The population is shrinking, while it grows in Kampen. Homes cost less than the average in the municipality of Kampen, and registered crime per resident is lower.
The average WOZ value in Cellesbroek is €307,000, 15% lower than in Kampen (€361,000). Between 2021 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 48%, against a rise of 44% in Kampen. 60% of the homes are owner-occupied, 4 percentage points less than in Kampen (64%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€307,000
▼15% lower than Kampen (€361,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+48%
▲higher than Kampen (+44%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
60%
▼4 percentage points lower than Kampen (64%)
Social housing
30%
▲5 percentage points higher than Kampen (25%)
Private rent
10%
▼2 percentage points lower than Kampen (12%)
Single-family dwellings
82%
▲6 percentage points higher than Kampen (76%)
Built 1965–1974
32%
▲20 percentage points higher than Kampen (12%)
Built 2016 and later
1%
▼9 percentage points lower than Kampen (10%)
Built 1945–1964
0%
▼8 percentage points lower than Kampen (8%)
Average WOZ value
€307,000
▼15% lower than Kampen (€361,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+48%
▲higher than Kampen (+44%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
60%
▼4 percentage points lower than Kampen (64%)
Social housing
30%
▲5 percentage points higher than Kampen (25%)
Private rent
10%
▼2 percentage points lower than Kampen (12%)
Single-family dwellings
82%
▲6 percentage points higher than Kampen (76%)
Built 1965–1974
32%
▲20 percentage points higher than Kampen (12%)
Built 2016 and later
1%
▼9 percentage points lower than Kampen (10%)
Built 1945–1964
0%
▼8 percentage points lower than Kampen (8%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 48% between 2021 and 2025, to €307,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€307,000▼ 15% below Kampen
+48% since 2021
Kampen +44%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€265 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€265/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
114 m² · measured buurt average
WOZ €307,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€109NL median
Water board levy€40–
Property tax (OZB)€28€27
Waste levy€22€27
Sewage levy€19€22
Costs to set aside€156
Maintenance reserve€146–
Buildings insurance€10–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Kampen's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 64th of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 114 m² (measured average in this buurt) with the average WOZ value here, €307,000.
Levies: Kampen's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Cellesbroek has the 4th-lowest WOZ value of the 17 buurten in Kampen.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €307,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Cellesbroek
307,000
2,961
–
Binnenstad Kampen
257,000
3,390
–
Brunnepe
278,000
1,820
–
Hanzewijk/Greente
329,000
1,387
–
Kampen-Zuid
318,000
963
–
Flevowijk
256,000
1,820
–
Industrieterrein Kampen
447,000
140
–
Bovenbroek
443,000
642
–
Hagenbroek
394,000
848
–
De Maten
475,000
1,047
–
Stationsplein
363,000
55
–
Stationskwartier
414,000
663
–
Het Onderdijks
517,000
1,194
–
Polder Dronthen
547,000
49
–
De Melm
318,000
64
–
Kampereiland
463,000
147
–
Mandjeswaard
562,000
26
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 60% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied60%
Social housing30%
Private rent10%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
82% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes82%
Multi-family homes18%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
62% of dwellings were built between 1975 and 1991, against 21% in the municipality of Kampen.
1945-19640.3%
1965-197431.8%
1975-199161.7%
2006-20155.1%
2016 and later1%
Explanation
Based on 2,985 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
Less registered crime per resident than the Kampen average.
In 2025, 23 crimes per 1,000 residents were registered in Cellesbroek, 15% lower than in Kampen (27). Since 2021 the registered rate per 1,000 residents fell 2%, against a fall of 13% in Kampen. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
23
▼15% lower than Kampen (27)
Change since 2021
-2%
▲higher than Kampen (-13%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
1.2
▼25% lower than Kampen (1.6)
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
23
▼15% lower than Kampen (27)
Change since 2021
-2%
▲higher than Kampen (-13%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
1.2
▼25% lower than Kampen (1.6)
Registered crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
In 2025, Cellesbroek registered 23 crimes per 1,000 residents, against 27 in the municipality of Kampen.
Cellesbroek23
The municipality of Kampen27
Explanation
Crime is counted where it happens and divided by the number of residents, so places with many visitors — city centres, nightlife, stations — score higher.
The largest category in Cellesbroek is 'Theft and burglary': 8.1 per 1,000 residents in 2025, against 9.1 in the municipality of Kampen.
