The average WOZ value in Pottemsestraat en Groenestraat e.o. is €447,000, 14% higher than in Neder-Betuwe (€393,000). Between 2021 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 41%, against a rise of 39% in Neder-Betuwe. 88% of the homes are owner-occupied, 22 percentage points more than in Neder-Betuwe (66%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€447,000
▲14% higher than Neder-Betuwe (€393,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+41%
▲higher than Neder-Betuwe (+39%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
88%
▲22 percentage points higher than Neder-Betuwe (66%)
Social housing
0%
▼28 percentage points lower than Neder-Betuwe (28%)
Private rent
12%
▲6 percentage points higher than Neder-Betuwe (6%)
Single-family dwellings
100%
▲9 percentage points higher than Neder-Betuwe (91%)
Built 1975–1991
4%
▼17 percentage points lower than Neder-Betuwe (21%)
Built 1965–1974
2%
▼16 percentage points lower than Neder-Betuwe (18%)
Built 1945–1964
6%
▼12 percentage points lower than Neder-Betuwe (18%)
Average WOZ value
€447,000
▲14% higher than Neder-Betuwe (€393,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+41%
▲higher than Neder-Betuwe (+39%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
88%
▲22 percentage points higher than Neder-Betuwe (66%)
Social housing
0%
▼28 percentage points lower than Neder-Betuwe (28%)
Private rent
12%
▲6 percentage points higher than Neder-Betuwe (6%)
Single-family dwellings
100%
▲9 percentage points higher than Neder-Betuwe (91%)
Built 1975–1991
4%
▼17 percentage points lower than Neder-Betuwe (21%)
Built 1965–1974
2%
▼16 percentage points lower than Neder-Betuwe (18%)
Built 1945–1964
6%
▼12 percentage points lower than Neder-Betuwe (18%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 41% between 2021 and 2025, to €447,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€447,000▲ 14% above Neder-Betuwe
+41% since 2021
Neder-Betuwe +39%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€340 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€340/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
169 m² · measured buurt average
WOZ €447,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€109NL median
Water board levy€44–
Property tax (OZB)€44€39
Sewage levy€21€22
Waste levy not included: a joint body (in Rivierenland, Avri) raises it on Neder-Betuwe's behalf, not the gemeente itself. Not counted in the total.
Costs to set aside€231
Maintenance reserve€216–
Buildings insurance€15–
Model estimates, not bills.
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 169 m² (measured average in this buurt) with the average WOZ value here, €447,000.
Levies: Neder-Betuwe's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Pottemsestraat en Groenestraat e.o. has the 4th-lowest WOZ value of the 8 buurten in Echteld.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €447,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Pottemsestraat en Groenestraat e.o.
447,000
52
–
Ochten
368,000
1,713
–
Echteld
359,000
221
–
IJzendoorn
359,000
323
–
Verspreide huizen Echteld-Waalbandijk
552,000
31
–
Verspreide huizen Echteld
471,000
178
–
Verspreide huizen IJzendoorn
490,000
71
–
Verspreide huizen Ochten
498,000
208
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 88% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied88%
Private rent12%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
100% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes100%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
81% of dwellings were built before 1945, against 11% in the municipality of Neder-Betuwe.
Before 194580.8%
1945-19645.8%
1965-19741.9%
1975-19913.8%
1992-20053.8%
2006-20151.9%
2016 and later1.9%
Explanation
Based on 52 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
Too few residents for a rate per resident: these are counts.
Pottemsestraat en Groenestraat e.o. has too few residents for a reliable rate per 1,000 residents (under 200), so counts are shown instead of a comparison. In 2025, 1 crimes were registered, against 1 in 2021. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Registered crimes, 2025
1
=about the same as 1 in 2021
Home burglary
0
2023–2025
Registered crimes, 2025
1
=about the same as 1 in 2021
Home burglary
0
2023–2025
Registered crime per year
1 crimes were registered in Pottemsestraat en Groenestraat e.o. in 2025 (1 in 2021).
Registered crimes, 2025
1
same as 1 in 2021
Explanation
Too few residents for a reliable per-1,000 figure (threshold 200) — registered crime, not all crime — CBS/Politie 47018NED.
The largest category in Pottemsestraat en Groenestraat e.o. is 'Theft and burglary': 1 in 2025.
