We're pulling the figures from public sources. This usually takes a few seconds.
Area and its neighbourhoodsCBS key figures for districts and neighbourhoods
Residents and householdsCBS
Homes and WOZ valueCBS · Kadaster BAG
Housing marketNVM market overview
Municipal leviesMunicipal budgets · CBS
SafetyCBS and Police
HealthRIVM Health Monitor
Land use and amenitiesCBS land use · proximity statistics
Road safety and electionsRijkswaterstaat · Kiesraad
Comparing with the municipality and the countryRankings and comparisons
Neighbourhood · Roosendaal
Living in Heerma van Vossstraat-Molenbeek
The population is growing faster than in Roosendaal. Homes cost less than the average in the municipality of Roosendaal, and registered crime per resident is higher.
The average WOZ value in Heerma van Vossstraat-Molenbeek is €273,000, 15% lower than in Roosendaal (€323,000). Between 2021 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 33%, against a rise of 34% in Roosendaal. 55% of the homes are owner-occupied, 7 percentage points less than in Roosendaal (62%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€273,000
▼15% lower than Roosendaal (€323,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+33%
=about the same as Roosendaal (+34%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
55%
▼7 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (62%)
Social housing
7%
▼20 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (27%)
Private rent
37%
▲27 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (10%)
Single-family dwellings
44%
▼30 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (74%)
Built 1975–1991
4%
▼22 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (26%)
Built 2016 and later
14%
▲10 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (4%)
Built 1992–2005
10%
▼7 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (17%)
Average WOZ value
€273,000
▼15% lower than Roosendaal (€323,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+33%
=about the same as Roosendaal (+34%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
55%
▼7 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (62%)
Social housing
7%
▼20 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (27%)
Private rent
37%
▲27 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (10%)
Single-family dwellings
44%
▼30 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (74%)
Built 1975–1991
4%
▼22 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (26%)
Built 2016 and later
14%
▲10 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (4%)
Built 1992–2005
10%
▼7 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (17%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 33% between 2021 and 2025, to €273,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€273,000▼ 15% below Roosendaal
+33% since 2021
Roosendaal +34%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€263 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€263/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
105 m² · measured buurt average
WOZ €273,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€120NL median
Water board levy€39–
Sewage levy€33€22
Waste levy€27€27
Property tax (OZB)€21€24
Costs to set aside€143
Maintenance reserve€134–
Buildings insurance€9–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Roosendaal's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 252nd of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 105 m² (measured average in this buurt) with the average WOZ value here, €273,000.
Levies: Roosendaal's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Heerma van Vossstraat-Molenbeek has the 2nd-highest WOZ value of the 5 buurten in West.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €273,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Heerma van Vossstraat-Molenbeek
273,000
1,027
–
Herreweg
231,000
563
–
Ettingen
215,000
1,067
–
Scherpdeel
260,000
1,230
–
Vroenhout
589,000
139
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 55% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied55%
Social housing7%
Private rent37%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
56% of the dwelling stock is multi-family homes.
Single-family homes44%
Multi-family homes56%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
37% of dwellings were built before 1945, against 12% in the municipality of Roosendaal.
Before 194536.8%
1945-196415.3%
1965-197410.8%
1975-19913.6%
1992-200510.1%
2006-20159.6%
2016 and later13.7%
Explanation
Based on 1,072 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
More registered crime per resident than the Roosendaal average.
In 2025, 57 crimes per 1,000 residents were registered in Heerma van Vossstraat-Molenbeek, 8% higher than in Roosendaal (53). Since 2021 the registered rate per 1,000 residents rose 14%, against a fall of 9% in Roosendaal. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
57
▲8% higher than Roosendaal (53)
Change since 2021
+14%
▲higher than Roosendaal (-9%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
1.6
▼50% lower than Roosendaal (3.2)
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
57
▲8% higher than Roosendaal (53)
Change since 2021
+14%
▲higher than Roosendaal (-9%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
1.6
▼50% lower than Roosendaal (3.2)
Registered crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
In 2025, Heerma van Vossstraat-Molenbeek registered 57 crimes per 1,000 residents, against 53 in the municipality of Roosendaal.
Heerma van Vossstraat-Molenbeek57
The municipality of Roosendaal53
Explanation
Crime is counted where it happens and divided by the number of residents, so places with many visitors — city centres, nightlife, stations — score higher.
The largest category in Heerma van Vossstraat-Molenbeek is 'Theft and burglary': 28.8 per 1,000 residents in 2025, against 26.0 in the municipality of Roosendaal.
