We're pulling the figures from public sources. This usually takes a few seconds.
Area and its neighbourhoodsCBS key figures for districts and neighbourhoods
Residents and householdsCBS
Homes and WOZ valueCBS · Kadaster BAG
Housing marketNVM market overview
Municipal leviesMunicipal budgets · CBS
SafetyCBS and Police
HealthRIVM Health Monitor
Land use and amenitiesCBS land use · proximity statistics
Road safety and electionsRijkswaterstaat · Kiesraad
Comparing with the municipality and the countryRankings and comparisons
Neighbourhood · Laarbeek
Living in Verspreide huizen Beek en Donk
The population is growing faster than in Laarbeek. Homes cost more than the average in the municipality of Laarbeek, and registered crime per resident is higher.
The average WOZ value in Verspreide huizen Beek en Donk is €556,000, 27% higher than in Laarbeek (€439,000). Between 2021 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 33%, against a rise of 43% in Laarbeek. 81% of the homes are owner-occupied, 11 percentage points more than in Laarbeek (70%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€556,000
▲27% higher than Laarbeek (€439,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+33%
▼lower than Laarbeek (+43%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
81%
▲11 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (70%)
Social housing
8%
▼14 percentage points lower than Laarbeek (22%)
Private rent
11%
▲3 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (8%)
Single-family dwellings
96%
▲8 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (88%)
Built 1975–1991
9%
▼18 percentage points lower than Laarbeek (27%)
Built 2006–2015
22%
▲13 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (9%)
Built before 1945
22%
▲13 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (9%)
Average WOZ value
€556,000
▲27% higher than Laarbeek (€439,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+33%
▼lower than Laarbeek (+43%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
81%
▲11 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (70%)
Social housing
8%
▼14 percentage points lower than Laarbeek (22%)
Private rent
11%
▲3 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (8%)
Single-family dwellings
96%
▲8 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (88%)
Built 1975–1991
9%
▼18 percentage points lower than Laarbeek (27%)
Built 2006–2015
22%
▲13 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (9%)
Built before 1945
22%
▲13 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (9%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 33% between 2021 and 2025, to €556,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€556,000▲ 27% above Laarbeek
+33% since 2021
Laarbeek +43%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€438 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€438/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
222 m² · measured buurt average
WOZ €556,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€134NL median
Water board levy€47–
Property tax (OZB)€45€49
Sewage levy€24€22
Waste levy€18€27
Costs to set aside€304
Maintenance reserve€284–
Buildings insurance€20–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Laarbeek's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 62nd of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 222 m² (measured average in this buurt) with the average WOZ value here, €556,000.
Levies: Laarbeek's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Verspreide huizen Beek en Donk has the highest WOZ value of the 5 buurten in Beek en Donk.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €556,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Verspreide huizen Beek en Donk
556,000
436
–
Beek
399,000
2,501
–
Donk
364,000
1,762
–
Bedrijventerrein Beekerheide
428,000
67
–
Bedrijventerrein Bemmer
462,000
101
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 81% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied81%
Social housing8%
Private rent11%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
96% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes96%
Multi-family homes4%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
26% of dwellings were built in 2016 or later, against 9% in the municipality of Laarbeek.
Before 194521.6%
1945-196411.1%
1965-19746.8%
1975-19918.6%
1992-20053%
2006-201522.5%
2016 and later26.4%
Explanation
Based on 440 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
More registered crime per resident than the Laarbeek average.
In 2025, 55 crimes per 1,000 residents were registered in Verspreide huizen Beek en Donk, 2.3 times as high as in Laarbeek (24). Since 2021 the registered rate per 1,000 residents rose 4%, against a fall of 18% in Laarbeek. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
55
▲2.3 times as high as Laarbeek (24)
Change since 2021
+4%
▲higher than Laarbeek (-18%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
0.8
▼70% lower than Laarbeek (2.7)
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
55
▲2.3 times as high as Laarbeek (24)
Change since 2021
+4%
▲higher than Laarbeek (-18%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
0.8
▼70% lower than Laarbeek (2.7)
Registered crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
In 2025, Verspreide huizen Beek en Donk registered 55 crimes per 1,000 residents, against 24 in the municipality of Laarbeek.
Verspreide huizen Beek en Donk55
The municipality of Laarbeek24
Explanation
Crime is counted where it happens and divided by the number of residents, so places with many visitors — city centres, nightlife, stations — score higher.
The largest category in Verspreide huizen Beek en Donk is 'Traffic': 25.3 per 1,000 residents in 2025, against 6.0 in the municipality of Laarbeek.
