We're pulling the figures from public sources. This usually takes a few seconds.
Area and its neighbourhoodsCBS key figures for districts and neighbourhoods
Residents and householdsCBS
Homes and WOZ valueCBS · Kadaster BAG
Housing marketNVM market overview
Municipal leviesMunicipal budgets · CBS
SafetyCBS and Police
HealthRIVM Health Monitor
Land use and amenitiesCBS land use · proximity statistics
Road safety and electionsRijkswaterstaat · Kiesraad
Comparing with the municipality and the countryRankings and comparisons
Neighbourhood · Steenbergen
Living in Kruislandse polders
The population is growing about as fast as in Steenbergen. Homes cost more than the average in the municipality of Steenbergen, and registered crime per resident is higher.
The average WOZ value in Kruislandse polders is €603,000, 67% higher than in Steenbergen (€362,000). Between 2021 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 28%, against a rise of 43% in Steenbergen. 92% of the homes are owner-occupied, 22 percentage points more than in Steenbergen (70%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€603,000
▲67% higher than Steenbergen (€362,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+28%
▼lower than Steenbergen (+43%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
92%
▲22 percentage points higher than Steenbergen (70%)
Social housing
0%
▼22 percentage points lower than Steenbergen (22%)
Private rent
8%
=about the same as Steenbergen (8%)
Single-family dwellings
99%
▲13 percentage points higher than Steenbergen (86%)
Built 1975–1991
15%
▼11 percentage points lower than Steenbergen (26%)
Built 1992–2005
10%
▼4 percentage points lower than Steenbergen (14%)
Built 2016 and later
3%
▼4 percentage points lower than Steenbergen (7%)
Average WOZ value
€603,000
▲67% higher than Steenbergen (€362,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+28%
▼lower than Steenbergen (+43%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
92%
▲22 percentage points higher than Steenbergen (70%)
Social housing
0%
▼22 percentage points lower than Steenbergen (22%)
Private rent
8%
=about the same as Steenbergen (8%)
Single-family dwellings
99%
▲13 percentage points higher than Steenbergen (86%)
Built 1975–1991
15%
▼11 percentage points lower than Steenbergen (26%)
Built 1992–2005
10%
▼4 percentage points lower than Steenbergen (14%)
Built 2016 and later
3%
▼4 percentage points lower than Steenbergen (7%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 28% between 2021 and 2025, to €603,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€603,000▲ 67% above Steenbergen
+28% since 2021
Steenbergen +43%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€451 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€451/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
221 m² · measured buurt average
WOZ €603,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€149NL median
Property tax (OZB)€49€53
Water board levy€49–
Waste levy€33€27
Sewage levy€18€22
Costs to set aside€302
Maintenance reserve€282–
Buildings insurance€20–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Steenbergen's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 142nd of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 221 m² (measured average in this buurt) with the average WOZ value here, €603,000.
Levies: Steenbergen's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Kruislandse polders has the highest WOZ value of the 2 buurten in Kruisland.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €603,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Kruislandse polders
603,000
235
–
Kruisland
404,000
821
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 92% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied92%
Private rent8%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
99% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes99%
Multi-family homes1%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
39% of dwellings were built before 1945, against 14% in the municipality of Steenbergen.
Before 194539.5%
1945-196412.9%
1965-197414.2%
1975-199115%
1992-200510.3%
2006-20154.7%
2016 and later3.4%
Explanation
Based on 233 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
More registered crime per resident than the Steenbergen average.
In 2025, 31 crimes per 1,000 residents were registered in Kruislandse polders, 3% higher than in Steenbergen (30). Since 2021 the registered rate per 1,000 residents fell 44%, against a rise of 1% in Steenbergen. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
31
▲3% higher than Steenbergen (30)
Change since 2021
-44%
▼lower than Steenbergen (+1%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
2.8
▼10% lower than Steenbergen (3.1)
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
31
▲3% higher than Steenbergen (30)
Change since 2021
-44%
▼lower than Steenbergen (+1%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
2.8
▼10% lower than Steenbergen (3.1)
Registered crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
In 2025, Kruislandse polders registered 31 crimes per 1,000 residents, against 30 in the municipality of Steenbergen.
Kruislandse polders31
The municipality of Steenbergen30
Explanation
Crime is counted where it happens and divided by the number of residents, so places with many visitors — city centres, nightlife, stations — score higher.
The largest category in Kruislandse polders is 'Theft and burglary': 12.1 per 1,000 residents in 2025, against 9.8 in the municipality of Steenbergen.
