The population is shrinking, while it grows in Bergeijk. Homes cost more than the average in the municipality of Bergeijk, and registered crime per resident is lower.
The average WOZ value in De Kabouterberg e.o. is €516,000, 8% higher than in Bergeijk (€477,000). Between 2021 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 35%, against a rise of 38% in Bergeijk. 72% of the homes are owner-occupied, 6 percentage points less than in Bergeijk (78%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€516,000
▲8% higher than Bergeijk (€477,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+35%
▼lower than Bergeijk (+38%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
72%
▼6 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (78%)
Social housing
26%
▲13 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (13%)
Private rent
2%
▼7 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (9%)
Single-family dwellings
96%
▲10 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (86%)
Built 2016 and later
1%
▼10 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (11%)
Built 2006–2015
15%
▲6 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (9%)
Built 1975–1991
28%
▲3 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (25%)
Average WOZ value
€516,000
▲8% higher than Bergeijk (€477,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+35%
▼lower than Bergeijk (+38%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
72%
▼6 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (78%)
Social housing
26%
▲13 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (13%)
Private rent
2%
▼7 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (9%)
Single-family dwellings
96%
▲10 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (86%)
Built 2016 and later
1%
▼10 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (11%)
Built 2006–2015
15%
▲6 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (9%)
Built 1975–1991
28%
▲3 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (25%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 35% between 2021 and 2025, to €516,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€516,000▲ 8% above Bergeijk
+35% since 2021
Bergeijk +38%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€374 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€374/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
184 m² · measured buurt average
WOZ €516,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€123NL median
Water board levy€46–
Property tax (OZB)€32€45
Waste levy€23€27
Sewage levy€22€22
Costs to set aside€251
Maintenance reserve€234–
Buildings insurance€17–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Bergeijk's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 15th of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 184 m² (measured average in this buurt) with the average WOZ value here, €516,000.
Levies: Bergeijk's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
De Kabouterberg e.o. has the 7th-highest WOZ value of the 17 buurten in Bergeijk 't Hof.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €516,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
De Kabouterberg e.o.
516,000
103
–
Broekstraat-Hoek-Lijnt-Eijkereind
566,000
184
–
Kleine Broekstraat
566,000
67
–
Jeruzalem
373,000
543
–
Burgemeester Magneestraat e.o.
434,000
193
–
Dokter A.Hoynck v. Papendrechtstraat-Dok
390,000
322
–
Kept e.o.
375,000
437
–
Hof
342,000
155
–
Meester Pankenstraat-Riethovensedijk
385,000
203
–
Bucht e.o.
694,000
97
–
Schutsboom e.o.
452,000
290
–
Eerselsedijk-Woonbos e.o.
960,000
150
–
Van den Valgaetstraat e.o.
385,000
170
–
Hagelkruis e.o.
412,000
512
–
Beistervelden
374,000
386
–
Eikenberg-Hooge Berkt
552,000
105
–
Industrieterrein ' 't Stoom '
537,000
53
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 72% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied72%
Social housing26%
Private rent2%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
96% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes96%
Multi-family homes4%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
56% of dwellings were built between 1992 and 2005, against 11% in the municipality of Bergeijk.
1975-199128.2%
1992-200556.3%
2006-201514.6%
2016 and later1%
Explanation
Based on 103 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
Less registered crime per resident than the Bergeijk average.
In 2025, 16 crimes per 1,000 residents were registered in De Kabouterberg e.o., 27% lower than in Bergeijk (22). Since 2021 the registered rate per 1,000 residents rose 6%, against a fall of 14% in Bergeijk. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
16
▼27% lower than Bergeijk (22)
Change since 2021
+6%
▲higher than Bergeijk (-14%)
Home burglary
3
2023–2025
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
16
▼27% lower than Bergeijk (22)
Change since 2021
+6%
▲higher than Bergeijk (-14%)
Home burglary
3
2023–2025
Registered crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
In 2025, De Kabouterberg e.o. registered 16 crimes per 1,000 residents, against 22 in the municipality of Bergeijk.
