The average WOZ value in Dorpstraat-Sengelsbroeksestraat is €536,000, 12% higher than in Bergeijk (€477,000). Between 2021 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 33%, against a rise of 38% in Bergeijk. 93% of the homes are owner-occupied, 15 percentage points more than in Bergeijk (78%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€536,000
▲12% higher than Bergeijk (€477,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+33%
▼lower than Bergeijk (+38%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
93%
▲15 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (78%)
Social housing
0%
▼13 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (13%)
Private rent
7%
▼2 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (9%)
Single-family dwellings
86%
=about the same as Bergeijk (86%)
Built before 1945
25%
▲16 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (9%)
Built 1975–1991
15%
▼10 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (25%)
Built 2016 and later
5%
▼6 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (11%)
Average WOZ value
€536,000
▲12% higher than Bergeijk (€477,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+33%
▼lower than Bergeijk (+38%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
93%
▲15 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (78%)
Social housing
0%
▼13 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (13%)
Private rent
7%
▼2 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (9%)
Single-family dwellings
86%
=about the same as Bergeijk (86%)
Built before 1945
25%
▲16 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (9%)
Built 1975–1991
15%
▼10 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (25%)
Built 2016 and later
5%
▼6 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (11%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 33% between 2021 and 2025, to €536,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€536,000▲ 12% above Bergeijk
+33% since 2021
Bergeijk +38%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€418 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€418/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
215 m² · measured buurt average
WOZ €536,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€125NL median
Water board levy€47–
Property tax (OZB)€33€47
Waste levy€23€27
Sewage levy€22€22
Costs to set aside€293
Maintenance reserve€274–
Buildings insurance€19–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Bergeijk's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 15th of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 215 m² (measured average in this buurt) with the average WOZ value here, €536,000.
Levies: Bergeijk's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Dorpstraat-Sengelsbroeksestraat has the highest WOZ value of the 10 buurten in Luyksgestel.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €536,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Dorpstraat-Sengelsbroeksestraat
536,000
81
–
Tiliaans-Weegbree e.o.
444,000
209
–
Prins van Luikstraat e.o.
413,000
179
–
Hasselsestraat e.o.
403,000
207
–
Kerkstraat e.o.
424,000
87
–
Dorpstraat
504,000
77
–
Kapellerweg-Rijt
443,000
77
–
Molenstraat e.o.
400,000
101
–
Industrieterrein 'Loonsebaan'
320,000
6
–
Boscheind
498,000
44
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 93% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied93%
Private rent7%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
86% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes86%
Multi-family homes14%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
31% of dwellings were built between 1945 and 1964, against 15% in the municipality of Bergeijk.
Before 194524.7%
1945-196430.9%
1965-197413.6%
1975-199114.8%
1992-20057.4%
2006-20153.7%
2016 and later4.9%
Explanation
Based on 81 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
Too few residents for a rate per resident: these are counts.
Dorpstraat-Sengelsbroeksestraat has too few residents for a reliable rate per 1,000 residents (under 200), so counts are shown instead of a comparison. In 2025, 10 crimes were registered, against 4 in 2021. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Registered crimes, 2025
10
▲up from 4 in 2021
Home burglary
1
2023–2025
Registered crimes, 2025
10
▲up from 4 in 2021
Home burglary
1
2023–2025
Registered crime per year
10 crimes were registered in Dorpstraat-Sengelsbroeksestraat in 2025 (4 in 2021).
Registered crimes, 2025
10
up from 4 in 2021
Explanation
Too few residents for a reliable per-1,000 figure (threshold 200) — registered crime, not all crime — CBS/Politie 47018NED.
The largest category in Dorpstraat-Sengelsbroeksestraat is 'Violence and threats': 6 in 2025.
Violence and threats6
Theft and burglary3
Other and withheld1
Vandalism and public order0
Fraud and scams0
Traffic0
Environmental0
Explanation
Too few residents for a reliable per-1,000 figure (threshold 200). Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2023, police in Dorpstraat-Sengelsbroeksestraat registered 1 traffic accidents, of which 0 with injury and none fatal.
