The average WOZ value in Sint Agatha buitengebied is €562,000, 43% higher than in Land van Cuijk (€394,000). Between 2022 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 16%, against a rise of 30% in Land van Cuijk. 85% of the homes are owner-occupied, 16 percentage points more than in Land van Cuijk (69%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€562,000
▲43% higher than Land van Cuijk (€394,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2022
+16%
▼lower than Land van Cuijk (+30%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
85%
▲16 percentage points higher than Land van Cuijk (69%)
Social housing
0%
▼22 percentage points lower than Land van Cuijk (22%)
Private rent
15%
▲6 percentage points higher than Land van Cuijk (9%)
Single-family dwellings
91%
▲9 percentage points higher than Land van Cuijk (82%)
Built 1975–1991
5%
▼21 percentage points lower than Land van Cuijk (26%)
Built 2016 and later
4%
▼7 percentage points lower than Land van Cuijk (11%)
Built 1992–2005
9%
▼4 percentage points lower than Land van Cuijk (13%)
Average WOZ value
€562,000
▲43% higher than Land van Cuijk (€394,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2022
+16%
▼lower than Land van Cuijk (+30%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
85%
▲16 percentage points higher than Land van Cuijk (69%)
Social housing
0%
▼22 percentage points lower than Land van Cuijk (22%)
Private rent
15%
▲6 percentage points higher than Land van Cuijk (9%)
Single-family dwellings
91%
▲9 percentage points higher than Land van Cuijk (82%)
Built 1975–1991
5%
▼21 percentage points lower than Land van Cuijk (26%)
Built 2016 and later
4%
▼7 percentage points lower than Land van Cuijk (11%)
Built 1992–2005
9%
▼4 percentage points lower than Land van Cuijk (13%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 16% between 2022 and 2025, to €562,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€562,000▲ 43% above Land van Cuijk
+16% since 2022
Land van Cuijk +30%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€538 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€538/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
290 m² · measured buurt average
WOZ €562,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€143NL median
Water board levy€48–
Property tax (OZB)€47€49
Waste levy€24€27
Sewage levy€24€22
Costs to set aside€395
Maintenance reserve€369–
Buildings insurance€26–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Land van Cuijk's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 125th of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 290 m² (measured average in this buurt) with the average WOZ value here, €562,000.
Levies: Land van Cuijk's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Sint Agatha buitengebied has the highest WOZ value of the 2 buurten in Sint Agatha.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €562,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Sint Agatha buitengebied
562,000
75
–
Sint Agatha kern
408,000
157
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 85% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied85%
Private rent15%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
91% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes91%
Multi-family homes9%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
49% of dwellings were built before 1945, against 10% in the municipality of Land van Cuijk.
Before 194548.7%
1945-196415.4%
1965-197414.1%
1975-19915.1%
1992-20059%
2006-20153.8%
2016 and later3.8%
Explanation
Based on 78 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
Too few residents for a rate per resident: these are counts.
Sint Agatha buitengebied has too few residents for a reliable rate per 1,000 residents (under 200), so counts are shown instead of a comparison. In 2025, 8 crimes were registered, against 8 in 2021. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Registered crimes, 2025
8
=about the same as 8 in 2021
Home burglary
1
2023–2025
Registered crimes, 2025
8
=about the same as 8 in 2021
Home burglary
1
2023–2025
Registered crime per year
8 crimes were registered in Sint Agatha buitengebied in 2025 (8 in 2021).
Registered crimes, 2025
8
same as 8 in 2021
Explanation
Too few residents for a reliable per-1,000 figure (threshold 200) — registered crime, not all crime — CBS/Politie 47018NED.
The largest category in Sint Agatha buitengebied is 'Traffic': 4 in 2025.
Traffic4
Theft and burglary2
Vandalism and public order1
Other and withheld1
Violence and threats0
Fraud and scams0
Environmental0
Explanation
Too few residents for a reliable per-1,000 figure (threshold 200). Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2024, police in Sint Agatha buitengebied registered 2 traffic accidents, of which 0 with injury and none fatal.
2020
2021
2023
2024
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2024
03 · Living environment
Residents rate their health above the Land van Cuijk average; green space is below the Land van Cuijk average.
An estimated 79% of adults in Sint Agatha buitengebied rate their own health as good, 6 percentage points more than in Land van Cuijk. Fewer adults are overweight (48% against 54%), fewer report anxiety or depression (40% against 44%) and fewer feel lonely (39% against 42%), but more meet the physical activity guideline (54% against 48%). Agricultural land is the largest land use in Sint Agatha buitengebied, covering 86% of the area, against 71% in Land van Cuijk. Green space such as parks, sports fields, forest and nature covers 6% of the area, 9 percentage points below the 15% in Land van Cuijk.
