We're pulling the figures from public sources. This usually takes a few seconds.
Area and its neighbourhoodsCBS key figures for districts and neighbourhoods
Residents and householdsCBS
Homes and WOZ valueCBS · Kadaster BAG
Housing marketNVM market overview
Municipal leviesMunicipal budgets · CBS
SafetyCBS and Police
HealthRIVM Health Monitor
Land use and amenitiesCBS land use · proximity statistics
Road safety and electionsRijkswaterstaat · Kiesraad
Comparing with the municipality and the countryRankings and comparisons
Neighbourhood · Alphen aan den Rijn
Living in Laag Boskoop
The population is shrinking, while it grows in Alphen aan den Rijn. Homes cost more than the average in the municipality of Alphen aan den Rijn, and registered crime per resident is higher.
Homes cost more than the Alphen aan den Rijn average.
The average WOZ value in Laag Boskoop is €509,000, 28% higher than in Alphen aan den Rijn (€397,000). Between 2021 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 42%, against a rise of 41% in Alphen aan den Rijn. 94% of the homes are owner-occupied, 30 percentage points more than in Alphen aan den Rijn (64%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€509,000
▲28% higher than Alphen aan den Rijn (€397,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+42%
▲higher than Alphen aan den Rijn (+41%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
94%
▲30 percentage points higher than Alphen aan den Rijn (64%)
Social housing
0%
▼25 percentage points lower than Alphen aan den Rijn (25%)
Private rent
6%
▼5 percentage points lower than Alphen aan den Rijn (11%)
Single-family dwellings
99%
▲35 percentage points higher than Alphen aan den Rijn (64%)
Built 1965–1974
7%
▼13 percentage points lower than Alphen aan den Rijn (20%)
Built 1945–1964
6%
▼6 percentage points lower than Alphen aan den Rijn (12%)
Built 2016 and later
5%
▼6 percentage points lower than Alphen aan den Rijn (11%)
Average WOZ value
€509,000
▲28% higher than Alphen aan den Rijn (€397,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+42%
▲higher than Alphen aan den Rijn (+41%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
94%
▲30 percentage points higher than Alphen aan den Rijn (64%)
Social housing
0%
▼25 percentage points lower than Alphen aan den Rijn (25%)
Private rent
6%
▼5 percentage points lower than Alphen aan den Rijn (11%)
Single-family dwellings
99%
▲35 percentage points higher than Alphen aan den Rijn (64%)
Built 1965–1974
7%
▼13 percentage points lower than Alphen aan den Rijn (20%)
Built 1945–1964
6%
▼6 percentage points lower than Alphen aan den Rijn (12%)
Built 2016 and later
5%
▼6 percentage points lower than Alphen aan den Rijn (11%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 42% between 2021 and 2025, to €509,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€509,000▲ 28% above Alphen aan den Rijn
+42% since 2021
Alphen aan den Rijn +41%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€335 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€335/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
136 m² · measured buurt average
WOZ €509,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€150NL median
Property tax (OZB)€51€45
Water board levy€46–
Sewage levy€28€22
Waste levy€25€27
Costs to set aside€185
Maintenance reserve€173–
Buildings insurance€12–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Alphen aan den Rijn's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 251st of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 136 m² (measured average in this buurt) with the average WOZ value here, €509,000.
Levies: Alphen aan den Rijn's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Laag Boskoop has the 6th-highest WOZ value of the 15 buurten in Boskoop.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €509,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Laag Boskoop
509,000
232
–
Nesse
662,000
80
–
Rijneveld-Noord
709,000
82
–
Rijneveld-Zuid
649,000
146
–
Draaistok
437,000
892
–
Biezen-West
450,000
997
–
Biezen-Oost
392,000
267
–
Zonnedauw
314,000
488
–
Snijdelwijk
345,000
731
–
Vogelbuurt
372,000
481
–
Voorofschebuurt
367,000
1,155
–
Appelbuurt
346,000
798
–
Botanicusbuurt
363,000
562
–
Zuidwijk
529,000
334
–
Spoelwijk
730,000
58
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 94% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied94%
Private rent6%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
99% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes99%
Multi-family homes1%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
42% of dwellings were built before 1945, against 9% in the municipality of Alphen aan den Rijn.
