The average WOZ value in Nattenhoven is €363,000, 16% higher than in Stein (L.) (€314,000). Between 2021 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 40%, against a rise of 34% in Stein (L.). 97% of the homes are owner-occupied, 25 percentage points more than in Stein (L.) (72%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€363,000
▲16% higher than Stein (L.) (€314,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+40%
▲higher than Stein (L.) (+34%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
97%
▲25 percentage points higher than Stein (L.) (72%)
Social housing
0%
▼22 percentage points lower than Stein (L.) (22%)
Private rent
3%
▼3 percentage points lower than Stein (L.) (6%)
Single-family dwellings
97%
▲15 percentage points higher than Stein (L.) (82%)
Built before 1945
24%
▲12 percentage points higher than Stein (L.) (12%)
Built 1975–1991
9%
▼10 percentage points lower than Stein (L.) (19%)
Built 1992–2005
9%
▼2 percentage points lower than Stein (L.) (11%)
Average WOZ value
€363,000
▲16% higher than Stein (L.) (€314,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+40%
▲higher than Stein (L.) (+34%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
97%
▲25 percentage points higher than Stein (L.) (72%)
Social housing
0%
▼22 percentage points lower than Stein (L.) (22%)
Private rent
3%
▼3 percentage points lower than Stein (L.) (6%)
Single-family dwellings
97%
▲15 percentage points higher than Stein (L.) (82%)
Built before 1945
24%
▲12 percentage points higher than Stein (L.) (12%)
Built 1975–1991
9%
▼10 percentage points lower than Stein (L.) (19%)
Built 1992–2005
9%
▼2 percentage points lower than Stein (L.) (11%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 40% between 2021 and 2025, to €363,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€363,000▲ 16% above Stein (L.)
+40% since 2021
Stein (L.) +34%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€388 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€388/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
187 m² · measured buurt average
WOZ €363,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€133NL median
Water board levy€42–
Property tax (OZB)€35€32
Waste levy€31€27
Sewage levy€25€22
Costs to set aside€255
Maintenance reserve€238–
Buildings insurance€17–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Stein (L.)'s OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 256th of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 187 m² (measured average in this buurt) with the average WOZ value here, €363,000.
Levies: Stein (L.)'s own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Nattenhoven has the highest WOZ value of the 4 buurten in Urmond.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €363,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Nattenhoven
363,000
70
–
Berg
309,000
931
–
Urmond ten westen van Julianakanaal
325,000
458
–
Urmond ten oosten van Julianakanaal
321,000
1,229
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 97% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied97%
Private rent3%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
97% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes97%
Multi-family homes3%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
30% of dwellings were built between 1965 and 1974, against 27% in the municipality of Stein (L.).
Before 194524.3%
1945-196424.3%
1965-197430%
1975-19918.6%
1992-20058.6%
2006-20151.4%
2016 and later2.9%
Explanation
Based on 70 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
Too few residents for a rate per resident: these are counts.
Nattenhoven has too few residents for a reliable rate per 1,000 residents (under 200), so counts are shown instead of a comparison. In 2025, 2 crimes were registered, against 7 in 2021. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Registered crimes, 2025
2
▼down from 7 in 2021
Home burglary
1
2023–2025
Registered crimes, 2025
2
▼down from 7 in 2021
Home burglary
1
2023–2025
Registered crime per year
2 crimes were registered in Nattenhoven in 2025 (7 in 2021).
Registered crimes, 2025
2
down from 7 in 2021
Explanation
Too few residents for a reliable per-1,000 figure (threshold 200) — registered crime, not all crime — CBS/Politie 47018NED.
The largest category in Nattenhoven is 'Fraud and scams': 2 in 2025.
Fraud and scams2
Theft and burglary0
Vandalism and public order0
Violence and threats0
Traffic0
Environmental0
Other and withheld0
Explanation
Too few residents for a reliable per-1,000 figure (threshold 200). Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2021, police in Nattenhoven registered 1 traffic accidents, of which 0 with injury and none fatal.
2021
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2021
03 · Living environment
Residents rate their health above the Stein (L.) average; green space is below the Stein (L.) average.
