The average WOZ value in Maren-Kessel is €493,000, 29% higher than in Oss (€383,000). Between 2014 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 100%, against a rise of 80% in Oss. 77% of the homes are owner-occupied, 14 percentage points more than in Oss (63%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€493,000
▲29% higher than Oss (€383,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2014
+100%
▲higher than Oss (+80%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
77%
▲14 percentage points higher than Oss (63%)
Social housing
16%
▼11 percentage points lower than Oss (27%)
Private rent
7%
▼3 percentage points lower than Oss (10%)
Single-family dwellings
96%
▲19 percentage points higher than Oss (77%)
Built 1992–2005
9%
▼6 percentage points lower than Oss (15%)
Built 2016 and later
13%
▲5 percentage points higher than Oss (8%)
Built before 1945
13%
▲6 percentage points higher than Oss (7%)
Average WOZ value
€493,000
▲29% higher than Oss (€383,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2014
+100%
▲higher than Oss (+80%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
77%
▲14 percentage points higher than Oss (63%)
Social housing
16%
▼11 percentage points lower than Oss (27%)
Private rent
7%
▼3 percentage points lower than Oss (10%)
Single-family dwellings
96%
▲19 percentage points higher than Oss (77%)
Built 1992–2005
9%
▼6 percentage points lower than Oss (15%)
Built 2016 and later
13%
▲5 percentage points higher than Oss (8%)
Built before 1945
13%
▲6 percentage points higher than Oss (7%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 100% between 2014 and 2025, to €493,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€493,000▲ 29% above Oss
+100% since 2014
Oss +80%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€319 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€319/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
135 m² · estimated gemeente average
WOZ €493,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€135NL median
Water board levy€46–
Property tax (OZB)€43€43
Waste levy€29€27
Sewage levy€17€22
Costs to set aside€184
Maintenance reserve€172–
Buildings insurance€12–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Oss's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 124th of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 135 m² (estimated gemeente average) with the average WOZ value here, €493,000.
Levies: Oss's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Maren-Kessel has the 8th-highest WOZ value of the 23 wijken in the municipality of Oss.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €493,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Maren-Kessel
493,000
591
–
Lithoijen
549,000
410
–
Centrum
281,000
3,539
–
Schadewijk
316,000
4,993
–
Industrieterreinen-Zuid
461,000
127
–
Oss-Zuid
369,000
3,189
–
Krinkelhoek
390,000
3,604
–
Industrieterreinen-Noord
526,000
57
–
Ruwaard
320,000
6,292
–
Ussen
365,000
5,851
–
Buitengebied-Noord
592,000
116
–
Buitengebied-Zuid
703,000
121
–
Berghem
463,000
4,419
–
Haren
497,000
300
–
Macharen
445,000
306
–
Megen
415,000
765
–
Ravenstein
411,000
1,631
–
Herpen
433,000
1,340
–
Overlangel
550,000
296
–
Deursen en Dennenburg
555,000
457
–
Lith
435,000
1,330
–
Oijen
448,000
531
–
Geffen
479,000
2,130
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 77% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied77%
Social housing16%
Private rent7%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
96% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes96%
Multi-family homes4%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
21% of dwellings were built between 1975 and 1991, against 27% in the municipality of Oss.
Before 194512.5%
1945-196418.3%
1965-197420.5%
1975-199120.8%
1992-20058.9%
2006-20155.8%
2016 and later13.2%
Explanation
Based on 606 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
Less registered crime per resident than the Oss average.
In 2025, 16 crimes per 1,000 residents were registered in Maren-Kessel, 64% lower than in Oss (44). Since 2021 the registered rate per 1,000 residents fell 37%, against a fall of 8% in Oss. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
16
▼64% lower than Oss (44)
Change since 2021
-37%
▼lower than Oss (-8%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
4.5
▲88% higher than Oss (2.4)
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
16
▼64% lower than Oss (44)
Change since 2021
-37%
▼lower than Oss (-8%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
4.5
▲88% higher than Oss (2.4)
Registered crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
In 2025, Maren-Kessel registered 16 crimes per 1,000 residents, against 44 in the municipality of Oss.
Maren-Kessel16
The municipality of Oss44
Explanation
Crime is counted where it happens and divided by the number of residents, so places with many visitors — city centres, nightlife, stations — score higher.
The largest category in Maren-Kessel is 'Theft and burglary': 5.5 per 1,000 residents in 2025, against 20.1 in the municipality of Oss.
