The population is growing slower than in Buren. Homes cost less than the average in the municipality of Buren, and registered crime per resident is higher.
The average WOZ value in Rijswijk is €418,000, 12% lower than in Buren (€473,000). Between 2021 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 43%, against a rise of 37% in Buren. 60% of the homes are owner-occupied, 15 percentage points less than in Buren (75%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€418,000
▼12% lower than Buren (€473,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+43%
▲higher than Buren (+37%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
60%
▼15 percentage points lower than Buren (75%)
Social housing
35%
▲16 percentage points higher than Buren (19%)
Private rent
5%
▼1 percentage point lower than Buren (6%)
Single-family dwellings
95%
▲3 percentage points higher than Buren (92%)
Built 1945–1964
22%
▲11 percentage points higher than Buren (11%)
Built 2006–2015
1%
▼8 percentage points lower than Buren (9%)
Built 2016 and later
1%
▼8 percentage points lower than Buren (9%)
Average WOZ value
€418,000
▼12% lower than Buren (€473,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+43%
▲higher than Buren (+37%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
60%
▼15 percentage points lower than Buren (75%)
Social housing
35%
▲16 percentage points higher than Buren (19%)
Private rent
5%
▼1 percentage point lower than Buren (6%)
Single-family dwellings
95%
▲3 percentage points higher than Buren (92%)
Built 1945–1964
22%
▲11 percentage points higher than Buren (11%)
Built 2006–2015
1%
▼8 percentage points lower than Buren (9%)
Built 2016 and later
1%
▼8 percentage points lower than Buren (9%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 43% between 2021 and 2025, to €418,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€418,000▼ 12% below Buren
+43% since 2021
Buren +37%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€315 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€315/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
150 m² · measured buurt average
WOZ €418,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€111NL median
Water board levy€44–
Property tax (OZB)€43€37
Sewage levy€24€22
Waste levy not included: a joint body (in Rivierenland, Avri) raises it on Buren's behalf, not the gemeente itself. Not counted in the total.
Costs to set aside€204
Maintenance reserve€191–
Buildings insurance€13–
Model estimates, not bills.
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 150 m² (measured average in this buurt) with the average WOZ value here, €418,000.
Levies: Buren's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Rijswijk has the 2nd-lowest WOZ value of the 7 buurten in Maurik.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €418,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Rijswijk
418,000
157
–
Maurik
403,000
1,412
–
Eck en Wiel
419,000
413
–
Ganzert
666,000
80
–
Verspreide huizen Rijswijk
559,000
82
–
Verspreide huizen Maurik
511,000
522
–
Verspreide huizen Eck en Wiel
594,000
257
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 60% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied60%
Social housing35%
Private rent5%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
95% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes95%
Multi-family homes5%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
24% of dwellings were built between 1975 and 1991, against 20% in the municipality of Buren.
Before 194521.7%
1945-196422.3%
1965-197416.6%
1975-199123.6%
1992-200514%
2006-20151.3%
2016 and later0.6%
Explanation
Based on 157 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
More registered crime per resident than the Buren average.
In 2025, 37 crimes per 1,000 residents were registered in Rijswijk, 68% higher than in Buren (22). Since 2021 the registered rate per 1,000 residents rose 315%, against a fall of 15% in Buren. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
37
▲68% higher than Buren (22)
Change since 2021
+315%
▲higher than Buren (-15%)
Home burglary
1
2023–2025
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
37
▲68% higher than Buren (22)
Change since 2021
+315%
▲higher than Buren (-15%)
Home burglary
1
2023–2025
Registered crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
In 2025, Rijswijk registered 37 crimes per 1,000 residents, against 22 in the municipality of Buren.
Rijswijk37
The municipality of Buren22
Explanation
Crime is counted where it happens and divided by the number of residents, so places with many visitors — city centres, nightlife, stations — score higher.
The largest category in Rijswijk is 'Vandalism and public order': 19.7 per 1,000 residents in 2025, against 2.8 in the municipality of Buren.
RijswijkBuren
Vandalism and public order19.7
Buren 2.8▲ +604% vs Buren
Violence and threats11.3
Buren 2.7▲ +319% vs Buren
Theft and burglary5.6
Buren 6.6▼ −15% vs Buren
Fraud and scams0.0
Buren 3.3▼ −100% vs Buren
Traffic0.0
Buren 5.4▼ −100% vs Buren
Environmental0.0
Buren 0.1≈ Buren
Other and withheld0.0
Buren 1.0▼ −100% vs Buren
Explanation
Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2023, police in Rijswijk registered 4 traffic accidents, of which 0 with injury and none fatal.