Before 194541.9%
1945-19645.6%
1965-19747.3%
1975-199129.1%
1992-20057.7%
2006-20153.4%
2016 and later5.1%
Explanation
Based on 234 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
More registered crime per resident than the Alphen aan den Rijn average.
In 2025, 42 crimes per 1,000 residents were registered in Laag Boskoop, 24% higher than in Alphen aan den Rijn (34). Since 2021 the registered rate per 1,000 residents fell 11%, against a fall of 10% in Alphen aan den Rijn. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
42
▲24% higher than Alphen aan den Rijn (34)
Change since 2021
-11%
▼lower than Alphen aan den Rijn (-10%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
2.9
▲45% higher than Alphen aan den Rijn (2.0)
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
42
▲24% higher than Alphen aan den Rijn (34)
Change since 2021
-11%
▼lower than Alphen aan den Rijn (-10%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
2.9
▲45% higher than Alphen aan den Rijn (2.0)
Registered crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
In 2025, Laag Boskoop registered 42 crimes per 1,000 residents, against 34 in the municipality of Alphen aan den Rijn.
Laag Boskoop42
The municipality of Alphen aan den Rijn34
Explanation
Crime is counted where it happens and divided by the number of residents, so places with many visitors — city centres, nightlife, stations — score higher.
The largest category in Laag Boskoop is 'Theft and burglary': 20.0 per 1,000 residents in 2025, against 13.6 in the municipality of Alphen aan den Rijn.
Laag BoskoopAlphen aan den Rijn
Theft and burglary20.0
Alphen aan den Rijn 13.6▲ +47% vs Alphen aan den Rijn
Vandalism and public order8.3
Alphen aan den Rijn 3.7▲ +124% vs Alphen aan den Rijn
Violence and threats6.7
Alphen aan den Rijn 3.8▲ +76% vs Alphen aan den Rijn
Traffic6.7
Alphen aan den Rijn 5.3▲ +26% vs Alphen aan den Rijn
Fraud and scams0.0
Alphen aan den Rijn 4.7▼ −100% vs Alphen aan den Rijn
Environmental0.0
Alphen aan den Rijn 0.1≈ Alphen aan den Rijn
Other and withheld0.0
Alphen aan den Rijn 2.4▼ −100% vs Alphen aan den Rijn
Explanation
Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2023, police in Laag Boskoop registered 2 traffic accidents, of which 1 with injury and none fatal.
2020
2021
2022
2023
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2023
03 · Living environment
Residents rate their health above the Alphen aan den Rijn average; green space is below the Alphen aan den Rijn average.
An estimated 80% of adults in Laag Boskoop rate their own health as good, 6 percentage points more than in Alphen aan den Rijn. Fewer adults feel lonely (38% against 46%), fewer report anxiety or depression (39% against 46%), fewer are overweight (50% against 54%) and fewer smoke (13% against 16%). Agricultural land is the largest land use in Laag Boskoop, covering 70% of the area, against 69% in Alphen aan den Rijn. Green space such as parks, sports fields, forest and nature covers 4% of the area, 4 percentage points below the 8% in Alphen aan den Rijn.
Key figures
Self-rated health (estimated)
80%
▲6 percentage points higher than Alphen aan den Rijn (74%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
4%
▼4 percentage points lower than Alphen aan den Rijn (8%)
More figures
Lonely
38%
▼8 percentage points lower than Alphen aan den Rijn (46%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
39%
▼7 percentage points lower than Alphen aan den Rijn (46%)
Overweight
50%
▼4 percentage points lower than Alphen aan den Rijn (54%)
Meets physical activity guideline
48%
▲3 percentage points higher than Alphen aan den Rijn (45%)
Water, share of the area
8%
▲3 percentage points higher than Alphen aan den Rijn (5%)
Built-up, share of the area
12%
▼3 percentage points lower than Alphen aan den Rijn (15%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
0%
▼3 percentage points lower than Alphen aan den Rijn (3%)
Self-rated health (estimated)
80%
▲6 percentage points higher than Alphen aan den Rijn (74%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
4%
▼4 percentage points lower than Alphen aan den Rijn (8%)
More figures
Lonely
38%
▼8 percentage points lower than Alphen aan den Rijn (46%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
39%
▼7 percentage points lower than Alphen aan den Rijn (46%)
Overweight
50%
▼4 percentage points lower than Alphen aan den Rijn (54%)
Meets physical activity guideline
48%
▲3 percentage points higher than Alphen aan den Rijn (45%)
Water, share of the area
8%
▲3 percentage points higher than Alphen aan den Rijn (5%)
Built-up, share of the area
12%
▼3 percentage points lower than Alphen aan den Rijn (15%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
0%
▼3 percentage points lower than Alphen aan den Rijn (3%)
Health
An estimated 80% of adults rate their own health as good, against 74% in the municipality of Alphen aan den Rijn (2024).
