We're pulling the figures from public sources. This usually takes a few seconds.
Area and its neighbourhoodsCBS key figures for districts and neighbourhoods
Residents and householdsCBS
Homes and WOZ valueCBS · Kadaster BAG
Housing marketNVM market overview
Municipal leviesMunicipal budgets · CBS
SafetyCBS and Police
HealthRIVM Health Monitor
Land use and amenitiesCBS land use · proximity statistics
Road safety and electionsRijkswaterstaat · Kiesraad
Comparing with the municipality and the countryRankings and comparisons
Neighbourhood · Loon op Zand
Living in Pannenhoef (oost)
The population is growing slower than in Loon op Zand. Homes cost less than the average in the municipality of Loon op Zand, and registered crime per resident is about the same.
The average WOZ value in Pannenhoef (oost) is €315,000, 22% lower than in Loon op Zand (€405,000). Between 2021 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 48%, against a rise of 41% in Loon op Zand. 36% of the homes are owner-occupied, 30 percentage points less than in Loon op Zand (66%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€315,000
▼22% lower than Loon op Zand (€405,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+48%
▲higher than Loon op Zand (+41%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
36%
▼30 percentage points lower than Loon op Zand (66%)
Social housing
64%
▲41 percentage points higher than Loon op Zand (23%)
Private rent
1%
▼10 percentage points lower than Loon op Zand (11%)
Single-family dwellings
73%
▼9 percentage points lower than Loon op Zand (82%)
Built 1975–1991
4%
▼28 percentage points lower than Loon op Zand (32%)
Built 1992–2005
29%
▲16 percentage points higher than Loon op Zand (13%)
Average WOZ value
€315,000
▼22% lower than Loon op Zand (€405,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+48%
▲higher than Loon op Zand (+41%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
36%
▼30 percentage points lower than Loon op Zand (66%)
Social housing
64%
▲41 percentage points higher than Loon op Zand (23%)
Private rent
1%
▼10 percentage points lower than Loon op Zand (11%)
Single-family dwellings
73%
▼9 percentage points lower than Loon op Zand (82%)
Built 1975–1991
4%
▼28 percentage points lower than Loon op Zand (32%)
Built 1992–2005
29%
▲16 percentage points higher than Loon op Zand (13%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 48% between 2021 and 2025, to €315,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€315,000▼ 22% below Loon op Zand
+48% since 2021
Loon op Zand +41%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€275 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€275/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
106 m² · measured buurt average
WOZ €315,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€129NL median
Water board levy€41–
Property tax (OZB)€40€28
Waste levy€26€27
Sewage levy€22€22
Costs to set aside€146
Maintenance reserve€136–
Buildings insurance€10–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Loon op Zand's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 280th of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 106 m² (measured average in this buurt) with the average WOZ value here, €315,000.
Levies: Loon op Zand's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Pannenhoef (oost) has the 3rd-lowest WOZ value of the 14 buurten in Kaatsheuvel-West.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €315,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Pannenhoef (oost)
315,000
313
–
Draaiboom
370,000
788
–
Hil (noord)
372,000
249
–
Hil (zuid)
424,000
290
–
Pannenhoef (west)
330,000
509
–
Bloemenbuurt
293,000
190
–
Centrum
307,000
513
–
Schrijversbuurt
352,000
269
–
Staatsliedenbuurt
348,000
281
–
Vossenberg (west)
332,000
461
–
Vossenberg (oost)
440,000
222
–
De Kets (industrieterrein)
374,000
37
–
De Zandschel
597,000
252
–
De Baan
542,000
327
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is social housing, at 64% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied36%
Social housing64%
Private rent1%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
73% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes73%
Multi-family homes27%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
67% of dwellings were built between 1965 and 1974, against 16% in the municipality of Loon op Zand.
1965-197467.1%
1975-19914.2%
1992-200528.8%
Explanation
Based on 313 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
About as much registered crime per resident as the Loon op Zand average.
In 2025, 32 crimes per 1,000 residents were registered in Pannenhoef (oost), about the same as in Loon op Zand (32). Since 2021 the registered rate per 1,000 residents rose 41%, against a fall of 10% in Loon op Zand. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
32
=about the same as Loon op Zand (32)
Change since 2021
+41%
▲higher than Loon op Zand (-10%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
2.1
▼36% lower than Loon op Zand (3.3)
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
32
=about the same as Loon op Zand (32)
Change since 2021
+41%
▲higher than Loon op Zand (-10%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
2.1
▼36% lower than Loon op Zand (3.3)
Registered crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
In 2025, Pannenhoef (oost) registered 32 crimes per 1,000 residents, against 32 in the municipality of Loon op Zand.
Pannenhoef (oost)32
The municipality of Loon op Zand32
Explanation
Crime is counted where it happens and divided by the number of residents, so places with many visitors — city centres, nightlife, stations — score higher.
The largest category in Pannenhoef (oost) is 'Fraud and scams': 9.2 per 1,000 residents in 2025, against 4.8 in the municipality of Loon op Zand.
