The average WOZ value in Klingelbeek is €466,000, 6% higher than in Renkum (€440,000). Between 2021 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 23%, against a rise of 40% in Renkum. 72% of the homes are owner-occupied, 9 percentage points more than in Renkum (63%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€466,000
▲6% higher than Renkum (€440,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+23%
▼lower than Renkum (+40%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
72%
▲9 percentage points higher than Renkum (63%)
Social housing
0%
▼21 percentage points lower than Renkum (21%)
Private rent
28%
▲12 percentage points higher than Renkum (16%)
Single-family dwellings
88%
▲18 percentage points higher than Renkum (70%)
Built 1975–1991
4%
▼13 percentage points lower than Renkum (17%)
Built 1945–1964
15%
▼10 percentage points lower than Renkum (25%)
Built 1965–1974
11%
▼8 percentage points lower than Renkum (19%)
Average WOZ value
€466,000
▲6% higher than Renkum (€440,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+23%
▼lower than Renkum (+40%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
72%
▲9 percentage points higher than Renkum (63%)
Social housing
0%
▼21 percentage points lower than Renkum (21%)
Private rent
28%
▲12 percentage points higher than Renkum (16%)
Single-family dwellings
88%
▲18 percentage points higher than Renkum (70%)
Built 1975–1991
4%
▼13 percentage points lower than Renkum (17%)
Built 1945–1964
15%
▼10 percentage points lower than Renkum (25%)
Built 1965–1974
11%
▼8 percentage points lower than Renkum (19%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 23% between 2021 and 2025, to €466,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€466,000▲ 6% above Renkum
+23% since 2021
Renkum +40%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€335 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€335/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
135 m² · measured buurt average
WOZ €466,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€150NL median
Property tax (OZB)€59€41
Water board levy€45–
Waste levy€23€27
Sewage levy€23€22
Costs to set aside€185
Maintenance reserve€173–
Buildings insurance€12–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Renkum's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 289th of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 135 m² (measured average in this buurt) with the average WOZ value here, €466,000.
Levies: Renkum's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Klingelbeek has the lowest WOZ value of the 4 buurten in Oosterbeek Zuidoost.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €466,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Klingelbeek
466,000
25
–
Bato's Wijk
559,000
973
–
Nieuwland
491,000
875
–
Stenenkruis
518,000
590
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 72% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied72%
Private rent28%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
88% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes88%
Multi-family homes12%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
67% of dwellings were built before 1945, against 23% in the municipality of Renkum.
Before 194566.7%
1945-196414.8%
1965-197411.1%
1975-19913.7%
2016 and later3.7%
Explanation
Based on 27 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
Too few residents for a rate per resident: these are counts.
Klingelbeek has too few residents for a reliable rate per 1,000 residents (under 200), so counts are shown instead of a comparison. In 2025, 9 crimes were registered, against 7 in 2021. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Registered crimes, 2025
9
▲up from 7 in 2021
Home burglary
3
2023–2025
Registered crimes, 2025
9
▲up from 7 in 2021
Home burglary
3
2023–2025
Registered crime per year
9 crimes were registered in Klingelbeek in 2025 (7 in 2021).
Registered crimes, 2025
9
up from 7 in 2021
Explanation
Too few residents for a reliable per-1,000 figure (threshold 200) — registered crime, not all crime — CBS/Politie 47018NED.
The largest category in Klingelbeek is 'Theft and burglary': 8 in 2025.
Theft and burglary8
Fraud and scams1
Vandalism and public order0
Violence and threats0
Traffic0
Environmental0
Other and withheld0
Explanation
Too few residents for a reliable per-1,000 figure (threshold 200). Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2022, police in Klingelbeek registered 1 traffic accidents, of which 1 with injury and none fatal.
2021
2022
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2022
03 · Living environment
Residents rate their health above the Renkum average; green space is below the Renkum average.