An estimated 74% of adults in Nattenhoven rate their own health as good, 5 percentage points more than in Stein (L.). Fewer adults are overweight (54% against 57%), fewer feel lonely (45% against 48%) and fewer report anxiety or depression (42% against 45%), but more meet the physical activity guideline (44% against 42%). Agricultural land is the largest land use in Nattenhoven, covering 76% of the area, against 40% in Stein (L.). Green space such as parks, sports fields, forest and nature covers 4% of the area, 6 percentage points below the 10% in Stein (L.).
Key figures
Self-rated health (estimated)
74%
▲5 percentage points higher than Stein (L.) (69%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
4%
▼6 percentage points lower than Stein (L.) (10%)
More figures
Anxiety or depression feelings
42%
▼3 percentage points lower than Stein (L.) (45%)
Overweight
54%
▼3 percentage points lower than Stein (L.) (57%)
Lonely
45%
▼3 percentage points lower than Stein (L.) (48%)
Meets physical activity guideline
44%
▲2 percentage points higher than Stein (L.) (42%)
Agriculture, share of the area
76%
▲36 percentage points higher than Stein (L.) (40%)
Built-up, share of the area
6%
▼28 percentage points lower than Stein (L.) (34%)
Recreation, share of the area
0%
▼5 percentage points lower than Stein (L.) (5%)
Self-rated health (estimated)
74%
▲5 percentage points higher than Stein (L.) (69%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
4%
▼6 percentage points lower than Stein (L.) (10%)
More figures
Anxiety or depression feelings
42%
▼3 percentage points lower than Stein (L.) (45%)
Overweight
54%
▼3 percentage points lower than Stein (L.) (57%)
Lonely
45%
▼3 percentage points lower than Stein (L.) (48%)
Meets physical activity guideline
44%
▲2 percentage points higher than Stein (L.) (42%)
Agriculture, share of the area
76%
▲36 percentage points higher than Stein (L.) (40%)
Built-up, share of the area
6%
▼28 percentage points lower than Stein (L.) (34%)
Recreation, share of the area
0%
▼5 percentage points lower than Stein (L.) (5%)
Health
An estimated 74% of adults rate their own health as good, against 69% in the municipality of Stein (L.) (2024).
This areaThe municipality of Stein (L.)
Good self-rated health
73.7%
69.1%
Smokes
13.4%
14.1%
Excessive drinking
5.2%
4.8%
Overweight
54%
57%
Lonely
45.1%
47.6%
Anxiety or depression feelings
41.8%
45.2%
Meets physical activity guideline
44%
41.9%
Explanation
An RIVM model estimate (small-area estimation from the 2024 Health Monitor for Adults and Elderly), not a direct tabulation — even a buurt that was not itself surveyed gets an estimate. Figures cover adults aged 18 and over.
Source: RIVM/CBS Gezondheidsmonitor Volwassenen en Ouderen (kleine-gebieden-schatting) 2024
Land use
4% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 10% in the municipality of Stein (L.).
Traffic1%
Built-up5.8%
Agriculture76%
Forest and nature3.8%
Water13.5%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
Distance to amenities
A primary school lies here at an average road distance of 1000 m.
Distance
Value
Large supermarket
2,800 m
–
GP practice
1,900 m
–
Primary school
1,000 m
–
Daycare
1,000 m
–
Large supermarkets
–
0
GP practices
–
0
Daycares
–
0.6
Explanation
Average road distance from every address in this buurt to the nearest amenity, and the average count within 1 km — a buurt average, not a distance from one address.
Source: CBS proximity statistics 2025
04 · Residents
The population is growing, while it shrinks in Stein (L.).
Nattenhoven has 145 inhabitants (2026), or 166 per km² (86% lower than in Stein (L.)). In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Stein (L.) was 78%, in line with the national figure. Of the parties that are largest nationally, PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) had the highest share there: 30% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2021
+0%
=about the same as Stein (L.) (-1%)
Turnout, municipality of Stein (L.)
