We're pulling the figures from public sources. This usually takes a few seconds.
Area and its neighbourhoodsCBS key figures for districts and neighbourhoods
Residents and householdsCBS
Homes and WOZ valueCBS · Kadaster BAG
Housing marketNVM market overview
Municipal leviesMunicipal budgets · CBS
SafetyCBS and Police
HealthRIVM Health Monitor
Land use and amenitiesCBS land use · proximity statistics
Road safety and electionsRijkswaterstaat · Kiesraad
Comparing with the municipality and the countryRankings and comparisons
District · Hof van Twente
Living in Diepenheim
The population is growing slower than in Hof van Twente. Homes cost more than the average in the municipality of Hof van Twente, and registered crime per resident is lower.
The average WOZ value in Diepenheim is €392,000, 4% higher than in Hof van Twente (€376,000). Between 2014 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 63%, against a rise of 64% in Hof van Twente. 74% of the homes are owner-occupied, 5 percentage points more than in Hof van Twente (69%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€392,000
▲4% higher than Hof van Twente (€376,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2014
+63%
▼lower than Hof van Twente (+64%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
74%
▲5 percentage points higher than Hof van Twente (69%)
Social housing
16%
▼3 percentage points lower than Hof van Twente (19%)
Private rent
11%
▼1 percentage point lower than Hof van Twente (12%)
Single-family dwellings
92%
▲7 percentage points higher than Hof van Twente (85%)
Built 1965–1974
16%
▼3 percentage points lower than Hof van Twente (19%)
Built 2006–2015
7%
▼2 percentage points lower than Hof van Twente (9%)
Built 1945–1964
11%
▼2 percentage points lower than Hof van Twente (13%)
Average WOZ value
€392,000
▲4% higher than Hof van Twente (€376,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2014
+63%
▼lower than Hof van Twente (+64%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
74%
▲5 percentage points higher than Hof van Twente (69%)
Social housing
16%
▼3 percentage points lower than Hof van Twente (19%)
Private rent
11%
▼1 percentage point lower than Hof van Twente (12%)
Single-family dwellings
92%
▲7 percentage points higher than Hof van Twente (85%)
Built 1965–1974
16%
▼3 percentage points lower than Hof van Twente (19%)
Built 2006–2015
7%
▼2 percentage points lower than Hof van Twente (9%)
Built 1945–1964
11%
▼2 percentage points lower than Hof van Twente (13%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 63% between 2014 and 2025, to €392,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€392,000▲ 4% above Hof van Twente
+63% since 2014
Hof van Twente +64%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€348 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€348/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
160 m² · estimated gemeente average
WOZ €392,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€130NL median
Water board levy€43–
Property tax (OZB)€35€34
Sewage levy€33€22
Waste levy€19€27
Costs to set aside€218
Maintenance reserve€204–
Buildings insurance€14–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Hof van Twente's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 197th of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 160 m² (estimated gemeente average) with the average WOZ value here, €392,000.
Levies: Hof van Twente's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Diepenheim has the 4th-lowest WOZ value of the 10 wijken in the municipality of Hof van Twente.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €392,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Diepenheim
392,000
1,228
–
Goor
297,000
4,134
–
De Whee II
335,000
1,498
–
Markelo
418,000
2,702
–
Verspr.h. Kerspel en omgeving
437,000
91
–
Elsen
543,000
237
–
Delden
387,000
3,420
–
Overig Delden
561,000
80
–
Hengevelde
440,000
1,447
–
Bentelo
443,000
874
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 74% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied74%
Social housing16%
Private rent11%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
92% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes92%
Multi-family homes8%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
26% of dwellings were built before 1945, against 17% in the municipality of Hof van Twente.
Before 194525.8%
1945-196411.4%
1965-197416.4%
1975-199121.1%
1992-200512.7%
2006-20156.5%
2016 and later6%
Explanation
Based on 1,228 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
Less registered crime per resident than the Hof van Twente average.
In 2025, 16 crimes per 1,000 residents were registered in Diepenheim, 43% lower than in Hof van Twente (28). Since 2021 the registered rate per 1,000 residents fell 8%, against a rise of 28% in Hof van Twente. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
16
▼43% lower than Hof van Twente (28)
Change since 2021
-8%
▼lower than Hof van Twente (+28%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
1.6
▼43% lower than Hof van Twente (2.8)
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
16
▼43% lower than Hof van Twente (28)
Change since 2021
-8%
▼lower than Hof van Twente (+28%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
1.6
▼43% lower than Hof van Twente (2.8)
Registered crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
In 2025, Diepenheim registered 16 crimes per 1,000 residents, against 28 in the municipality of Hof van Twente.
Diepenheim16
The municipality of Hof van Twente28
Explanation
Crime is counted where it happens and divided by the number of residents, so places with many visitors — city centres, nightlife, stations — score higher.
The largest category in Diepenheim is 'Theft and burglary': 5.6 per 1,000 residents in 2025, against 9.5 in the municipality of Hof van Twente.
