The average WOZ value in De Belt is €371,000, 5% higher than in Hardenberg (€352,000). Between 2024 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 3%, against a rise of 7% in Hardenberg. 81% of the homes are owner-occupied, 11 percentage points more than in Hardenberg (70%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€371,000
▲5% higher than Hardenberg (€352,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2024
+3%
▼lower than Hardenberg (+7%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
81%
▲11 percentage points higher than Hardenberg (70%)
Social housing
0%
▼21 percentage points lower than Hardenberg (21%)
Private rent
19%
▲11 percentage points higher than Hardenberg (8%)
Single-family dwellings
94%
▲9 percentage points higher than Hardenberg (85%)
Built 1975–1991
6%
▼16 percentage points lower than Hardenberg (22%)
Built before 1945
23%
▲10 percentage points higher than Hardenberg (13%)
Built 1992–2005
6%
▼9 percentage points lower than Hardenberg (15%)
Average WOZ value
€371,000
▲5% higher than Hardenberg (€352,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2024
+3%
▼lower than Hardenberg (+7%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
81%
▲11 percentage points higher than Hardenberg (70%)
Social housing
0%
▼21 percentage points lower than Hardenberg (21%)
Private rent
19%
▲11 percentage points higher than Hardenberg (8%)
Single-family dwellings
94%
▲9 percentage points higher than Hardenberg (85%)
Built 1975–1991
6%
▼16 percentage points lower than Hardenberg (22%)
Built before 1945
23%
▲10 percentage points higher than Hardenberg (13%)
Built 1992–2005
6%
▼9 percentage points lower than Hardenberg (15%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 3% between 2024 and 2025, to €371,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€371,000▲ 5% above Hardenberg
+3% since 2024
Hardenberg +7%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€343 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€343/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
164 m² · measured buurt average
WOZ €371,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€119NL median
Water board levy€42–
Sewage levy€29€22
Property tax (OZB)€26€33
Waste levy€22€27
Costs to set aside€224
Maintenance reserve€209–
Buildings insurance€15–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Hardenberg's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 98th of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 164 m² (measured average in this buurt) with the average WOZ value here, €371,000.
Levies: Hardenberg's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
De Belt has the 2nd-lowest WOZ value of the 4 buurten in Slagharen.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €371,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
De Belt
371,000
31
–
Slagharen Kern
300,000
1,144
–
Verspreide huizen Slagharen-Oost
446,000
57
–
Verspreide huizen Slagharen-West
473,000
156
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 81% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied81%
Private rent19%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
94% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes94%
Multi-family homes6%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
39% of dwellings were built between 1965 and 1974, against 15% in the municipality of Hardenberg.
Before 194522.6%
1945-196419.4%
1965-197438.7%
1975-19916.5%
1992-20056.5%
2006-20153.2%
2016 and later3.2%
Explanation
Based on 31 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
Too few residents for a rate per resident: these are counts.
De Belt has too few residents for a reliable rate per 1,000 residents (under 200), so counts are shown instead of a comparison. In 2025, 0 crimes were registered, against 0 in 2021. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Registered crimes, 2025
0
=about the same as 0 in 2021
Home burglary
0
2023–2025
Registered crimes, 2025
0
=about the same as 0 in 2021
Home burglary
0
2023–2025
Registered crime per year
0 crimes were registered in De Belt in 2025 (0 in 2021).
Registered crimes, 2025
0
same as 0 in 2021
Explanation
Too few residents for a reliable per-1,000 figure (threshold 200) — registered crime, not all crime — CBS/Politie 47018NED.
Agricultural land is the largest land use in De Belt, covering 81% of the area, against 80% in Hardenberg.
Key figures
Green (parks, sport, nature)
0%
▼9 percentage points lower than Hardenberg (9%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
0%
▼7 percentage points lower than Hardenberg (7%)
Built-up, share of the area
12%
▲6 percentage points higher than Hardenberg (6%)
Traffic, share of the area
6%
▲3 percentage points higher than Hardenberg (3%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
0%
▼9 percentage points lower than Hardenberg (9%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
0%
▼7 percentage points lower than Hardenberg (7%)
Built-up, share of the area
12%
▲6 percentage points higher than Hardenberg (6%)
Traffic, share of the area
6%
▲3 percentage points higher than Hardenberg (3%)
Land use
0% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 9% in the municipality of Hardenberg.
Traffic6.2%
Built-up12.5%
Agriculture81.2%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
Distance to amenities
A daycare lies here at an average road distance of 300 m.
