The population is growing, while it shrinks in Renkum. Homes cost less than the average in the municipality of Renkum, and registered crime per resident is higher.
The average WOZ value in Renkum Centrum is €331,000, 25% lower than in Renkum (€440,000). Between 2021 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 34%, against a rise of 40% in Renkum. 60% of the homes are owner-occupied, 3 percentage points less than in Renkum (63%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€331,000
▼25% lower than Renkum (€440,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+34%
▼lower than Renkum (+40%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
60%
▼3 percentage points lower than Renkum (63%)
Social housing
9%
▼12 percentage points lower than Renkum (21%)
Private rent
30%
▲14 percentage points higher than Renkum (16%)
Single-family dwellings
48%
▼22 percentage points lower than Renkum (70%)
Built 1965–1974
6%
▼13 percentage points lower than Renkum (19%)
Built 1992–2005
14%
▲8 percentage points higher than Renkum (6%)
Built 1945–1964
18%
▼7 percentage points lower than Renkum (25%)
Average WOZ value
€331,000
▼25% lower than Renkum (€440,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+34%
▼lower than Renkum (+40%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
60%
▼3 percentage points lower than Renkum (63%)
Social housing
9%
▼12 percentage points lower than Renkum (21%)
Private rent
30%
▲14 percentage points higher than Renkum (16%)
Single-family dwellings
48%
▼22 percentage points lower than Renkum (70%)
Built 1965–1974
6%
▼13 percentage points lower than Renkum (19%)
Built 1992–2005
14%
▲8 percentage points higher than Renkum (6%)
Built 1945–1964
18%
▼7 percentage points lower than Renkum (25%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 34% between 2021 and 2025, to €331,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€331,000▼ 25% below Renkum
+34% since 2021
Renkum +40%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€286 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€286/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
115 m² · measured buurt average
WOZ €331,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€129NL median
Property tax (OZB)€42€29
Water board levy€41–
Waste levy€23€27
Sewage levy€23€22
Costs to set aside€157
Maintenance reserve€147–
Buildings insurance€10–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Renkum's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 269th of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 115 m² (measured average in this buurt) with the average WOZ value here, €331,000.
Levies: Renkum's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Renkum Centrum has the 2nd-lowest WOZ value of the 5 buurten in Renkum Zuid.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €331,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Renkum Centrum
331,000
657
–
Jufferswaard
261,000
0
–
Onder de Bomen
394,000
860
–
De Enk
362,000
737
–
Gelria
405,000
406
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 60% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied60%
Social housing9%
Private rent30%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
52% of the dwelling stock is multi-family homes.
Single-family homes48%
Multi-family homes52%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
30% of dwellings were built before 1945, against 23% in the municipality of Renkum.
Before 194530.4%
1945-196418.2%
1965-19745.6%
1975-199117.9%
1992-200513.6%
2006-20157.2%
2016 and later7.2%
Explanation
Based on 698 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
More registered crime per resident than the Renkum average.
In 2025, 53 crimes per 1,000 residents were registered in Renkum Centrum, 71% higher than in Renkum (31). Since 2021 the registered rate per 1,000 residents fell 12%, against a fall of 5% in Renkum. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
53
▲71% higher than Renkum (31)
Change since 2021
-12%
▼lower than Renkum (-5%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
3.0
▼23% lower than Renkum (3.9)
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
53
▲71% higher than Renkum (31)
Change since 2021
-12%
▼lower than Renkum (-5%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
3.0
▼23% lower than Renkum (3.9)
Registered crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
In 2025, Renkum Centrum registered 53 crimes per 1,000 residents, against 31 in the municipality of Renkum.
Renkum Centrum53
The municipality of Renkum31
Explanation
Crime is counted where it happens and divided by the number of residents, so places with many visitors — city centres, nightlife, stations — score higher.
The largest category in Renkum Centrum is 'Theft and burglary': 22.5 per 1,000 residents in 2025, against 10.9 in the municipality of Renkum.
Renkum CentrumRenkum
Theft and burglary22.5
Renkum 10.9▲ +106% vs Renkum
Traffic13.8
Renkum 5.9▲ +134% vs Renkum
Vandalism and public order5.1
Renkum 4.0▲ +27% vs Renkum
Violence and threats4.4
Renkum 3.6▲ +22% vs Renkum
Fraud and scams4.4
Renkum 5.7▼ −23% vs Renkum
Other and withheld2.9
Renkum 1.2▲ +142% vs Renkum
Environmental0.0
Renkum 0.1≈ Renkum
Explanation
Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2024, police in Renkum Centrum registered 5 traffic accidents, of which 1 with injury and none fatal.