Pannenhoef (oost)Loon op Zand
Fraud and scams9.2
Loon op Zand 4.8▲ +92% vs Loon op Zand
Theft and burglary6.2
Loon op Zand 11.9▼ −48% vs Loon op Zand
Violence and threats6.2
Loon op Zand 3.8▲ +63% vs Loon op Zand
Traffic6.2
Loon op Zand 6.8▼ −9% vs Loon op Zand
Other and withheld3.1
Loon op Zand 1.4▲ +121% vs Loon op Zand
Vandalism and public order1.5
Loon op Zand 3.1▼ −52% vs Loon op Zand
Environmental0.0
Loon op Zand 0.1≈ Loon op Zand
Explanation
Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2024, police in Pannenhoef (oost) registered 5 traffic accidents, of which 2 with injury and none fatal.
2022
2024
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2024
03 · Living environment
Residents rate their health below the Loon op Zand average; green space is below the Loon op Zand average.
An estimated 62% of adults in Pannenhoef (oost) rate their own health as good, 10 percentage points less than in Loon op Zand. More adults feel lonely (52% against 44%), more are overweight (63% against 56%) and more report anxiety or depression (51% against 44%), but fewer meet the physical activity guideline (38% against 43%). Built-up land is the largest land use in Pannenhoef (oost), covering 100% of the area, against 11% in Loon op Zand.
Key figures
Self-rated health (estimated)
62%
▼10 percentage points lower than Loon op Zand (72%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
0%
▼43 percentage points lower than Loon op Zand (43%)
More figures
Lonely
52%
▲8 percentage points higher than Loon op Zand (44%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
51%
▲7 percentage points higher than Loon op Zand (44%)
Overweight
63%
▲7 percentage points higher than Loon op Zand (56%)
Meets physical activity guideline
38%
▼5 percentage points lower than Loon op Zand (43%)
Built-up, share of the area
100%
▲89 percentage points higher than Loon op Zand (11%)
Agriculture, share of the area
0%
▼41 percentage points lower than Loon op Zand (41%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
0%
▼36 percentage points lower than Loon op Zand (36%)
Self-rated health (estimated)
62%
▼10 percentage points lower than Loon op Zand (72%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
0%
▼43 percentage points lower than Loon op Zand (43%)
More figures
Lonely
52%
▲8 percentage points higher than Loon op Zand (44%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
51%
▲7 percentage points higher than Loon op Zand (44%)
Overweight
63%
▲7 percentage points higher than Loon op Zand (56%)
Meets physical activity guideline
38%
▼5 percentage points lower than Loon op Zand (43%)
Built-up, share of the area
100%
▲89 percentage points higher than Loon op Zand (11%)
Agriculture, share of the area
0%
▼41 percentage points lower than Loon op Zand (41%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
0%
▼36 percentage points lower than Loon op Zand (36%)
Health
An estimated 62% of adults rate their own health as good, against 72% in the municipality of Loon op Zand (2024).
This areaThe municipality of Loon op Zand
Good self-rated health
61.5%
72.5%
Smokes
20%
15.6%
Excessive drinking
5.2%
5.9%
Overweight
62.6%
56.3%
Lonely
52.1%
43.9%
Anxiety or depression feelings
51.3%
44.5%
Meets physical activity guideline
38.2%
42.7%
Explanation
An RIVM model estimate (small-area estimation from the 2024 Health Monitor for Adults and Elderly), not a direct tabulation — even a buurt that was not itself surveyed gets an estimate. Figures cover adults aged 18 and over.
Source: RIVM/CBS Gezondheidsmonitor Volwassenen en Ouderen (kleine-gebieden-schatting) 2024
Land use
0% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 43% in the municipality of Loon op Zand.
Built-up100%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
Distance to amenities
A daycare lies here at an average road distance of 200 m.
Distance
Value
Large supermarket
1,100 m
–
GP practice
300 m
–
Primary school
300 m
–
Daycare
200 m
–
Large supermarkets
–
0.6
GP practices
–
1.9
Daycares
–
4.7
Explanation
Average road distance from every address in this buurt to the nearest amenity, and the average count within 1 km — a buurt average, not a distance from one address.
Source: CBS proximity statistics 2025
04 · Residents
The population is growing slower than the Loon op Zand average.
