We're pulling the figures from public sources. This usually takes a few seconds.
Area and its neighbourhoodsCBS key figures for districts and neighbourhoods
Residents and householdsCBS
Homes and WOZ valueCBS · Kadaster BAG
Housing marketNVM market overview
Municipal leviesMunicipal budgets · CBS
SafetyCBS and Police
HealthRIVM Health Monitor
Land use and amenitiesCBS land use · proximity statistics
Road safety and electionsRijkswaterstaat · Kiesraad
Comparing with the municipality and the countryRankings and comparisons
Neighbourhood · Zaltbommel
Living in Verspr.h. in de polder Poederoijen
The population is growing faster than in Zaltbommel. Homes cost more than the average in the municipality of Zaltbommel, and registered crime per resident is lower.
The average WOZ value in Verspr.h. in de polder Poederoijen is €503,000, 25% higher than in Zaltbommel (€404,000). Between 2021 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 37%, against a rise of 39% in Zaltbommel. 80% of the homes are owner-occupied, 13 percentage points more than in Zaltbommel (67%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€503,000
▲25% higher than Zaltbommel (€404,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+37%
▼lower than Zaltbommel (+39%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
80%
▲13 percentage points higher than Zaltbommel (67%)
Social housing
9%
▼15 percentage points lower than Zaltbommel (24%)
Private rent
11%
▲2 percentage points higher than Zaltbommel (9%)
Single-family dwellings
99%
▲13 percentage points higher than Zaltbommel (86%)
Built 1975–1991
7%
▼13 percentage points lower than Zaltbommel (20%)
Built 2006–2015
21%
▲10 percentage points higher than Zaltbommel (11%)
Built 1965–1974
7%
▼8 percentage points lower than Zaltbommel (15%)
Average WOZ value
€503,000
▲25% higher than Zaltbommel (€404,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+37%
▼lower than Zaltbommel (+39%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
80%
▲13 percentage points higher than Zaltbommel (67%)
Social housing
9%
▼15 percentage points lower than Zaltbommel (24%)
Private rent
11%
▲2 percentage points higher than Zaltbommel (9%)
Single-family dwellings
99%
▲13 percentage points higher than Zaltbommel (86%)
Built 1975–1991
7%
▼13 percentage points lower than Zaltbommel (20%)
Built 2006–2015
21%
▲10 percentage points higher than Zaltbommel (11%)
Built 1965–1974
7%
▼8 percentage points lower than Zaltbommel (15%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 37% between 2021 and 2025, to €503,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€503,000▲ 25% above Zaltbommel
+37% since 2021
Zaltbommel +39%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€371 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€371/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
184 m² · measured buurt average
WOZ €503,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€119NL median
Water board levy€46–
Property tax (OZB)€37€44
Sewage levy€36€22
Waste levy not included: a joint body (in Rivierenland, Avri) raises it on Zaltbommel's behalf, not the gemeente itself. Not counted in the total.
Costs to set aside€252
Maintenance reserve€235–
Buildings insurance€17–
Model estimates, not bills.
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 184 m² (measured average in this buurt) with the average WOZ value here, €503,000.
Levies: Zaltbommel's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Verspr.h. in de polder Poederoijen has the highest WOZ value of the 9 buurten in Brakel.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €503,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Verspr.h. in de polder Poederoijen
503,000
152
–
Brakel
385,000
1,050
–
Poederoijen
403,000
208
–
Aalst
374,000
633
–
Zuilichem
416,000
506
–
De Rietschoof
448,000
56
–
Verspreide huizen in de polder Aalst
443,000
264
–
Verspreide huizen in de polder Brakel
448,000
158
–
Verspr.h. in de polder Zuilichem e.o.
442,000
155
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 80% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied80%
Social housing9%
Private rent11%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
99% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes99%
Multi-family homes1%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
30% of dwellings were built in 2016 or later, against 14% in the municipality of Zaltbommel.
Before 194518.4%
1945-19643.1%
1965-19747.4%
1975-19917.4%
1992-200512.3%
2006-201521.5%
2016 and later30.1%
Explanation
Based on 163 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
Less registered crime per resident than the Zaltbommel average.
In 2025, 27 crimes per 1,000 residents were registered in Verspr.h. in de polder Poederoijen, 27% lower than in Zaltbommel (37). Since 2021 the registered rate per 1,000 residents fell 4%, against a fall of 9% in Zaltbommel. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
27
▼27% lower than Zaltbommel (37)
Change since 2021
-4%
▲higher than Zaltbommel (-9%)
Home burglary
0
2023–2025
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
27
▼27% lower than Zaltbommel (37)
Change since 2021
-4%
▲higher than Zaltbommel (-9%)
Home burglary
0
2023–2025
Registered crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
In 2025, Verspr.h. in de polder Poederoijen registered 27 crimes per 1,000 residents, against 37 in the municipality of Zaltbommel.
Verspr.h. in de polder Poederoijen27
The municipality of Zaltbommel37
Explanation
Crime is counted where it happens and divided by the number of residents, so places with many visitors — city centres, nightlife, stations — score higher.
