The average WOZ value in Industrieterrein ' 't Stoom ' is €537,000, 13% higher than in Bergeijk (€477,000). Between 2021 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 39%, against a rise of 38% in Bergeijk. 79% of the homes are owner-occupied, 1 percentage point more than in Bergeijk (78%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€537,000
▲13% higher than Bergeijk (€477,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+39%
=about the same as Bergeijk (+38%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
79%
▲1 percentage point higher than Bergeijk (78%)
Social housing
4%
▼9 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (13%)
Private rent
17%
▲8 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (9%)
Single-family dwellings
89%
▲3 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (86%)
Built before 1945
23%
▲14 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (9%)
Built 1965–1974
8%
▼12 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (20%)
Built 1992–2005
6%
▼5 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (11%)
Average WOZ value
€537,000
▲13% higher than Bergeijk (€477,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+39%
=about the same as Bergeijk (+38%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
79%
▲1 percentage point higher than Bergeijk (78%)
Social housing
4%
▼9 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (13%)
Private rent
17%
▲8 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (9%)
Single-family dwellings
89%
▲3 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (86%)
Built before 1945
23%
▲14 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (9%)
Built 1965–1974
8%
▼12 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (20%)
Built 1992–2005
6%
▼5 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (11%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 39% between 2021 and 2025, to €537,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€537,000▲ 13% above Bergeijk
+39% since 2021
Bergeijk +38%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€439 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€439/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
230 m² · measured buurt average
WOZ €537,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€125NL median
Water board levy€47–
Property tax (OZB)€33€47
Waste levy€23€27
Sewage levy€22€22
Costs to set aside€314
Maintenance reserve€293–
Buildings insurance€21–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Bergeijk's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 15th of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 230 m² (measured average in this buurt) with the average WOZ value here, €537,000.
Levies: Bergeijk's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Industrieterrein ' 't Stoom ' has the 6th-highest WOZ value of the 17 buurten in Bergeijk 't Hof.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €537,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Industrieterrein ' 't Stoom '
537,000
53
–
Broekstraat-Hoek-Lijnt-Eijkereind
566,000
184
–
Kleine Broekstraat
566,000
67
–
Jeruzalem
373,000
543
–
Burgemeester Magneestraat e.o.
434,000
193
–
Dokter A.Hoynck v. Papendrechtstraat-Dok
390,000
322
–
Kept e.o.
375,000
437
–
Hof
342,000
155
–
Meester Pankenstraat-Riethovensedijk
385,000
203
–
Bucht e.o.
694,000
97
–
Schutsboom e.o.
452,000
290
–
Eerselsedijk-Woonbos e.o.
960,000
150
–
Van den Valgaetstraat e.o.
385,000
170
–
Hagelkruis e.o.
412,000
512
–
Beistervelden
374,000
386
–
De Kabouterberg e.o.
516,000
103
–
Eikenberg-Hooge Berkt
552,000
105
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 79% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied79%
Social housing4%
Private rent17%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
89% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes89%
Multi-family homes11%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
36% of dwellings were built between 1945 and 1964, against 15% in the municipality of Bergeijk.
Before 194522.6%
1945-196435.8%
1965-19747.5%
1975-199128.3%
1992-20055.7%
Explanation
Based on 53 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
Too few residents for a rate per resident: these are counts.
Industrieterrein ' 't Stoom ' has too few residents for a reliable rate per 1,000 residents (under 200), so counts are shown instead of a comparison. In 2025, 5 crimes were registered, against 12 in 2021. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Registered crimes, 2025
5
▼down from 12 in 2021
Home burglary
1
2023–2025
Registered crimes, 2025
5
▼down from 12 in 2021
Home burglary
1
2023–2025
Registered crime per year
5 crimes were registered in Industrieterrein ' 't Stoom ' in 2025 (12 in 2021).
Registered crimes, 2025
5
down from 12 in 2021
Explanation
Too few residents for a reliable per-1,000 figure (threshold 200) — registered crime, not all crime — CBS/Politie 47018NED.