CellesbroekKampen
Theft and burglary8.1
Kampen 9.1▼ −11% vs Kampen
Fraud and scams5.6
Kampen 4.3▲ +30% vs Kampen
Traffic4.3
Kampen 6.7▼ −36% vs Kampen
Vandalism and public order2.6
Kampen 2.7≈ Kampen
Violence and threats1.9
Kampen 2.9▼ −34% vs Kampen
Other and withheld0.9
Kampen 1.2▼ −25% vs Kampen
Environmental0.0
Kampen 0.1≈ Kampen
Explanation
Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2024, police in Cellesbroek registered 29 traffic accidents, of which 3 with injury and none fatal.
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2024
03 · Living environment
Residents rate their health below the Kampen average; green space is above the Kampen average.
An estimated 72% of adults in Cellesbroek rate their own health as good, 4 percentage points less than in Kampen. More adults are overweight (58% against 53%), more feel lonely (48% against 43%) and more report anxiety or depression (45% against 43%), but fewer meet the physical activity guideline (45% against 47%). Built-up land is the largest land use in Cellesbroek, covering 61% of the area, against 7% in Kampen. Green space such as parks, sports fields, forest and nature covers 20% of the area, 10 percentage points above the 10% in Kampen.
Key figures
Self-rated health (estimated)
72%
▼4 percentage points lower than Kampen (76%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
20%
▲10 percentage points higher than Kampen (10%)
More figures
Overweight
58%
▲5 percentage points higher than Kampen (53%)
Lonely
48%
▲5 percentage points higher than Kampen (43%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
45%
▲2 percentage points higher than Kampen (43%)
Meets physical activity guideline
45%
▼2 percentage points lower than Kampen (47%)
Agriculture, share of the area
9%
▼57 percentage points lower than Kampen (66%)
Built-up, share of the area
61%
▲54 percentage points higher than Kampen (7%)
Recreation, share of the area
20%
▲18 percentage points higher than Kampen (2%)
Self-rated health (estimated)
72%
▼4 percentage points lower than Kampen (76%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
20%
▲10 percentage points higher than Kampen (10%)
More figures
Overweight
58%
▲5 percentage points higher than Kampen (53%)
Lonely
48%
▲5 percentage points higher than Kampen (43%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
45%
▲2 percentage points higher than Kampen (43%)
Meets physical activity guideline
45%
▼2 percentage points lower than Kampen (47%)
Agriculture, share of the area
9%
▼57 percentage points lower than Kampen (66%)
Built-up, share of the area
61%
▲54 percentage points higher than Kampen (7%)
Recreation, share of the area
20%
▲18 percentage points higher than Kampen (2%)
Health
An estimated 72% of adults rate their own health as good, against 76% in the municipality of Kampen (2024).
This areaThe municipality of Kampen
Good self-rated health
71.7%
75.7%
Smokes
18%
17.1%
Excessive drinking
4.2%
5.4%
Overweight
58.2%
53.4%
Lonely
47.8%
43.2%
Anxiety or depression feelings
45%
42.9%
Meets physical activity guideline
45.1%
46.7%
Explanation
An RIVM model estimate (small-area estimation from the 2024 Health Monitor for Adults and Elderly), not a direct tabulation — even a buurt that was not itself surveyed gets an estimate. Figures cover adults aged 18 and over.
Source: RIVM/CBS Gezondheidsmonitor Volwassenen en Ouderen (kleine-gebieden-schatting) 2024
Land use
20% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 10% in the municipality of Kampen.
Traffic5.2%
Built-up60.9%
Recreation20.1%
Agriculture9.2%
Water4.6%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
Distance to amenities
A primary school lies here at an average road distance of 500 m.
Distance
Value
Large supermarket
800 m
–
GP practice
700 m
–
Primary school
500 m
–
Daycare
600 m
–
Large supermarkets
–
0.9
GP practices
–
1.4
Daycares
–
3.9
Explanation
Average road distance from every address in this buurt to the nearest amenity, and the average count within 1 km — a buurt average, not a distance from one address.
Source: CBS proximity statistics 2025
04 · Residents
The population is shrinking, while it grows in Kampen.
Cellesbroek has 6,955 inhabitants (2026), or 4,179 per km² (10.3 times as high as in Kampen). Between 2021 and 2026 the population stayed about level, against a rise of 4% in Kampen. In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Kampen was 84%, 6 percentage points above the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, CDA had the highest share there: 17% of the vote, against 12% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2021
-0%
▼lower than Kampen (+4%)
Turnout, municipality of Kampen
84%
▲6 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+0%
▼lower than Kampen (+4%)
Aged 25 to 45
25%
▼1 percentage point lower than Kampen (26%)
Married
44%
=about the same as Kampen (44%)
Dutch origin
82%
▼4 percentage points lower than Kampen (86%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
47%
▲2 percentage points higher than Kampen (45%)
CDA, share of the vote
17%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (12%)
Population growth since 2021
-0%
▼lower than Kampen (+4%)
Turnout, municipality of Kampen
84%
▲6 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+0%
▼lower than Kampen (+4%)
Aged 25 to 45
25%
▼1 percentage point lower than Kampen (26%)
Married
44%
=about the same as Kampen (44%)
Dutch origin
82%
▼4 percentage points lower than Kampen (86%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
47%
▲2 percentage points higher than Kampen (45%)
CDA, share of the vote
17%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (12%)
Population per year
The population held steady between 2021 and 2026, at 6,955.