Maren-KesselOss
Theft and burglary5.5
Oss 20.1▼ −73% vs Oss
Fraud and scams4.8
Oss 4.7≈ Oss
Traffic2.8
Oss 7.7▼ −64% vs Oss
Violence and threats1.4
Oss 4.6▼ −70% vs Oss
Vandalism and public order0.7
Oss 4.6▼ −85% vs Oss
Other and withheld0.7
Oss 2.4▼ −71% vs Oss
Environmental0.0
Oss 0.2≈ Oss
Explanation
Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2024, police in Maren-Kessel registered 6 traffic accidents, of which 1 with injury and none fatal.
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2024
03 · Living environment
Residents rate their health above the Oss average; green space is below the Oss average.
An estimated 75% of adults in Maren-Kessel rate their own health as good, 3 percentage points more than in Oss. Fewer adults feel lonely (39% against 46%), fewer report anxiety or depression (41% against 47%), fewer meet the physical activity guideline (42% against 45%) and fewer smoke (16% against 18%). Agricultural land is the largest land use in Maren-Kessel, covering 88% of the area, against 67% in Oss. Green space such as parks, sports fields, forest and nature covers 2% of the area, 7 percentage points below the 9% in Oss.
Key figures
Self-rated health (estimated)
75%
▲3 percentage points higher than Oss (72%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
2%
▼7 percentage points lower than Oss (9%)
More figures
Lonely
39%
▼7 percentage points lower than Oss (46%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
41%
▼6 percentage points lower than Oss (47%)
Meets physical activity guideline
42%
▼3 percentage points lower than Oss (45%)
Smokes
16%
▼2 percentage points lower than Oss (18%)
Agriculture, share of the area
88%
▲21 percentage points higher than Oss (67%)
Built-up, share of the area
3%
▼12 percentage points lower than Oss (15%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
2%
▼3 percentage points lower than Oss (5%)
Self-rated health (estimated)
75%
▲3 percentage points higher than Oss (72%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
2%
▼7 percentage points lower than Oss (9%)
More figures
Lonely
39%
▼7 percentage points lower than Oss (46%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
41%
▼6 percentage points lower than Oss (47%)
Meets physical activity guideline
42%
▼3 percentage points lower than Oss (45%)
Smokes
16%
▼2 percentage points lower than Oss (18%)
Agriculture, share of the area
88%
▲21 percentage points higher than Oss (67%)
Built-up, share of the area
3%
▼12 percentage points lower than Oss (15%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
2%
▼3 percentage points lower than Oss (5%)
Health
An estimated 75% of adults rate their own health as good, against 72% in the municipality of Oss (2024).
This areaThe municipality of Oss
Good self-rated health
75.2%
71.8%
Smokes
15.6%
18.3%
Excessive drinking
5.7%
5.7%
Overweight
55.5%
54.9%
Lonely
39.4%
46.2%
Anxiety or depression feelings
40.9%
46.7%
Meets physical activity guideline
41.6%
44.9%
Explanation
An RIVM model estimate (small-area estimation from the 2024 Health Monitor for Adults and Elderly), not a direct tabulation — even a buurt that was not itself surveyed gets an estimate. Figures cover adults aged 18 and over.
Source: RIVM/CBS Gezondheidsmonitor Volwassenen en Ouderen (kleine-gebieden-schatting) 2024
Land use
2% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 9% in the municipality of Oss.
Traffic2.9%
Built-up2.9%
Other built-up0.1%
Recreation0.8%
Agriculture87.9%
Forest and nature1.6%
Water4%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
04 · Residents
The population is growing slower than the Oss average.
Maren-Kessel has 1,480 inhabitants (2026), or 83 per km² (86% lower than in Oss). Between 2014 and 2026 the population rose 4%, against a rise of 12% in Oss. In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Oss was 78%, in line with the national figure. Of the parties that are largest nationally, PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) had the highest share there: 24% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2014
+4%
▼lower than Oss (+12%)
Turnout, municipality of Oss
78%
=about the same as the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+12%
▼lower than Oss (+17%)
Aged 45 to 65
33%
▲6 percentage points higher than Oss (27%)
Married
46%
▲7 percentage points higher than Oss (39%)
Dutch origin
87%
▲11 percentage points higher than Oss (76%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
50%
▲6 percentage points higher than Oss (44%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
24%
▲7 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2014
+4%
▼lower than Oss (+12%)
Turnout, municipality of Oss
78%
=about the same as the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+12%
▼lower than Oss (+17%)
Aged 45 to 65
33%
▲6 percentage points higher than Oss (27%)
Married
46%
▲7 percentage points higher than Oss (39%)
Dutch origin
87%
▲11 percentage points higher than Oss (76%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
50%
▲6 percentage points higher than Oss (44%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
24%
▲7 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population grew 4% between 2014 and 2026, to 1,480.
