The average WOZ value in Verspreide huizen Laar en Strijp is €634,000, 44% higher than in Laarbeek (€439,000). Between 2021 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 44%, against a rise of 43% in Laarbeek. 79% of the homes are owner-occupied, 9 percentage points more than in Laarbeek (70%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€634,000
▲44% higher than Laarbeek (€439,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+44%
=about the same as Laarbeek (+43%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
79%
▲9 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (70%)
Social housing
0%
▼22 percentage points lower than Laarbeek (22%)
Private rent
21%
▲13 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (8%)
Single-family dwellings
95%
▲7 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (88%)
Built 1975–1991
10%
▼17 percentage points lower than Laarbeek (27%)
Built 1945–1964
29%
▲15 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (14%)
Built 1965–1974
5%
▼14 percentage points lower than Laarbeek (19%)
Average WOZ value
€634,000
▲44% higher than Laarbeek (€439,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+44%
=about the same as Laarbeek (+43%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
79%
▲9 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (70%)
Social housing
0%
▼22 percentage points lower than Laarbeek (22%)
Private rent
21%
▲13 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (8%)
Single-family dwellings
95%
▲7 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (88%)
Built 1975–1991
10%
▼17 percentage points lower than Laarbeek (27%)
Built 1945–1964
29%
▲15 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (14%)
Built 1965–1974
5%
▼14 percentage points lower than Laarbeek (19%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 44% between 2021 and 2025, to €634,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€634,000▲ 44% above Laarbeek
+44% since 2021
Laarbeek +43%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€568 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€568/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
311 m² · measured buurt average
WOZ €634,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€144NL median
Property tax (OZB)€52€56
Water board levy€50–
Sewage levy€24€22
Waste levy€18€27
Costs to set aside€424
Maintenance reserve€396–
Buildings insurance€28–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Laarbeek's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 63rd of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 311 m² (measured average in this buurt) with the average WOZ value here, €634,000.
Levies: Laarbeek's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Verspreide huizen Laar en Strijp has the 2nd-highest WOZ value of the 4 buurten in Aarle-Rixtel.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €634,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Verspreide huizen Laar en Strijp
634,000
57
–
Aarle-Rixtel
442,000
2,314
–
Bedrijventerrein Torenakker
434,000
21
–
Verspreide huizen Heikant
646,000
97
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 79% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied79%
Private rent21%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
95% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes95%
Multi-family homes5%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
47% of dwellings were built before 1945, against 9% in the municipality of Laarbeek.
Before 194546.6%
1945-196429.3%
1965-19745.2%
1975-199110.3%
1992-20053.4%
2006-20153.4%
2016 and later1.7%
Explanation
Based on 58 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
Too few residents for a rate per resident: these are counts.
Verspreide huizen Laar en Strijp has too few residents for a reliable rate per 1,000 residents (under 200), so counts are shown instead of a comparison. In 2025, 15 crimes were registered, against 9 in 2021. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Registered crimes, 2025
15
▲up from 9 in 2021
Home burglary
0
2023–2025
Registered crimes, 2025
15
▲up from 9 in 2021
Home burglary
0
2023–2025
Registered crime per year
15 crimes were registered in Verspreide huizen Laar en Strijp in 2025 (9 in 2021).
Registered crimes, 2025
15
up from 9 in 2021
Explanation
Too few residents for a reliable per-1,000 figure (threshold 200) — registered crime, not all crime — CBS/Politie 47018NED.
The largest category in Verspreide huizen Laar en Strijp is 'Theft and burglary': 8 in 2025.
Theft and burglary8
Fraud and scams3
Traffic3
Violence and threats1
Vandalism and public order0
Environmental0
Other and withheld0
Explanation
Too few residents for a reliable per-1,000 figure (threshold 200). Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2024, police in Verspreide huizen Laar en Strijp registered 3 traffic accidents, of which 0 with injury and none fatal.
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2024
03 · Living environment
Residents rate their health above the Laarbeek average; green space is below the Laarbeek average.
