We're pulling the figures from public sources. This usually takes a few seconds.
Area and its neighbourhoodsCBS key figures for districts and neighbourhoods
Residents and householdsCBS
Homes and WOZ valueCBS · Kadaster BAG
Housing marketNVM market overview
Municipal leviesMunicipal budgets · CBS
SafetyCBS and Police
HealthRIVM Health Monitor
Land use and amenitiesCBS land use · proximity statistics
Road safety and electionsRijkswaterstaat · Kiesraad
Comparing with the municipality and the countryRankings and comparisons
Neighbourhood · Hof van Twente
Living in Dr. Schaepmanbuurt
The population is growing about as fast as in Hof van Twente. Homes cost less than the average in the municipality of Hof van Twente, and registered crime per resident is lower.
The average WOZ value in Dr. Schaepmanbuurt is €289,000, 23% lower than in Hof van Twente (€376,000). Between 2021 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 38%, against a rise of 34% in Hof van Twente. 70% of the homes are owner-occupied, 1 percentage point more than in Hof van Twente (69%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€289,000
▼23% lower than Hof van Twente (€376,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+38%
▲higher than Hof van Twente (+34%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
70%
▲1 percentage point higher than Hof van Twente (69%)
Social housing
17%
▼2 percentage points lower than Hof van Twente (19%)
Private rent
13%
▲1 percentage point higher than Hof van Twente (12%)
Single-family dwellings
92%
▲7 percentage points higher than Hof van Twente (85%)
Built 1965–1974
2%
▼17 percentage points lower than Hof van Twente (19%)
Built 1975–1991
7%
▼15 percentage points lower than Hof van Twente (22%)
Built 1992–2005
2%
▼11 percentage points lower than Hof van Twente (13%)
Average WOZ value
€289,000
▼23% lower than Hof van Twente (€376,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+38%
▲higher than Hof van Twente (+34%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
70%
▲1 percentage point higher than Hof van Twente (69%)
Social housing
17%
▼2 percentage points lower than Hof van Twente (19%)
Private rent
13%
▲1 percentage point higher than Hof van Twente (12%)
Single-family dwellings
92%
▲7 percentage points higher than Hof van Twente (85%)
Built 1965–1974
2%
▼17 percentage points lower than Hof van Twente (19%)
Built 1975–1991
7%
▼15 percentage points lower than Hof van Twente (22%)
Built 1992–2005
2%
▼11 percentage points lower than Hof van Twente (13%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 38% between 2021 and 2025, to €289,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€289,000▼ 23% below Hof van Twente
+38% since 2021
Hof van Twente +34%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€298 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€298/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
132 m² · measured buurt average
WOZ €289,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€118NL median
Water board levy€40–
Sewage levy€33€22
Property tax (OZB)€26€25
Waste levy€19€27
Costs to set aside€180
Maintenance reserve€168–
Buildings insurance€12–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Hof van Twente's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 200th of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 132 m² (measured average in this buurt) with the average WOZ value here, €289,000.
Levies: Hof van Twente's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Dr. Schaepmanbuurt has the 4th-highest WOZ value of the 8 buurten in Goor.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €289,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Dr. Schaepmanbuurt
289,000
261
–
Centrum-Goor
270,000
1,652
–
De Whee I
255,000
566
–
Bungalow-wijk
247,000
303
–
Heeckeren
369,000
437
–
Gijmink
294,000
631
–
Waterhoek
556,000
129
–
De Meene
277,000
142
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 70% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied70%
Social housing17%
Private rent13%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
92% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes92%
Multi-family homes8%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
55% of dwellings were built before 1945, against 17% in the municipality of Hof van Twente.
Before 194554.8%
1945-19647.1%
1965-19741.8%
1975-19917.1%
1992-20052.1%
2006-201518.4%
2016 and later8.8%
Explanation
Based on 283 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
Less registered crime per resident than the Hof van Twente average.
In 2025, 21 crimes per 1,000 residents were registered in Dr. Schaepmanbuurt, 25% lower than in Hof van Twente (28). Since 2021 the registered rate per 1,000 residents rose 29%, against a rise of 28% in Hof van Twente. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
21
▼25% lower than Hof van Twente (28)
Change since 2021
+29%
▲higher than Hof van Twente (+28%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
3.8
▲36% higher than Hof van Twente (2.8)
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
21
▼25% lower than Hof van Twente (28)
Change since 2021
+29%
▲higher than Hof van Twente (+28%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
3.8
▲36% higher than Hof van Twente (2.8)
Registered crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
In 2025, Dr. Schaepmanbuurt registered 21 crimes per 1,000 residents, against 28 in the municipality of Hof van Twente.
Dr. Schaepmanbuurt21
The municipality of Hof van Twente28
Explanation
Crime is counted where it happens and divided by the number of residents, so places with many visitors — city centres, nightlife, stations — score higher.
The largest category in Dr. Schaepmanbuurt is 'Traffic': 6.6 per 1,000 residents in 2025, against 7.9 in the municipality of Hof van Twente.