78%
=about the same as the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+3%
▲higher than Stein (L.) (+1%)
Aged 45 to 65
30%
▲2 percentage points higher than Stein (L.) (28%)
Never married
45%
▲6 percentage points higher than Stein (L.) (39%)
Dutch origin
87%
▲4 percentage points higher than Stein (L.) (83%)
Lower education (primary, vmbo, mbo 1)
100%
▲72 percentage points higher than Stein (L.) (28%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
30%
▲13 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2021
+0%
=about the same as Stein (L.) (-1%)
Turnout, municipality of Stein (L.)
78%
=about the same as the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+3%
▲higher than Stein (L.) (+1%)
Aged 45 to 65
30%
▲2 percentage points higher than Stein (L.) (28%)
Never married
45%
▲6 percentage points higher than Stein (L.) (39%)
Dutch origin
87%
▲4 percentage points higher than Stein (L.) (83%)
Lower education (primary, vmbo, mbo 1)
100%
▲72 percentage points higher than Stein (L.) (28%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
30%
▲13 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population held steady between 2021 and 2026, at 145.
Residents, 2026
145
+0% since 2021
Stein (L.) -1%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 166 residents per km², this buurt is 86% less densely populated than the municipality of Stein (L.).
Residents per km²166
Dwellings per km²77.8
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, almost no children were born; almost no one died.
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
30% of residents are between 45 and 65.
0 to 1520
15 to 2515
25 to 4530
45 to 6545
65 to 8035
80 and over5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
45% of residents are never married.
Never married70
Married65
Divorced10
Widowed10
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
87% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands130
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)10
Outside Europe10
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Education level of residents aged 15 to 75
100% of residents have a primary, vmbo or mbo1 level education.
Primary, vmbo, mbo120
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2024
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Stein (L.); there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 78% of eligible voters in Stein (L.) voted. The largest party was PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) with 30% of the valid votes.
Municipality of Stein (L.)The Netherlands
D66
12.6%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
29.6%
16.7%
VVD
13.1%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
8.2%
12.8%
CDA
13.1%
11.8%
JA21
6.1%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
6.2%
4.5%
BBB
2.3%
2.6%
Other
8.8%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
Nattenhoven has an average of 1.5 cars per household, 15% higher than in Stein (L.) (1.3). 18% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), about the same as in Stein (L.) (18%).
Key figures
Cars per household (2025)
1.5
▲15% higher than Stein (L.) (1.3)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
18%
=about the same as Stein (L.) (18%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+8 pp
▲higher than Stein (L.) (+6 pp)
Industrial, share of addresses
4%
▲2 percentage points higher than Stein (L.) (2%)
Residential, share of addresses
93%
▲2 percentage points higher than Stein (L.) (91%)
Office, share of addresses
3%
▲1 percentage point higher than Stein (L.) (2%)
Private rent
3%
▼11 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Residents per km²
166
▼69% lower than the Netherlands (539)
Owner-occupied dwellings
97%
▲40 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (57%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.5
▲15% higher than Stein (L.) (1.3)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
18%
=about the same as Stein (L.) (18%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+8 pp
▲higher than Stein (L.) (+6 pp)
Industrial, share of addresses
4%
▲2 percentage points higher than Stein (L.) (2%)
Residential, share of addresses
93%
▲2 percentage points higher than Stein (L.) (91%)
Office, share of addresses
3%
▲1 percentage point higher than Stein (L.) (2%)
Private rent
3%
▼11 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Residents per km²
166
▼69% lower than the Netherlands (539)
Owner-occupied dwellings
97%
▲40 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (57%)
Passenger cars by fuel type
18% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 18% in the municipality of Stein (L.) (2025).
Petrol81.8%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)18.2%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 11% to 18% between 2021 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
18%– about the same as Stein (L.) (18%)
+7 pp since 2021
Stein (L.) +7 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 110 passenger cars and 15 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars110
Motorcycles15
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
93% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is industrial (4%).
Residential93.3%
Retail2.7%
Office2.7%
Industrial4%
Other1.3%
Explanation
Based on 75 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
3% multi-family dwellings, against 37% nationally.
This areaThe Netherlands
Multi-family dwellings3%
NL 37%▼ −92% vs NL
Private rent3%
NL 14%▼ −79% vs NL
Residents per km²166
NL 539▼ −69% vs NL
Owner-occupied dwellings97%
NL 57%▲ +70% vs NL
Single-family dwellings97%
NL 63%▲ +54% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025