We're pulling the figures from public sources. This usually takes a few seconds.
Area and its neighbourhoodsCBS key figures for districts and neighbourhoods
Residents and householdsCBS
Homes and WOZ valueCBS · Kadaster BAG
Housing marketNVM market overview
Municipal leviesMunicipal budgets · CBS
SafetyCBS and Police
HealthRIVM Health Monitor
Land use and amenitiesCBS land use · proximity statistics
Road safety and electionsRijkswaterstaat · Kiesraad
Comparing with the municipality and the countryRankings and comparisons
District · Gulpen-Wittem
Living in Eys
The population is shrinking slower than in Gulpen-Wittem. Homes cost more than the average in the municipality of Gulpen-Wittem, and registered crime per resident is lower.
The average WOZ value in Eys is €383,000, 7% higher than in Gulpen-Wittem (€357,000). Between 2014 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 77%, against a rise of 75% in Gulpen-Wittem. 80% of the homes are owner-occupied, 13 percentage points more than in Gulpen-Wittem (67%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€383,000
▲7% higher than Gulpen-Wittem (€357,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2014
+77%
▲higher than Gulpen-Wittem (+75%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
80%
▲13 percentage points higher than Gulpen-Wittem (67%)
Rented from a housing corporation
14%
▼4 percentage points lower than Gulpen-Wittem (18%)
Rented from another landlord
6%
▼9 percentage points lower than Gulpen-Wittem (15%)
Single-family dwellings
91%
▲13 percentage points higher than Gulpen-Wittem (78%)
Built 1992–2005
6%
▼5 percentage points lower than Gulpen-Wittem (11%)
Built 2006–2015
4%
▼2 percentage points lower than Gulpen-Wittem (6%)
Built 1975–1991
22%
▲1 percentage point higher than Gulpen-Wittem (21%)
Average WOZ value
€383,000
▲7% higher than Gulpen-Wittem (€357,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2014
+77%
▲higher than Gulpen-Wittem (+75%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
80%
▲13 percentage points higher than Gulpen-Wittem (67%)
Rented from a housing corporation
14%
▼4 percentage points lower than Gulpen-Wittem (18%)
Rented from another landlord
6%
▼9 percentage points lower than Gulpen-Wittem (15%)
Single-family dwellings
91%
▲13 percentage points higher than Gulpen-Wittem (78%)
Built 1992–2005
6%
▼5 percentage points lower than Gulpen-Wittem (11%)
Built 2006–2015
4%
▼2 percentage points lower than Gulpen-Wittem (6%)
Built 1975–1991
22%
▲1 percentage point higher than Gulpen-Wittem (21%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 77% between 2014 and 2025, to €383,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€383,000▲ 7% above Gulpen-Wittem
+77% since 2014
Gulpen-Wittem +75%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€366 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€366/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
161 m² · estimated gemeente average
WOZ €383,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€147NL median
Water board levy€43–
Property tax (OZB)€41€34
Sewage levy€34€22
Waste levy€29€27
Costs to set aside€219
Maintenance reserve€205–
Buildings insurance€14–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Gulpen-Wittem's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 313th of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 161 m² (estimated gemeente average) with the average WOZ value here, €383,000.
Levies: Gulpen-Wittem's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Eys has the 3rd-highest WOZ value of the 7 wijken in the municipality of Gulpen-Wittem.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €383,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Eys
383,000
769
–
Gulpen
334,000
2,398
–
Wijlre
332,000
1,206
–
Wittem
354,000
894
–
Mechelen
358,000
864
–
Epen
415,000
508
–
Slenaken
478,000
297
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Who owns the homes
The largest group: owner-occupied, 80% of homes.
Owner-occupied
Eys
80%
Gulpen-Wittem
67%
the Netherlands
57%
Rented from a housing corporation
Eys
14%
Gulpen-Wittem
18%
the Netherlands
28%
Rented from another landlord
Eys
6%
Gulpen-Wittem
15%
the Netherlands
14%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a rounded share of the dwelling stock, so the parts do not always add up to 100.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
What kind of homes
The largest group: single-family houses, 91% of homes.
Single-family houses
Eys
91%
Gulpen-Wittem
78%
the Netherlands
63%
Apartments and other multi-family homes
Eys
9%
Gulpen-Wittem
22%
the Netherlands
37%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a rounded share of the dwelling stock, so the parts do not always add up to 100.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
26% of dwellings were built between 1965 and 1974, against 20% in the municipality of Gulpen-Wittem.
Before 194524.9%
1945-196415.3%
1965-197426.5%
1975-199121.7%
1992-20056.2%
2006-20154.2%
2016 and later1.2%
Explanation
Based on 770 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
Less registered crime per resident than the Gulpen-Wittem average.
