The average WOZ value in Bedrijventerrein Pannenhuis-Agropark is €395,000, 5% lower than in Lingewaard (€415,000). Between 2022 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 6%, against a rise of 27% in Lingewaard. 61% of the homes are owner-occupied, 12 percentage points less than in Lingewaard (73%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€395,000
▼5% lower than Lingewaard (€415,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2022
+6%
▼lower than Lingewaard (+27%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
61%
▼12 percentage points lower than Lingewaard (73%)
Social housing
0%
▼19 percentage points lower than Lingewaard (19%)
Private rent
39%
▲31 percentage points higher than Lingewaard (8%)
Single-family dwellings
87%
▲5 percentage points higher than Lingewaard (82%)
Built 1945–1964
3%
▼11 percentage points lower than Lingewaard (14%)
Built 1965–1974
26%
▲10 percentage points higher than Lingewaard (16%)
Built 1992–2005
13%
▼6 percentage points lower than Lingewaard (19%)
Average WOZ value
€395,000
▼5% lower than Lingewaard (€415,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2022
+6%
▼lower than Lingewaard (+27%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
61%
▼12 percentage points lower than Lingewaard (73%)
Social housing
0%
▼19 percentage points lower than Lingewaard (19%)
Private rent
39%
▲31 percentage points higher than Lingewaard (8%)
Single-family dwellings
87%
▲5 percentage points higher than Lingewaard (82%)
Built 1945–1964
3%
▼11 percentage points lower than Lingewaard (14%)
Built 1965–1974
26%
▲10 percentage points higher than Lingewaard (16%)
Built 1992–2005
13%
▼6 percentage points lower than Lingewaard (19%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 6% between 2022 and 2025, to €395,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€395,000▼ 5% below Lingewaard
+6% since 2022
Lingewaard +27%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€410 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€410/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
200 m² · measured buurt average
WOZ €395,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€137NL median
Property tax (OZB)€46€35
Water board levy€43–
Waste levy€27€27
Sewage levy€21€22
Costs to set aside€273
Maintenance reserve€255–
Buildings insurance€18–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Lingewaard's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 260th of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 200 m² (measured average in this buurt) with the average WOZ value here, €395,000.
Levies: Lingewaard's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Bedrijventerrein Pannenhuis-Agropark has the 6th-highest WOZ value of the 14 buurten in Huissen.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €395,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Bedrijventerrein Pannenhuis-Agropark
395,000
31
–
Centrum Huissen
297,000
617
–
Hofmeesterij-Kampstuk
347,000
508
–
't Zand-Tabakshof
434,000
607
–
Zilverkamp 1e fase
355,000
905
–
Zilverkamp 2e fase-Rietbaan
298,000
574
–
Zilverkamp 3e fase
324,000
620
–
Zilverkamp 4e fase
307,000
677
–
Johannahoeve
414,000
290
–
Loovelden
528,000
1,196
–
Brouwersland
353,000
801
–
De Laak-Binnenveld
394,000
816
–
't Kempke-Bloemstraat
463,000
715
–
Buitengebied Huissen
615,000
477
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 61% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied61%
Private rent39%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
87% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes87%
Multi-family homes13%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
58% of dwellings were built between 1975 and 1991, against 26% in the municipality of Lingewaard.
1945-19643.2%
1965-197425.8%
1975-199158.1%
1992-200512.9%
Explanation
Based on 31 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
Too few residents for a rate per resident: these are counts.
Bedrijventerrein Pannenhuis-Agropark has too few residents for a reliable rate per 1,000 residents (under 200), so counts are shown instead of a comparison. In 2025, 13 crimes were registered, against 15 in 2021. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Registered crimes, 2025
13
▼down from 15 in 2021
Home burglary
4
2023–2025
Registered crimes, 2025
13
▼down from 15 in 2021
Home burglary
4
2023–2025
Registered crime per year
13 crimes were registered in Bedrijventerrein Pannenhuis-Agropark in 2025 (15 in 2021).
Registered crimes, 2025
13
down from 15 in 2021
Explanation
Too few residents for a reliable per-1,000 figure (threshold 200) — registered crime, not all crime — CBS/Politie 47018NED.
The largest category in Bedrijventerrein Pannenhuis-Agropark is 'Theft and burglary': 8 in 2025.
Theft and burglary8
Traffic2
Vandalism and public order1
Violence and threats1
Fraud and scams1
Environmental0
Other and withheld0
Explanation
Too few residents for a reliable per-1,000 figure (threshold 200). Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2024, police in Bedrijventerrein Pannenhuis-Agropark registered 9 traffic accidents, of which 1 with injury and none fatal.
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2024
03 · Living environment
Green space is below the Lingewaard average.
Built-up land is the largest land use in Bedrijventerrein Pannenhuis-Agropark, covering 73% of the area, against 16% in Lingewaard.
Key figures
Green (parks, sport, nature)
0%
▼18 percentage points lower than Lingewaard (18%)
Built-up, share of the area
73%
▲57 percentage points higher than Lingewaard (16%)
Agriculture, share of the area
12%
▼38 percentage points lower than Lingewaard (50%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
0%
▼15 percentage points lower than Lingewaard (15%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
0%
▼18 percentage points lower than Lingewaard (18%)
Built-up, share of the area
73%
▲57 percentage points higher than Lingewaard (16%)
Agriculture, share of the area
12%
▼38 percentage points lower than Lingewaard (50%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
0%
▼15 percentage points lower than Lingewaard (15%)
Land use
0% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 18% in the municipality of Lingewaard.