Pannenhoef (oost) has 655 inhabitants (2026), or 6,654 per km² (13.8 times as high as in Loon op Zand). Between 2021 and 2026 the population stayed about level, against a rise of 3% in Loon op Zand. In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Loon op Zand was 81%, 3 percentage points above the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) had the highest share there: 24% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2021
+0%
▼lower than Loon op Zand (+3%)
Turnout, municipality of Loon op Zand
81%
▲3 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+1%
▼lower than Loon op Zand (+2%)
Aged 45 to 65
26%
▼1 percentage point lower than Loon op Zand (27%)
Never married
42%
▼3 percentage points lower than Loon op Zand (45%)
Dutch origin
80%
▼5 percentage points lower than Loon op Zand (85%)
Lower education (primary, vmbo, mbo 1)
56%
▲30 percentage points higher than Loon op Zand (26%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
24%
▲7 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2021
+0%
▼lower than Loon op Zand (+3%)
Turnout, municipality of Loon op Zand
81%
▲3 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+1%
▼lower than Loon op Zand (+2%)
Aged 45 to 65
26%
▼1 percentage point lower than Loon op Zand (27%)
Never married
42%
▼3 percentage points lower than Loon op Zand (45%)
Dutch origin
80%
▼5 percentage points lower than Loon op Zand (85%)
Lower education (primary, vmbo, mbo 1)
56%
▲30 percentage points higher than Loon op Zand (26%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
24%
▲7 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population held steady between 2021 and 2026, at 655.
Residents, 2026
655
+0% since 2021
Loon op Zand +3%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 6,654 residents per km², this buurt is 14 times as densely populated as the municipality of Loon op Zand.
Residents per km²6,654
Dwellings per km²3,130
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, 7.7 children were born per 1,000 residents; 15.4 died per 1,000.
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
26% of residents are between 45 and 65.
0 to 1585
15 to 2570
25 to 45135
45 to 65170
65 to 80140
80 and over55
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
42% of residents are never married.
Never married270
Married245
Divorced70
Widowed65
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
80% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands520
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)25
Outside Europe105
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Education level of residents aged 15 to 75
56% of residents have a primary, vmbo or mbo1 level education.
Primary, vmbo, mbo1230
Havo, vwo, mbo2-4180
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2024
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Loon op Zand; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 81% of eligible voters in Loon op Zand voted. The largest party was PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) with 24% of the valid votes.
Municipality of Loon op ZandThe Netherlands
D66
14.5%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
23.5%
16.7%
VVD
19.7%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
7.4%
12.8%
CDA
13.8%
11.8%
JA21
7.3%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
4.1%
4.5%
BBB
2.2%
2.6%
Other
7.4%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
Pannenhoef (oost) has an average of 1.0 cars per household, 23% lower than in Loon op Zand (1.3). 11% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 9 percentage points less than in Loon op Zand (20%).
Key figures
Government, education and care, share of businesses
45%
▲32 percentage points higher than Loon op Zand (13%)
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
9%
▼11 percentage points lower than Loon op Zand (20%)
Industry and energy, share of businesses
9%
▼10 percentage points lower than Loon op Zand (19%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.0
▼23% lower than Loon op Zand (1.3)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
11%
▼9 percentage points lower than Loon op Zand (20%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
0 pp
▼lower than Loon op Zand (+4 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
91%
▲4 percentage points higher than Loon op Zand (87%)
Industrial, share of addresses
0%
▼4 percentage points lower than Loon op Zand (4%)
Healthcare, share of addresses
1%
=about the same as Loon op Zand (1%)
Residents per km²
6,654
▲12 times as high as the Netherlands (539)
Social housing
64%
▲36 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (28%)
Owner-occupied dwellings
36%
▼21 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (57%)
Government, education and care, share of businesses
45%
▲32 percentage points higher than Loon op Zand (13%)
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
9%
▼11 percentage points lower than Loon op Zand (20%)
Industry and energy, share of businesses
9%
▼10 percentage points lower than Loon op Zand (19%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.0
▼23% lower than Loon op Zand (1.3)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
11%
▼9 percentage points lower than Loon op Zand (20%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
0 pp
▼lower than Loon op Zand (+4 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
91%
▲4 percentage points higher than Loon op Zand (87%)
Industrial, share of addresses
0%
▼4 percentage points lower than Loon op Zand (4%)
Healthcare, share of addresses
1%
=about the same as Loon op Zand (1%)
Residents per km²
6,654
▲12 times as high as the Netherlands (539)
Social housing
64%
▲36 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (28%)
Owner-occupied dwellings
36%
▼21 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (57%)
Business establishments by sector
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg is the largest sector, with 25 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij0
Nijverheid en energie5
Handel en horeca5
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie5
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed0
Zakelijke dienstverlening10
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg25
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
11% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 20% in the municipality of Loon op Zand (2025).
Petrol88.7%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)11.3%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 11% to 11% between 2021 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
11%▼ 9 percentage points below Loon op Zand (20%)
+0 pp since 2021
Loon op Zand +4 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 310 passenger cars and 15 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars310
Motorcycles15
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
91% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is assembly (0.9%).
Residential91.3%
Assembly0.9%
Healthcare0.9%
Industrial0.3%
Education0.3%
Other7%
Explanation
Based on 343 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
1% private rent, against 14% nationally.
This areaThe Netherlands
Private rent1%
NL 14%▼ −93% vs NL
Residents per km²6,654
NL 539▲ +1135% vs NL
Social housing64%
NL 28%▲ +129% vs NL
Owner-occupied dwellings36%
NL 57%▼ −37% vs NL
Multi-family dwellings27%
NL 37%▼ −27% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025