2020
2022
2023
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2023
03 · Living environment
Residents rate their health above the Bergeijk average; green space is below the Bergeijk average.
An estimated 79% of adults in Dorpstraat-Sengelsbroeksestraat rate their own health as good, 3 percentage points more than in Bergeijk. Fewer adults feel lonely (37% against 42%), fewer report anxiety or depression (37% against 41%) and fewer smoke (11% against 12%), but more meet the physical activity guideline (49% against 47%). Built-up land is the largest land use in Dorpstraat-Sengelsbroeksestraat, covering 53% of the area, against 7% in Bergeijk.
Key figures
Self-rated health (estimated)
79%
▲3 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (76%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
0%
▼31 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (31%)
More figures
Lonely
37%
▼5 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (42%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
37%
▼4 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (41%)
Meets physical activity guideline
49%
▲2 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (47%)
Smokes
11%
▼1 percentage point lower than Bergeijk (12%)
Built-up, share of the area
53%
▲46 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (7%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
0%
▼28 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (28%)
Agriculture, share of the area
41%
▼19 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (60%)
Self-rated health (estimated)
79%
▲3 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (76%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
0%
▼31 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (31%)
More figures
Lonely
37%
▼5 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (42%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
37%
▼4 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (41%)
Meets physical activity guideline
49%
▲2 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (47%)
Smokes
11%
▼1 percentage point lower than Bergeijk (12%)
Built-up, share of the area
53%
▲46 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (7%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
0%
▼28 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (28%)
Agriculture, share of the area
41%
▼19 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (60%)
Health
An estimated 79% of adults rate their own health as good, against 76% in the municipality of Bergeijk (2024).
This areaThe municipality of Bergeijk
Good self-rated health
79.1%
76%
Smokes
11.1%
12.3%
Excessive drinking
5.3%
6.1%
Overweight
52.4%
52.5%
Lonely
37.1%
42.3%
Anxiety or depression feelings
37.2%
41.4%
Meets physical activity guideline
48.6%
46.9%
Explanation
An RIVM model estimate (small-area estimation from the 2024 Health Monitor for Adults and Elderly), not a direct tabulation — even a buurt that was not itself surveyed gets an estimate. Figures cover adults aged 18 and over.
Source: RIVM/CBS Gezondheidsmonitor Volwassenen en Ouderen (kleine-gebieden-schatting) 2024
Land use
0% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 31% in the municipality of Bergeijk.
Traffic5.9%
Built-up52.9%
Agriculture41.2%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
Distance to amenities
A daycare lies here at an average road distance of 200 m.
Distance
Value
Large supermarket
300 m
–
GP practice
800 m
–
Primary school
900 m
–
Daycare
200 m
–
Large supermarkets
–
1
GP practices
–
0.9
Daycares
–
1.8
Explanation
Average road distance from every address in this buurt to the nearest amenity, and the average count within 1 km — a buurt average, not a distance from one address.
Source: CBS proximity statistics 2025
04 · Residents
The population is shrinking, while it grows in Bergeijk.
Dorpstraat-Sengelsbroeksestraat has 195 inhabitants (2026), or 1,183 per km² (6.2 times as high as in Bergeijk). In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Bergeijk was 84%, 6 percentage points above the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) had the highest share there: 19% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2021
-3%
▼lower than Bergeijk (+4%)
Turnout, municipality of Bergeijk
84%
▲6 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+1%
▼lower than Bergeijk (+5%)
Aged 45 to 65
28%
=about the same as Bergeijk (28%)
Never married
46%
▲3 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (43%)
Dutch origin
92%
▲7 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (85%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
19%
▲2 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2021
-3%
▼lower than Bergeijk (+4%)
Turnout, municipality of Bergeijk
84%
▲6 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+1%
▼lower than Bergeijk (+5%)
Aged 45 to 65
28%
=about the same as Bergeijk (28%)
Never married
46%
▲3 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (43%)
Dutch origin
92%
▲7 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (85%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
19%
▲2 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population shrank 2% between 2021 and 2026, to 195.