The largest category in Verspr.h. in de polder Poederoijen is 'Traffic': 7.8 per 1,000 residents in 2025, against 5.7 in the municipality of Zaltbommel.
Verspr.h. in de polder PoederoijenZaltbommel
Traffic7.8
Zaltbommel 5.7▲ +37% vs Zaltbommel
Vandalism and public order5.9
Zaltbommel 5.4▲ +9% vs Zaltbommel
Violence and threats5.9
Zaltbommel 3.0▲ +97% vs Zaltbommel
Theft and burglary3.9
Zaltbommel 17.9▼ −78% vs Zaltbommel
Fraud and scams3.9
Zaltbommel 3.8≈ Zaltbommel
Environmental0.0
Zaltbommel 0.2≈ Zaltbommel
Other and withheld0.0
Zaltbommel 0.5≈ Zaltbommel
Explanation
Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2024, police in Verspr.h. in de polder Poederoijen registered 3 traffic accidents, of which 1 with injury and none fatal.
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2024
03 · Living environment
Residents rate their health above the Zaltbommel average; green space is below the Zaltbommel average.
An estimated 77% of adults in Verspr.h. in de polder Poederoijen rate their own health as good, 3 percentage points more than in Zaltbommel. Fewer adults are overweight (50% against 54%), but more smoke (19% against 17%), more feel lonely (44% against 42%) and more report anxiety or depression (46% against 45%). Agricultural land is the largest land use in Verspr.h. in de polder Poederoijen, covering 83% of the area, against 64% in Zaltbommel. Green space such as parks, sports fields, forest and nature covers 6% of the area, 4 percentage points below the 10% in Zaltbommel.
Key figures
Self-rated health (estimated)
77%
▲3 percentage points higher than Zaltbommel (74%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
6%
▼4 percentage points lower than Zaltbommel (10%)
More figures
Overweight
50%
▼4 percentage points lower than Zaltbommel (54%)
Smokes
19%
▲2 percentage points higher than Zaltbommel (17%)
Lonely
44%
▲2 percentage points higher than Zaltbommel (42%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
46%
▲1 percentage point higher than Zaltbommel (45%)
Agriculture, share of the area
83%
▲19 percentage points higher than Zaltbommel (64%)
Built-up, share of the area
3%
▼7 percentage points lower than Zaltbommel (10%)
Water, share of the area
6%
▼6 percentage points lower than Zaltbommel (12%)
Self-rated health (estimated)
77%
▲3 percentage points higher than Zaltbommel (74%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
6%
▼4 percentage points lower than Zaltbommel (10%)
More figures
Overweight
50%
▼4 percentage points lower than Zaltbommel (54%)
Smokes
19%
▲2 percentage points higher than Zaltbommel (17%)
Lonely
44%
▲2 percentage points higher than Zaltbommel (42%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
46%
▲1 percentage point higher than Zaltbommel (45%)
Agriculture, share of the area
83%
▲19 percentage points higher than Zaltbommel (64%)
Built-up, share of the area
3%
▼7 percentage points lower than Zaltbommel (10%)
Water, share of the area
6%
▼6 percentage points lower than Zaltbommel (12%)
Health
An estimated 77% of adults rate their own health as good, against 74% in the municipality of Zaltbommel (2024).
This areaThe municipality of Zaltbommel
Good self-rated health
77.1%
74.2%
Smokes
19.3%
16.7%
Excessive drinking
6.3%
5.5%
Overweight
49.8%
54%
Lonely
44.1%
42.5%
Anxiety or depression feelings
46.4%
44.8%
Meets physical activity guideline
43.4%
42.2%
Explanation
An RIVM model estimate (small-area estimation from the 2024 Health Monitor for Adults and Elderly), not a direct tabulation — even a buurt that was not itself surveyed gets an estimate. Figures cover adults aged 18 and over.
Source: RIVM/CBS Gezondheidsmonitor Volwassenen en Ouderen (kleine-gebieden-schatting) 2024
Land use
6% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 10% in the municipality of Zaltbommel.
Traffic1.9%
Built-up2.7%
Recreation1.2%
Agriculture82.7%
Forest and nature5%
Water6.5%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
Distance to amenities
A primary school lies here at an average road distance of 800 m.
Distance
Value
Large supermarket
3,400 m
–
GP practice
3,500 m
–
Primary school
800 m
–
Daycare
800 m
–
Large supermarkets
–
0
GP practices
–
0
Daycares
–
1.6
Explanation
Average road distance from every address in this buurt to the nearest amenity, and the average count within 1 km — a buurt average, not a distance from one address.
Source: CBS proximity statistics 2025
04 · Residents
The population is growing faster than the Zaltbommel average.