Kruislandse poldersSteenbergen
Theft and burglary12.1
Steenbergen 9.8▲ +23% vs Steenbergen
Fraud and scams6.9
Steenbergen 5.0▲ +38% vs Steenbergen
Vandalism and public order3.4
Steenbergen 3.5≈ Steenbergen
Violence and threats3.4
Steenbergen 4.8▼ −29% vs Steenbergen
Traffic1.7
Steenbergen 5.0▼ −66% vs Steenbergen
Environmental1.7
Steenbergen 0.2▲ +750% vs Steenbergen
Other and withheld1.7
Steenbergen 1.9▼ −11% vs Steenbergen
Explanation
Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2024, police in Kruislandse polders registered 7 traffic accidents, of which 1 with injury and none fatal.
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2024
03 · Living environment
Residents rate their health above the Steenbergen average; green space is below the Steenbergen average.
An estimated 76% of adults in Kruislandse polders rate their own health as good, 5 percentage points more than in Steenbergen. Fewer adults are overweight (51% against 59%), fewer smoke (12% against 17%), fewer feel lonely (44% against 48%) and fewer report anxiety or depression (42% against 46%). Agricultural land is the largest land use in Kruislandse polders, covering 95% of the area, against 78% in Steenbergen. Green space such as parks, sports fields, forest and nature covers 2% of the area, 4 percentage points below the 6% in Steenbergen.
Key figures
Self-rated health (estimated)
76%
▲5 percentage points higher than Steenbergen (71%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
2%
▼4 percentage points lower than Steenbergen (6%)
More figures
Overweight
51%
▼8 percentage points lower than Steenbergen (59%)
Smokes
12%
▼5 percentage points lower than Steenbergen (17%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
42%
▼4 percentage points lower than Steenbergen (46%)
Meets physical activity guideline
46%
▲4 percentage points higher than Steenbergen (42%)
Agriculture, share of the area
95%
▲17 percentage points higher than Steenbergen (78%)
Water, share of the area
1%
▼7 percentage points lower than Steenbergen (8%)
Built-up, share of the area
0%
▼4 percentage points lower than Steenbergen (4%)
Self-rated health (estimated)
76%
▲5 percentage points higher than Steenbergen (71%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
2%
▼4 percentage points lower than Steenbergen (6%)
More figures
Overweight
51%
▼8 percentage points lower than Steenbergen (59%)
Smokes
12%
▼5 percentage points lower than Steenbergen (17%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
42%
▼4 percentage points lower than Steenbergen (46%)
Meets physical activity guideline
46%
▲4 percentage points higher than Steenbergen (42%)
Agriculture, share of the area
95%
▲17 percentage points higher than Steenbergen (78%)
Water, share of the area
1%
▼7 percentage points lower than Steenbergen (8%)
Built-up, share of the area
0%
▼4 percentage points lower than Steenbergen (4%)
Health
An estimated 76% of adults rate their own health as good, against 71% in the municipality of Steenbergen (2024).
This areaThe municipality of Steenbergen
Good self-rated health
75.6%
71.3%
Smokes
11.8%
17.4%
Excessive drinking
6.2%
6.1%
Overweight
50.8%
58.6%
Lonely
43.6%
47.5%
Anxiety or depression feelings
41.7%
45.7%
Meets physical activity guideline
45.6%
41.6%
Explanation
An RIVM model estimate (small-area estimation from the 2024 Health Monitor for Adults and Elderly), not a direct tabulation — even a buurt that was not itself surveyed gets an estimate. Figures cover adults aged 18 and over.
Source: RIVM/CBS Gezondheidsmonitor Volwassenen en Ouderen (kleine-gebieden-schatting) 2024
Land use
2% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 6% in the municipality of Steenbergen.
Traffic1.6%
Built-up0.4%
Agriculture94.7%
Forest and nature1.8%
Water1.5%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
Distance to amenities
A large supermarket lies here at an average road distance of 2500 m.
Distance
Value
Large supermarket
2,500 m
–
GP practice
5,000 m
–
Primary school
2,600 m
–
Daycare
2,500 m
–
Large supermarkets
–
0
GP practices
–
0
Daycares
–
0
Explanation
Average road distance from every address in this buurt to the nearest amenity, and the average count within 1 km — a buurt average, not a distance from one address.
Source: CBS proximity statistics 2025
04 · Residents
The population is growing about as fast as the Steenbergen average.
Kruislandse polders has 585 inhabitants (2026), or 19 per km² (89% lower than in Steenbergen). Between 2021 and 2026 the population rose 1%, the same as in Steenbergen. In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Steenbergen was 78%, in line with the national figure. Of the parties that are largest nationally, PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) had the highest share there: 29% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2021
+1%
=about the same as Steenbergen (+1%)
Turnout, municipality of Steenbergen
78%
=about the same as the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+5%
=about the same as Steenbergen (+5%)
Aged 45 to 65
34%
▲6 percentage points higher than Steenbergen (28%)
Never married
45%
▲2 percentage points higher than Steenbergen (43%)
Dutch origin
88%
▲5 percentage points higher than Steenbergen (83%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
46%
▼3 percentage points lower than Steenbergen (49%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
29%
▲12 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2021
+1%
=about the same as Steenbergen (+1%)
Turnout, municipality of Steenbergen
78%
=about the same as the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+5%
=about the same as Steenbergen (+5%)
Aged 45 to 65
34%
▲6 percentage points higher than Steenbergen (28%)
Never married
45%
▲2 percentage points higher than Steenbergen (43%)
Dutch origin
88%
▲5 percentage points higher than Steenbergen (83%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
46%
▼3 percentage points lower than Steenbergen (49%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
29%
▲12 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population held steady between 2021 and 2026, at 585.