De Kabouterberg e.o.16
The municipality of Bergeijk22
Explanation
Crime is counted where it happens and divided by the number of residents, so places with many visitors — city centres, nightlife, stations — score higher.
The largest category in De Kabouterberg e.o. is 'Fraud and scams': 12.0 per 1,000 residents in 2025, against 3.3 in the municipality of Bergeijk.
De Kabouterberg e.o.Bergeijk
Fraud and scams12.0
Bergeijk 3.3▲ +264% vs Bergeijk
Theft and burglary4.0
Bergeijk 10.2▼ −61% vs Bergeijk
Vandalism and public order0.0
Bergeijk 2.0▼ −100% vs Bergeijk
Violence and threats0.0
Bergeijk 2.6▼ −100% vs Bergeijk
Traffic0.0
Bergeijk 3.5▼ −100% vs Bergeijk
Environmental0.0
Bergeijk 0.0
Other and withheld0.0
Bergeijk 1.0▼ −100% vs Bergeijk
Explanation
Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
Residents rate their health above the Bergeijk average; green space is below the Bergeijk average.
An estimated 79% of adults in De Kabouterberg e.o. rate their own health as good, 3 percentage points more than in Bergeijk. Fewer adults are overweight (50% against 52%) and fewer smoke (11% against 12%), but more feel lonely (44% against 42%) and more meet the physical activity guideline (49% against 47%). Built-up land is the largest land use in De Kabouterberg e.o., covering 86% of the area, against 7% in Bergeijk. Green space such as parks, sports fields, forest and nature covers 14% of the area, 17 percentage points below the 31% in Bergeijk.
Key figures
Self-rated health (estimated)
79%
▲3 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (76%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
14%
▼17 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (31%)
More figures
Overweight
50%
▼2 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (52%)
Meets physical activity guideline
49%
▲2 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (47%)
Lonely
44%
▲2 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (42%)
Smokes
11%
▼1 percentage point lower than Bergeijk (12%)
Built-up, share of the area
86%
▲79 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (7%)
Agriculture, share of the area
0%
▼60 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (60%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
0%
▼28 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (28%)
Self-rated health (estimated)
79%
▲3 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (76%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
14%
▼17 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (31%)
More figures
Overweight
50%
▼2 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (52%)
Meets physical activity guideline
49%
▲2 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (47%)
Lonely
44%
▲2 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (42%)
Smokes
11%
▼1 percentage point lower than Bergeijk (12%)
Built-up, share of the area
86%
▲79 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (7%)
Agriculture, share of the area
0%
▼60 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (60%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
0%
▼28 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (28%)
Health
An estimated 79% of adults rate their own health as good, against 76% in the municipality of Bergeijk (2024).
This areaThe municipality of Bergeijk
Good self-rated health
78.7%
76%
Smokes
11.3%
12.3%
Excessive drinking
5.8%
6.1%
Overweight
49.6%
52.5%
Lonely
44%
42.3%
Anxiety or depression feelings
41.4%
41.4%
Meets physical activity guideline
48.8%
46.9%
Explanation
An RIVM model estimate (small-area estimation from the 2024 Health Monitor for Adults and Elderly), not a direct tabulation — even a buurt that was not itself surveyed gets an estimate. Figures cover adults aged 18 and over.
Source: RIVM/CBS Gezondheidsmonitor Volwassenen en Ouderen (kleine-gebieden-schatting) 2024
Land use
14% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 31% in the municipality of Bergeijk.
Built-up85.7%
Recreation14.3%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
Distance to amenities
A primary school lies here at an average road distance of 1000 m.
Distance
Value
Large supermarket
1,100 m
–
GP practice
1,600 m
–
Primary school
1,000 m
–
Daycare
1,000 m
–
Large supermarkets
–
0.3
GP practices
–
0
Daycares
–
0.5
Explanation
Average road distance from every address in this buurt to the nearest amenity, and the average count within 1 km — a buurt average, not a distance from one address.
Source: CBS proximity statistics 2025
04 · Residents
The population is shrinking, while it grows in Bergeijk.
