Built between 1992 and 2005: 33%, against 11% in the municipality of Bergeijk.
Key figures
Built 1992–2005
33%
▲22 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (11%)
Built 2006–2015
17%
▲8 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (9%)
Built 2016 and later
17%
▲6 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (11%)
Built 1992–2005
33%
▲22 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (11%)
Built 2006–2015
17%
▲8 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (9%)
Built 2016 and later
17%
▲6 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (11%)
02 · Safety
Too few residents for a rate per resident: these are counts.
Industrieterrein 'Loonsebaan' has too few residents for a reliable rate per 1,000 residents (under 200), so counts are shown instead of a comparison. In 2025, 1 crimes were registered, against 0 in 2021. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Registered crimes, 2025
1
▲up from 0 in 2021
Home burglary
0
2023–2025
Registered crimes, 2025
1
▲up from 0 in 2021
Home burglary
0
2023–2025
Registered crime per year
1 crimes were registered in Industrieterrein 'Loonsebaan' in 2025 (0 in 2021).
Registered crimes, 2025
1
up from 0 in 2021
Explanation
Too few residents for a reliable per-1,000 figure (threshold 200) — registered crime, not all crime — CBS/Politie 47018NED.
The largest category in Industrieterrein 'Loonsebaan' is 'Theft and burglary': 1 in 2025.
Theft and burglary1
Vandalism and public order0
Violence and threats0
Fraud and scams0
Traffic0
Environmental0
Other and withheld0
Explanation
Too few residents for a reliable per-1,000 figure (threshold 200). Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
Built-up land is the largest land use in Industrieterrein 'Loonsebaan', covering 100% of the area, against 7% in Bergeijk.
Key figures
Green (parks, sport, nature)
0%
▼31 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (31%)
Built-up, share of the area
100%
▲93 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (7%)
Agriculture, share of the area
0%
▼60 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (60%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
0%
▼28 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (28%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
0%
▼31 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (31%)
Built-up, share of the area
100%
▲93 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (7%)
Agriculture, share of the area
0%
▼60 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (60%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
0%
▼28 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (28%)
Land use
0% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 31% in the municipality of Bergeijk.
Built-up100%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
Distance to amenities
A primary school lies here at an average road distance of 400 m.
Distance
Value
Large supermarket
900 m
–
GP practice
1,200 m
–
Primary school
400 m
–
Daycare
400 m
–
Large supermarkets
–
1
GP practices
–
0
Daycares
–
1
Explanation
Average road distance from every address in this buurt to the nearest amenity, and the average count within 1 km — a buurt average, not a distance from one address.
Source: CBS proximity statistics 2025
04 · Residents
The population is growing slower than the Bergeijk average.
Industrieterrein 'Loonsebaan' has 15 inhabitants (2026), or 185 per km² (4% lower than in Bergeijk). In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Bergeijk was 84%, 6 percentage points above the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) had the highest share there: 19% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2021
+0%
▼lower than Bergeijk (+4%)
Turnout, municipality of Bergeijk
84%
▲6 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+20%
▲higher than Bergeijk (+5%)
Aged 15 to 25
33%
▲22 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (11%)
Never married
50%
▲7 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (43%)
Dutch origin
100%
▲15 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (85%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
19%
▲2 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2021
+0%
▼lower than Bergeijk (+4%)
Turnout, municipality of Bergeijk
84%
▲6 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+20%
▲higher than Bergeijk (+5%)
Aged 15 to 25
33%
▲22 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (11%)
Never married
50%
▲7 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (43%)
Dutch origin
100%
▲15 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (85%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
19%
▲2 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population held steady between 2021 and 2026, at 15.
Residents, 2026
15
+0% since 2021
Bergeijk +4%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 185 residents per km², this buurt is 4% less densely populated than the municipality of Bergeijk.
Residents per km²185
Dwellings per km²75
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, almost no children were born; almost no one died.
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
33% of residents are between 15 and 25.
15 to 255
25 to 455
45 to 655
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
50% of residents are never married.
Never married5
Married5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
100% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands15
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Bergeijk; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 84% of eligible voters in Bergeijk voted. The largest party was PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) with 19% of the valid votes.
Municipality of BergeijkThe Netherlands
D66
12.9%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
19%
16.7%
VVD
18.6%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
6.8%
12.8%
CDA
18.3%
11.8%
JA21
8.9%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
4.1%
4.5%
BBB
5%
2.6%
Other
6.3%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
0% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 21 percentage points less than in Bergeijk (21%).
Key figures
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
40%
▲29 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (11%)
Industry and energy, share of businesses
10%
▼14 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (24%)
Business services, share of businesses
10%
▼8 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (18%)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
0%
▼21 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (21%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
0 pp
▼lower than Bergeijk (+5 pp)
Industrial, share of addresses
71%
▲65 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (6%)
Residential, share of addresses
29%
▼54 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (83%)
Office, share of addresses
10%
▲9 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (1%)
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
40%
▲29 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (11%)
Industry and energy, share of businesses
10%
▼14 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (24%)
Business services, share of businesses
10%
▼8 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (18%)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
0%
▼21 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (21%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
0 pp
▼lower than Bergeijk (+5 pp)
Industrial, share of addresses
71%
▲65 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (6%)
Residential, share of addresses
29%
▼54 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (83%)
Office, share of addresses
10%
▲9 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (1%)
Business establishments by sector
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij is the largest sector, with 20 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij20
Nijverheid en energie5
Handel en horeca10
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie0
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed5
Zakelijke dienstverlening5
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2017
Passenger cars by fuel type
0% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 21% in the municipality of Bergeijk (2025).
Petrol100%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 0% to 0% between 2021 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
0%▼ 21 percentage points below Bergeijk (21%)
+0 pp since 2021
Bergeijk +4 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 10 passenger cars and 0 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars10
Motorcycles0
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
29% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is industrial (71%).
Residential28.6%
Retail9.5%
Office9.5%
Assembly9.5%
Industrial71.4%
Explanation
Based on 21 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
185 residents per km²: 66% less densely populated than the Dutch average.
This areaThe Netherlands
Residents per km²185
NL 539▼ −66% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026