We're pulling the figures from public sources. This usually takes a few seconds.
Area and its neighbourhoodsCBS key figures for districts and neighbourhoods
Residents and householdsCBS
Homes and WOZ valueCBS · Kadaster BAG
Housing marketNVM market overview
Municipal leviesMunicipal budgets · CBS
SafetyCBS and Police
HealthRIVM Health Monitor
Land use and amenitiesCBS land use · proximity statistics
Road safety and electionsRijkswaterstaat · Kiesraad
Comparing with the municipality and the countryRankings and comparisons
District · Roosendaal
Living in Wouw
The population is shrinking, while it grows in Roosendaal. Homes cost more than the average in the municipality of Roosendaal, and registered crime per resident is lower.
The average WOZ value in Wouw is €391,000, 21% higher than in Roosendaal (€323,000). Between 2014 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 62%, against a rise of 58% in Roosendaal. 79% of the homes are owner-occupied, 17 percentage points more than in Roosendaal (62%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€391,000
▲21% higher than Roosendaal (€323,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2014
+62%
▲higher than Roosendaal (+58%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
79%
▲17 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (62%)
Social housing
14%
▼13 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (27%)
Private rent
6%
▼4 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (10%)
Single-family dwellings
86%
▲12 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (74%)
Built 1965–1974
25%
▲8 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (17%)
Built 1992–2005
14%
▼3 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (17%)
Built before 1945
9%
▼3 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (12%)
Average WOZ value
€391,000
▲21% higher than Roosendaal (€323,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2014
+62%
▲higher than Roosendaal (+58%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
79%
▲17 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (62%)
Social housing
14%
▼13 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (27%)
Private rent
6%
▼4 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (10%)
Single-family dwellings
86%
▲12 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (74%)
Built 1965–1974
25%
▲8 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (17%)
Built 1992–2005
14%
▼3 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (17%)
Built before 1945
9%
▼3 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (12%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 62% between 2014 and 2025, to €391,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€391,000▲ 21% above Roosendaal
+62% since 2014
Roosendaal +58%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€300 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€300/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
122 m² · estimated gemeente average
WOZ €391,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€133NL median
Water board levy€43–
Sewage levy€33€22
Property tax (OZB)€30€34
Waste levy€27€27
Costs to set aside€167
Maintenance reserve€156–
Buildings insurance€11–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Roosendaal's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 235th of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 122 m² (estimated gemeente average) with the average WOZ value here, €391,000.
Levies: Roosendaal's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Wouw has the 6th-highest WOZ value of the 14 wijken in the municipality of Roosendaal.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €391,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Wouw
391,000
2,213
–
Centrum
277,000
4,002
–
Oost
280,000
2,833
–
Noord
258,000
3,434
–
West
258,000
4,026
–
Groot Kroeven
294,000
5,223
–
Langdonk
300,000
2,134
–
Kortendijk
370,000
4,757
–
Tolberg
382,000
4,895
–
Industriegebieden
461,000
238
–
Nispen
453,000
702
–
Heerle
428,000
750
–
Moerstraten
492,000
269
–
Wouwse Plantage
488,000
505
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 79% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied79%
Social housing14%
Private rent6%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
86% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes86%
Multi-family homes14%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
26% of dwellings were built between 1975 and 1991, against 26% in the municipality of Roosendaal.
Before 19458.8%
1945-196414.5%
1965-197425%
1975-199126.4%
1992-200513.5%
2006-20154.3%
2016 and later7.4%
Explanation
Based on 2,231 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
Less registered crime per resident than the Roosendaal average.
In 2025, 27 crimes per 1,000 residents were registered in Wouw, 49% lower than in Roosendaal (53). Since 2021 the registered rate per 1,000 residents fell 2%, against a fall of 9% in Roosendaal. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
27
▼49% lower than Roosendaal (53)
Change since 2021
-2%
▲higher than Roosendaal (-9%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
3.8
▲19% higher than Roosendaal (3.2)
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
27
▼49% lower than Roosendaal (53)
Change since 2021
-2%
▲higher than Roosendaal (-9%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
3.8
▲19% higher than Roosendaal (3.2)
Registered crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
In 2025, Wouw registered 27 crimes per 1,000 residents, against 53 in the municipality of Roosendaal.