Theft and burglary1
Vandalism and public order0
Violence and threats0
Fraud and scams0
Traffic0
Environmental0
Other and withheld0
Explanation
Too few residents for a reliable per-1,000 figure (threshold 200). Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2021, police in Pottemsestraat en Groenestraat e.o. registered 1 traffic accidents, of which 0 with injury and none fatal.
2020
2021
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2021
03 · Living environment
Residents rate their health above the Neder-Betuwe average; green space is below the Neder-Betuwe average.
An estimated 78% of adults in Pottemsestraat en Groenestraat e.o. rate their own health as good, 3 percentage points more than in Neder-Betuwe. Fewer adults report anxiety or depression (38% against 44%), fewer smoke (12% against 17%) and fewer feel lonely (36% against 40%), but more meet the physical activity guideline (45% against 42%). Agricultural land is the largest land use in Pottemsestraat en Groenestraat e.o., covering 77% of the area, against 59% in Neder-Betuwe.
Key figures
Self-rated health (estimated)
78%
▲3 percentage points higher than Neder-Betuwe (75%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
0%
▼14 percentage points lower than Neder-Betuwe (14%)
More figures
Anxiety or depression feelings
38%
▼6 percentage points lower than Neder-Betuwe (44%)
Smokes
12%
▼5 percentage points lower than Neder-Betuwe (17%)
Lonely
36%
▼4 percentage points lower than Neder-Betuwe (40%)
Meets physical activity guideline
45%
▲3 percentage points higher than Neder-Betuwe (42%)
Agriculture, share of the area
77%
▲18 percentage points higher than Neder-Betuwe (59%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
0%
▼12 percentage points lower than Neder-Betuwe (12%)
Water, share of the area
0%
▼11 percentage points lower than Neder-Betuwe (11%)
Self-rated health (estimated)
78%
▲3 percentage points higher than Neder-Betuwe (75%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
0%
▼14 percentage points lower than Neder-Betuwe (14%)
More figures
Anxiety or depression feelings
38%
▼6 percentage points lower than Neder-Betuwe (44%)
Smokes
12%
▼5 percentage points lower than Neder-Betuwe (17%)
Lonely
36%
▼4 percentage points lower than Neder-Betuwe (40%)
Meets physical activity guideline
45%
▲3 percentage points higher than Neder-Betuwe (42%)
Agriculture, share of the area
77%
▲18 percentage points higher than Neder-Betuwe (59%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
0%
▼12 percentage points lower than Neder-Betuwe (12%)
Water, share of the area
0%
▼11 percentage points lower than Neder-Betuwe (11%)
Health
An estimated 78% of adults rate their own health as good, against 75% in the municipality of Neder-Betuwe (2024).
This areaThe municipality of Neder-Betuwe
Good self-rated health
78.1%
74.6%
Smokes
12.4%
17.3%
Excessive drinking
5.5%
5%
Overweight
54.7%
55.9%
Lonely
36.5%
40.4%
Anxiety or depression feelings
38.2%
44.2%
Meets physical activity guideline
45%
41.8%
Explanation
An RIVM model estimate (small-area estimation from the 2024 Health Monitor for Adults and Elderly), not a direct tabulation — even a buurt that was not itself surveyed gets an estimate. Figures cover adults aged 18 and over.
Source: RIVM/CBS Gezondheidsmonitor Volwassenen en Ouderen (kleine-gebieden-schatting) 2024
Land use
0% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 14% in the municipality of Neder-Betuwe.
Traffic3.8%
Built-up19.2%
Agriculture76.9%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
Distance to amenities
A daycare lies here at an average road distance of 600 m.
Distance
Value
Large supermarket
1,800 m
–
GP practice
1,800 m
–
Primary school
1,600 m
–
Daycare
600 m
–
Large supermarkets
–
0
GP practices
–
0
Daycares
–
1
Explanation
Average road distance from every address in this buurt to the nearest amenity, and the average count within 1 km — a buurt average, not a distance from one address.
Source: CBS proximity statistics 2025
04 · Residents
The population is growing faster than the Neder-Betuwe average.