This areaThe municipality of Alphen aan den Rijn
Good self-rated health
80.4%
74.4%
Smokes
13%
15.7%
Excessive drinking
5.8%
5.2%
Overweight
50.1%
53.9%
Lonely
38%
45.7%
Anxiety or depression feelings
39.2%
45.7%
Meets physical activity guideline
48.2%
45.2%
Explanation
An RIVM model estimate (small-area estimation from the 2024 Health Monitor for Adults and Elderly), not a direct tabulation — even a buurt that was not itself surveyed gets an estimate. Figures cover adults aged 18 and over.
Source: RIVM/CBS Gezondheidsmonitor Volwassenen en Ouderen (kleine-gebieden-schatting) 2024
Land use
4% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 8% in the municipality of Alphen aan den Rijn.
Traffic4.2%
Built-up11.5%
Other built-up1.8%
Recreation3.6%
Agriculture70.3%
Water8.5%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
Distance to amenities
A gp practice lies here at an average road distance of 1200 m.
Distance
Value
Large supermarket
1,800 m
–
GP practice
1,200 m
–
Primary school
1,900 m
–
Daycare
1,900 m
–
Large supermarkets
–
0.1
GP practices
–
0.5
Daycares
–
0.1
Explanation
Average road distance from every address in this buurt to the nearest amenity, and the average count within 1 km — a buurt average, not a distance from one address.
Source: CBS proximity statistics 2025
04 · Residents
The population is shrinking, while it grows in Alphen aan den Rijn.
Laag Boskoop has 580 inhabitants (2026), or 385 per km² (59% lower than in Alphen aan den Rijn). Between 2021 and 2026 the population fell 9%, against a rise of 4% in Alphen aan den Rijn. In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Alphen aan den Rijn was 81%, 3 percentage points above the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, D66 had the highest share there: 17% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2021
-9%
▼lower than Alphen aan den Rijn (+4%)
Turnout, municipality of Alphen aan den Rijn
81%
▲3 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+2%
▼lower than Alphen aan den Rijn (+4%)
Aged 45 to 65
35%
▲8 percentage points higher than Alphen aan den Rijn (27%)
Married
50%
▲10 percentage points higher than Alphen aan den Rijn (40%)
Dutch origin
89%
▲14 percentage points higher than Alphen aan den Rijn (75%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
59%
▲16 percentage points higher than Alphen aan den Rijn (43%)
D66, share of the vote
17%
=about the same as the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2021
-9%
▼lower than Alphen aan den Rijn (+4%)
Turnout, municipality of Alphen aan den Rijn
81%
▲3 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+2%
▼lower than Alphen aan den Rijn (+4%)
Aged 45 to 65
35%
▲8 percentage points higher than Alphen aan den Rijn (27%)
Married
50%
▲10 percentage points higher than Alphen aan den Rijn (40%)
Dutch origin
89%
▲14 percentage points higher than Alphen aan den Rijn (75%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
59%
▲16 percentage points higher than Alphen aan den Rijn (43%)
D66, share of the vote
17%
=about the same as the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population shrank 9% between 2021 and 2026, to 580.
Residents, 2026
580
-9% since 2021
Alphen aan den Rijn +4%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 385 residents per km², this buurt is 59% less densely populated than the municipality of Alphen aan den Rijn.
Residents per km²385
Dwellings per km²153.6
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, almost no children were born; almost no one died.