Key figures
Self-rated health (estimated)
79%
▲6 percentage points higher than Land van Cuijk (73%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
6%
▼9 percentage points lower than Land van Cuijk (15%)
More figures
Meets physical activity guideline
54%
▲6 percentage points higher than Land van Cuijk (48%)
Overweight
48%
▼6 percentage points lower than Land van Cuijk (54%)
Lonely
39%
▼3 percentage points lower than Land van Cuijk (42%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
40%
▼4 percentage points lower than Land van Cuijk (44%)
Agriculture, share of the area
86%
▲15 percentage points higher than Land van Cuijk (71%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
5%
▼8 percentage points lower than Land van Cuijk (13%)
Built-up, share of the area
0%
▼8 percentage points lower than Land van Cuijk (8%)
Self-rated health (estimated)
79%
▲6 percentage points higher than Land van Cuijk (73%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
6%
▼9 percentage points lower than Land van Cuijk (15%)
More figures
Meets physical activity guideline
54%
▲6 percentage points higher than Land van Cuijk (48%)
Overweight
48%
▼6 percentage points lower than Land van Cuijk (54%)
Lonely
39%
▼3 percentage points lower than Land van Cuijk (42%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
40%
▼4 percentage points lower than Land van Cuijk (44%)
Agriculture, share of the area
86%
▲15 percentage points higher than Land van Cuijk (71%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
5%
▼8 percentage points lower than Land van Cuijk (13%)
Built-up, share of the area
0%
▼8 percentage points lower than Land van Cuijk (8%)
Health
An estimated 79% of adults rate their own health as good, against 73% in the municipality of Land van Cuijk (2024).
This areaThe municipality of Land van Cuijk
Good self-rated health
78.9%
73.4%
Smokes
13%
14.5%
Excessive drinking
6.2%
5.7%
Overweight
47.8%
53.7%
Lonely
38.6%
42.5%
Anxiety or depression feelings
40.3%
43.5%
Meets physical activity guideline
54.5%
47.7%
Explanation
An RIVM model estimate (small-area estimation from the 2024 Health Monitor for Adults and Elderly), not a direct tabulation — even a buurt that was not itself surveyed gets an estimate. Figures cover adults aged 18 and over.
Source: RIVM/CBS Gezondheidsmonitor Volwassenen en Ouderen (kleine-gebieden-schatting) 2024
Land use
6% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 15% in the municipality of Land van Cuijk.
Traffic3%
Built-up0.4%
Recreation1.3%
Agriculture85.9%
Forest and nature4.6%
Water4.8%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
Distance to amenities
A primary school lies here at an average road distance of 1200 m.
Distance
Value
Large supermarket
1,900 m
–
GP practice
2,700 m
–
Primary school
1,200 m
–
Daycare
1,300 m
–
Large supermarkets
–
0.1
GP practices
–
0
Daycares
–
0.3
Explanation
Average road distance from every address in this buurt to the nearest amenity, and the average count within 1 km — a buurt average, not a distance from one address.
Source: CBS proximity statistics 2025
04 · Residents
The population is growing about as fast as the Land van Cuijk average.
Sint Agatha buitengebied has 175 inhabitants (2026), or 34 per km² (88% lower than in Land van Cuijk). In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Land van Cuijk was 83%, 5 percentage points above the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) had the highest share there: 18% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2022
+3%
=about the same as Land van Cuijk (+3%)
Turnout, municipality of Land van Cuijk
83%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+9%
▲higher than Land van Cuijk (+4%)
Aged 45 to 65
36%
▲8 percentage points higher than Land van Cuijk (28%)
Married
49%
▲7 percentage points higher than Land van Cuijk (42%)
Dutch origin
83%
▼1 percentage point lower than Land van Cuijk (84%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
54%
▲8 percentage points higher than Land van Cuijk (46%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
18%
▲1 percentage point higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2022
+3%
=about the same as Land van Cuijk (+3%)
Turnout, municipality of Land van Cuijk
83%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+9%
▲higher than Land van Cuijk (+4%)
Aged 45 to 65
36%
▲8 percentage points higher than Land van Cuijk (28%)
Married
49%
▲7 percentage points higher than Land van Cuijk (42%)
Dutch origin
83%
▼1 percentage point lower than Land van Cuijk (84%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
54%
▲8 percentage points higher than Land van Cuijk (46%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
18%
▲1 percentage point higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population grew 3% between 2022 and 2026, to 175.