Dr. SchaepmanbuurtHof van Twente
Traffic6.6
Hof van Twente 7.9▼ −16% vs Hof van Twente
Theft and burglary4.9
Hof van Twente 9.5▼ −48% vs Hof van Twente
Fraud and scams4.9
Hof van Twente 4.0▲ +23% vs Hof van Twente
Vandalism and public order3.3
Hof van Twente 2.3▲ +43% vs Hof van Twente
Other and withheld1.6
Hof van Twente 1.1▲ +45% vs Hof van Twente
Violence and threats0.0
Hof van Twente 2.9▼ −100% vs Hof van Twente
Environmental0.0
Hof van Twente 0.1≈ Hof van Twente
Explanation
Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2024, police in Dr. Schaepmanbuurt registered 1 traffic accidents, of which 0 with injury and none fatal.
2022
2024
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2024
03 · Living environment
Residents rate their health below the Hof van Twente average; green space is below the Hof van Twente average.
An estimated 76% of adults in Dr. Schaepmanbuurt rate their own health as good, 1 percentage point less than in Hof van Twente. More adults smoke (19% against 15%) and more are overweight (57% against 55%), but fewer meet the physical activity guideline (46% against 50%) and fewer feel lonely (40% against 41%). Built-up land is the largest land use in Dr. Schaepmanbuurt, covering 77% of the area, against 5% in Hof van Twente. Green space such as parks, sports fields, forest and nature covers 15% of the area, 3 percentage points below the 18% in Hof van Twente.
Key figures
Self-rated health (estimated)
76%
▼1 percentage point lower than Hof van Twente (77%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
15%
▼3 percentage points lower than Hof van Twente (18%)
More figures
Smokes
19%
▲4 percentage points higher than Hof van Twente (15%)
Meets physical activity guideline
46%
▼4 percentage points lower than Hof van Twente (50%)
Overweight
57%
▲2 percentage points higher than Hof van Twente (55%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
40%
▲1 percentage point higher than Hof van Twente (39%)
Agriculture, share of the area
0%
▼72 percentage points lower than Hof van Twente (72%)
Built-up, share of the area
77%
▲72 percentage points higher than Hof van Twente (5%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
0%
▼16 percentage points lower than Hof van Twente (16%)
Self-rated health (estimated)
76%
▼1 percentage point lower than Hof van Twente (77%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
15%
▼3 percentage points lower than Hof van Twente (18%)
More figures
Smokes
19%
▲4 percentage points higher than Hof van Twente (15%)
Meets physical activity guideline
46%
▼4 percentage points lower than Hof van Twente (50%)
Overweight
57%
▲2 percentage points higher than Hof van Twente (55%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
40%
▲1 percentage point higher than Hof van Twente (39%)
Agriculture, share of the area
0%
▼72 percentage points lower than Hof van Twente (72%)
Built-up, share of the area
77%
▲72 percentage points higher than Hof van Twente (5%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
0%
▼16 percentage points lower than Hof van Twente (16%)
Health
An estimated 76% of adults rate their own health as good, against 77% in the municipality of Hof van Twente (2024).
This areaThe municipality of Hof van Twente
Good self-rated health
75.5%
76.8%
Smokes
19.3%
14.6%
Excessive drinking
8.2%
7.8%
Overweight
57.2%
54.6%
Lonely
40%
40.6%
Anxiety or depression feelings
40.5%
38.8%
Meets physical activity guideline
46.5%
50.5%
Explanation
An RIVM model estimate (small-area estimation from the 2024 Health Monitor for Adults and Elderly), not a direct tabulation — even a buurt that was not itself surveyed gets an estimate. Figures cover adults aged 18 and over.
Source: RIVM/CBS Gezondheidsmonitor Volwassenen en Ouderen (kleine-gebieden-schatting) 2024
Land use
15% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 18% in the municipality of Hof van Twente.
Built-up76.9%
Other built-up7.7%
Recreation15.4%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
Distance to amenities
A primary school lies here at an average road distance of 300 m.
Distance
Value
Large supermarket
1,000 m
–
GP practice
800 m
–
Primary school
300 m
–
Daycare
300 m
–
Large supermarkets
–
0.6
GP practices
–
0.9
Daycares
–
2.8
Explanation
Average road distance from every address in this buurt to the nearest amenity, and the average count within 1 km — a buurt average, not a distance from one address.
Source: CBS proximity statistics 2025
04 · Residents
The population is growing about as fast as the Hof van Twente average.