Heerma van Vossstraat-MolenbeekRoosendaal
Theft and burglary28.8
Roosendaal 26.0▲ +11% vs Roosendaal
Vandalism and public order6.6
Roosendaal 6.1▲ +8% vs Roosendaal
Traffic6.1
Roosendaal 7.7▼ −21% vs Roosendaal
Violence and threats5.5
Roosendaal 5.3≈ Roosendaal
Fraud and scams5.0
Roosendaal 5.1≈ Roosendaal
Other and withheld4.4
Roosendaal 2.6▲ +69% vs Roosendaal
Environmental0.0
Roosendaal 0.2≈ Roosendaal
Explanation
Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2024, police in Heerma van Vossstraat-Molenbeek registered 24 traffic accidents, of which 1 with injury and none fatal.
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2024
03 · Living environment
Residents rate their health about average; green space is below the Roosendaal average.
An estimated 69% of adults in Heerma van Vossstraat-Molenbeek rate their own health as good, about the same as in Roosendaal. Fewer adults are overweight (55% against 58%), but more smoke (20% against 18%), more meet the physical activity guideline (45% against 43%) and more drink excessively (7% against 6%). Built-up land is the largest land use in Heerma van Vossstraat-Molenbeek, covering 82% of the area, against 19% in Roosendaal. Green space such as parks, sports fields, forest and nature covers 2% of the area, 8 percentage points below the 10% in Roosendaal.
Key figures
Self-rated health (estimated)
69%
=about the same as Roosendaal (69%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
2%
▼8 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (10%)
More figures
Overweight
55%
▼3 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (58%)
Smokes
20%
▲2 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (18%)
Meets physical activity guideline
45%
▲2 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (43%)
Excessive drinking
7%
▲1 percentage point higher than Roosendaal (6%)
Agriculture, share of the area
0%
▼65 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (65%)
Built-up, share of the area
82%
▲63 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (19%)
Traffic, share of the area
12%
▲8 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (4%)
Self-rated health (estimated)
69%
=about the same as Roosendaal (69%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
2%
▼8 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (10%)
More figures
Overweight
55%
▼3 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (58%)
Smokes
20%
▲2 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (18%)
Meets physical activity guideline
45%
▲2 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (43%)
Excessive drinking
7%
▲1 percentage point higher than Roosendaal (6%)
Agriculture, share of the area
0%
▼65 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (65%)
Built-up, share of the area
82%
▲63 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (19%)
Traffic, share of the area
12%
▲8 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (4%)
Health
An estimated 69% of adults rate their own health as good, against 69% in the municipality of Roosendaal (2024).
This areaThe municipality of Roosendaal
Good self-rated health
69.4%
69.3%
Smokes
20.2%
18%
Excessive drinking
6.7%
5.7%
Overweight
55.3%
57.5%
Lonely
52.2%
51.7%
Anxiety or depression feelings
49.9%
48.9%
Meets physical activity guideline
45%
43.4%
Explanation
An RIVM model estimate (small-area estimation from the 2024 Health Monitor for Adults and Elderly), not a direct tabulation — even a buurt that was not itself surveyed gets an estimate. Figures cover adults aged 18 and over.
Source: RIVM/CBS Gezondheidsmonitor Volwassenen en Ouderen (kleine-gebieden-schatting) 2024
Land use
2% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 10% in the municipality of Roosendaal.
Traffic12.5%
Built-up82.5%
Other built-up2.5%
Recreation2.5%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
Distance to amenities
A primary school lies here at an average road distance of 500 m.
Distance
Value
Large supermarket
800 m
–
GP practice
800 m
–
Primary school
500 m
–
Daycare
500 m
–
Large supermarkets
–
0.7
GP practices
–
1.2
Daycares
–
2.5
Explanation
Average road distance from every address in this buurt to the nearest amenity, and the average count within 1 km — a buurt average, not a distance from one address.
Source: CBS proximity statistics 2025
04 · Residents
The population is growing faster than the Roosendaal average.
Heerma van Vossstraat-Molenbeek has 1,860 inhabitants (2026), or 4,620 per km² (6.3 times as high as in Roosendaal). Between 2021 and 2026 the population rose 4%, against a rise of 1% in Roosendaal. In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Roosendaal was 73%, 5 percentage points below the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) had the highest share there: 22% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2021
+4%
▲higher than Roosendaal (+1%)
Turnout, municipality of Roosendaal
73%
▼5 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+2%
=about the same as Roosendaal (+1%)
Aged 25 to 45
28%
▲3 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (25%)
Never married
49%
▲3 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (46%)
Dutch origin
81%
▲12 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (69%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
57%
▲14 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (43%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
22%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2021
+4%
▲higher than Roosendaal (+1%)
Turnout, municipality of Roosendaal
73%
▼5 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+2%
=about the same as Roosendaal (+1%)
Aged 25 to 45
28%
▲3 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (25%)
Never married
49%
▲3 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (46%)
Dutch origin
81%
▲12 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (69%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
57%
▲14 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (43%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
22%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population grew 4% between 2021 and 2026, to 1,860.