Wouw27
The municipality of Roosendaal53
Explanation
Crime is counted where it happens and divided by the number of residents, so places with many visitors — city centres, nightlife, stations — score higher.
The largest category in Wouw is 'Theft and burglary': 9.1 per 1,000 residents in 2025, against 26.0 in the municipality of Roosendaal.
WouwRoosendaal
Theft and burglary9.1
Roosendaal 26.0▼ −65% vs Roosendaal
Traffic6.4
Roosendaal 7.7▼ −17% vs Roosendaal
Fraud and scams6.2
Roosendaal 5.1▲ +22% vs Roosendaal
Vandalism and public order3.1
Roosendaal 6.1▼ −49% vs Roosendaal
Violence and threats1.4
Roosendaal 5.3▼ −74% vs Roosendaal
Other and withheld0.8
Roosendaal 2.6▼ −69% vs Roosendaal
Environmental0.2
Roosendaal 0.2≈ Roosendaal
Explanation
Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2024, police in Wouw registered 24 traffic accidents, of which 2 with injury and none fatal.
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2024
03 · Living environment
Residents rate their health above the Roosendaal average; green space is below the Roosendaal average.
An estimated 74% of adults in Wouw rate their own health as good, 5 percentage points more than in Roosendaal. Fewer adults feel lonely (43% against 52%), fewer report anxiety or depression (43% against 49%), fewer smoke (14% against 18%) and fewer are overweight (57% against 58%). Agricultural land is the largest land use in Wouw, covering 81% of the area, against 65% in Roosendaal. Green space such as parks, sports fields, forest and nature covers 2% of the area, 8 percentage points below the 10% in Roosendaal.
Key figures
Self-rated health (estimated)
74%
▲5 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (69%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
2%
▼8 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (10%)
More figures
Lonely
43%
▼9 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (52%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
43%
▼6 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (49%)
Smokes
14%
▼4 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (18%)
Meets physical activity guideline
44%
▲1 percentage point higher than Roosendaal (43%)
Agriculture, share of the area
81%
▲16 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (65%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
0%
▼6 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (6%)
Built-up, share of the area
14%
▼5 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (19%)
Self-rated health (estimated)
74%
▲5 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (69%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
2%
▼8 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (10%)
More figures
Lonely
43%
▼9 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (52%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
43%
▼6 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (49%)
Smokes
14%
▼4 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (18%)
Meets physical activity guideline
44%
▲1 percentage point higher than Roosendaal (43%)
Agriculture, share of the area
81%
▲16 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (65%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
0%
▼6 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (6%)
Built-up, share of the area
14%
▼5 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (19%)
Health
An estimated 74% of adults rate their own health as good, against 69% in the municipality of Roosendaal (2024).
This areaThe municipality of Roosendaal
Good self-rated health
73.8%
69.3%
Smokes
13.9%
18%
Excessive drinking
6.1%
5.7%
Overweight
57%
57.5%
Lonely
42.7%
51.7%
Anxiety or depression feelings
43.2%
48.9%
Meets physical activity guideline
44.5%
43.4%
Explanation
An RIVM model estimate (small-area estimation from the 2024 Health Monitor for Adults and Elderly), not a direct tabulation — even a buurt that was not itself surveyed gets an estimate. Figures cover adults aged 18 and over.
Source: RIVM/CBS Gezondheidsmonitor Volwassenen en Ouderen (kleine-gebieden-schatting) 2024
Land use
2% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 10% in the municipality of Roosendaal.
Traffic3.1%
Built-up14.4%
Other built-up0.1%
Recreation1.6%
Agriculture80.8%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
04 · Residents
The population is shrinking, while it grows in Roosendaal.
Wouw has 4,805 inhabitants (2026), or 546 per km² (26% lower than in Roosendaal). Between 2014 and 2026 the population fell 1%, against a rise of 1% in Roosendaal. In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Roosendaal was 73%, 5 percentage points below the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) had the highest share there: 22% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2014
-1%
▼lower than Roosendaal (+1%)
Turnout, municipality of Roosendaal
73%
▼5 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+7%
▲higher than Roosendaal (+6%)
Aged 45 to 65
28%
▲1 percentage point higher than Roosendaal (27%)
Married
45%
▲6 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (39%)
Dutch origin
88%
▲19 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (69%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
47%
▲4 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (43%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
22%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2014
-1%
▼lower than Roosendaal (+1%)
Turnout, municipality of Roosendaal
73%
▼5 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+7%
▲higher than Roosendaal (+6%)
Aged 45 to 65
28%
▲1 percentage point higher than Roosendaal (27%)
Married
45%
▲6 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (39%)
Dutch origin
88%
▲19 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (69%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
47%
▲4 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (43%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
22%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population held steady between 2014 and 2026, at 4,805.