DiepenheimHof van Twente
Theft and burglary5.6
Hof van Twente 9.5▼ −41% vs Hof van Twente
Traffic4.9
Hof van Twente 7.9▼ −38% vs Hof van Twente
Vandalism and public order3.0
Hof van Twente 2.3▲ +30% vs Hof van Twente
Fraud and scams2.3
Hof van Twente 4.0▼ −43% vs Hof van Twente
Other and withheld0.4
Hof van Twente 1.1▼ −64% vs Hof van Twente
Violence and threats0.0
Hof van Twente 2.9▼ −100% vs Hof van Twente
Environmental0.0
Hof van Twente 0.1≈ Hof van Twente
Explanation
Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2024, police in Diepenheim registered 17 traffic accidents, of which 0 with injury and none fatal.
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2024
03 · Living environment
Residents rate their health above the Hof van Twente average; green space is below the Hof van Twente average.
An estimated 78% of adults in Diepenheim rate their own health as good, 1 percentage point more than in Hof van Twente. Fewer adults feel lonely (38% against 41%), fewer smoke (13% against 15%), fewer report anxiety or depression (37% against 39%) and fewer are overweight (54% against 55%). Agricultural land is the largest land use in Diepenheim, covering 79% of the area, against 72% in Hof van Twente. Green space such as parks, sports fields, forest and nature covers 16% of the area, 2 percentage points below the 18% in Hof van Twente.
Key figures
Self-rated health (estimated)
78%
▲1 percentage point higher than Hof van Twente (77%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
16%
▼2 percentage points lower than Hof van Twente (18%)
More figures
Lonely
38%
▼3 percentage points lower than Hof van Twente (41%)
Smokes
13%
▼2 percentage points lower than Hof van Twente (15%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
37%
▼2 percentage points lower than Hof van Twente (39%)
Meets physical activity guideline
50%
=about the same as Hof van Twente (50%)
Agriculture, share of the area
79%
▲7 percentage points higher than Hof van Twente (72%)
Built-up, share of the area
2%
▼3 percentage points lower than Hof van Twente (5%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
14%
▼2 percentage points lower than Hof van Twente (16%)
Self-rated health (estimated)
78%
▲1 percentage point higher than Hof van Twente (77%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
16%
▼2 percentage points lower than Hof van Twente (18%)
More figures
Lonely
38%
▼3 percentage points lower than Hof van Twente (41%)
Smokes
13%
▼2 percentage points lower than Hof van Twente (15%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
37%
▼2 percentage points lower than Hof van Twente (39%)
Meets physical activity guideline
50%
=about the same as Hof van Twente (50%)
Agriculture, share of the area
79%
▲7 percentage points higher than Hof van Twente (72%)
Built-up, share of the area
2%
▼3 percentage points lower than Hof van Twente (5%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
14%
▼2 percentage points lower than Hof van Twente (16%)
Health
An estimated 78% of adults rate their own health as good, against 77% in the municipality of Hof van Twente (2024).
This areaThe municipality of Hof van Twente
Good self-rated health
77.6%
76.8%
Smokes
12.6%
14.6%
Excessive drinking
8.2%
7.8%
Overweight
54.5%
54.6%
Lonely
38.5%
40.6%
Anxiety or depression feelings
36.9%
38.8%
Meets physical activity guideline
49.8%
50.5%
Explanation
An RIVM model estimate (small-area estimation from the 2024 Health Monitor for Adults and Elderly), not a direct tabulation — even a buurt that was not itself surveyed gets an estimate. Figures cover adults aged 18 and over.
Source: RIVM/CBS Gezondheidsmonitor Volwassenen en Ouderen (kleine-gebieden-schatting) 2024
Land use
16% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 18% in the municipality of Hof van Twente.
Traffic2.4%
Built-up2.1%
Other built-up0.1%
Recreation1.8%
Agriculture78.6%
Forest and nature14.2%
Water0.8%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
04 · Residents
The population is growing slower than the Hof van Twente average.
Diepenheim has 2,655 inhabitants (2026), or 101 per km² (40% lower than in Hof van Twente). Between 2014 and 2026 the population rose 1%, against a rise of 2% in Hof van Twente. In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Hof van Twente was 86%, 8 percentage points above the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, CDA had the highest share there: 18% of the vote, against 12% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2014
+1%
▼lower than Hof van Twente (+2%)
Turnout, municipality of Hof van Twente
86%
▲8 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+11%
▲higher than Hof van Twente (+6%)
Aged 45 to 65
30%
▲2 percentage points higher than Hof van Twente (28%)
Married
48%
▲5 percentage points higher than Hof van Twente (43%)
Dutch origin
92%
▲5 percentage points higher than Hof van Twente (87%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
48%
▲2 percentage points higher than Hof van Twente (46%)
CDA, share of the vote
18%
▲6 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (12%)
Population growth since 2014
+1%
▼lower than Hof van Twente (+2%)
Turnout, municipality of Hof van Twente
86%
▲8 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+11%
▲higher than Hof van Twente (+6%)
Aged 45 to 65
30%
▲2 percentage points higher than Hof van Twente (28%)
Married
48%
▲5 percentage points higher than Hof van Twente (43%)
Dutch origin
92%
▲5 percentage points higher than Hof van Twente (87%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
48%
▲2 percentage points higher than Hof van Twente (46%)
CDA, share of the vote
18%
▲6 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (12%)
Population per year
The population held steady between 2014 and 2026, at 2,655.