Pottemsestraat en Groenestraat e.o. has 145 inhabitants (2026), or 542 per km² (25% higher than in Neder-Betuwe). In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Neder-Betuwe was 86%, 8 percentage points above the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) had the highest share there: 20% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2021
+12%
▲higher than Neder-Betuwe (+5%)
Turnout, municipality of Neder-Betuwe
86%
▲8 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+0%
▼lower than Neder-Betuwe (+5%)
Aged 45 to 65
23%
=about the same as Neder-Betuwe (23%)
Married
48%
▲3 percentage points higher than Neder-Betuwe (45%)
Dutch origin
100%
▲11 percentage points higher than Neder-Betuwe (89%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
20%
▲3 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2021
+12%
▲higher than Neder-Betuwe (+5%)
Turnout, municipality of Neder-Betuwe
86%
▲8 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+0%
▼lower than Neder-Betuwe (+5%)
Aged 45 to 65
23%
=about the same as Neder-Betuwe (23%)
Married
48%
▲3 percentage points higher than Neder-Betuwe (45%)
Dutch origin
100%
▲11 percentage points higher than Neder-Betuwe (89%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
20%
▲3 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population grew 12% between 2021 and 2026, to 145.
Residents, 2026
145
+12% since 2021
Neder-Betuwe +5%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 542 residents per km², this buurt is 25% more densely populated than the municipality of Neder-Betuwe.
Residents per km²542
Dwellings per km²192.6
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, almost no children were born; 37.0 died per 1,000.
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
23% of residents are between 45 and 65.
0 to 1525
15 to 2520
25 to 4530
45 to 6535
65 to 8035
80 and over10
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
48% of residents are married.
Never married55
Married70
Divorced10
Widowed10
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
100% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands145
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Neder-Betuwe; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 86% of eligible voters in Neder-Betuwe voted. The largest party was PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) with 20% of the valid votes.
Municipality of Neder-BetuweThe Netherlands
D66
5.8%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
19.7%
16.7%
VVD
9.7%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
4.1%
12.8%
CDA
8.3%
11.8%
JA21
5%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
4.6%
4.5%
BBB
2.3%
2.6%
Other
40.4%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
Pottemsestraat en Groenestraat e.o. has an average of 1.5 cars per household, 7% higher than in Neder-Betuwe (1.4). 31% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 9 percentage points more than in Neder-Betuwe (22%).
Key figures
Cars per household (2025)
1.5
▲7% higher than Neder-Betuwe (1.4)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
31%
▲9 percentage points higher than Neder-Betuwe (22%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+6 pp
▲higher than Neder-Betuwe (+3 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
100%
▲13 percentage points higher than Neder-Betuwe (87%)
Industrial, share of addresses
4%
▼2 percentage points lower than Neder-Betuwe (6%)
Owner-occupied dwellings
88%
▲31 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (57%)
Private rent
12%
▼2 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Average WOZ value
€447,000
▲12% higher than the Netherlands (€398,000)
Cars per household (2025)
1.5
▲7% higher than Neder-Betuwe (1.4)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
31%
▲9 percentage points higher than Neder-Betuwe (22%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+6 pp
▲higher than Neder-Betuwe (+3 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
100%
▲13 percentage points higher than Neder-Betuwe (87%)
Industrial, share of addresses
4%
▼2 percentage points lower than Neder-Betuwe (6%)
Owner-occupied dwellings
88%
▲31 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (57%)
Private rent
12%
▼2 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Average WOZ value
€447,000
▲12% higher than the Netherlands (€398,000)
Passenger cars by fuel type
31% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 22% in the municipality of Neder-Betuwe (2025).
Petrol68.8%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)31.2%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 25% to 31% between 2021 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
31%▲ 9 percentage points above Neder-Betuwe (22%)
+6 pp since 2021
Neder-Betuwe +3 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 80 passenger cars and 5 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars80
Motorcycles5
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
100% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is industrial (4%).
Residential100%
Industrial3.8%
Explanation
Based on 52 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
100% single-family dwellings, against 63% nationally.
This areaThe Netherlands
Single-family dwellings100%
NL 63%▲ +59% vs NL
Owner-occupied dwellings88%
NL 57%▲ +54% vs NL
Private rent12%
NL 14%▼ −14% vs NL
Average WOZ value€447,000
NL €398,000▲ +12% vs NL
Residents per km²542
NL 539≈ NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025