Residents, 2026
585
+1% since 2021
Steenbergen +1%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 19 residents per km², this buurt is 89% less densely populated than the municipality of Steenbergen.
Residents per km²19
Dwellings per km²7.6
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, almost no children were born; 8.6 died per 1,000.
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
34% of residents are between 45 and 65.
0 to 1565
15 to 2575
25 to 45115
45 to 65195
65 to 8095
80 and over30
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
45% of residents are never married.
Never married265
Married265
Divorced20
Widowed35
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
88% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands520
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)45
Outside Europe25
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Education level of residents aged 15 to 75
46% of residents have a havo, vwo or mbo2-4 level education.
Primary, vmbo, mbo190
Havo, vwo, mbo2-4210
Higher professional, university160
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2024
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Steenbergen; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 78% of eligible voters in Steenbergen voted. The largest party was PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) with 29% of the valid votes.
Municipality of SteenbergenThe Netherlands
D66
11.4%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
28.7%
16.7%
VVD
17%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
5.1%
12.8%
CDA
11.4%
11.8%
JA21
8.4%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
6.1%
4.5%
BBB
3.5%
2.6%
Other
8.4%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
Kruislandse polders has an average of 1.6 cars per household, 23% higher than in Steenbergen (1.3). 32% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 11 percentage points more than in Steenbergen (21%).
Key figures
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
41%
▲31 percentage points higher than Steenbergen (10%)
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
9%
▼8 percentage points lower than Steenbergen (17%)
Industry and energy, share of businesses
12%
▼7 percentage points lower than Steenbergen (19%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.6
▲23% higher than Steenbergen (1.3)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
32%
▲11 percentage points higher than Steenbergen (21%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+4 pp
=about the same as Steenbergen (+3 pp)
Industrial, share of addresses
24%
▲19 percentage points higher than Steenbergen (5%)
Residential, share of addresses
91%
▲5 percentage points higher than Steenbergen (86%)
Lodging, share of addresses
4%
▲3 percentage points higher than Steenbergen (1%)
Residents per km²
19
▼96% lower than the Netherlands (539)
Private rent
8%
▼6 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Owner-occupied dwellings
92%
▲35 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (57%)
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
41%
▲31 percentage points higher than Steenbergen (10%)
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
9%
▼8 percentage points lower than Steenbergen (17%)
Industry and energy, share of businesses
12%
▼7 percentage points lower than Steenbergen (19%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.6
▲23% higher than Steenbergen (1.3)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
32%
▲11 percentage points higher than Steenbergen (21%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+4 pp
=about the same as Steenbergen (+3 pp)
Industrial, share of addresses
24%
▲19 percentage points higher than Steenbergen (5%)
Residential, share of addresses
91%
▲5 percentage points higher than Steenbergen (86%)
Lodging, share of addresses
4%
▲3 percentage points higher than Steenbergen (1%)
Residents per km²
19
▼96% lower than the Netherlands (539)
Private rent
8%
▼6 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Owner-occupied dwellings
92%
▲35 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (57%)
Business establishments by sector
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij is the largest sector, with 65 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij65
Nijverheid en energie20
Handel en horeca15
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie5
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed5
Zakelijke dienstverlening30
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg10
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten10
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
32% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 21% in the municipality of Steenbergen (2025).
Petrol68.1%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)31.9%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 28% to 32% between 2021 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
32%▲ 11 percentage points above Steenbergen (21%)
+4 pp since 2021
Steenbergen +3 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 360 passenger cars and 55 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars360
Motorcycles55
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
91% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is industrial (24%).
Residential90.7%
Retail0.4%
Assembly0.4%
Industrial23.7%
Lodging3.5%
Other2.7%
Explanation
Based on 257 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
1% multi-family dwellings, against 37% nationally.
This areaThe Netherlands
Multi-family dwellings1%
NL 37%▼ −97% vs NL
Residents per km²19
NL 539▼ −96% vs NL
Private rent8%
NL 14%▼ −43% vs NL
Owner-occupied dwellings92%
NL 57%▲ +61% vs NL
Single-family dwellings99%
NL 63%▲ +57% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025