Dr. Schaepmanbuurt has 615 inhabitants (2026), or 4,932 per km² (29.2 times as high as in Hof van Twente). Between 2021 and 2026 the population rose 2%, the same as in Hof van Twente. In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Hof van Twente was 86%, 8 percentage points above the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, CDA had the highest share there: 18% of the vote, against 12% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2021
+2%
=about the same as Hof van Twente (+2%)
Turnout, municipality of Hof van Twente
86%
▲8 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+1%
▼lower than Hof van Twente (+3%)
Aged 45 to 65
28%
=about the same as Hof van Twente (28%)
Never married
49%
▲6 percentage points higher than Hof van Twente (43%)
Dutch origin
85%
▼2 percentage points lower than Hof van Twente (87%)
Lower education (primary, vmbo, mbo 1)
40%
▲15 percentage points higher than Hof van Twente (25%)
CDA, share of the vote
18%
▲6 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (12%)
Population growth since 2021
+2%
=about the same as Hof van Twente (+2%)
Turnout, municipality of Hof van Twente
86%
▲8 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+1%
▼lower than Hof van Twente (+3%)
Aged 45 to 65
28%
=about the same as Hof van Twente (28%)
Never married
49%
▲6 percentage points higher than Hof van Twente (43%)
Dutch origin
85%
▼2 percentage points lower than Hof van Twente (87%)
Lower education (primary, vmbo, mbo 1)
40%
▲15 percentage points higher than Hof van Twente (25%)
CDA, share of the vote
18%
▲6 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (12%)
Population per year
The population grew 2% between 2021 and 2026, to 615.
Residents, 2026
615
+2% since 2021
Hof van Twente +2%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 4,932 residents per km², this buurt is 29 times as densely populated as the municipality of Hof van Twente.
Residents per km²4,932
Dwellings per km²2,175
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, 16.4 children were born per 1,000 residents; 16.4 died per 1,000.
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
28% of residents are between 45 and 65.
0 to 1580
15 to 2560
25 to 45160
45 to 65175
65 to 80105
80 and over35
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
49% of residents are never married.
Never married300
Married240
Divorced45
Widowed30
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
85% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands525
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)40
Outside Europe55
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Education level of residents aged 15 to 75
40% of residents have a primary, vmbo or mbo1 level education.
Primary, vmbo, mbo1190
Havo, vwo, mbo2-4180
Higher professional, university100
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2024
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Hof van Twente; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 86% of eligible voters in Hof van Twente voted. The largest party was CDA with 18% of the valid votes.
Municipality of Hof van TwenteThe Netherlands
D66
12.3%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
15.4%
16.7%
VVD
17.7%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
7.8%
12.8%
CDA
17.8%
11.8%
JA21
7.9%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
5.7%
4.5%
BBB
8.9%
2.6%
Other
6.4%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
Dr. Schaepmanbuurt has an average of 1.3 cars per household, 7% lower than in Hof van Twente (1.4). 16% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 6 percentage points less than in Hof van Twente (22%).
Key figures
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
0%
▼12 percentage points lower than Hof van Twente (12%)
Culture, recreation and other services, share of businesses
20%
▲10 percentage points higher than Hof van Twente (10%)
Financial services and real estate, share of businesses
0%
▼7 percentage points lower than Hof van Twente (7%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.3
▼7% lower than Hof van Twente (1.4)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
16%
▼6 percentage points lower than Hof van Twente (22%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+4 pp
=about the same as Hof van Twente (+4 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
94%
▲10 percentage points higher than Hof van Twente (84%)
Industrial, share of addresses
0%
▼5 percentage points lower than Hof van Twente (5%)
Office, share of addresses
0%
▼1 percentage point lower than Hof van Twente (1%)
Multi-family dwellings
8%
▼29 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (37%)
Social housing
17%
▼11 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (28%)
Single-family dwellings
92%
▲29 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
0%
▼12 percentage points lower than Hof van Twente (12%)
Culture, recreation and other services, share of businesses
20%
▲10 percentage points higher than Hof van Twente (10%)
Financial services and real estate, share of businesses
0%
▼7 percentage points lower than Hof van Twente (7%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.3
▼7% lower than Hof van Twente (1.4)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
16%
▼6 percentage points lower than Hof van Twente (22%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+4 pp
=about the same as Hof van Twente (+4 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
94%
▲10 percentage points higher than Hof van Twente (84%)
Industrial, share of addresses
0%
▼5 percentage points lower than Hof van Twente (5%)
Office, share of addresses
0%
▼1 percentage point lower than Hof van Twente (1%)
Multi-family dwellings
8%
▼29 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (37%)
Social housing
17%
▼11 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (28%)
Single-family dwellings
92%
▲29 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Business establishments by sector
Handel en horeca is the largest sector, with 10 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij0
Nijverheid en energie5
Handel en horeca10
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie5
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed0
Zakelijke dienstverlening10
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg10
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten10
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
16% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 22% in the municipality of Hof van Twente (2025).
Petrol83.9%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)16.1%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 12% to 16% between 2021 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
16%▼ 6 percentage points below Hof van Twente (22%)
+4 pp since 2021
Hof van Twente +4 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 315 passenger cars and 40 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars315
Motorcycles40
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
94% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is retail (2%).
Residential94.3%
Retail1.7%
Office0.3%
Assembly1.7%
Industrial0.3%
Other3%
Explanation
Based on 300 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
4,932 residents per km²: 9.2 times as densely populated as the Dutch average.
This areaThe Netherlands
Residents per km²4,932
NL 539▲ +815% vs NL
Multi-family dwellings8%
NL 37%▼ −78% vs NL
Social housing17%
NL 28%▼ −39% vs NL
Single-family dwellings92%
NL 63%▲ +46% vs NL
Average WOZ value€289,000
NL €398,000▼ −27% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026