2023
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2023
03 · Living environment
Residents rate their health below the Buren average; green space is above the Buren average.
An estimated 73% of adults in Rijswijk rate their own health as good, 3 percentage points less than in Buren. More adults are overweight (58% against 54%), more smoke (16% against 15%), more drink excessively (6% against 5%) and more feel lonely (41% against 40%). Agricultural land is the largest land use in Rijswijk, covering 45% of the area, against 77% in Buren. Green space such as parks, sports fields, forest and nature covers 16% of the area, 8 percentage points above the 8% in Buren.
Key figures
Self-rated health (estimated)
73%
▼3 percentage points lower than Buren (76%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
16%
▲8 percentage points higher than Buren (8%)
More figures
Overweight
58%
▲4 percentage points higher than Buren (54%)
Lonely
41%
▲1 percentage point higher than Buren (40%)
Smokes
16%
▲1 percentage point higher than Buren (15%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
43%
▲1 percentage point higher than Buren (42%)
Agriculture, share of the area
45%
▼32 percentage points lower than Buren (77%)
Built-up, share of the area
32%
▲27 percentage points higher than Buren (5%)
Water, share of the area
0%
▼7 percentage points lower than Buren (7%)
Self-rated health (estimated)
73%
▼3 percentage points lower than Buren (76%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
16%
▲8 percentage points higher than Buren (8%)
More figures
Overweight
58%
▲4 percentage points higher than Buren (54%)
Lonely
41%
▲1 percentage point higher than Buren (40%)
Smokes
16%
▲1 percentage point higher than Buren (15%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
43%
▲1 percentage point higher than Buren (42%)
Agriculture, share of the area
45%
▼32 percentage points lower than Buren (77%)
Built-up, share of the area
32%
▲27 percentage points higher than Buren (5%)
Water, share of the area
0%
▼7 percentage points lower than Buren (7%)
Health
An estimated 73% of adults rate their own health as good, against 76% in the municipality of Buren (2024).
This areaThe municipality of Buren
Good self-rated health
72.8%
75.7%
Smokes
15.8%
15%
Excessive drinking
5.8%
5.3%
Overweight
58%
54%
Lonely
41.1%
39.5%
Anxiety or depression feelings
42.8%
42.2%
Meets physical activity guideline
43.2%
43.3%
Explanation
An RIVM model estimate (small-area estimation from the 2024 Health Monitor for Adults and Elderly), not a direct tabulation — even a buurt that was not itself surveyed gets an estimate. Figures cover adults aged 18 and over.
Source: RIVM/CBS Gezondheidsmonitor Volwassenen en Ouderen (kleine-gebieden-schatting) 2024
Land use
16% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 8% in the municipality of Buren.
Traffic6.5%
Built-up32.3%
Recreation9.7%
Agriculture45.2%
Forest and nature6.5%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
Distance to amenities
A primary school lies here at an average road distance of 200 m.
Distance
Value
Large supermarket
3,700 m
–
GP practice
3,600 m
–
Primary school
200 m
–
Daycare
2,000 m
–
Large supermarkets
–
0
GP practices
–
0
Daycares
–
0
Explanation
Average road distance from every address in this buurt to the nearest amenity, and the average count within 1 km — a buurt average, not a distance from one address.
Source: CBS proximity statistics 2025
04 · Residents
The population is growing slower than the Buren average.
Rijswijk has 345 inhabitants (2026), or 1,137 per km² (5.4 times as high as in Buren). Between 2021 and 2026 the population rose 1%, against a rise of 4% in Buren. In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Buren was 85%, 7 percentage points above the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) had the highest share there: 23% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2021
+1%
▼lower than Buren (+4%)
Turnout, municipality of Buren
85%
▲7 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+1%
▼lower than Buren (+3%)
Aged 45 to 65
32%
▲2 percentage points higher than Buren (30%)
Married
45%
=about the same as Buren (45%)
Dutch origin
88%
=about the same as Buren (88%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
48%
▲5 percentage points higher than Buren (43%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
23%
▲6 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2021
+1%
▼lower than Buren (+4%)
Turnout, municipality of Buren
85%
▲7 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+1%
▼lower than Buren (+3%)
Aged 45 to 65
32%
▲2 percentage points higher than Buren (30%)
Married
45%
=about the same as Buren (45%)
Dutch origin
88%
=about the same as Buren (88%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
48%
▲5 percentage points higher than Buren (43%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
23%
▲6 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population grew 1% between 2021 and 2026, to 345.