An estimated 82% of adults in Klingelbeek rate their own health as good, 8 percentage points more than in Renkum. More adults meet the physical activity guideline (60% against 50%), but fewer are overweight (45% against 50%), fewer feel lonely (40% against 42%) and fewer report anxiety or depression (42% against 44%). Agricultural land is the largest land use in Klingelbeek, covering 55% of the area, against 24% in Renkum.
Key figures
Self-rated health (estimated)
82%
▲8 percentage points higher than Renkum (74%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
0%
▼52 percentage points lower than Renkum (52%)
More figures
Meets physical activity guideline
60%
▲10 percentage points higher than Renkum (50%)
Overweight
45%
▼5 percentage points lower than Renkum (50%)
Lonely
40%
▼2 percentage points lower than Renkum (42%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
42%
▼2 percentage points lower than Renkum (44%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
0%
▼45 percentage points lower than Renkum (45%)
Agriculture, share of the area
55%
▲31 percentage points higher than Renkum (24%)
Water, share of the area
28%
▲25 percentage points higher than Renkum (3%)
Self-rated health (estimated)
82%
▲8 percentage points higher than Renkum (74%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
0%
▼52 percentage points lower than Renkum (52%)
More figures
Meets physical activity guideline
60%
▲10 percentage points higher than Renkum (50%)
Overweight
45%
▼5 percentage points lower than Renkum (50%)
Lonely
40%
▼2 percentage points lower than Renkum (42%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
42%
▼2 percentage points lower than Renkum (44%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
0%
▼45 percentage points lower than Renkum (45%)
Agriculture, share of the area
55%
▲31 percentage points higher than Renkum (24%)
Water, share of the area
28%
▲25 percentage points higher than Renkum (3%)
Health
An estimated 82% of adults rate their own health as good, against 74% in the municipality of Renkum (2024).
This areaThe municipality of Renkum
Good self-rated health
81.7%
74.1%
Smokes
13.8%
14.4%
Excessive drinking
6.6%
5.5%
Overweight
45%
49.5%
Lonely
40.3%
42.5%
Anxiety or depression feelings
42.1%
43.7%
Meets physical activity guideline
60%
49.5%
Explanation
An RIVM model estimate (small-area estimation from the 2024 Health Monitor for Adults and Elderly), not a direct tabulation — even a buurt that was not itself surveyed gets an estimate. Figures cover adults aged 18 and over.
Source: RIVM/CBS Gezondheidsmonitor Volwassenen en Ouderen (kleine-gebieden-schatting) 2024
Land use
0% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 52% in the municipality of Renkum.
Traffic2.4%
Built-up14.1%
Agriculture55.3%
Water28.2%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
Distance to amenities
A daycare lies here at an average road distance of 900 m.
Distance
Value
Large supermarket
1,600 m
–
GP practice
2,800 m
–
Primary school
1,400 m
–
Daycare
900 m
–
Large supermarkets
–
0
GP practices
–
0
Daycares
–
0.6
Explanation
Average road distance from every address in this buurt to the nearest amenity, and the average count within 1 km — a buurt average, not a distance from one address.
Source: CBS proximity statistics 2025
04 · Residents
The population is shrinking slower than the Renkum average.
Klingelbeek has 115 inhabitants (2026), or 187 per km² (73% lower than in Renkum). In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Renkum was 84%, 6 percentage points above the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, D66 had the highest share there: 22% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2021
-4%
▼lower than Renkum (-0%)
Turnout, municipality of Renkum
84%
▲6 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+14%
▲higher than Renkum (+1%)
Aged 45 to 65
32%
▲2 percentage points higher than Renkum (30%)
Never married
50%
▲7 percentage points higher than Renkum (43%)
Dutch origin
83%
▲2 percentage points higher than Renkum (81%)
D66, share of the vote
22%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2021
-4%
▼lower than Renkum (-0%)
Turnout, municipality of Renkum
84%
▲6 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+14%
▲higher than Renkum (+1%)
Aged 45 to 65
32%
▲2 percentage points higher than Renkum (30%)
Never married
50%
▲7 percentage points higher than Renkum (43%)
Dutch origin
83%
▲2 percentage points higher than Renkum (81%)
D66, share of the vote
22%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population shrank 4% between 2021 and 2026, to 115.