Residents, 2026
195
-3% since 2021
Bergeijk +4%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 1,183 residents per km², this buurt is 6.2 times as densely populated as the municipality of Bergeijk.
Residents per km²1,183
Dwellings per km²506.2
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, almost no children were born; almost no one died.
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
28% of residents are between 45 and 65.
0 to 1540
15 to 2520
25 to 4540
45 to 6555
65 to 8035
80 and over10
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
46% of residents are never married.
Never married90
Married85
Divorced10
Widowed10
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
92% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands175
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)15
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Bergeijk; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 84% of eligible voters in Bergeijk voted. The largest party was PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) with 19% of the valid votes.
Municipality of BergeijkThe Netherlands
D66
12.9%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
19%
16.7%
VVD
18.6%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
6.8%
12.8%
CDA
18.3%
11.8%
JA21
8.9%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
4.1%
4.5%
BBB
5%
2.6%
Other
6.3%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
Dorpstraat-Sengelsbroeksestraat has an average of 2.0 cars per household. 26% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 5 percentage points more than in Bergeijk (21%).
Key figures
Business services, share of businesses
8%
▼14 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (22%)
Industry and energy, share of businesses
33%
▲13 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (20%)
Transport, information and communication, share of businesses
0%
▼5 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (5%)
Cars per household (2021)
2.0
▲43% higher than Bergeijk (1.4)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
26%
▲5 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (21%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
−3 pp
▼lower than Bergeijk (+5 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
92%
▲9 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (83%)
Retail, share of addresses
7%
▲6 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (1%)
Industrial, share of addresses
1%
▼5 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (6%)
Residents per km²
1,183
▲2.2 times as high as the Netherlands (539)
Private rent
7%
▼7 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Owner-occupied dwellings
93%
▲36 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (57%)
Business services, share of businesses
8%
▼14 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (22%)
Industry and energy, share of businesses
33%
▲13 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (20%)
Transport, information and communication, share of businesses
0%
▼5 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (5%)
Cars per household (2021)
2.0
▲43% higher than Bergeijk (1.4)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
26%
▲5 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (21%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
−3 pp
▼lower than Bergeijk (+5 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
92%
▲9 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (83%)
Retail, share of addresses
7%
▲6 percentage points higher than Bergeijk (1%)
Industrial, share of addresses
1%
▼5 percentage points lower than Bergeijk (6%)
Residents per km²
1,183
▲2.2 times as high as the Netherlands (539)
Private rent
7%
▼7 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Owner-occupied dwellings
93%
▲36 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (57%)
Business establishments by sector
Nijverheid en energie is the largest sector, with 20 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij5
Nijverheid en energie20
Handel en horeca10
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie0
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed5
Zakelijke dienstverlening5
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg10
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
26% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 21% in the municipality of Bergeijk (2025).
Petrol74.5%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)25.5%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 28% to 26% between 2021 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
26%▲ 5 percentage points above Bergeijk (21%)
-2 pp since 2021
Bergeijk +4 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 235 passenger cars and 25 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars235
Motorcycles25
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
92% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is retail (7%).
Residential92%
Retail6.8%
Assembly2.3%
Industrial1.1%
Explanation
Based on 88 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
14% multi-family dwellings, against 37% nationally.
This areaThe Netherlands
Multi-family dwellings14%
NL 37%▼ −62% vs NL
Residents per km²1,183
NL 539▲ +120% vs NL
Private rent7%
NL 14%▼ −50% vs NL
Owner-occupied dwellings93%
NL 57%▲ +63% vs NL
Single-family dwellings86%
NL 63%▲ +37% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025