The average WOZ value in Boompjesdijk is €414,000, 14% higher than in Steenbergen (€362,000). Between 2021 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 44%, against a rise of 43% in Steenbergen. 96% of the homes are owner-occupied, 26 percentage points more than in Steenbergen (70%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€414,000
▲14% higher than Steenbergen (€362,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+44%
▲higher than Steenbergen (+43%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
96%
▲26 percentage points higher than Steenbergen (70%)
Social housing
0%
▼22 percentage points lower than Steenbergen (22%)
Private rent
4%
▼4 percentage points lower than Steenbergen (8%)
Single-family dwellings
96%
▲10 percentage points higher than Steenbergen (86%)
Built 1975–1991
11%
▼15 percentage points lower than Steenbergen (26%)
Built 1945–1964
4%
▼12 percentage points lower than Steenbergen (16%)
Built 1992–2005
2%
▼12 percentage points lower than Steenbergen (14%)
Average WOZ value
€414,000
▲14% higher than Steenbergen (€362,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+44%
▲higher than Steenbergen (+43%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
96%
▲26 percentage points higher than Steenbergen (70%)
Social housing
0%
▼22 percentage points lower than Steenbergen (22%)
Private rent
4%
▼4 percentage points lower than Steenbergen (8%)
Single-family dwellings
96%
▲10 percentage points higher than Steenbergen (86%)
Built 1975–1991
11%
▼15 percentage points lower than Steenbergen (26%)
Built 1945–1964
4%
▼12 percentage points lower than Steenbergen (16%)
Built 1992–2005
2%
▼12 percentage points lower than Steenbergen (14%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 44% between 2021 and 2025, to €414,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€414,000▲ 14% above Steenbergen
+44% since 2021
Steenbergen +43%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€330 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€330/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
148 m² · measured buurt average
WOZ €414,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€128NL median
Water board levy€43–
Property tax (OZB)€34€36
Waste levy€33€27
Sewage levy€18€22
Costs to set aside€202
Maintenance reserve€189–
Buildings insurance€13–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Steenbergen's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 143rd of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 148 m² (measured average in this buurt) with the average WOZ value here, €414,000.
Levies: Steenbergen's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Boompjesdijk has the 2nd-lowest WOZ value of the 4 buurten in Dinteloord.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €414,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Boompjesdijk
414,000
46
–
Dinteloord
321,000
2,401
–
Verspreide huizen in het Oosten
650,000
62
–
Verspreide huizen in het Westen
538,000
74
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 96% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied96%
Private rent4%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
96% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes96%
Multi-family homes4%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
74% of dwellings were built before 1945, against 14% in the municipality of Steenbergen.
Before 194573.9%
1945-19644.3%
1965-19748.7%
1975-199110.9%
1992-20052.2%
Explanation
Based on 46 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
Too few residents for a rate per resident: these are counts.
Boompjesdijk has too few residents for a reliable rate per 1,000 residents (under 200), so counts are shown instead of a comparison. In 2025, 0 crimes were registered, against 3 in 2021. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Registered crimes, 2025
0
▼down from 3 in 2021
Home burglary
0
2023–2025
Registered crimes, 2025
0
▼down from 3 in 2021
Home burglary
0
2023–2025
Registered crime per year
0 crimes were registered in Boompjesdijk in 2025 (3 in 2021).
Registered crimes, 2025
0
down from 3 in 2021
Explanation
Too few residents for a reliable per-1,000 figure (threshold 200) — registered crime, not all crime — CBS/Politie 47018NED.
In 2020, police in Boompjesdijk registered 1 traffic accidents, of which 1 with injury and none fatal.
2020
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2020
03 · Living environment
Green space is below the Steenbergen average.
Agricultural land is the largest land use in Boompjesdijk, covering 97% of the area, against 78% in Steenbergen.
Key figures
Green (parks, sport, nature)
0%
▼6 percentage points lower than Steenbergen (6%)
Agriculture, share of the area
97%
▲19 percentage points higher than Steenbergen (78%)
Water, share of the area
0%
▼8 percentage points lower than Steenbergen (8%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
0%
▼6 percentage points lower than Steenbergen (6%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
0%
▼6 percentage points lower than Steenbergen (6%)
Agriculture, share of the area
97%
▲19 percentage points higher than Steenbergen (78%)
Water, share of the area
0%
▼8 percentage points lower than Steenbergen (8%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
0%
▼6 percentage points lower than Steenbergen (6%)
Land use
0% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 6% in the municipality of Steenbergen.
Traffic3.4%
Agriculture96.6%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
Distance to amenities
A daycare lies here at an average road distance of 500 m.