Distance
Value
Large supermarket
2,000 m
–
GP practice
1,600 m
–
Primary school
1,900 m
–
Daycare
300 m
–
Large supermarkets
–
0
GP practices
–
0
Daycares
–
1
Explanation
Average road distance from every address in this buurt to the nearest amenity, and the average count within 1 km — a buurt average, not a distance from one address.
Source: CBS proximity statistics 2025
04 · Residents
The population is growing faster than the Hardenberg average.
De Belt has 85 inhabitants (2026), or 578 per km² (2.8 times as high as in Hardenberg). In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Hardenberg was 85%, 7 percentage points above the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, CDA had the highest share there: 20% of the vote, against 12% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2024
+6%
▲higher than Hardenberg (+2%)
Turnout, municipality of Hardenberg
85%
▲7 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+0%
=about the same as Hardenberg (+1%)
Aged 45 to 65
38%
▲11 percentage points higher than Hardenberg (27%)
Never married
50%
▲3 percentage points higher than Hardenberg (47%)
Dutch origin
94%
▲4 percentage points higher than Hardenberg (90%)
CDA, share of the vote
20%
▲8 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (12%)
Population growth since 2024
+6%
▲higher than Hardenberg (+2%)
Turnout, municipality of Hardenberg
85%
▲7 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+0%
=about the same as Hardenberg (+1%)
Aged 45 to 65
38%
▲11 percentage points higher than Hardenberg (27%)
Never married
50%
▲3 percentage points higher than Hardenberg (47%)
Dutch origin
94%
▲4 percentage points higher than Hardenberg (90%)
CDA, share of the vote
20%
▲8 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (12%)
Population per year
The population grew 6% between 2024 and 2026, to 85.
Residents, 2026
85
+6% since 2024
Hardenberg +2%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 578 residents per km², this buurt is 2.8 times as densely populated as the municipality of Hardenberg.
Residents per km²578
Dwellings per km²221.4
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, almost no children were born; 62.5 died per 1,000.
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
38% of residents are between 45 and 65.
0 to 1510
15 to 2515
25 to 4515
45 to 6530
65 to 805
80 and over5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
50% of residents are never married.
Never married40
Married35
Widowed5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
94% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands80
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Hardenberg; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 85% of eligible voters in Hardenberg voted. The largest party was CDA with 20% of the valid votes.
Municipality of HardenbergThe Netherlands
D66
8.5%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
19.1%
16.7%
VVD
12.2%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
5.1%
12.8%
CDA
19.5%
11.8%
JA21
6.9%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
6.9%
4.5%
BBB
7.6%
2.6%
Other
14.2%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
22% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 1 percentage point less than in Hardenberg (23%).
Key figures
Cars not on petrol (2025)
22%
▼1 percentage point lower than Hardenberg (23%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2024
0 pp
=about the same as Hardenberg (+1 pp)
Assembly, share of addresses
6%
▲5 percentage points higher than Hardenberg (1%)
Retail, share of addresses
6%
▲4 percentage points higher than Hardenberg (2%)
Industrial, share of addresses
6%
▲2 percentage points higher than Hardenberg (4%)
Single-family dwellings
94%
▲31 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Owner-occupied dwellings
81%
▲24 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (57%)
Private rent
19%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (14%)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
22%
▼1 percentage point lower than Hardenberg (23%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2024
0 pp
=about the same as Hardenberg (+1 pp)
Assembly, share of addresses
6%
▲5 percentage points higher than Hardenberg (1%)
Retail, share of addresses
6%
▲4 percentage points higher than Hardenberg (2%)
Industrial, share of addresses
6%
▲2 percentage points higher than Hardenberg (4%)
Single-family dwellings
94%
▲31 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Owner-occupied dwellings
81%
▲24 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (57%)
Private rent
19%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (14%)
Passenger cars by fuel type
22% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 23% in the municipality of Hardenberg (2025).
Petrol77.8%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)22.2%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 22% to 22% between 2024 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
22%▼ 1 percentage point below Hardenberg (23%)
+0 pp since 2024
Hardenberg +0 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 45 passenger cars and 5 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars45
Motorcycles5
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
86% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is retail (6%).
Residential86.1%
Retail5.6%
Assembly5.6%
Industrial5.6%
Explanation
Based on 36 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
6% multi-family dwellings, against 37% nationally.
This areaThe Netherlands
Multi-family dwellings6%
NL 37%▼ −84% vs NL
Single-family dwellings94%
NL 63%▲ +49% vs NL
Owner-occupied dwellings81%
NL 57%▲ +42% vs NL
Private rent19%
NL 14%▲ +36% vs NL
Average WOZ value€371,000
NL €398,000▼ −7% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025