De Kabouterberg e.o. has 250 inhabitants (2026), or 3,436 per km² (17.9 times as high as in Bergeijk). Between 2021 and 2026 the population fell 6%, against a rise of 4% in Bergeijk. In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Bergeijk was 84%, 6 percentage points above the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) had the highest share there: 19% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2021
-6%
▼lower than Bergeijk (+4%)
Turnout, municipality of Bergeijk
84%
▲6 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+2%
▼lower than Bergeijk (+5%)
Aged 45 to 65
38%
▲10 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (28%)
Never married
48%
▲5 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (43%)
Dutch origin
88%
▲3 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (85%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
19%
▲2 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2021
-6%
▼lower than Bergeijk (+4%)
Turnout, municipality of Bergeijk
84%
▲6 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+2%
▼lower than Bergeijk (+5%)
Aged 45 to 65
38%
▲10 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (28%)
Never married
48%
▲5 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (43%)
Dutch origin
88%
▲3 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (85%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
19%
▲2 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population shrank 6% between 2021 and 2026, to 250.
Residents, 2026
250
-6% since 2021
Bergeijk +4%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 3,436 residents per km², this buurt is 18 times as densely populated as the municipality of Bergeijk.
Residents per km²3,436
Dwellings per km²1,471.4
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, almost no children were born; almost no one died.
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
38% of residents are between 45 and 65.
0 to 1535
15 to 2540
25 to 4540
45 to 6595
65 to 8035
80 and over5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
48% of residents are never married.
Never married120
Married105
Divorced20
Widowed5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
88% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands225
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)15
Outside Europe15
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Bergeijk; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 84% of eligible voters in Bergeijk voted. The largest party was PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) with 19% of the valid votes.
Municipality of BergeijkThe Netherlands
D66
12.9%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
19%
16.7%
VVD
18.6%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
6.8%
12.8%
CDA
18.3%
11.8%
JA21
8.9%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
4.1%
4.5%
BBB
5%
2.6%
Other
6.3%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
De Kabouterberg e.o. has an average of 1.3 cars per household, 7% lower than in Bergeijk (1.4). 21% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), about the same as in Bergeijk (21%).
Key figures
Business services, share of businesses
60%
▲39 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (21%)
Government, education and care, share of businesses
0%
▼13 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (13%)
Culture, recreation and other services, share of businesses
0%
▼9 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (9%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.3
▼7% lower than Bergeijk (1.4)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
21%
=about the same as Bergeijk (21%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+6 pp
▲higher than Bergeijk (+5 pp)
Private rent
2%
▼12 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Residents per km²
3,436
▲6.4 times as high as the Netherlands (539)
Single-family dwellings
96%
▲33 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Business services, share of businesses
60%
▲39 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (21%)
Government, education and care, share of businesses
0%
▼13 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (13%)
Culture, recreation and other services, share of businesses
0%
▼9 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (9%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.3
▼7% lower than Bergeijk (1.4)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
21%
=about the same as Bergeijk (21%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+6 pp
▲higher than Bergeijk (+5 pp)
Private rent
2%
▼12 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Residents per km²
3,436
▲6.4 times as high as the Netherlands (539)
Single-family dwellings
96%
▲33 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Business establishments by sector
Zakelijke dienstverlening is the largest sector, with 15 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij0
Nijverheid en energie5
Handel en horeca5
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie0
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed0
Zakelijke dienstverlening15
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg0
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten0
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2024
Passenger cars by fuel type
21% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 21% in the municipality of Bergeijk (2025).
Petrol79.3%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)20.7%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 14% to 21% between 2021 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
21%– about the same as Bergeijk (21%)
+7 pp since 2021
Bergeijk +4 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 145 passenger cars and 20 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars145
Motorcycles20
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
99% of addresses are residential.
Residential99%
Other1%
Explanation
Based on 104 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
4% multi-family dwellings, against 37% nationally.
This areaThe Netherlands
Multi-family dwellings4%
NL 37%▼ −89% vs NL
Private rent2%
NL 14%▼ −86% vs NL
Residents per km²3,436
NL 539▲ +538% vs NL
Single-family dwellings96%
NL 63%▲ +52% vs NL
Average WOZ value€516,000
NL €398,000▲ +30% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025