Traffic7.1%
Built-up73.2%
Other built-up7.1%
Agriculture12.5%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
Distance to amenities
A primary school lies here at an average road distance of 2300 m.
Distance
Value
Large supermarket
2,900 m
–
GP practice
2,400 m
–
Primary school
2,300 m
–
Daycare
2,300 m
–
Large supermarkets
–
0
GP practices
–
0
Daycares
–
0
Explanation
Average road distance from every address in this buurt to the nearest amenity, and the average count within 1 km — a buurt average, not a distance from one address.
Source: CBS proximity statistics 2025
04 · Residents
The population is growing faster than the Lingewaard average.
Bedrijventerrein Pannenhuis-Agropark has 65 inhabitants (2026), or 121 per km² (84% lower than in Lingewaard). In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Lingewaard was 84%, 6 percentage points above the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, D66 had the highest share there: 20% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2022
+8%
▲higher than Lingewaard (+2%)
Turnout, municipality of Lingewaard
84%
▲6 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
-3%
▼lower than Lingewaard (+2%)
Aged 45 to 65
38%
▲10 percentage points higher than Lingewaard (28%)
Never married
54%
▲9 percentage points higher than Lingewaard (45%)
Dutch origin
71%
▼15 percentage points lower than Lingewaard (86%)
D66, share of the vote
20%
▲3 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2022
+8%
▲higher than Lingewaard (+2%)
Turnout, municipality of Lingewaard
84%
▲6 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
-3%
▼lower than Lingewaard (+2%)
Aged 45 to 65
38%
▲10 percentage points higher than Lingewaard (28%)
Never married
54%
▲9 percentage points higher than Lingewaard (45%)
Dutch origin
71%
▼15 percentage points lower than Lingewaard (86%)
D66, share of the vote
20%
▲3 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population grew 8% between 2022 and 2026, to 65.
Residents, 2026
65
+8% since 2022
Lingewaard +2%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 121 residents per km², this buurt is 84% less densely populated than the municipality of Lingewaard.
Residents per km²121
Dwellings per km²56.4
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, almost no children were born; almost no one died.
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
38% of residents are between 45 and 65.
0 to 155
15 to 255
25 to 4520
45 to 6525
65 to 805
80 and over5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
54% of residents are never married.
Never married35
Married30
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
71% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands50
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)15
Outside Europe5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Lingewaard; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 84% of eligible voters in Lingewaard voted. The largest party was D66 with 20% of the valid votes.
Municipality of LingewaardThe Netherlands
D66
19.8%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
17.5%
16.7%
VVD
19.2%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
10%
12.8%
CDA
13.1%
11.8%
JA21
7.2%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
3.8%
4.5%
BBB
2.3%
2.6%
Other
7%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
42% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 20 percentage points more than in Lingewaard (22%).
Key figures
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
36%
▲20 percentage points higher than Lingewaard (16%)
Government, education and care, share of businesses
5%
▼14 percentage points lower than Lingewaard (19%)
Industry and energy, share of businesses
23%
▲8 percentage points higher than Lingewaard (15%)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
41%
▲19 percentage points higher than Lingewaard (22%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2022
+1 pp
▼lower than Lingewaard (+5 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
10%
▼80 percentage points lower than Lingewaard (90%)
Industrial, share of addresses
49%
▲45 percentage points higher than Lingewaard (4%)
Office, share of addresses
13%
▲12 percentage points higher than Lingewaard (1%)
Multi-family dwellings
13%
▼24 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (37%)
Private rent
39%
▲25 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (14%)
Single-family dwellings
87%
▲24 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
36%
▲20 percentage points higher than Lingewaard (16%)
Government, education and care, share of businesses
5%
▼14 percentage points lower than Lingewaard (19%)
Industry and energy, share of businesses
23%
▲8 percentage points higher than Lingewaard (15%)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
41%
▲19 percentage points higher than Lingewaard (22%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2022
+1 pp
▼lower than Lingewaard (+5 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
10%
▼80 percentage points lower than Lingewaard (90%)
Industrial, share of addresses
49%
▲45 percentage points higher than Lingewaard (4%)
Office, share of addresses
13%
▲12 percentage points higher than Lingewaard (1%)
Multi-family dwellings
13%
▼24 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (37%)
Private rent
39%
▲25 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (14%)
Single-family dwellings
87%
▲24 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Business establishments by sector
Handel en horeca is the largest sector, with 70 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij0
Nijverheid en energie45
Handel en horeca70
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie15
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed10
Zakelijke dienstverlening40
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg10
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
41% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 22% in the municipality of Lingewaard (2025).
Petrol58.5%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)41.5%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 41% to 41% between 2022 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
41%▲ 19 percentage points above Lingewaard (22%)
+0 pp since 2022
Lingewaard +6 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 200 passenger cars and 10 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars200
Motorcycles10
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
10% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is industrial (49%).
Residential10.4%
Retail14.1%
Office13.4%
Assembly0.3%
Healthcare0.3%
Industrial48.7%
Education0.3%
Sports1%
Other15.8%
Explanation
Based on 298 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
121 residents per km²: 78% less densely populated than the Dutch average.
This areaThe Netherlands
Residents per km²121
NL 539▼ −78% vs NL
Multi-family dwellings13%
NL 37%▼ −65% vs NL
Private rent39%
NL 14%▲ +179% vs NL
Single-family dwellings87%
NL 63%▲ +38% vs NL
Owner-occupied dwellings61%
NL 57%▲ +7% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026