The largest category in Industrieterrein ' 't Stoom ' is 'Theft and burglary': 4 in 2025.
Theft and burglary4
Vandalism and public order1
Violence and threats0
Fraud and scams0
Traffic0
Environmental0
Other and withheld0
Explanation
Too few residents for a reliable per-1,000 figure (threshold 200). Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2024, police in Industrieterrein ' 't Stoom ' registered 2 traffic accidents, of which 0 with injury and none fatal.
2021
2023
2024
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2024
03 · Living environment
Residents rate their health above the Bergeijk average; green space is below the Bergeijk average.
An estimated 79% of adults in Industrieterrein ' 't Stoom ' rate their own health as good, 3 percentage points more than in Bergeijk. More adults smoke (16% against 12%), more meet the physical activity guideline (51% against 47%), more drink excessively (8% against 6%) and more feel lonely (44% against 42%). Built-up land is the largest land use in Industrieterrein ' 't Stoom ', covering 98% of the area, against 7% in Bergeijk.
Key figures
Self-rated health (estimated)
79%
▲3 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (76%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
0%
▼31 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (31%)
More figures
Meets physical activity guideline
51%
▲4 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (47%)
Smokes
16%
▲4 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (12%)
Excessive drinking
8%
▲2 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (6%)
Lonely
44%
▲2 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (42%)
Built-up, share of the area
98%
▲91 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (7%)
Agriculture, share of the area
0%
▼60 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (60%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
0%
▼28 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (28%)
Self-rated health (estimated)
79%
▲3 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (76%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
0%
▼31 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (31%)
More figures
Meets physical activity guideline
51%
▲4 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (47%)
Smokes
16%
▲4 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (12%)
Excessive drinking
8%
▲2 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (6%)
Lonely
44%
▲2 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (42%)
Built-up, share of the area
98%
▲91 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (7%)
Agriculture, share of the area
0%
▼60 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (60%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
0%
▼28 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (28%)
Health
An estimated 79% of adults rate their own health as good, against 76% in the municipality of Bergeijk (2024).
This areaThe municipality of Bergeijk
Good self-rated health
79.3%
76%
Smokes
16.5%
12.3%
Excessive drinking
8.5%
6.1%
Overweight
52.2%
52.5%
Lonely
44.5%
42.3%
Anxiety or depression feelings
41%
41.4%
Meets physical activity guideline
51.3%
46.9%
Explanation
An RIVM model estimate (small-area estimation from the 2024 Health Monitor for Adults and Elderly), not a direct tabulation — even a buurt that was not itself surveyed gets an estimate. Figures cover adults aged 18 and over.
Source: RIVM/CBS Gezondheidsmonitor Volwassenen en Ouderen (kleine-gebieden-schatting) 2024
Land use
0% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 31% in the municipality of Bergeijk.
Traffic2.4%
Built-up97.6%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
Distance to amenities
A large supermarket lies here at an average road distance of 400 m.
Distance
Value
Large supermarket
400 m
–
GP practice
1,100 m
–
Primary school
900 m
–
Daycare
900 m
–
Large supermarkets
–
1.3
GP practices
–
0.3
Daycares
–
1.6
Explanation
Average road distance from every address in this buurt to the nearest amenity, and the average count within 1 km — a buurt average, not a distance from one address.
Source: CBS proximity statistics 2025
04 · Residents
The population is growing faster than the Bergeijk average.
Industrieterrein ' 't Stoom ' has 140 inhabitants (2026), or 325 per km² (69% higher than in Bergeijk). In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Bergeijk was 84%, 6 percentage points above the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) had the highest share there: 19% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2021
+8%
▲higher than Bergeijk (+4%)
Turnout, municipality of Bergeijk
84%
▲6 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+2%
▼lower than Bergeijk (+5%)
Aged 45 to 65
35%
▲7 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (28%)
Never married
52%
▲9 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (43%)
Dutch origin
86%
▲1 percentage point higher than Bergeijk (85%)
Lower education (primary, vmbo, mbo 1)
50%
▲26 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (24%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
19%
▲2 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2021
+8%
▲higher than Bergeijk (+4%)
Turnout, municipality of Bergeijk
84%
▲6 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+2%
▼lower than Bergeijk (+5%)
Aged 45 to 65
35%
▲7 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (28%)
Never married
52%
▲9 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (43%)
Dutch origin
86%
▲1 percentage point higher than Bergeijk (85%)
Lower education (primary, vmbo, mbo 1)
50%
▲26 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (24%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
19%
▲2 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population grew 8% between 2021 and 2026, to 140.