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2024
03 · Living environment
Residents rate their health above the Renkum average; green space is below the Renkum average.
An estimated 75% of adults in Renkum Centrum rate their own health as good, 1 percentage point more than in Renkum. More adults smoke (19% against 14%), more report anxiety or depression (48% against 44%) and more are overweight (51% against 50%), but fewer meet the physical activity guideline (47% against 50%). Built-up land is the largest land use in Renkum Centrum, covering 96% of the area, against 19% in Renkum.
Key figures
Self-rated health (estimated)
75%
▲1 percentage point higher than Renkum (74%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
0%
▼52 percentage points lower than Renkum (52%)
More figures
Smokes
19%
▲5 percentage points higher than Renkum (14%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
48%
▲4 percentage points higher than Renkum (44%)
Meets physical activity guideline
47%
▼3 percentage points lower than Renkum (50%)
Overweight
51%
▲1 percentage point higher than Renkum (50%)
Built-up, share of the area
96%
▲77 percentage points higher than Renkum (19%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
0%
▼45 percentage points lower than Renkum (45%)
Agriculture, share of the area
0%
▼24 percentage points lower than Renkum (24%)
Self-rated health (estimated)
75%
▲1 percentage point higher than Renkum (74%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
0%
▼52 percentage points lower than Renkum (52%)
More figures
Smokes
19%
▲5 percentage points higher than Renkum (14%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
48%
▲4 percentage points higher than Renkum (44%)
Meets physical activity guideline
47%
▼3 percentage points lower than Renkum (50%)
Overweight
51%
▲1 percentage point higher than Renkum (50%)
Built-up, share of the area
96%
▲77 percentage points higher than Renkum (19%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
0%
▼45 percentage points lower than Renkum (45%)
Agriculture, share of the area
0%
▼24 percentage points lower than Renkum (24%)
Health
An estimated 75% of adults rate their own health as good, against 74% in the municipality of Renkum (2024).
This areaThe municipality of Renkum
Good self-rated health
75.3%
74.1%
Smokes
19.1%
14.4%
Excessive drinking
5.9%
5.5%
Overweight
51.1%
49.5%
Lonely
43.2%
42.5%
Anxiety or depression feelings
48%
43.7%
Meets physical activity guideline
46.9%
49.5%
Explanation
An RIVM model estimate (small-area estimation from the 2024 Health Monitor for Adults and Elderly), not a direct tabulation — even a buurt that was not itself surveyed gets an estimate. Figures cover adults aged 18 and over.
Source: RIVM/CBS Gezondheidsmonitor Volwassenen en Ouderen (kleine-gebieden-schatting) 2024
Land use
0% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 52% in the municipality of Renkum.
Traffic3.7%
Built-up96.3%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
Distance to amenities
A large supermarket lies here at an average road distance of 300 m.
Distance
Value
Large supermarket
300 m
–
GP practice
300 m
–
Primary school
800 m
–
Daycare
300 m
–
Large supermarkets
–
2
GP practices
–
2
Daycares
–
3
Explanation
Average road distance from every address in this buurt to the nearest amenity, and the average count within 1 km — a buurt average, not a distance from one address.
Source: CBS proximity statistics 2025
04 · Residents
The population is growing, while it shrinks in Renkum.
Renkum Centrum has 1,465 inhabitants (2026), or 5,397 per km² (7.9 times as high as in Renkum). Between 2021 and 2026 the population rose 17%, against no real change in Renkum. In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Renkum was 84%, 6 percentage points above the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, D66 had the highest share there: 22% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2021
+17%
▲higher than Renkum (-0%)
Turnout, municipality of Renkum
84%
▲6 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+12%
▲higher than Renkum (+1%)
Aged 25 to 45
29%
▲11 percentage points higher than Renkum (18%)
Never married
51%
▲8 percentage points higher than Renkum (43%)
Dutch origin
83%
▲2 percentage points higher than Renkum (81%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
44%
▲11 percentage points higher than Renkum (33%)
D66, share of the vote
22%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2021
+17%
▲higher than Renkum (-0%)
Turnout, municipality of Renkum
84%
▲6 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+12%
▲higher than Renkum (+1%)
Aged 25 to 45
29%
▲11 percentage points higher than Renkum (18%)
Never married
51%
▲8 percentage points higher than Renkum (43%)
Dutch origin
83%
▲2 percentage points higher than Renkum (81%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
44%
▲11 percentage points higher than Renkum (33%)
D66, share of the vote
22%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population grew 17% between 2021 and 2026, to 1,465.