Distance
Value
Large supermarket
5,000 m
–
GP practice
5,100 m
–
Primary school
4,700 m
–
Daycare
500 m
–
Large supermarkets
–
0
GP practices
–
0
Daycares
–
0.9
Explanation
Average road distance from every address in this buurt to the nearest amenity, and the average count within 1 km — a buurt average, not a distance from one address.
Source: CBS proximity statistics 2025
04 · Residents
The population is shrinking, while it grows in Steenbergen.
Boompjesdijk has 105 inhabitants (2026), or 115 per km² (32% lower than in Steenbergen). In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Steenbergen was 78%, in line with the national figure. Of the parties that are largest nationally, PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) had the highest share there: 29% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2021
-9%
▼lower than Steenbergen (+1%)
Turnout, municipality of Steenbergen
78%
=about the same as the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+0%
▼lower than Steenbergen (+5%)
Aged 45 to 65
43%
▲15 percentage points higher than Steenbergen (28%)
Married
55%
▲12 percentage points higher than Steenbergen (43%)
Dutch origin
90%
▲7 percentage points higher than Steenbergen (83%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
100%
▲51 percentage points higher than Steenbergen (49%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
29%
▲12 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2021
-9%
▼lower than Steenbergen (+1%)
Turnout, municipality of Steenbergen
78%
=about the same as the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+0%
▼lower than Steenbergen (+5%)
Aged 45 to 65
43%
▲15 percentage points higher than Steenbergen (28%)
Married
55%
▲12 percentage points higher than Steenbergen (43%)
Dutch origin
90%
▲7 percentage points higher than Steenbergen (83%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
100%
▲51 percentage points higher than Steenbergen (49%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
29%
▲12 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population shrank 9% between 2021 and 2026, to 105.
Residents, 2026
105
-9% since 2021
Steenbergen +1%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 115 residents per km², this buurt is 32% less densely populated than the municipality of Steenbergen.
Residents per km²115
Dwellings per km²51.7
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, almost no children were born; almost no one died.
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
43% of residents are between 45 and 65.
0 to 1510
15 to 2515
25 to 4520
45 to 6545
65 to 8015
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
55% of residents are married.
Never married40
Married55
Divorced5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
90% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands95
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)5
Outside Europe5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Education level of residents aged 15 to 75
100% of residents have a havo, vwo or mbo2-4 level education.
Havo, vwo, mbo2-440
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2024
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Steenbergen; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 78% of eligible voters in Steenbergen voted. The largest party was PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) with 29% of the valid votes.
Municipality of SteenbergenThe Netherlands
D66
11.4%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
28.7%
16.7%
VVD
17%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
5.1%
12.8%
CDA
11.4%
11.8%
JA21
8.4%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
6.1%
4.5%
BBB
3.5%
2.6%
Other
8.4%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
14% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 7 percentage points less than in Steenbergen (21%).
Key figures
Cars not on petrol (2025)
14%
▼7 percentage points lower than Steenbergen (21%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
−7 pp
▼lower than Steenbergen (+3 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
90%
▲4 percentage points higher than Steenbergen (86%)
Industrial, share of addresses
2%
▼3 percentage points lower than Steenbergen (5%)
Healthcare, share of addresses
2%
▲2 percentage points higher than Steenbergen (0%)
Residents per km²
115
▼79% lower than the Netherlands (539)
Private rent
4%
▼10 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Owner-occupied dwellings
96%
▲39 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (57%)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
14%
▼7 percentage points lower than Steenbergen (21%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
−7 pp
▼lower than Steenbergen (+3 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
90%
▲4 percentage points higher than Steenbergen (86%)
Industrial, share of addresses
2%
▼3 percentage points lower than Steenbergen (5%)
Healthcare, share of addresses
2%
▲2 percentage points higher than Steenbergen (0%)
Residents per km²
115
▼79% lower than the Netherlands (539)
Private rent
4%
▼10 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Owner-occupied dwellings
96%
▲39 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (57%)
Passenger cars by fuel type
14% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 21% in the municipality of Steenbergen (2025).
Petrol85.7%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)14.3%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 21% to 14% between 2021 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
14%▼ 7 percentage points below Steenbergen (21%)
-7 pp since 2021
Steenbergen +3 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 70 passenger cars and 15 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars70
Motorcycles15
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
90% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is healthcare (2%).
Residential90.2%
Healthcare2%
Industrial2%
Other7.8%
Explanation
Based on 51 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
4% multi-family dwellings, against 37% nationally.
This areaThe Netherlands
Multi-family dwellings4%
NL 37%▼ −89% vs NL
Residents per km²115
NL 539▼ −79% vs NL
Private rent4%
NL 14%▼ −71% vs NL
Owner-occupied dwellings96%
NL 57%▲ +68% vs NL
Single-family dwellings96%
NL 63%▲ +52% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025