Verspreide huizen Beek en DonkLaarbeek
Traffic25.3
Laarbeek 6.0▲ +322% vs Laarbeek
Theft and burglary9.5
Laarbeek 7.4▲ +28% vs Laarbeek
Violence and threats7.9
Laarbeek 2.7▲ +193% vs Laarbeek
Fraud and scams7.9
Laarbeek 4.4▲ +80% vs Laarbeek
Vandalism and public order3.2
Laarbeek 2.1▲ +52% vs Laarbeek
Other and withheld1.6
Laarbeek 0.9▲ +78% vs Laarbeek
Environmental0.0
Laarbeek 0.0
Explanation
Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2024, police in Verspreide huizen Beek en Donk registered 40 traffic accidents, of which 3 with injury and none fatal.
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2024
03 · Living environment
Residents rate their health above the Laarbeek average; green space is below the Laarbeek average.
An estimated 82% of adults in Verspreide huizen Beek en Donk rate their own health as good, 8 percentage points more than in Laarbeek. Fewer adults are overweight (49% against 54%), fewer feel lonely (36% against 41%) and fewer report anxiety or depression (40% against 43%), but more meet the physical activity guideline (50% against 47%). Agricultural land is the largest land use in Verspreide huizen Beek en Donk, covering 88% of the area, against 68% in Laarbeek. Green space such as parks, sports fields, forest and nature covers 3% of the area, 11 percentage points below the 14% in Laarbeek.
Key figures
Self-rated health (estimated)
82%
▲8 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (74%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
3%
▼11 percentage points lower than Laarbeek (14%)
More figures
Lonely
36%
▼5 percentage points lower than Laarbeek (41%)
Overweight
49%
▼5 percentage points lower than Laarbeek (54%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
40%
▼3 percentage points lower than Laarbeek (43%)
Meets physical activity guideline
50%
▲3 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (47%)
Agriculture, share of the area
88%
▲20 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (68%)
Built-up, share of the area
3%
▼10 percentage points lower than Laarbeek (13%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
2%
▼8 percentage points lower than Laarbeek (10%)
Self-rated health (estimated)
82%
▲8 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (74%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
3%
▼11 percentage points lower than Laarbeek (14%)
More figures
Lonely
36%
▼5 percentage points lower than Laarbeek (41%)
Overweight
49%
▼5 percentage points lower than Laarbeek (54%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
40%
▼3 percentage points lower than Laarbeek (43%)
Meets physical activity guideline
50%
▲3 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (47%)
Agriculture, share of the area
88%
▲20 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (68%)
Built-up, share of the area
3%
▼10 percentage points lower than Laarbeek (13%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
2%
▼8 percentage points lower than Laarbeek (10%)
Health
An estimated 82% of adults rate their own health as good, against 74% in the municipality of Laarbeek (2024).
This areaThe municipality of Laarbeek
Good self-rated health
81.7%
74.5%
Smokes
12.3%
13.8%
Excessive drinking
6.3%
5.9%
Overweight
49%
53.8%
Lonely
36%
41.2%
Anxiety or depression feelings
39.5%
42.7%
Meets physical activity guideline
49.9%
47.1%
Explanation
An RIVM model estimate (small-area estimation from the 2024 Health Monitor for Adults and Elderly), not a direct tabulation — even a buurt that was not itself surveyed gets an estimate. Figures cover adults aged 18 and over.
Source: RIVM/CBS Gezondheidsmonitor Volwassenen en Ouderen (kleine-gebieden-schatting) 2024
Land use
3% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 14% in the municipality of Laarbeek.
Traffic2.8%
Built-up2.7%
Other built-up1.2%
Recreation0.9%
Agriculture88.3%
Forest and nature2.5%
Water1.6%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
Distance to amenities
A daycare lies here at an average road distance of 1400 m.
Distance
Value
Large supermarket
1,500 m
–
GP practice
1,900 m
–
Primary school
1,500 m
–
Daycare
1,400 m
–
Large supermarkets
–
0.1
GP practices
–
0.1
Daycares
–
0.3
Explanation
Average road distance from every address in this buurt to the nearest amenity, and the average count within 1 km — a buurt average, not a distance from one address.
Source: CBS proximity statistics 2025
04 · Residents
The population is growing faster than the Laarbeek average.