Residents, 2026
2,655
+1% since 2014
Hof van Twente +2%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 101 residents per km², this wijk is 40% less densely populated than the municipality of Hof van Twente.
Residents per km²101
Dwellings per km²46.6
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, 5.6 children were born per 1,000 residents; 9.4 died per 1,000.
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
30% of residents are between 45 and 65.
0 to 15330
15 to 25235
25 to 45465
45 to 65805
65 to 80640
80 and over190
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
48% of residents are married.
Never married1,025
Married1,270
Divorced180
Widowed175
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
92% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands2,445
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)95
Outside Europe115
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Education level of residents aged 15 to 75
48% of residents have a havo, vwo or mbo2-4 level education.
Primary, vmbo, mbo1400
Havo, vwo, mbo2-4950
Higher professional, university610
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2024
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Hof van Twente; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 86% of eligible voters in Hof van Twente voted. The largest party was CDA with 18% of the valid votes.
Municipality of Hof van TwenteThe Netherlands
D66
12.3%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
15.4%
16.7%
VVD
17.7%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
7.8%
12.8%
CDA
17.8%
11.8%
JA21
7.9%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
5.7%
4.5%
BBB
8.9%
2.6%
Other
6.4%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
Diepenheim has an average of 1.4 cars per household, about the same as in Hof van Twente (1.4). 23% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 1 percentage point more than in Hof van Twente (22%).
Key figures
Industry and energy, share of businesses
11%
▼4 percentage points lower than Hof van Twente (15%)
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
16%
▲4 percentage points higher than Hof van Twente (12%)
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
14%
▼4 percentage points lower than Hof van Twente (18%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.4
=about the same as Hof van Twente (1.4)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
24%
▲2 percentage points higher than Hof van Twente (22%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2014
+4 pp
▲higher than Hof van Twente (+3 pp)
Lodging, share of addresses
6%
▲2 percentage points higher than Hof van Twente (4%)
Residential, share of addresses
85%
▲1 percentage point higher than Hof van Twente (84%)
Assembly, share of addresses
2%
▲1 percentage point higher than Hof van Twente (1%)
Multi-family dwellings
8%
▼29 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (37%)
Social housing
16%
▼12 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (28%)
Single-family dwellings
92%
▲29 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Industry and energy, share of businesses
11%
▼4 percentage points lower than Hof van Twente (15%)
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
16%
▲4 percentage points higher than Hof van Twente (12%)
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
14%
▼4 percentage points lower than Hof van Twente (18%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.4
=about the same as Hof van Twente (1.4)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
24%
▲2 percentage points higher than Hof van Twente (22%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2014
+4 pp
▲higher than Hof van Twente (+3 pp)
Lodging, share of addresses
6%
▲2 percentage points higher than Hof van Twente (4%)
Residential, share of addresses
85%
▲1 percentage point higher than Hof van Twente (84%)
Assembly, share of addresses
2%
▲1 percentage point higher than Hof van Twente (1%)
Multi-family dwellings
8%
▼29 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (37%)
Social housing
16%
▼12 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (28%)
Single-family dwellings
92%
▲29 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Business establishments by sector
Zakelijke dienstverlening is the largest sector, with 95 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij65
Nijverheid en energie45
Handel en horeca60
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie20
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed20
Zakelijke dienstverlening95
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg55
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten55
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
24% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 22% in the municipality of Hof van Twente (2025).
Petrol76.5%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)23.5%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 19% to 24% between 2014 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
24%▲ 2 percentage points above Hof van Twente (22%)
+5 pp since 2014
Hof van Twente +3 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 1,705 passenger cars and 165 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars1,705
Motorcycles165
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
85% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is lodging (6%).
Residential84.8%
Retail1.8%
Office0.8%
Assembly1.6%
Healthcare0.4%
Industrial5%
Lodging6.4%
Education0.2%
Sports0.3%
Other6.1%
Explanation
Based on 1,448 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
101 residents per km²: 81% less densely populated than the Dutch average.
This areaThe Netherlands
Residents per km²101
NL 539▼ −81% vs NL
Multi-family dwellings8%
NL 37%▼ −78% vs NL
Social housing16%
NL 28%▼ −43% vs NL
Single-family dwellings92%
NL 63%▲ +46% vs NL
Owner-occupied dwellings74%
NL 57%▲ +30% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026