Residents, 2026
1,465
+17% since 2021
Renkum +0%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 5,397 residents per km², this buurt is 7.9 times as densely populated as the municipality of Renkum.
Residents per km²5,397
Dwellings per km²2,433.3
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, 14.5 children were born per 1,000 residents; 21.8 died per 1,000.
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
30% of residents are between 25 and 45.
0 to 15160
15 to 25195
25 to 45430
45 to 65375
65 to 80195
80 and over105
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
51% of residents are never married.
Never married755
Married520
Divorced100
Widowed95
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
83% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands1,215
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)105
Outside Europe145
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Education level of residents aged 15 to 75
44% of residents have a havo, vwo or mbo2-4 level education.
Primary, vmbo, mbo1190
Havo, vwo, mbo2-4470
Higher professional, university420
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2024
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Renkum; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 84% of eligible voters in Renkum voted. The largest party was D66 with 22% of the valid votes.
Municipality of RenkumThe Netherlands
D66
21.7%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
10.9%
16.7%
VVD
14.5%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
20%
12.8%
CDA
12.2%
11.8%
JA21
4.1%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
3.5%
4.5%
BBB
1.4%
2.6%
Other
11.8%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
Renkum Centrum has an average of 1.0 cars per household, 17% lower than in Renkum (1.2). 20% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 4 percentage points less than in Renkum (24%).
Key figures
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
24%
▲12 percentage points higher than Renkum (12%)
Business services, share of businesses
22%
▼10 percentage points lower than Renkum (32%)
Transport, information and communication, share of businesses
2%
▼4 percentage points lower than Renkum (6%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.0
▼17% lower than Renkum (1.2)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
20%
▼4 percentage points lower than Renkum (24%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+4 pp
▼lower than Renkum (+6 pp)
Retail, share of addresses
9%
▲8 percentage points higher than Renkum (1%)
Residential, share of addresses
85%
▼4 percentage points lower than Renkum (89%)
Healthcare, share of addresses
3%
▲2 percentage points higher than Renkum (1%)
Social housing
9%
▼19 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (28%)
Private rent
30%
▲16 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (14%)
Multi-family dwellings
52%
▲15 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (37%)
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
24%
▲12 percentage points higher than Renkum (12%)
Business services, share of businesses
22%
▼10 percentage points lower than Renkum (32%)
Transport, information and communication, share of businesses
2%
▼4 percentage points lower than Renkum (6%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.0
▼17% lower than Renkum (1.2)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
20%
▼4 percentage points lower than Renkum (24%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+4 pp
▼lower than Renkum (+6 pp)
Retail, share of addresses
9%
▲8 percentage points higher than Renkum (1%)
Residential, share of addresses
85%
▼4 percentage points lower than Renkum (89%)
Healthcare, share of addresses
3%
▲2 percentage points higher than Renkum (1%)
Social housing
9%
▼19 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (28%)
Private rent
30%
▲16 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (14%)
Multi-family dwellings
52%
▲15 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (37%)
Business establishments by sector
Handel en horeca is the largest sector, with 55 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij0
Nijverheid en energie25
Handel en horeca55
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie5
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed10
Zakelijke dienstverlening50
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg55
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten25
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
20% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 24% in the municipality of Renkum (2025).
Petrol79.6%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)20.4%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 16% to 20% between 2021 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
20%▼ 4 percentage points below Renkum (24%)
+4 pp since 2021
Renkum +6 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 710 passenger cars and 55 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars710
Motorcycles55
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
85% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is retail (9%).
Residential84.9%
Retail8.6%
Office1.6%
Assembly1.6%
Healthcare3.3%
Industrial0.2%
Lodging0.6%
Sports0.1%
Other3%
Explanation
Based on 822 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
5,397 residents per km²: 10 times as densely populated as the Dutch average.
This areaThe Netherlands
Residents per km²5,397
NL 539▲ +901% vs NL
Social housing9%
NL 28%▼ −68% vs NL
Private rent30%
NL 14%▲ +114% vs NL
Multi-family dwellings52%
NL 37%▲ +41% vs NL
Single-family dwellings48%
NL 63%▼ −24% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026