Residents, 2026
4,805
-1% since 2014
Roosendaal +1%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 546 residents per km², this wijk is 26% less densely populated than the municipality of Roosendaal.
Residents per km²546
Dwellings per km²251.2
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, 5.2 children were born per 1,000 residents; 12.4 died per 1,000.
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
28% of residents are between 45 and 65.
0 to 15645
15 to 25520
25 to 45965
45 to 651,335
65 to 80985
80 and over360
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
45% of residents are married.
Never married1,945
Married2,180
Divorced340
Widowed345
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
88% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands4,245
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)360
Outside Europe205
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Education level of residents aged 15 to 75
47% of residents have a havo, vwo or mbo2-4 level education.
Primary, vmbo, mbo1940
Havo, vwo, mbo2-41,640
Higher professional, university930
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2024
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Roosendaal; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 73% of eligible voters in Roosendaal voted. The largest party was PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) with 22% of the valid votes.
Municipality of RoosendaalThe Netherlands
D66
14.9%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
21.5%
16.7%
VVD
17.6%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
8.8%
12.8%
CDA
12%
11.8%
JA21
7.3%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
4.5%
4.5%
BBB
2.2%
2.6%
Other
11.2%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
Wouw has an average of 1.4 cars per household, 27% higher than in Roosendaal (1.1). 20% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 1 percentage point less than in Roosendaal (21%).
Key figures
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
15%
▼4 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (19%)
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
6%
▲3 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (3%)
Business services, share of businesses
26%
▲3 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (23%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.4
▲27% higher than Roosendaal (1.1)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
20%
▼1 percentage point lower than Roosendaal (21%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2014
+4 pp
▲higher than Roosendaal (+3 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
88%
▲5 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (83%)
Industrial, share of addresses
3%
▼1 percentage point lower than Roosendaal (4%)
Office, share of addresses
0%
▼1 percentage point lower than Roosendaal (1%)
Private rent
6%
▼8 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Social housing
14%
▼14 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (28%)
Owner-occupied dwellings
79%
▲22 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (57%)
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
15%
▼4 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (19%)
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
6%
▲3 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (3%)
Business services, share of businesses
26%
▲3 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (23%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.4
▲27% higher than Roosendaal (1.1)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
20%
▼1 percentage point lower than Roosendaal (21%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2014
+4 pp
▲higher than Roosendaal (+3 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
88%
▲5 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (83%)
Industrial, share of addresses
3%
▼1 percentage point lower than Roosendaal (4%)
Office, share of addresses
0%
▼1 percentage point lower than Roosendaal (1%)
Private rent
6%
▼8 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Social housing
14%
▼14 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (28%)
Owner-occupied dwellings
79%
▲22 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (57%)
Business establishments by sector
Zakelijke dienstverlening is the largest sector, with 160 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij40
Nijverheid en energie90
Handel en horeca90
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie40
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed35
Zakelijke dienstverlening160
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg110
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten55
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
20% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 21% in the municipality of Roosendaal (2025).
Petrol80.1%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)19.9%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 16% to 20% between 2014 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
20%▼ 1 percentage point below Roosendaal (21%)
+4 pp since 2014
Roosendaal +3 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 2,890 passenger cars and 200 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars2,890
Motorcycles200
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
88% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is industrial (3%).
Residential87.6%
Retail1.3%
Office0.3%
Assembly0.7%
Healthcare0.5%
Industrial2.6%
Education0.1%
Sports0.1%
Other9.1%
Explanation
Based on 2,547 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
14% multi-family dwellings, against 37% nationally.
This areaThe Netherlands
Multi-family dwellings14%
NL 37%▼ −62% vs NL
Private rent6%
NL 14%▼ −57% vs NL
Social housing14%
NL 28%▼ −50% vs NL
Owner-occupied dwellings79%
NL 57%▲ +39% vs NL
Single-family dwellings86%
NL 63%▲ +37% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025