An estimated 79% of adults in Verspreide huizen Laar en Strijp rate their own health as good, 5 percentage points more than in Laarbeek. Fewer adults report anxiety or depression (35% against 43%), fewer feel lonely (34% against 41%) and fewer are overweight (49% against 54%), but more meet the physical activity guideline (53% against 47%). Agricultural land is the largest land use in Verspreide huizen Laar en Strijp, covering 93% of the area, against 68% in Laarbeek. Green space such as parks, sports fields, forest and nature covers 4% of the area, 10 percentage points below the 14% in Laarbeek.
Key figures
Self-rated health (estimated)
79%
▲5 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (74%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
4%
▼10 percentage points lower than Laarbeek (14%)
More figures
Anxiety or depression feelings
35%
▼8 percentage points lower than Laarbeek (43%)
Lonely
34%
▼7 percentage points lower than Laarbeek (41%)
Meets physical activity guideline
53%
▲6 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (47%)
Overweight
49%
▼5 percentage points lower than Laarbeek (54%)
Agriculture, share of the area
93%
▲25 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (68%)
Built-up, share of the area
0%
▼13 percentage points lower than Laarbeek (13%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
4%
▼6 percentage points lower than Laarbeek (10%)
Self-rated health (estimated)
79%
▲5 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (74%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
4%
▼10 percentage points lower than Laarbeek (14%)
More figures
Anxiety or depression feelings
35%
▼8 percentage points lower than Laarbeek (43%)
Lonely
34%
▼7 percentage points lower than Laarbeek (41%)
Meets physical activity guideline
53%
▲6 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (47%)
Overweight
49%
▼5 percentage points lower than Laarbeek (54%)
Agriculture, share of the area
93%
▲25 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (68%)
Built-up, share of the area
0%
▼13 percentage points lower than Laarbeek (13%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
4%
▼6 percentage points lower than Laarbeek (10%)
Health
An estimated 79% of adults rate their own health as good, against 74% in the municipality of Laarbeek (2024).
This areaThe municipality of Laarbeek
Good self-rated health
79.1%
74.5%
Smokes
9.8%
13.8%
Excessive drinking
7.4%
5.9%
Overweight
48.8%
53.8%
Lonely
34%
41.2%
Anxiety or depression feelings
34.7%
42.7%
Meets physical activity guideline
53%
47.1%
Explanation
An RIVM model estimate (small-area estimation from the 2024 Health Monitor for Adults and Elderly), not a direct tabulation — even a buurt that was not itself surveyed gets an estimate. Figures cover adults aged 18 and over.
Source: RIVM/CBS Gezondheidsmonitor Volwassenen en Ouderen (kleine-gebieden-schatting) 2024
Land use
4% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 14% in the municipality of Laarbeek.
Traffic2.1%
Built-up0.3%
Agriculture92.6%
Forest and nature3.6%
Water1.5%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
Distance to amenities
A gp practice lies here at an average road distance of 1600 m.
Distance
Value
Large supermarket
1,700 m
–
GP practice
1,600 m
–
Primary school
1,600 m
–
Daycare
1,600 m
–
Large supermarkets
–
0
GP practices
–
0.1
Daycares
–
0
Explanation
Average road distance from every address in this buurt to the nearest amenity, and the average count within 1 km — a buurt average, not a distance from one address.
Source: CBS proximity statistics 2025
04 · Residents
The population is growing slower than the Laarbeek average.
Verspreide huizen Laar en Strijp has 150 inhabitants (2026), or 39 per km² (91% lower than in Laarbeek). In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Laarbeek was 81%, 3 percentage points above the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) had the highest share there: 23% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2021
+0%
▼lower than Laarbeek (+3%)
Turnout, municipality of Laarbeek
81%
▲3 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
-2%
▼lower than Laarbeek (+3%)
Married
45%
▲2 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (43%)
Dutch origin
97%
▲10 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (87%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
23%
▲6 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2021
+0%
▼lower than Laarbeek (+3%)
Turnout, municipality of Laarbeek
81%
▲3 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
-2%
▼lower than Laarbeek (+3%)
Married
45%
▲2 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (43%)
Dutch origin
97%
▲10 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (87%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
23%
▲6 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population held steady between 2021 and 2026, at 150.