Verspreide huizen Beek en Donk has 1,285 inhabitants (2026), or 102 per km² (76% lower than in Laarbeek). Between 2021 and 2026 the population rose 14%, against a rise of 3% in Laarbeek. In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Laarbeek was 81%, 3 percentage points above the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) had the highest share there: 23% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2021
+14%
▲higher than Laarbeek (+3%)
Turnout, municipality of Laarbeek
81%
▲3 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+11%
▲higher than Laarbeek (+3%)
Aged 25 to 45
29%
▲6 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (23%)
Never married
55%
▲10 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (45%)
Dutch origin
88%
▲1 percentage point higher than Laarbeek (87%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
43%
▼2 percentage points lower than Laarbeek (45%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
23%
▲6 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2021
+14%
▲higher than Laarbeek (+3%)
Turnout, municipality of Laarbeek
81%
▲3 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+11%
▲higher than Laarbeek (+3%)
Aged 25 to 45
29%
▲6 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (23%)
Never married
55%
▲10 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (45%)
Dutch origin
88%
▲1 percentage point higher than Laarbeek (87%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
43%
▼2 percentage points lower than Laarbeek (45%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
23%
▲6 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population grew 14% between 2021 and 2026, to 1,285.
Residents, 2026
1,285
+14% since 2021
Laarbeek +3%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 102 residents per km², this buurt is 76% less densely populated than the municipality of Laarbeek.
Residents per km²102
Dwellings per km²34.5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, 15.8 children were born per 1,000 residents; 4.0 died per 1,000.
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
29% of residents are between 25 and 45.
0 to 15280
15 to 25160
25 to 45375
45 to 65305
65 to 80140
80 and over25
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
56% of residents are never married.
Never married710
Married495
Divorced40
Widowed35
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
88% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands1,130
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)100
Outside Europe55
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Education level of residents aged 15 to 75
43% of residents have a havo, vwo or mbo2-4 level education.
Primary, vmbo, mbo1240
Havo, vwo, mbo2-4390
Higher professional, university280
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2024
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Laarbeek; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 81% of eligible voters in Laarbeek voted. The largest party was PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) with 23% of the valid votes.
Municipality of LaarbeekThe Netherlands
D66
14.8%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
22.5%
16.7%
VVD
16.1%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
7.1%
12.8%
CDA
16.2%
11.8%
JA21
7.8%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
4.3%
4.5%
BBB
3.6%
2.6%
Other
7.5%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
Verspreide huizen Beek en Donk has an average of 1.6 cars per household, 23% higher than in Laarbeek (1.3). 28% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 6 percentage points more than in Laarbeek (22%).
Key figures
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
21%
▲15 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (6%)
Government, education and care, share of businesses
6%
▼8 percentage points lower than Laarbeek (14%)
Culture, recreation and other services, share of businesses
6%
▼4 percentage points lower than Laarbeek (10%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.6
▲23% higher than Laarbeek (1.3)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
28%
▲6 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (22%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+5 pp
=about the same as Laarbeek (+5 pp)
Office, share of addresses
19%
▲15 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (4%)
Industrial, share of addresses
12%
▲8 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (4%)
Residential, share of addresses
84%
▼5 percentage points lower than Laarbeek (89%)
Residents per km²
102
▼81% lower than the Netherlands (539)
Social housing
8%
▼20 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (28%)
Single-family dwellings
96%
▲33 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
21%
▲15 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (6%)
Government, education and care, share of businesses
6%
▼8 percentage points lower than Laarbeek (14%)
Culture, recreation and other services, share of businesses
6%
▼4 percentage points lower than Laarbeek (10%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.6
▲23% higher than Laarbeek (1.3)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
28%
▲6 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (22%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+5 pp
=about the same as Laarbeek (+5 pp)
Office, share of addresses
19%
▲15 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (4%)
Industrial, share of addresses
12%
▲8 percentage points higher than Laarbeek (4%)
Residential, share of addresses
84%
▼5 percentage points lower than Laarbeek (89%)
Residents per km²
102
▼81% lower than the Netherlands (539)
Social housing
8%
▼20 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (28%)
Single-family dwellings
96%
▲33 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Business establishments by sector
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij is the largest sector, with 55 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij55
Nijverheid en energie50
Handel en horeca45
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie20
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed10
Zakelijke dienstverlening55
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg15
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten15
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
28% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 22% in the municipality of Laarbeek (2025).
Petrol72.1%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)27.9%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 23% to 28% between 2021 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
28%▲ 6 percentage points above Laarbeek (22%)
+5 pp since 2021
Laarbeek +5 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 680 passenger cars and 60 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars680
Motorcycles60
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
84% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is office (19%).
Residential83.7%
Retail1.7%
Office19%
Assembly2.1%
Healthcare1.5%
Industrial12%
Lodging0.6%
Sports0.2%
Other2.3%
Explanation
Based on 526 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
4% multi-family dwellings, against 37% nationally.
This areaThe Netherlands
Multi-family dwellings4%
NL 37%▼ −89% vs NL
Residents per km²102
NL 539▼ −81% vs NL
Social housing8%
NL 28%▼ −71% vs NL
Single-family dwellings96%
NL 63%▲ +52% vs NL
Owner-occupied dwellings81%
NL 57%▲ +42% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025