Residents, 2026
1,860
+4% since 2021
Roosendaal +1%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 4,620 residents per km², this buurt is 6.3 times as densely populated as the municipality of Roosendaal.
Residents per km²4,620
Dwellings per km²2,567.5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, 5.5 children were born per 1,000 residents; 33.2 died per 1,000.
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
28% of residents are between 25 and 45.
0 to 15190
15 to 25175
25 to 45525
45 to 65425
65 to 80285
80 and over260
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
50% of residents are never married.
Never married920
Married560
Divorced185
Widowed195
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
81% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands1,500
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)200
Outside Europe160
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Education level of residents aged 15 to 75
57% of residents have a havo, vwo or mbo2-4 level education.
Primary, vmbo, mbo1220
Havo, vwo, mbo2-4720
Higher professional, university320
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2024
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Roosendaal; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 73% of eligible voters in Roosendaal voted. The largest party was PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) with 22% of the valid votes.
Municipality of RoosendaalThe Netherlands
D66
14.9%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
21.5%
16.7%
VVD
17.6%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
8.8%
12.8%
CDA
12%
11.8%
JA21
7.3%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
4.5%
4.5%
BBB
2.2%
2.6%
Other
11.2%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
Heerma van Vossstraat-Molenbeek has an average of 1.0 cars per household, 9% lower than in Roosendaal (1.1). 14% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 7 percentage points less than in Roosendaal (21%).
Key figures
Culture, recreation and other services, share of businesses
15%
▲5 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (10%)
Industry and energy, share of businesses
13%
▼3 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (16%)
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
0%
▼3 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (3%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.0
▼9% lower than Roosendaal (1.1)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
14%
▼7 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (21%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+2 pp
▼lower than Roosendaal (+4 pp)
Industrial, share of addresses
1%
▼3 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (4%)
Office, share of addresses
1%
=about the same as Roosendaal (1%)
Assembly, share of addresses
1%
=about the same as Roosendaal (1%)
Social housing
7%
▼21 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (28%)
Private rent
37%
▲23 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (14%)
Multi-family dwellings
56%
▲19 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (37%)
Culture, recreation and other services, share of businesses
15%
▲5 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (10%)
Industry and energy, share of businesses
13%
▼3 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (16%)
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
0%
▼3 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (3%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.0
▼9% lower than Roosendaal (1.1)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
14%
▼7 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (21%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+2 pp
▼lower than Roosendaal (+4 pp)
Industrial, share of addresses
1%
▼3 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (4%)
Office, share of addresses
1%
=about the same as Roosendaal (1%)
Assembly, share of addresses
1%
=about the same as Roosendaal (1%)
Social housing
7%
▼21 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (28%)
Private rent
37%
▲23 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (14%)
Multi-family dwellings
56%
▲19 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (37%)
Business establishments by sector
Zakelijke dienstverlening is the largest sector, with 50 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij0
Nijverheid en energie30
Handel en horeca45
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie15
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed15
Zakelijke dienstverlening50
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg40
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten35
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
14% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 21% in the municipality of Roosendaal (2025).
Petrol85.9%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)14.1%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 12% to 14% between 2021 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
14%▼ 7 percentage points below Roosendaal (21%)
+2 pp since 2021
Roosendaal +4 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 850 passenger cars and 75 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars850
Motorcycles75
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
83% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is retail (2%).
Residential83.1%
Retail1.9%
Office0.5%
Assembly1.2%
Healthcare0.1%
Industrial1.1%
Education0.1%
Sports0.1%
Other13.8%
Explanation
Based on 1,290 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
4,620 residents per km²: 8.6 times as densely populated as the Dutch average.
This areaThe Netherlands
Residents per km²4,620
NL 539▲ +757% vs NL
Social housing7%
NL 28%▼ −75% vs NL
Private rent37%
NL 14%▲ +164% vs NL
Multi-family dwellings56%
NL 37%▲ +51% vs NL
Average WOZ value€273,000
NL €398,000▼ −31% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026