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
35% of residents are between 45 and 65.
0 to 1575
15 to 2570
25 to 45100
45 to 65205
65 to 8095
80 and over35
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
50% of residents are married.
Never married235
Married290
Divorced35
Widowed25
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
89% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands515
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)25
Outside Europe40
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Education level of residents aged 15 to 75
59% of residents have a havo, vwo or mbo2-4 level education.
Primary, vmbo, mbo1140
Havo, vwo, mbo2-4200
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2024
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Alphen aan den Rijn; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 81% of eligible voters in Alphen aan den Rijn voted. The largest party was D66 with 17% of the valid votes.
Municipality of Alphen aan den RijnThe Netherlands
D66
17.4%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
15.3%
16.7%
VVD
15.9%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
10%
12.8%
CDA
13.7%
11.8%
JA21
7.1%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
4.7%
4.5%
BBB
2.2%
2.6%
Other
13.6%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
Laag Boskoop has an average of 1.3 cars per household, 18% higher than in Alphen aan den Rijn (1.1). 20% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 2 percentage points less than in Alphen aan den Rijn (22%).
Key figures
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
32%
▲27 percentage points higher than Alphen aan den Rijn (5%)
Government, education and care, share of businesses
5%
▼11 percentage points lower than Alphen aan den Rijn (16%)
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
9%
▼7 percentage points lower than Alphen aan den Rijn (16%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.3
▲18% higher than Alphen aan den Rijn (1.1)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
21%
▼1 percentage point lower than Alphen aan den Rijn (22%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+7 pp
=about the same as Alphen aan den Rijn (+8 pp)
Industrial, share of addresses
22%
▲17 percentage points higher than Alphen aan den Rijn (5%)
Residential, share of addresses
83%
▼5 percentage points lower than Alphen aan den Rijn (88%)
Office, share of addresses
2%
▲1 percentage point higher than Alphen aan den Rijn (1%)
Private rent
6%
▼8 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Owner-occupied dwellings
94%
▲37 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (57%)
Single-family dwellings
99%
▲36 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
32%
▲27 percentage points higher than Alphen aan den Rijn (5%)
Government, education and care, share of businesses
5%
▼11 percentage points lower than Alphen aan den Rijn (16%)
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
9%
▼7 percentage points lower than Alphen aan den Rijn (16%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.3
▲18% higher than Alphen aan den Rijn (1.1)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
21%
▼1 percentage point lower than Alphen aan den Rijn (22%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+7 pp
=about the same as Alphen aan den Rijn (+8 pp)
Industrial, share of addresses
22%
▲17 percentage points higher than Alphen aan den Rijn (5%)
Residential, share of addresses
83%
▼5 percentage points lower than Alphen aan den Rijn (88%)
Office, share of addresses
2%
▲1 percentage point higher than Alphen aan den Rijn (1%)
Private rent
6%
▼8 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Owner-occupied dwellings
94%
▲37 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (57%)
Single-family dwellings
99%
▲36 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Business establishments by sector
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij is the largest sector, with 35 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij35
Nijverheid en energie15
Handel en horeca10
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie5
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed10
Zakelijke dienstverlening25
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg5
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
21% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 22% in the municipality of Alphen aan den Rijn (2025).
Petrol79.4%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)20.6%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 14% to 21% between 2021 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
21%▼ 1 percentage point below Alphen aan den Rijn (22%)
+7 pp since 2021
Alphen aan den Rijn +7 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 320 passenger cars and 50 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars320
Motorcycles50
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
83% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is industrial (22%).
Residential82.7%
Retail0.7%
Office2.1%
Assembly1.4%
Industrial21.6%
Education0.4%
Other0.4%
Explanation
Based on 283 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
1% multi-family dwellings, against 37% nationally.
This areaThe Netherlands
Multi-family dwellings1%
NL 37%▼ −97% vs NL
Private rent6%
NL 14%▼ −57% vs NL
Owner-occupied dwellings94%
NL 57%▲ +65% vs NL
Single-family dwellings99%
NL 63%▲ +57% vs NL
Residents per km²385
NL 539▼ −29% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025