Residents, 2026
175
+3% since 2022
Land van Cuijk +3%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 34 residents per km², this buurt is 88% less densely populated than the municipality of Land van Cuijk.
Residents per km²34
Dwellings per km²14.7
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, almost no children were born; 27.0 died per 1,000.
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
36% of residents are between 45 and 65.
0 to 1515
15 to 2515
25 to 4535
45 to 6560
65 to 8040
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
49% of residents are married.
Never married80
Married85
Divorced5
Widowed5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
83% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands150
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)15
Outside Europe15
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Education level of residents aged 15 to 75
54% of residents have a havo, vwo or mbo2-4 level education.
Havo, vwo, mbo2-470
Higher professional, university60
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2024
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Land van Cuijk; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 83% of eligible voters in Land van Cuijk voted. The largest party was PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) with 18% of the valid votes.
Municipality of Land van CuijkThe Netherlands
D66
16.2%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
18.4%
16.7%
VVD
16.4%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
8.6%
12.8%
CDA
16.3%
11.8%
JA21
7.3%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
4.1%
4.5%
BBB
4.4%
2.6%
Other
8.3%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
Sint Agatha buitengebied has an average of 2.0 cars per household, 54% higher than in Land van Cuijk (1.3). 34% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 11 percentage points more than in Land van Cuijk (23%).
Key figures
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
33%
▲24 percentage points higher than Land van Cuijk (9%)
Government, education and care, share of businesses
0%
▼16 percentage points lower than Land van Cuijk (16%)
Business services, share of businesses
33%
▲11 percentage points higher than Land van Cuijk (22%)
Cars per household (2025)
2.0
▲54% higher than Land van Cuijk (1.3)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
34%
▲11 percentage points higher than Land van Cuijk (23%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2022
+1 pp
▼lower than Land van Cuijk (+3 pp)
Industrial, share of addresses
16%
▲12 percentage points higher than Land van Cuijk (4%)
Assembly, share of addresses
3%
▲2 percentage points higher than Land van Cuijk (1%)
Sports, share of addresses
1%
▲1 percentage point higher than Land van Cuijk (0%)
Multi-family dwellings
9%
▼28 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (37%)
Owner-occupied dwellings
85%
▲28 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (57%)
Single-family dwellings
91%
▲28 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
33%
▲24 percentage points higher than Land van Cuijk (9%)
Government, education and care, share of businesses
0%
▼16 percentage points lower than Land van Cuijk (16%)
Business services, share of businesses
33%
▲11 percentage points higher than Land van Cuijk (22%)
Cars per household (2025)
2.0
▲54% higher than Land van Cuijk (1.3)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
34%
▲11 percentage points higher than Land van Cuijk (23%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2022
+1 pp
▼lower than Land van Cuijk (+3 pp)
Industrial, share of addresses
16%
▲12 percentage points higher than Land van Cuijk (4%)
Assembly, share of addresses
3%
▲2 percentage points higher than Land van Cuijk (1%)
Sports, share of addresses
1%
▲1 percentage point higher than Land van Cuijk (0%)
Multi-family dwellings
9%
▼28 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (37%)
Owner-occupied dwellings
85%
▲28 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (57%)
Single-family dwellings
91%
▲28 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Business establishments by sector
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij is the largest sector, with 15 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij15
Nijverheid en energie5
Handel en horeca5
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie0
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed0
Zakelijke dienstverlening15
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg0
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
34% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 23% in the municipality of Land van Cuijk (2025).
Petrol65.6%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)34.4%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 33% to 34% between 2022 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
34%▲ 11 percentage points above Land van Cuijk (23%)
+1 pp since 2022
Land van Cuijk +3 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 160 passenger cars and 15 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars160
Motorcycles15
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
89% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is industrial (16%).
Residential88.6%
Retail1.1%
Office1.1%
Assembly3.4%
Industrial15.9%
Lodging1.1%
Sports1.1%
Other2.3%
Explanation
Based on 88 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
34 residents per km²: 94% less densely populated than the Dutch average.
This areaThe Netherlands
Residents per km²34
NL 539▼ −94% vs NL
Multi-family dwellings9%
NL 37%▼ −76% vs NL
Owner-occupied dwellings85%
NL 57%▲ +49% vs NL
Single-family dwellings91%
NL 63%▲ +44% vs NL
Average WOZ value€562,000
NL €398,000▲ +41% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026