Residents, 2026
6,955
+0% since 2021
Kampen +4%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 4,179 residents per km², this buurt is 10 times as densely populated as the municipality of Kampen.
Residents per km²4,179
Dwellings per km²1,783.7
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, 9.4 children were born per 1,000 residents; 12.3 died per 1,000.
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
25% of residents are between 25 and 45.
0 to 151,140
15 to 25845
25 to 451,720
45 to 651,645
65 to 801,140
80 and over465
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
44% of residents are married.
Never married2,985
Married3,075
Divorced480
Widowed415
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
82% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands5,710
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)320
Outside Europe925
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Education level of residents aged 15 to 75
47% of residents have a havo, vwo or mbo2-4 level education.
Primary, vmbo, mbo11,640
Havo, vwo, mbo2-42,300
Higher professional, university990
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2024
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Kampen; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 84% of eligible voters in Kampen voted. The largest party was CDA with 17% of the valid votes.
Municipality of KampenThe Netherlands
D66
9.2%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
16.8%
16.7%
VVD
9.1%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
7.3%
12.8%
CDA
17%
11.8%
JA21
5.8%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
5.7%
4.5%
BBB
3.5%
2.6%
Other
25.7%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
Cellesbroek has an average of 1.0 cars per household, 9% lower than in Kampen (1.1). 19% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 3 percentage points less than in Kampen (22%).
Key figures
Government, education and care, share of businesses
25%
▲10 percentage points higher than Kampen (15%)
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
0%
▼7 percentage points lower than Kampen (7%)
Industry and energy, share of businesses
24%
▲7 percentage points higher than Kampen (17%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.0
▼9% lower than Kampen (1.1)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
19%
▼3 percentage points lower than Kampen (22%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
0 pp
▼lower than Kampen (+1 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
93%
▲7 percentage points higher than Kampen (86%)
Industrial, share of addresses
0%
▼6 percentage points lower than Kampen (6%)
Retail, share of addresses
0%
▼2 percentage points lower than Kampen (2%)
Multi-family dwellings
18%
▼19 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (37%)
Private rent
10%
▼4 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Single-family dwellings
82%
▲19 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Government, education and care, share of businesses
25%
▲10 percentage points higher than Kampen (15%)
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
0%
▼7 percentage points lower than Kampen (7%)
Industry and energy, share of businesses
24%
▲7 percentage points higher than Kampen (17%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.0
▼9% lower than Kampen (1.1)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
19%
▼3 percentage points lower than Kampen (22%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
0 pp
▼lower than Kampen (+1 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
93%
▲7 percentage points higher than Kampen (86%)
Industrial, share of addresses
0%
▼6 percentage points lower than Kampen (6%)
Retail, share of addresses
0%
▼2 percentage points lower than Kampen (2%)
Multi-family dwellings
18%
▼19 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (37%)
Private rent
10%
▼4 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Single-family dwellings
82%
▲19 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Business establishments by sector
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg is the largest sector, with 115 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij0
Nijverheid en energie110
Handel en horeca65
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie20
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed10
Zakelijke dienstverlening85
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg115
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten60
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
19% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 22% in the municipality of Kampen (2025).
Petrol81.2%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)18.8%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 19% to 19% between 2021 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
19%▼ 3 percentage points below Kampen (22%)
+0 pp since 2021
Kampen +1 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 2,905 passenger cars and 245 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars2,905
Motorcycles245
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
93% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is healthcare (3%).
Residential92.9%
Retail0.4%
Office0.4%
Assembly0.3%
Healthcare2.6%
Industrial0.1%
Lodging0.1%
Education0.3%
Sports0.1%
Other3%
Explanation
Based on 3,212 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
4,179 residents per km²: 7.8 times as densely populated as the Dutch average.
This areaThe Netherlands
Residents per km²4,179
NL 539▲ +675% vs NL
Multi-family dwellings18%
NL 37%▼ −51% vs NL
Private rent10%
NL 14%▼ −29% vs NL
Single-family dwellings82%
NL 63%▲ +30% vs NL
Average WOZ value€307,000
NL €398,000▼ −23% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026