Residents, 2026
345
+1% since 2021
Buren +4%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 1,137 residents per km², this buurt is 5.4 times as densely populated as the municipality of Buren.
Residents per km²1,137
Dwellings per km²523.3
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, almost no children were born; almost no one died.
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
32% of residents are between 45 and 65.
0 to 1550
15 to 2525
25 to 4560
45 to 65110
65 to 8075
80 and over20
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
45% of residents are married.
Never married140
Married155
Divorced30
Widowed20
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
88% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands305
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)15
Outside Europe25
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Education level of residents aged 15 to 75
48% of residents have a havo, vwo or mbo2-4 level education.
Primary, vmbo, mbo160
Havo, vwo, mbo2-4120
Higher professional, university70
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2024
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Buren; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 85% of eligible voters in Buren voted. The largest party was PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) with 23% of the valid votes.
Municipality of BurenThe Netherlands
D66
12%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
23.3%
16.7%
VVD
18%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
7.1%
12.8%
CDA
10%
11.8%
JA21
7.3%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
5.9%
4.5%
BBB
4.2%
2.6%
Other
12.2%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
Rijswijk has an average of 1.3 cars per household, 7% lower than in Buren (1.4). 22% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 3 percentage points less than in Buren (25%).
Key figures
Government, education and care, share of businesses
25%
▲12 percentage points higher than Buren (13%)
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
0%
▼9 percentage points lower than Buren (9%)
Transport, information and communication, share of businesses
12%
▲6 percentage points higher than Buren (6%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.3
▼7% lower than Buren (1.4)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
22%
▼3 percentage points lower than Buren (25%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+1 pp
▼lower than Buren (+4 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
94%
▲6 percentage points higher than Buren (88%)
Industrial, share of addresses
1%
▼6 percentage points lower than Buren (7%)
Lodging, share of addresses
1%
▼3 percentage points lower than Buren (4%)
Private rent
5%
▼9 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Residents per km²
1,137
▲2.1 times as high as the Netherlands (539)
Single-family dwellings
95%
▲32 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Government, education and care, share of businesses
25%
▲12 percentage points higher than Buren (13%)
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
0%
▼9 percentage points lower than Buren (9%)
Transport, information and communication, share of businesses
12%
▲6 percentage points higher than Buren (6%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.3
▼7% lower than Buren (1.4)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
22%
▼3 percentage points lower than Buren (25%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+1 pp
▼lower than Buren (+4 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
94%
▲6 percentage points higher than Buren (88%)
Industrial, share of addresses
1%
▼6 percentage points lower than Buren (7%)
Lodging, share of addresses
1%
▼3 percentage points lower than Buren (4%)
Private rent
5%
▼9 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Residents per km²
1,137
▲2.1 times as high as the Netherlands (539)
Single-family dwellings
95%
▲32 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Business establishments by sector
Zakelijke dienstverlening is the largest sector, with 10 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij0
Nijverheid en energie5
Handel en horeca5
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie5
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed0
Zakelijke dienstverlening10
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg10
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
22% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 25% in the municipality of Buren (2025).
Petrol78%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)22%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 21% to 22% between 2021 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
22%▼ 3 percentage points below Buren (25%)
+1 pp since 2021
Buren +5 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 205 passenger cars and 30 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars205
Motorcycles30
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
94% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is assembly (2%).
Residential94%
Office0.6%
Assembly1.8%
Industrial1.2%
Lodging0.6%
Education0.6%
Sports0.6%
Other1.8%
Explanation
Based on 167 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
5% multi-family dwellings, against 37% nationally.
This areaThe Netherlands
Multi-family dwellings5%
NL 37%▼ −86% vs NL
Private rent5%
NL 14%▼ −64% vs NL
Residents per km²1,137
NL 539▲ +111% vs NL
Single-family dwellings95%
NL 63%▲ +51% vs NL
Social housing35%
NL 28%▲ +25% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025