Residents, 2026
1,480
+4% since 2014
Oss +12%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 83 residents per km², this wijk is 86% less densely populated than the municipality of Oss.
Residents per km²83
Dwellings per km²33.2
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, 6.9 children were born per 1,000 residents; 6.9 died per 1,000.
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
32% of residents are between 45 and 65.
0 to 15190
15 to 25160
25 to 45325
45 to 65480
65 to 80255
80 and over65
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
46% of residents are married.
Never married640
Married675
Divorced105
Widowed60
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
87% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands1,285
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)125
Outside Europe70
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Education level of residents aged 15 to 75
50% of residents have a havo, vwo or mbo2-4 level education.
Primary, vmbo, mbo1250
Havo, vwo, mbo2-4550
Higher professional, university310
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2024
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Oss; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 78% of eligible voters in Oss voted. The largest party was PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) with 24% of the valid votes.
Municipality of OssThe Netherlands
D66
15.4%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
23.9%
16.7%
VVD
15.3%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
9.1%
12.8%
CDA
11.7%
11.8%
JA21
6.7%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
4.7%
4.5%
BBB
2.6%
2.6%
Other
10.7%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
Maren-Kessel has an average of 1.4 cars per household, 17% higher than in Oss (1.2). 29% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 4 percentage points more than in Oss (25%).
Key figures
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
21%
▲17 percentage points higher than Oss (4%)
Business services, share of businesses
17%
▼5 percentage points lower than Oss (22%)
Government, education and care, share of businesses
10%
▼3 percentage points lower than Oss (13%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.4
▲17% higher than Oss (1.2)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
29%
▲4 percentage points higher than Oss (25%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2014
+3 pp
=about the same as Oss (+3 pp)
Industrial, share of addresses
8%
▲4 percentage points higher than Oss (4%)
Residential, share of addresses
92%
▲3 percentage points higher than Oss (89%)
Office, share of addresses
0%
▼2 percentage points lower than Oss (2%)
Residents per km²
83
▼85% lower than the Netherlands (539)
Private rent
7%
▼7 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Social housing
16%
▼12 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (28%)
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
21%
▲17 percentage points higher than Oss (4%)
Business services, share of businesses
17%
▼5 percentage points lower than Oss (22%)
Government, education and care, share of businesses
10%
▼3 percentage points lower than Oss (13%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.4
▲17% higher than Oss (1.2)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
29%
▲4 percentage points higher than Oss (25%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2014
+3 pp
=about the same as Oss (+3 pp)
Industrial, share of addresses
8%
▲4 percentage points higher than Oss (4%)
Residential, share of addresses
92%
▲3 percentage points higher than Oss (89%)
Office, share of addresses
0%
▼2 percentage points lower than Oss (2%)
Residents per km²
83
▼85% lower than the Netherlands (539)
Private rent
7%
▼7 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Social housing
16%
▼12 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (28%)
Business establishments by sector
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij is the largest sector, with 55 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij55
Nijverheid en energie55
Handel en horeca40
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie10
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed10
Zakelijke dienstverlening45
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg25
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten20
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
29% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 25% in the municipality of Oss (2025).
Petrol70.6%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)29.4%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 26% to 29% between 2014 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
29%▲ 4 percentage points above Oss (25%)
+3 pp since 2014
Oss +4 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 885 passenger cars and 95 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars885
Motorcycles95
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
92% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is industrial (8%).
Residential92.1%
Retail0.2%
Office0.2%
Assembly1.8%
Industrial8.4%
Lodging0.9%
Education0.2%
Sports0.2%
Other1.5%
Explanation
Based on 658 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
4% multi-family dwellings, against 37% nationally.
This areaThe Netherlands
Multi-family dwellings4%
NL 37%▼ −89% vs NL
Residents per km²83
NL 539▼ −85% vs NL
Private rent7%
NL 14%▼ −50% vs NL
Social housing16%
NL 28%▼ −43% vs NL
Single-family dwellings96%
NL 63%▲ +52% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025