The average WOZ value in IJsselham is €487,000, 44% higher than in Steenwijkerland (€339,000). Between 2019 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 15%, against a rise of 53% in Steenwijkerland. 93% of the homes are owner-occupied, 27 percentage points more than in Steenwijkerland (66%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€487,000
▲44% higher than Steenwijkerland (€339,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2019
+15%
▼lower than Steenwijkerland (+53%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
93%
▲27 percentage points higher than Steenwijkerland (66%)
Social housing
0%
▼25 percentage points lower than Steenwijkerland (25%)
Private rent
7%
▼2 percentage points lower than Steenwijkerland (9%)
Single-family dwellings
93%
▲8 percentage points higher than Steenwijkerland (85%)
Built 1965–1974
7%
▼7 percentage points lower than Steenwijkerland (14%)
Built 1975–1991
14%
▼7 percentage points lower than Steenwijkerland (21%)
Built 1945–1964
7%
▼5 percentage points lower than Steenwijkerland (12%)
Average WOZ value
€487,000
▲44% higher than Steenwijkerland (€339,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2019
+15%
▼lower than Steenwijkerland (+53%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
93%
▲27 percentage points higher than Steenwijkerland (66%)
Social housing
0%
▼25 percentage points lower than Steenwijkerland (25%)
Private rent
7%
▼2 percentage points lower than Steenwijkerland (9%)
Single-family dwellings
93%
▲8 percentage points higher than Steenwijkerland (85%)
Built 1965–1974
7%
▼7 percentage points lower than Steenwijkerland (14%)
Built 1975–1991
14%
▼7 percentage points lower than Steenwijkerland (21%)
Built 1945–1964
7%
▼5 percentage points lower than Steenwijkerland (12%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 15% between 2019 and 2025, to €487,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€487,000▲ 44% above Steenwijkerland
+15% since 2019
Steenwijkerland +53%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€323 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€323/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
145 m² · estimated gemeente average
WOZ €487,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€125NL median
Water board levy€45–
Property tax (OZB)€32€43
Waste levy€24€27
Sewage levy€24€22
Costs to set aside€198
Maintenance reserve€185–
Buildings insurance€13–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Steenwijkerland's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 38th of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 145 m² (estimated gemeente average) with the average WOZ value here, €487,000.
Levies: Steenwijkerland's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
IJsselham has the 7th-highest WOZ value of the 29 wijken in the municipality of Steenwijkerland.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €487,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
IJsselham
487,000
28
–
Steenwijk
286,000
8,683
–
Oldemarkt
323,000
1,194
–
Kalenberg
442,000
167
–
Kuinre
304,000
406
–
Blankenham
386,000
140
–
Scheerwolde
387,000
265
–
Vollenhove
289,000
1,972
–
Sint Jansklooster
398,000
943
–
Belt-Schutsloot
447,000
258
–
Wanneperveen
387,000
706
–
Blokzijl
327,000
657
–
Giethoorn
483,000
1,353
–
Zuidveen
369,000
263
–
Onna
438,000
129
–
Kallenkote
428,000
137
–
Eesveen
434,000
249
–
De Bult
649,000
54
–
Baars
571,000
39
–
Witte Paarden
390,000
96
–
De Pol
487,000
64
–
Willemsoord
376,000
367
–
Marijenkampen
438,000
58
–
Tuk
401,000
873
–
Steenwijkerwold
318,000
878
–
Basse
506,000
97
–
Paasloo
509,000
160
–
Ossenzijl
360,000
269
–
Wetering
632,000
99
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 93% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied93%
Private rent7%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
93% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes93%
Multi-family homes7%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
54% of dwellings were built before 1945, against 19% in the municipality of Steenwijkerland.
Before 194553.6%
1945-19647.1%
1965-19747.1%
1975-199114.3%
1992-200514.3%
2016 and later3.6%
Explanation
Based on 28 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
Too few residents for a rate per resident: these are counts.
IJsselham has too few residents for a reliable rate per 1,000 residents (under 200), so counts are shown instead of a comparison. In 2025, 0 crimes were registered, against 2 in 2021. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Registered crimes, 2025
0
▼down from 2 in 2021
Home burglary
0
2023–2025
Registered crimes, 2025
0
▼down from 2 in 2021
Home burglary
0
2023–2025
Registered crime per year
0 crimes were registered in IJsselham in 2025 (2 in 2021).
Registered crimes, 2025
0
down from 2 in 2021
Explanation
Too few residents for a reliable per-1,000 figure (threshold 200) — registered crime, not all crime — CBS/Politie 47018NED.
In 2022, police in IJsselham registered 1 traffic accidents, of which 0 with injury and none fatal.
2022
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2022
03 · Living environment
Green space is below the Steenwijkerland average.
Agricultural land is the largest land use in IJsselham, covering 83% of the area, against 50% in Steenwijkerland. Green space such as parks, sports fields, forest and nature covers 12% of the area, 21 percentage points below the 33% in Steenwijkerland.
Key figures
Green (parks, sport, nature)
12%
▼21 percentage points lower than Steenwijkerland (33%)
Agriculture, share of the area
83%
▲33 percentage points higher than Steenwijkerland (50%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
11%
▼20 percentage points lower than Steenwijkerland (31%)
Water, share of the area
2%
▼8 percentage points lower than Steenwijkerland (10%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
12%
▼21 percentage points lower than Steenwijkerland (33%)
Agriculture, share of the area
83%
▲33 percentage points higher than Steenwijkerland (50%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
11%
▼20 percentage points lower than Steenwijkerland (31%)
Water, share of the area
2%
▼8 percentage points lower than Steenwijkerland (10%)
Land use
12% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 33% in the municipality of Steenwijkerland.
