The average WOZ value in Gellicum e.o. is €576,000, 24% higher than in West Betuwe (€466,000). Between 2021 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 47%, against a rise of 45% in West Betuwe. 97% of the homes are owner-occupied, 24 percentage points more than in West Betuwe (73%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€576,000
▲24% higher than West Betuwe (€466,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+47%
▲higher than West Betuwe (+45%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
97%
▲24 percentage points higher than West Betuwe (73%)
Social housing
0%
▼21 percentage points lower than West Betuwe (21%)
Private rent
3%
▼3 percentage points lower than West Betuwe (6%)
Single-family dwellings
100%
▲10 percentage points higher than West Betuwe (90%)
Built 1992–2005
3%
▼13 percentage points lower than West Betuwe (16%)
Built 1945–1964
23%
▲11 percentage points higher than West Betuwe (12%)
Built 1975–1991
10%
▼10 percentage points lower than West Betuwe (20%)
Average WOZ value
€576,000
▲24% higher than West Betuwe (€466,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+47%
▲higher than West Betuwe (+45%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
97%
▲24 percentage points higher than West Betuwe (73%)
Social housing
0%
▼21 percentage points lower than West Betuwe (21%)
Private rent
3%
▼3 percentage points lower than West Betuwe (6%)
Single-family dwellings
100%
▲10 percentage points higher than West Betuwe (90%)
Built 1992–2005
3%
▼13 percentage points lower than West Betuwe (16%)
Built 1945–1964
23%
▲11 percentage points higher than West Betuwe (12%)
Built 1975–1991
10%
▼10 percentage points lower than West Betuwe (20%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 47% between 2021 and 2025, to €576,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€576,000▲ 24% above West Betuwe
+47% since 2021
West Betuwe +45%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€539 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€539/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
291 m² · measured buurt average
WOZ €576,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€142NL median
Property tax (OZB)€48€51
Water board levy€48–
Sewage levy€46€22
Waste levy not included: a joint body (in Rivierenland, Avri) raises it on West Betuwe's behalf, not the gemeente itself. Not counted in the total.
Costs to set aside€397
Maintenance reserve€371–
Buildings insurance€26–
Model estimates, not bills.
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 291 m² (measured average in this buurt) with the average WOZ value here, €576,000.
Levies: West Betuwe's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Gellicum e.o. has the 4th-highest WOZ value of the 8 buurten in Deil.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €576,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Gellicum e.o.
576,000
30
–
Deil
494,000
768
–
Enspijk
501,000
181
–
Rumpt
546,000
250
–
Gellicum
631,000
106
–
Rumpt e.o.
672,000
137
–
Enspijk e.o.
578,000
53
–
Deil e.o.
545,000
83
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 97% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied97%
Private rent3%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
100% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes100%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
33% of dwellings were built before 1945, against 18% in the municipality of West Betuwe.
Before 194533.3%
1945-196423.3%
1965-197420%
1975-199110%
1992-20053.3%
2006-20156.7%
2016 and later3.3%
Explanation
Based on 30 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
Too few residents for a rate per resident: these are counts.
Gellicum e.o. has too few residents for a reliable rate per 1,000 residents (under 200), so counts are shown instead of a comparison. In 2025, 3 crimes were registered, against 2 in 2021. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Registered crimes, 2025
3
▲up from 2 in 2021
Home burglary
0
2023–2025
Registered crimes, 2025
3
▲up from 2 in 2021
Home burglary
0
2023–2025
Registered crime per year
3 crimes were registered in Gellicum e.o. in 2025 (2 in 2021).
Registered crimes, 2025
3
up from 2 in 2021
Explanation
Too few residents for a reliable per-1,000 figure (threshold 200) — registered crime, not all crime — CBS/Politie 47018NED.
The largest category in Gellicum e.o. is 'Theft and burglary': 2 in 2025.
Theft and burglary2
Fraud and scams1
Vandalism and public order0
Violence and threats0
Traffic0
Environmental0
Other and withheld0
Explanation
Too few residents for a reliable per-1,000 figure (threshold 200). Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2024, police in Gellicum e.o. registered 10 traffic accidents, of which 1 with injury and none fatal.
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2024
03 · Living environment
Green space is below the West Betuwe average.
Agricultural land is the largest land use in Gellicum e.o., covering 89% of the area, against 72% in West Betuwe. Green space such as parks, sports fields, forest and nature covers 3% of the area, 7 percentage points below the 10% in West Betuwe.
Key figures
Green (parks, sport, nature)
3%
▼7 percentage points lower than West Betuwe (10%)
Agriculture, share of the area
89%
▲17 percentage points higher than West Betuwe (72%)
Built-up, share of the area
0%
▼7 percentage points lower than West Betuwe (7%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
3%
▼5 percentage points lower than West Betuwe (8%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
3%
▼7 percentage points lower than West Betuwe (10%)
Agriculture, share of the area
89%
▲17 percentage points higher than West Betuwe (72%)
Built-up, share of the area
0%
▼7 percentage points lower than West Betuwe (7%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
3%
▼5 percentage points lower than West Betuwe (8%)
Land use
3% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 10% in the municipality of West Betuwe.
