, share of businesses
9%
▲4 percentage points higher than Buren (5%)
Business services, share of businesses
27%
▲3 percentage points higher than Buren (24%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.6
▲14% higher than Buren (1.4)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
29%
▲4 percentage points higher than Buren (25%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
0 pp
▼lower than Buren (+4 pp)
Industrial, share of addresses
15%
▲8 percentage points higher than Buren (7%)
Lodging, share of addresses
1%
▼3 percentage points lower than Buren (4%)
Residential, share of addresses
89%
▲1 percentage point higher than Buren (88%)
Multi-family dwellings
9%
▼28 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (37%)
Single-family dwellings
91%
▲28 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Owner-occupied dwellings
82%
▲25 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (57%)
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
9%
▼8 percentage points lower than Buren (17%)
Financial services and real estate, share of businesses
9%
▲4 percentage points higher than Buren (5%)
Business services, share of businesses
27%
▲3 percentage points higher than Buren (24%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.6
▲14% higher than Buren (1.4)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
29%
▲4 percentage points higher than Buren (25%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
0 pp
▼lower than Buren (+4 pp)
Industrial, share of addresses
15%
▲8 percentage points higher than Buren (7%)
Lodging, share of addresses
1%
▼3 percentage points lower than Buren (4%)
Residential, share of addresses
89%
▲1 percentage point higher than Buren (88%)
Multi-family dwellings
9%
▼28 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (37%)
Single-family dwellings
91%
▲28 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Owner-occupied dwellings
82%
▲25 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (57%)
Business establishments by sector
Zakelijke dienstverlening is the largest sector, with 15 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij5
Nijverheid en energie10
Handel en horeca5
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie5
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed5
Zakelijke dienstverlening15
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg5
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
29% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 25% in the municipality of Buren (2025).
Petrol70.8%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)29.2%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 29% to 29% between 2021 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
29%▲ 4 percentage points above Buren (25%)
+0 pp since 2021
Buren +5 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 120 passenger cars and 10 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars120
Motorcycles10
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
89% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is industrial (15%).
Residential89.2%
Retail1.1%
Office1.1%
Assembly1.1%
Healthcare1.1%
Industrial15.1%
Lodging1.1%
Other4.3%
Explanation
Based on 93 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
50 residents per km²: 91% less densely populated than the Dutch average.
This areaThe Netherlands
Residents per km²50
NL 539▼ −91% vs NL
Multi-family dwellings9%
NL 37%▼ −76% vs NL
Single-family dwellings91%
NL 63%▲ +44% vs NL
Owner-occupied dwellings82%
NL 57%▲ +44% vs NL
Average WOZ value€559,000
NL €398,000▲ +41% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026