We're pulling the figures from public sources. This usually takes a few seconds.
Area and its neighbourhoodsCBS key figures for districts and neighbourhoods
Residents and householdsCBS
Homes and WOZ valueCBS · Kadaster BAG
Housing marketNVM market overview
Municipal leviesMunicipal budgets · CBS
SafetyCBS and Police
HealthRIVM Health Monitor
Land use and amenitiesCBS land use · proximity statistics
Road safety and electionsRijkswaterstaat · Kiesraad
Comparing with the municipality and the countryRankings and comparisons
Neighbourhood · Roosendaal
Living in Kalsdonk
The population is shrinking, while it grows in Roosendaal. Homes cost less than the average in the municipality of Roosendaal, and registered crime per resident is lower.
The average WOZ value in Kalsdonk is €235,000, 27% lower than in Roosendaal (€323,000). Between 2021 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 40%, against a rise of 34% in Roosendaal. 33% of the homes are owner-occupied, 29 percentage points less than in Roosendaal (62%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€235,000
▼27% lower than Roosendaal (€323,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+40%
▲higher than Roosendaal (+34%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
33%
▼29 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (62%)
Social housing
62%
▲35 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (27%)
Private rent
5%
▼5 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (10%)
Single-family dwellings
64%
▼10 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (74%)
Built 1975–1991
2%
▼24 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (26%)
Built 1965–1974
1%
▼16 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (17%)
Built 2006–2015
18%
▲12 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (6%)
Average WOZ value
€235,000
▼27% lower than Roosendaal (€323,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+40%
▲higher than Roosendaal (+34%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
33%
▼29 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (62%)
Social housing
62%
▲35 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (27%)
Private rent
5%
▼5 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (10%)
Single-family dwellings
64%
▼10 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (74%)
Built 1975–1991
2%
▼24 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (26%)
Built 1965–1974
1%
▼16 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (17%)
Built 2006–2015
18%
▲12 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (6%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 40% between 2021 and 2025, to €235,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€235,000▼ 27% below Roosendaal
+40% since 2021
Roosendaal +34%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€252 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€252/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
99 m² · measured buurt average
WOZ €235,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€116NL median
Water board levy€38–
Sewage levy€33€22
Waste levy€27€27
Property tax (OZB)€18€21
Costs to set aside€136
Maintenance reserve€127–
Buildings insurance€9–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Roosendaal's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 256th of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 99 m² (measured average in this buurt) with the average WOZ value here, €235,000.
Levies: Roosendaal's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Kalsdonk has the lowest WOZ value of the 4 buurten in Noord.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €235,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Kalsdonk
235,000
1,737
–
Parklaan-Hoogstraat
258,000
762
–
Spoorstraat-Van Coothlaan
283,000
823
–
Nieuwenberg
425,000
112
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is social housing, at 62% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied33%
Social housing62%
Private rent5%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
64% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes64%
Multi-family homes36%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
62% of dwellings were built between 1945 and 1964, against 16% in the municipality of Roosendaal.
Before 19453.6%
1945-196462.5%
1965-19740.9%
1975-19911.7%
1992-200513.5%
2006-201517.8%
Explanation
Based on 1,737 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
Less registered crime per resident than the Roosendaal average.
In 2025, 50 crimes per 1,000 residents were registered in Kalsdonk, 6% lower than in Roosendaal (53). Since 2021 the registered rate per 1,000 residents fell 12%, against a fall of 9% in Roosendaal. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
50
▼6% lower than Roosendaal (53)
Change since 2021
-12%
▼lower than Roosendaal (-9%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
2.7
▼16% lower than Roosendaal (3.2)
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
50
▼6% lower than Roosendaal (53)
Change since 2021
-12%
▼lower than Roosendaal (-9%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
2.7
▼16% lower than Roosendaal (3.2)
Registered crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
In 2025, Kalsdonk registered 50 crimes per 1,000 residents, against 53 in the municipality of Roosendaal.
Kalsdonk50
The municipality of Roosendaal53
Explanation
Crime is counted where it happens and divided by the number of residents, so places with many visitors — city centres, nightlife, stations — score higher.
The largest category in Kalsdonk is 'Theft and burglary': 20.3 per 1,000 residents in 2025, against 26.0 in the municipality of Roosendaal.