Traffic2.1%
Built-up1.1%
Recreation0.3%
Agriculture83.4%
Forest and nature11.5%
Water1.6%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
04 · Residents
The population is shrinking, while it grows in Steenwijkerland.
IJsselham has 75 inhabitants (2026), or 19 per km² (88% lower than in Steenwijkerland). In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Steenwijkerland was 83%, 5 percentage points above the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) had the highest share there: 19% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2018
-6%
▼lower than Steenwijkerland (+5%)
Turnout, municipality of Steenwijkerland
83%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+4%
=about the same as Steenwijkerland (+3%)
Aged 45 to 65
33%
▲5 percentage points higher than Steenwijkerland (28%)
Never married
47%
▲3 percentage points higher than Steenwijkerland (44%)
Dutch origin
100%
▲13 percentage points higher than Steenwijkerland (87%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
19%
▲2 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2018
-6%
▼lower than Steenwijkerland (+5%)
Turnout, municipality of Steenwijkerland
83%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+4%
=about the same as Steenwijkerland (+3%)
Aged 45 to 65
33%
▲5 percentage points higher than Steenwijkerland (28%)
Never married
47%
▲3 percentage points higher than Steenwijkerland (44%)
Dutch origin
100%
▲13 percentage points higher than Steenwijkerland (87%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
19%
▲2 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population shrank 6% between 2018 and 2026, to 75.
Residents, 2026
75
-6% since 2018
Steenwijkerland +5%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 19 residents per km², this wijk is 88% less densely populated than the municipality of Steenwijkerland.
Residents per km²19
Dwellings per km²7.6
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, almost no children were born; 66.7 died per 1,000.
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
33% of residents are between 45 and 65.
0 to 1515
15 to 255
25 to 4515
45 to 6525
65 to 8015
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
47% of residents are never married.
Never married35
Married30
Divorced5
Widowed5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
100% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands70
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Steenwijkerland; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 83% of eligible voters in Steenwijkerland voted. The largest party was PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) with 19% of the valid votes.
Municipality of SteenwijkerlandThe Netherlands
D66
11.5%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
18.9%
16.7%
VVD
14.7%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
9.1%
12.8%
CDA
14.4%
11.8%
JA21
6.2%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
6.8%
4.5%
BBB
6.6%
2.6%
Other
11.8%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
38% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 9 percentage points more than in Steenwijkerland (29%).
Key figures
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
50%
▲40 percentage points higher than Steenwijkerland (10%)
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
0%
▼19 percentage points lower than Steenwijkerland (19%)
Culture, recreation and other services, share of businesses
0%
▼10 percentage points lower than Steenwijkerland (10%)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
38%
▲9 percentage points higher than Steenwijkerland (29%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2018
−25 pp
▼lower than Steenwijkerland (0 pp)
Industrial, share of addresses
26%
▲20 percentage points higher than Steenwijkerland (6%)
Lodging, share of addresses
16%
▲10 percentage points higher than Steenwijkerland (6%)
Residential, share of addresses
90%
▲7 percentage points higher than Steenwijkerland (83%)
Multi-family dwellings
7%
▼30 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (37%)
Private rent
7%
▼7 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Owner-occupied dwellings
93%
▲36 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (57%)
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
50%
▲40 percentage points higher than Steenwijkerland (10%)
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
0%
▼19 percentage points lower than Steenwijkerland (19%)
Culture, recreation and other services, share of businesses
0%
▼10 percentage points lower than Steenwijkerland (10%)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
38%
▲9 percentage points higher than Steenwijkerland (29%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2018
−25 pp
▼lower than Steenwijkerland (0 pp)
Industrial, share of addresses
26%
▲20 percentage points higher than Steenwijkerland (6%)
Lodging, share of addresses
16%
▲10 percentage points higher than Steenwijkerland (6%)
Residential, share of addresses
90%
▲7 percentage points higher than Steenwijkerland (83%)
Multi-family dwellings
7%
▼30 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (37%)
Private rent
7%
▼7 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Owner-occupied dwellings
93%
▲36 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (57%)
Business establishments by sector
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij is the largest sector, with 15 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij15
Nijverheid en energie5
Handel en horeca0
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie0
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed0
Zakelijke dienstverlening5
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg5
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten0
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
38% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 29% in the municipality of Steenwijkerland (2025).
Petrol62.5%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)37.5%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 62% to 38% between 2018 and 2025.
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 40 passenger cars and 10 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars40
Motorcycles10
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
90% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is industrial (26%).
Residential90.3%
Assembly3.2%
Industrial25.8%
Lodging16.1%
Other6.5%
Explanation
Based on 31 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
19 residents per km²: 96% less densely populated than the Dutch average.
This areaThe Netherlands
Residents per km²19
NL 539▼ −96% vs NL
Multi-family dwellings7%
NL 37%▼ −81% vs NL
Private rent7%
NL 14%▼ −50% vs NL
Owner-occupied dwellings93%
NL 57%▲ +63% vs NL
Single-family dwellings93%
NL 63%▲ +48% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026