Residents, 2026
140
+8% since 2021
Bergeijk +4%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 325 residents per km², this buurt is 69% more densely populated than the municipality of Bergeijk.
Residents per km²325
Dwellings per km²126.2
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, 37.0 children were born per 1,000 residents; almost no one died.
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
35% of residents are between 45 and 65.
0 to 1515
15 to 2520
25 to 4535
45 to 6545
65 to 8015
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
52% of residents are never married.
Never married70
Married55
Divorced10
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
86% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands120
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)15
Outside Europe5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Education level of residents aged 15 to 75
50% of residents have a primary, vmbo or mbo1 level education.
Primary, vmbo, mbo150
Havo, vwo, mbo2-450
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2024
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Bergeijk; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 84% of eligible voters in Bergeijk voted. The largest party was PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) with 19% of the valid votes.
Municipality of BergeijkThe Netherlands
D66
12.9%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
19%
16.7%
VVD
18.6%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
6.8%
12.8%
CDA
18.3%
11.8%
JA21
8.9%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
4.1%
4.5%
BBB
5%
2.6%
Other
6.3%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
26% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 5 percentage points more than in Bergeijk (21%).
Key figures
Industry and energy, share of businesses
35%
▲15 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (20%)
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
0%
▼8 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (8%)
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
23%
▲7 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (16%)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
26%
▲5 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (21%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+4 pp
=about the same as Bergeijk (+5 pp)
Industrial, share of addresses
61%
▲55 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (6%)
Residential, share of addresses
34%
▼49 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (83%)
Office, share of addresses
2%
▲1 percentage point higher than Bergeijk (1%)
Multi-family dwellings
11%
▼26 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (37%)
Residents per km²
325
▼40% lower than the Netherlands (539)
Single-family dwellings
89%
▲26 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Industry and energy, share of businesses
35%
▲15 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (20%)
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
0%
▼8 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (8%)
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
23%
▲7 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (16%)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
26%
▲5 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (21%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+4 pp
=about the same as Bergeijk (+5 pp)
Industrial, share of addresses
61%
▲55 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (6%)
Residential, share of addresses
34%
▼49 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (83%)
Office, share of addresses
2%
▲1 percentage point higher than Bergeijk (1%)
Multi-family dwellings
11%
▼26 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (37%)
Residents per km²
325
▼40% lower than the Netherlands (539)
Single-family dwellings
89%
▲26 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Business establishments by sector
Nijverheid en energie is the largest sector, with 45 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij0
Nijverheid en energie45
Handel en horeca30
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie5
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed5
Zakelijke dienstverlening20
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg10
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten15
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
26% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 21% in the municipality of Bergeijk (2025).
Petrol74.5%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)25.5%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 22% to 26% between 2021 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
26%▲ 5 percentage points above Bergeijk (21%)
+4 pp since 2021
Bergeijk +4 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 235 passenger cars and 15 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars235
Motorcycles15
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
34% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is industrial (61%).
Residential34.2%
Retail2.6%
Office1.9%
Assembly0.6%
Industrial61.3%
Sports0.6%
Other4.5%
Explanation
Based on 155 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
4% social housing, against 28% nationally.
This areaThe Netherlands
Social housing4%
NL 28%▼ −86% vs NL
Multi-family dwellings11%
NL 37%▼ −70% vs NL
Residents per km²325
NL 539▼ −40% vs NL
Single-family dwellings89%
NL 63%▲ +41% vs NL
Owner-occupied dwellings79%
NL 57%▲ +39% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025