Residents, 2026
115
-4% since 2021
Renkum +0%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 187 residents per km², this buurt is 73% less densely populated than the municipality of Renkum.
Residents per km²187
Dwellings per km²40.3
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, 41.7 children were born per 1,000 residents; almost no one died.
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
32% of residents are between 45 and 65.
0 to 1515
15 to 255
25 to 4525
45 to 6535
65 to 8030
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
50% of residents are never married.
Never married60
Married50
Divorced5
Widowed5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
83% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands100
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)10
Outside Europe10
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Renkum; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 84% of eligible voters in Renkum voted. The largest party was D66 with 22% of the valid votes.
Municipality of RenkumThe Netherlands
D66
21.7%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
10.9%
16.7%
VVD
14.5%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
20%
12.8%
CDA
12.2%
11.8%
JA21
4.1%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
3.5%
4.5%
BBB
1.4%
2.6%
Other
11.8%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
Klingelbeek has an average of 1.6 cars per household, 33% higher than in Renkum (1.2). 26% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 2 percentage points more than in Renkum (24%).
Key figures
Financial services and real estate, share of businesses
0%
▼6 percentage points lower than Renkum (6%)
Government, education and care, share of businesses
29%
▲7 percentage points higher than Renkum (22%)
Transport, information and communication, share of businesses
0%
▼6 percentage points lower than Renkum (6%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.6
▲33% higher than Renkum (1.2)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
26%
▲2 percentage points higher than Renkum (24%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+1 pp
▼lower than Renkum (+6 pp)
Industrial, share of addresses
27%
▲26 percentage points higher than Renkum (1%)
Residential, share of addresses
73%
▼16 percentage points lower than Renkum (89%)
Retail, share of addresses
11%
▲10 percentage points higher than Renkum (1%)
Residents per km²
187
▼65% lower than the Netherlands (539)
Private rent
28%
▲14 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (14%)
Single-family dwellings
88%
▲25 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Financial services and real estate, share of businesses
0%
▼6 percentage points lower than Renkum (6%)
Government, education and care, share of businesses
29%
▲7 percentage points higher than Renkum (22%)
Transport, information and communication, share of businesses
0%
▼6 percentage points lower than Renkum (6%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.6
▲33% higher than Renkum (1.2)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
26%
▲2 percentage points higher than Renkum (24%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+1 pp
▼lower than Renkum (+6 pp)
Industrial, share of addresses
27%
▲26 percentage points higher than Renkum (1%)
Residential, share of addresses
73%
▼16 percentage points lower than Renkum (89%)
Retail, share of addresses
11%
▲10 percentage points higher than Renkum (1%)
Residents per km²
187
▼65% lower than the Netherlands (539)
Private rent
28%
▲14 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (14%)
Single-family dwellings
88%
▲25 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Business establishments by sector
Zakelijke dienstverlening is the largest sector, with 10 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij0
Nijverheid en energie5
Handel en horeca5
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie0
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed0
Zakelijke dienstverlening10
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg10
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
26% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 24% in the municipality of Renkum (2025).
Petrol73.7%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)26.3%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 25% to 26% between 2021 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
26%▲ 2 percentage points above Renkum (24%)
+1 pp since 2021
Renkum +6 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 95 passenger cars and 10 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars95
Motorcycles10
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
73% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is industrial (27%).
Residential73%
Retail10.8%
Office5.4%
Industrial27%
Explanation
Based on 37 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
12% multi-family dwellings, against 37% nationally.
This areaThe Netherlands
Multi-family dwellings12%
NL 37%▼ −68% vs NL
Residents per km²187
NL 539▼ −65% vs NL
Private rent28%
NL 14%▲ +100% vs NL
Single-family dwellings88%
NL 63%▲ +40% vs NL
Owner-occupied dwellings72%
NL 57%▲ +26% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025