KalsdonkRoosendaal
Theft and burglary20.3
Roosendaal 26.0▼ −22% vs Roosendaal
Vandalism and public order7.0
Roosendaal 6.1▲ +15% vs Roosendaal
Fraud and scams6.8
Roosendaal 5.1▲ +33% vs Roosendaal
Traffic6.3
Roosendaal 7.7▼ −18% vs Roosendaal
Violence and threats5.0
Roosendaal 5.3▼ −6% vs Roosendaal
Other and withheld4.5
Roosendaal 2.6▲ +73% vs Roosendaal
Environmental0.3
Roosendaal 0.2≈ Roosendaal
Explanation
Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2024, police in Kalsdonk registered 8 traffic accidents, of which 0 with injury and none fatal.
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2024
03 · Living environment
Residents rate their health below the Roosendaal average; green space is below the Roosendaal average.
An estimated 60% of adults in Kalsdonk rate their own health as good, 9 percentage points less than in Roosendaal. More adults feel lonely (64% against 52%), more report anxiety or depression (60% against 49%), more smoke (26% against 18%) and more are overweight (62% against 58%). Built-up land is the largest land use in Kalsdonk, covering 90% of the area, against 19% in Roosendaal. Green space such as parks, sports fields, forest and nature covers 6% of the area, 4 percentage points below the 10% in Roosendaal.
Key figures
Self-rated health (estimated)
60%
▼9 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (69%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
6%
▼4 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (10%)
More figures
Lonely
64%
▲12 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (52%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
60%
▲11 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (49%)
Smokes
26%
▲8 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (18%)
Overweight
62%
▲4 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (58%)
Built-up, share of the area
90%
▲71 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (19%)
Agriculture, share of the area
0%
▼65 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (65%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
0%
▼6 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (6%)
Self-rated health (estimated)
60%
▼9 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (69%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
6%
▼4 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (10%)
More figures
Lonely
64%
▲12 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (52%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
60%
▲11 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (49%)
Smokes
26%
▲8 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (18%)
Overweight
62%
▲4 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (58%)
Built-up, share of the area
90%
▲71 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (19%)
Agriculture, share of the area
0%
▼65 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (65%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
0%
▼6 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (6%)
Health
An estimated 60% of adults rate their own health as good, against 69% in the municipality of Roosendaal (2024).
This areaThe municipality of Roosendaal
Good self-rated health
59.9%
69.3%
Smokes
25.9%
18%
Excessive drinking
4.5%
5.7%
Overweight
62%
57.5%
Lonely
63.7%
51.7%
Anxiety or depression feelings
60.4%
48.9%
Meets physical activity guideline
39.4%
43.4%
Explanation
An RIVM model estimate (small-area estimation from the 2024 Health Monitor for Adults and Elderly), not a direct tabulation — even a buurt that was not itself surveyed gets an estimate. Figures cover adults aged 18 and over.
Source: RIVM/CBS Gezondheidsmonitor Volwassenen en Ouderen (kleine-gebieden-schatting) 2024
Land use
6% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 10% in the municipality of Roosendaal.
Traffic3.9%
Built-up90.2%
Recreation5.9%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
Distance to amenities
A large supermarket lies here at an average road distance of 500 m.
Distance
Value
Large supermarket
500 m
–
GP practice
600 m
–
Primary school
500 m
–
Daycare
500 m
–
Large supermarkets
–
2.3
GP practices
–
1.9
Daycares
–
1.2
Explanation
Average road distance from every address in this buurt to the nearest amenity, and the average count within 1 km — a buurt average, not a distance from one address.
Source: CBS proximity statistics 2025
04 · Residents
The population is shrinking, while it grows in Roosendaal.
Kalsdonk has 4,030 inhabitants (2026), or 7,775 per km² (10.6 times as high as in Roosendaal). Between 2021 and 2026 the population fell 1%, against a rise of 1% in Roosendaal. In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Roosendaal was 73%, 5 percentage points below the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) had the highest share there: 22% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2021
-1%
▼lower than Roosendaal (+1%)
Turnout, municipality of Roosendaal
73%
▼5 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+0%
=about the same as Roosendaal (+1%)
Aged 45 to 65
29%
▲2 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (27%)
Never married
54%
▲8 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (46%)
Origin outside Europe
51%
▲32 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (19%)
Lower education (primary, vmbo, mbo 1)
45%
▲15 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (30%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
22%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2021
-1%
▼lower than Roosendaal (+1%)
Turnout, municipality of Roosendaal
73%
▼5 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+0%
=about the same as Roosendaal (+1%)
Aged 45 to 65
29%
▲2 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (27%)
Never married
54%
▲8 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (46%)
Origin outside Europe
51%
▲32 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (19%)
Lower education (primary, vmbo, mbo 1)
45%
▲15 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (30%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
22%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population shrank 1% between 2021 and 2026, to 4,030.