Residents, 2026
150
+0% since 2021
Laarbeek +3%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 39 residents per km², this buurt is 91% less densely populated than the municipality of Laarbeek.
Residents per km²39
Dwellings per km²14.8
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, 32.3 children were born per 1,000 residents; 64.5 died per 1,000.
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
29% of residents are between 65 and 80.
0 to 1525
15 to 2515
25 to 4525
45 to 6530
65 to 8045
80 and over15
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
45% of residents are married.
Never married65
Married70
Divorced5
Widowed15
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
97% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands145
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Laarbeek; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 81% of eligible voters in Laarbeek voted. The largest party was PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) with 23% of the valid votes.
Municipality of LaarbeekThe Netherlands
D66
14.8%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
22.5%
16.7%
VVD
16.1%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
7.1%
12.8%
CDA
16.2%
11.8%
JA21
7.8%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
4.3%
4.5%
BBB
3.6%
2.6%
Other
7.5%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
Verspreide huizen Laar en Strijp has an average of 1.3 cars per household, about the same as in Laarbeek (1.3). 33% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 11 percentage points more than in Laarbeek (22%).
Key figures
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
29%
▲23 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (6%)
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
0%
▼16 percentage points lower than Laarbeek (16%)
Culture, recreation and other services, share of businesses
0%
▼10 percentage points lower than Laarbeek (10%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.3
=about the same as Laarbeek (1.3)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
33%
▲11 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (22%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+7 pp
▲higher than Laarbeek (+5 pp)
Office, share of addresses
28%
▲24 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (4%)
Lodging, share of addresses
4%
▲4 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (0%)
Residential, share of addresses
87%
▼2 percentage points lower than Laarbeek (89%)
Multi-family dwellings
5%
▼32 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (37%)
Average WOZ value
€634,000
▲59% higher than the Netherlands (€398,000)
Single-family dwellings
95%
▲32 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
29%
▲23 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (6%)
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
0%
▼16 percentage points lower than Laarbeek (16%)
Culture, recreation and other services, share of businesses
0%
▼10 percentage points lower than Laarbeek (10%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.3
=about the same as Laarbeek (1.3)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
33%
▲11 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (22%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+7 pp
▲higher than Laarbeek (+5 pp)
Office, share of addresses
28%
▲24 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (4%)
Lodging, share of addresses
4%
▲4 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (0%)
Residential, share of addresses
87%
▼2 percentage points lower than Laarbeek (89%)
Multi-family dwellings
5%
▼32 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (37%)
Average WOZ value
€634,000
▲59% higher than the Netherlands (€398,000)
Single-family dwellings
95%
▲32 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Business establishments by sector
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij is the largest sector, with 10 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij10
Nijverheid en energie5
Handel en horeca0
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie5
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed0
Zakelijke dienstverlening10
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg5
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten0
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
33% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 22% in the municipality of Laarbeek (2025).
Petrol66.7%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)33.3%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 27% to 33% between 2021 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
33%▲ 11 percentage points above Laarbeek (22%)
+6 pp since 2021
Laarbeek +5 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 75 passenger cars and 10 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars75
Motorcycles10
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
87% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is office (28%).
Residential86.6%
Retail1.5%
Office28.4%
Assembly1.5%
Healthcare1.5%
Industrial6%
Lodging4.5%
Sports1.5%
Other3%
Explanation
Based on 67 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
39 residents per km²: 93% less densely populated than the Dutch average.
This areaThe Netherlands
Residents per km²39
NL 539▼ −93% vs NL
Multi-family dwellings5%
NL 37%▼ −86% vs NL
Average WOZ value€634,000
NL €398,000▲ +59% vs NL
Single-family dwellings95%
NL 63%▲ +51% vs NL
Private rent21%
NL 14%▲ +50% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026