Traffic3.8%
Agriculture88.9%
Forest and nature3.4%
Water4%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
Distance to amenities
A daycare lies here at an average road distance of 2700 m.
Distance
Value
Large supermarket
4,000 m
–
GP practice
4,400 m
–
Primary school
2,800 m
–
Daycare
2,700 m
–
Large supermarkets
–
0
GP practices
–
0
Daycares
–
0
Explanation
Average road distance from every address in this buurt to the nearest amenity, and the average count within 1 km — a buurt average, not a distance from one address.
Source: CBS proximity statistics 2025
04 · Residents
The population is growing slower than the West Betuwe average.
Gellicum e.o. has 75 inhabitants (2026), or 15 per km² (94% lower than in West Betuwe). In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of West Betuwe was 86%, 8 percentage points above the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) had the highest share there: 21% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2021
+0%
▼lower than West Betuwe (+4%)
Turnout, municipality of West Betuwe
86%
▲8 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+0%
▼lower than West Betuwe (+4%)
Aged 25 to 45
29%
▲6 percentage points higher than West Betuwe (23%)
Never married
54%
▲9 percentage points higher than West Betuwe (45%)
Dutch origin
88%
▲1 percentage point higher than West Betuwe (87%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
21%
▲4 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2021
+0%
▼lower than West Betuwe (+4%)
Turnout, municipality of West Betuwe
86%
▲8 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+0%
▼lower than West Betuwe (+4%)
Aged 25 to 45
29%
▲6 percentage points higher than West Betuwe (23%)
Never married
54%
▲9 percentage points higher than West Betuwe (45%)
Dutch origin
88%
▲1 percentage point higher than West Betuwe (87%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
21%
▲4 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population held steady between 2021 and 2026, at 75.
Residents, 2026
75
+0% since 2021
West Betuwe +4%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 15 residents per km², this buurt is 94% less densely populated than the municipality of West Betuwe.
Residents per km²15
Dwellings per km²5.9
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, almost no children were born; almost no one died.
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
29% of residents are between 25 and 45.
0 to 155
15 to 2515
25 to 4520
45 to 6520
65 to 8010
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
54% of residents are never married.
Never married35
Married25
Widowed5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
88% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands70
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)5
Outside Europe5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of West Betuwe; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 86% of eligible voters in West Betuwe voted. The largest party was PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) with 21% of the valid votes.
Municipality of West BetuweThe Netherlands
D66
11.3%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
21.1%
16.7%
VVD
15.7%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
7.3%
12.8%
CDA
11.9%
11.8%
JA21
6.6%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
5.8%
4.5%
BBB
3.4%
2.6%
Other
17%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
31% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 5 percentage points more than in West Betuwe (26%).
Key figures
Cars not on petrol (2025)
31%
▲5 percentage points higher than West Betuwe (26%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+3 pp
=about the same as West Betuwe (+4 pp)
Industrial, share of addresses
27%
▲21 percentage points higher than West Betuwe (6%)
Lodging, share of addresses
6%
▲6 percentage points higher than West Betuwe (0%)
Residential, share of addresses
91%
▲2 percentage points higher than West Betuwe (89%)
Private rent
3%
▼11 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Owner-occupied dwellings
97%
▲40 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (57%)
Single-family dwellings
100%
▲37 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
31%
▲5 percentage points higher than West Betuwe (26%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+3 pp
=about the same as West Betuwe (+4 pp)
Industrial, share of addresses
27%
▲21 percentage points higher than West Betuwe (6%)
Lodging, share of addresses
6%
▲6 percentage points higher than West Betuwe (0%)
Residential, share of addresses
91%
▲2 percentage points higher than West Betuwe (89%)
Private rent
3%
▼11 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Owner-occupied dwellings
97%
▲40 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (57%)
Single-family dwellings
100%
▲37 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Passenger cars by fuel type
31% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 26% in the municipality of West Betuwe (2025).
Petrol69.2%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)30.8%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 27% to 31% between 2021 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
31%▲ 5 percentage points above West Betuwe (26%)
+4 pp since 2021
West Betuwe +4 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 65 passenger cars and 5 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars65
Motorcycles5
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
91% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is industrial (27%).
Residential90.9%
Industrial27.3%
Lodging6.1%
Other3%
Explanation
Based on 33 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
15 residents per km²: 97% less densely populated than the Dutch average.
This areaThe Netherlands
Residents per km²15
NL 539▼ −97% vs NL
Private rent3%
NL 14%▼ −79% vs NL
Owner-occupied dwellings97%
NL 57%▲ +70% vs NL
Single-family dwellings100%
NL 63%▲ +59% vs NL
Average WOZ value€576,000
NL €398,000▲ +45% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026