Verspr.h. in de polder Poederoijen has 555 inhabitants (2026), or 101 per km² (74% lower than in Zaltbommel). Between 2021 and 2026 the population rose 22%, against a rise of 4% in Zaltbommel. In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Zaltbommel was 85%, 7 percentage points above the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) had the highest share there: 17% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2021
+22%
▲higher than Zaltbommel (+4%)
Turnout, municipality of Zaltbommel
85%
▲7 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+11%
▲higher than Zaltbommel (+4%)
Aged 25 to 45
29%
▲5 percentage points higher than Zaltbommel (24%)
Never married
58%
▲12 percentage points higher than Zaltbommel (46%)
Dutch origin
74%
▼8 percentage points lower than Zaltbommel (82%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
65%
▲22 percentage points higher than Zaltbommel (43%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
17%
=about the same as the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2021
+22%
▲higher than Zaltbommel (+4%)
Turnout, municipality of Zaltbommel
85%
▲7 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+11%
▲higher than Zaltbommel (+4%)
Aged 25 to 45
29%
▲5 percentage points higher than Zaltbommel (24%)
Never married
58%
▲12 percentage points higher than Zaltbommel (46%)
Dutch origin
74%
▼8 percentage points lower than Zaltbommel (82%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
65%
▲22 percentage points higher than Zaltbommel (43%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
17%
=about the same as the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population grew 22% between 2021 and 2026, to 555.
Residents, 2026
555
+22% since 2021
Zaltbommel +4%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 101 residents per km², this buurt is 74% less densely populated than the municipality of Zaltbommel.
Residents per km²101
Dwellings per km²27.8
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, almost no children were born; 9.8 died per 1,000.
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
29% of residents are between 25 and 45.
0 to 15110
15 to 25120
25 to 45160
45 to 65110
65 to 8045
80 and over10
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
58% of residents are never married.
Never married320
Married210
Divorced10
Widowed15
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
74% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands410
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)135
Outside Europe10
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Education level of residents aged 15 to 75
65% of residents have a havo, vwo or mbo2-4 level education.
Primary, vmbo, mbo1120
Havo, vwo, mbo2-4220
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2024
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Zaltbommel; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 85% of eligible voters in Zaltbommel voted. The largest party was PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) with 17% of the valid votes.
Municipality of ZaltbommelThe Netherlands
D66
12.5%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
17.3%
16.7%
VVD
12.3%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
8.2%
12.8%
CDA
12.3%
11.8%
JA21
6%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
4.7%
4.5%
BBB
1.9%
2.6%
Other
24.8%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
Verspr.h. in de polder Poederoijen has an average of 1.1 cars per household, 15% lower than in Zaltbommel (1.3). 29% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 5 percentage points more than in Zaltbommel (24%).
Key figures
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
23%
▲17 percentage points higher than Zaltbommel (6%)
Business services, share of businesses
15%
▼9 percentage points lower than Zaltbommel (24%)
Government, education and care, share of businesses
8%
▼5 percentage points lower than Zaltbommel (13%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.1
▼15% lower than Zaltbommel (1.3)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
29%
▲5 percentage points higher than Zaltbommel (24%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
−4 pp
▼lower than Zaltbommel (+1 pp)
Industrial, share of addresses
15%
▲9 percentage points higher than Zaltbommel (6%)
Lodging, share of addresses
7%
▲4 percentage points higher than Zaltbommel (3%)
Residential, share of addresses
82%
▼4 percentage points lower than Zaltbommel (86%)
Residents per km²
101
▼81% lower than the Netherlands (539)
Social housing
9%
▼19 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (28%)
Single-family dwellings
99%
▲36 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
23%
▲17 percentage points higher than Zaltbommel (6%)
Business services, share of businesses
15%
▼9 percentage points lower than Zaltbommel (24%)
Government, education and care, share of businesses
8%
▼5 percentage points lower than Zaltbommel (13%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.1
▼15% lower than Zaltbommel (1.3)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
29%
▲5 percentage points higher than Zaltbommel (24%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
−4 pp
▼lower than Zaltbommel (+1 pp)
Industrial, share of addresses
15%
▲9 percentage points higher than Zaltbommel (6%)
Lodging, share of addresses
7%
▲4 percentage points higher than Zaltbommel (3%)
Residential, share of addresses
82%
▼4 percentage points lower than Zaltbommel (86%)
Residents per km²
101
▼81% lower than the Netherlands (539)
Social housing
9%
▼19 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (28%)
Single-family dwellings
99%
▲36 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Business establishments by sector
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij is the largest sector, with 15 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij15
Nijverheid en energie15
Handel en horeca10
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie5
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed0
Zakelijke dienstverlening10
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg5
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
29% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 24% in the municipality of Zaltbommel (2025).
Petrol70.7%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)29.3%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 33% to 29% between 2021 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
29%▲ 5 percentage points above Zaltbommel (24%)
-4 pp since 2021
Zaltbommel +1 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 205 passenger cars and 15 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars205
Motorcycles15
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
82% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is industrial (15%).
Residential82.3%
Retail1%
Office3%
Assembly1.5%
Industrial14.6%
Lodging6.6%
Other3.5%
Explanation
Based on 198 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
1% multi-family dwellings, against 37% nationally.
This areaThe Netherlands
Multi-family dwellings1%
NL 37%▼ −97% vs NL
Residents per km²101
NL 539▼ −81% vs NL
Social housing9%
NL 28%▼ −68% vs NL
Single-family dwellings99%
NL 63%▲ +57% vs NL
Owner-occupied dwellings80%
NL 57%▲ +40% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025