Residents, 2026
4,030
-1% since 2021
Roosendaal +1%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 7,775 residents per km², this buurt is 11 times as densely populated as the municipality of Roosendaal.
Residents per km²7,775
Dwellings per km²3,340.4
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, 11.3 children were born per 1,000 residents; 7.5 died per 1,000.
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
29% of residents are between 45 and 65.
0 to 15730
15 to 25580
25 to 451,095
45 to 651,175
65 to 80355
80 and over100
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
54% of residents are never married.
Never married2,170
Married1,375
Divorced345
Widowed140
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
51% of residents have origin outside Europe.
Netherlands1,405
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)570
Outside Europe2,060
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Education level of residents aged 15 to 75
45% of residents have a primary, vmbo or mbo1 level education.
Primary, vmbo, mbo11,390
Havo, vwo, mbo2-41,300
Higher professional, university400
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2024
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Roosendaal; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 73% of eligible voters in Roosendaal voted. The largest party was PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) with 22% of the valid votes.
Municipality of RoosendaalThe Netherlands
D66
14.9%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
21.5%
16.7%
VVD
17.6%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
8.8%
12.8%
CDA
12%
11.8%
JA21
7.3%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
4.5%
4.5%
BBB
2.2%
2.6%
Other
11.2%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
Kalsdonk has an average of 0.9 cars per household, 18% lower than in Roosendaal (1.1). 19% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 2 percentage points less than in Roosendaal (21%).
Key figures
Government, education and care, share of businesses
24%
▲7 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (17%)
Transport, information and communication, share of businesses
13%
▲6 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (7%)
Culture, recreation and other services, share of businesses
4%
▼6 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (10%)
Cars per household (2025)
0.9
▼18% lower than Roosendaal (1.1)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
19%
▼2 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (21%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
−1 pp
▼lower than Roosendaal (+4 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
91%
▲8 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (83%)
Industrial, share of addresses
0%
▼4 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (4%)
Retail, share of addresses
1%
▼1 percentage point lower than Roosendaal (2%)
Private rent
5%
▼9 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Social housing
62%
▲34 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (28%)
Owner-occupied dwellings
33%
▼24 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (57%)
Government, education and care, share of businesses
24%
▲7 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (17%)
Transport, information and communication, share of businesses
13%
▲6 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (7%)
Culture, recreation and other services, share of businesses
4%
▼6 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (10%)
Cars per household (2025)
0.9
▼18% lower than Roosendaal (1.1)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
19%
▼2 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (21%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
−1 pp
▼lower than Roosendaal (+4 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
91%
▲8 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (83%)
Industrial, share of addresses
0%
▼4 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (4%)
Retail, share of addresses
1%
▼1 percentage point lower than Roosendaal (2%)
Private rent
5%
▼9 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Social housing
62%
▲34 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (28%)
Owner-occupied dwellings
33%
▼24 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (57%)
Business establishments by sector
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg is the largest sector, with 80 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij0
Nijverheid en energie65
Handel en horeca65
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie45
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed5
Zakelijke dienstverlening65
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg80
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten15
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
19% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 21% in the municipality of Roosendaal (2025).
Petrol81.4%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)18.6%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 20% to 19% between 2021 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
19%▼ 2 percentage points below Roosendaal (21%)
-1 pp since 2021
Roosendaal +4 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 1,665 passenger cars and 85 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars1,665
Motorcycles85
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
91% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is retail (0.7%).
Residential91%
Retail0.7%
Office0.2%
Assembly0.5%
Healthcare0.7%
Industrial0.5%
Education0.1%
Other6.8%
Explanation
Based on 1,908 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
7,775 residents per km²: 14 times as densely populated as the Dutch average.
This areaThe Netherlands
Residents per km²7,775
NL 539▲ +1343% vs NL
Private rent5%
NL 14%▼ −64% vs NL
Social housing62%
NL 28%▲ +121% vs NL
Owner-occupied dwellings33%
NL 57%▼ −42% vs NL
Average WOZ value€235,000
NL €398,000▼ −41% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026