In 2025, 14 crimes per 1,000 residents were registered in Eys, 55% lower than in Gulpen-Wittem (31). Since 2021 the registered rate per 1,000 residents fell 52%, against no real change in Gulpen-Wittem. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
14
▼55% lower than Gulpen-Wittem (31)
Change since 2021
-52%
▼lower than Gulpen-Wittem (+0%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
1.3
▼7% lower than Gulpen-Wittem (1.4)
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
14
▼55% lower than Gulpen-Wittem (31)
Change since 2021
-52%
▼lower than Gulpen-Wittem (+0%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
1.3
▼7% lower than Gulpen-Wittem (1.4)
Registered crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
In 2025, Eys registered 14 crimes per 1,000 residents, against 31 in the municipality of Gulpen-Wittem.
Eys14
The municipality of Gulpen-Wittem31
Explanation
Crime is counted where it happens and divided by the number of residents, so places with many visitors — city centres, nightlife, stations — score higher.
The largest category in Eys is 'Violence and threats': 5.0 per 1,000 residents in 2025, against 2.4 in the municipality of Gulpen-Wittem.
EysGulpen-Wittem
Violence and threats5.0
Gulpen-Wittem 2.4▲ +108% vs Gulpen-Wittem
Theft and burglary3.7
Gulpen-Wittem 13.9▼ −73% vs Gulpen-Wittem
Fraud and scams2.5
Gulpen-Wittem 3.6▼ −31% vs Gulpen-Wittem
Vandalism and public order1.9
Gulpen-Wittem 3.1▼ −39% vs Gulpen-Wittem
Traffic1.2
Gulpen-Wittem 6.2▼ −81% vs Gulpen-Wittem
Environmental0.0
Gulpen-Wittem 0.0
Other and withheld0.0
Gulpen-Wittem 1.4▼ −100% vs Gulpen-Wittem
Explanation
Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2024, police in Eys registered 4 traffic accidents, of which 1 with injury and none fatal.
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2024
03 · Living environment
Residents rate their health above the Gulpen-Wittem average; green space is below the Gulpen-Wittem average.
An estimated 73% of adults in Eys rate their own health as good, 3 percentage points more than in Gulpen-Wittem. Fewer adults feel lonely (41% against 44%), fewer report anxiety or depression (40% against 43%) and fewer smoke (11% against 13%), but more meet the physical activity guideline (42% against 40%). Agricultural land is the largest land use in Eys, covering 78% of the area, against 74% in Gulpen-Wittem. Green space such as parks, sports fields, forest and nature covers 14% of the area, 5 percentage points below the 19% in Gulpen-Wittem.
Key figures
Self-rated health (estimated)
73%
▲3 percentage points higher than Gulpen-Wittem (70%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
14%
▼5 percentage points lower than Gulpen-Wittem (19%)
More figures
Anxiety or depression feelings
40%
▼3 percentage points lower than Gulpen-Wittem (43%)
Lonely
41%
▼3 percentage points lower than Gulpen-Wittem (44%)
Meets physical activity guideline
42%
▲2 percentage points higher than Gulpen-Wittem (40%)
Smokes
11%
▼2 percentage points lower than Gulpen-Wittem (13%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
12%
▼4 percentage points lower than Gulpen-Wittem (16%)
Agriculture, share of the area
78%
▲4 percentage points higher than Gulpen-Wittem (74%)
Built-up, share of the area
6%
▲1 percentage point higher than Gulpen-Wittem (5%)
Self-rated health (estimated)
73%
▲3 percentage points higher than Gulpen-Wittem (70%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
14%
▼5 percentage points lower than Gulpen-Wittem (19%)
More figures
Anxiety or depression feelings
40%
▼3 percentage points lower than Gulpen-Wittem (43%)
Lonely
41%
▼3 percentage points lower than Gulpen-Wittem (44%)
Meets physical activity guideline
42%
▲2 percentage points higher than Gulpen-Wittem (40%)
Smokes
11%
▼2 percentage points lower than Gulpen-Wittem (13%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
12%
▼4 percentage points lower than Gulpen-Wittem (16%)
Agriculture, share of the area
78%
▲4 percentage points higher than Gulpen-Wittem (74%)
Built-up, share of the area
6%
▲1 percentage point higher than Gulpen-Wittem (5%)
Health
An estimated 73% of adults rate their own health as good, against 70% in the municipality of Gulpen-Wittem (2024).
This areaThe municipality of Gulpen-Wittem
Good self-rated health
72.8%
70%
Smokes
10.9%
13.2%
Excessive drinking
5.7%
5.6%
Overweight
53.6%
53.5%
Lonely
40.9%
43.7%
Anxiety or depression feelings
39.5%
42.9%
Meets physical activity guideline
42.3%
39.5%
Explanation
An RIVM model estimate (small-area estimation from the 2024 Health Monitor for Adults and Elderly), not a direct tabulation — even a buurt that was not itself surveyed gets an estimate. Figures cover adults aged 18 and over.
Source: RIVM/CBS Gezondheidsmonitor Volwassenen en Ouderen (kleine-gebieden-schatting) 2024
Land use
14% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 19% in the municipality of Gulpen-Wittem.
Traffic1.5%
Built-up5.5%
Other built-up0.1%
Recreation2.7%
Agriculture78.5%
Forest and nature11.6%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
04 · Residents
The population is shrinking slower than the Gulpen-Wittem average.
Eys has 1,605 inhabitants (2026), or 207 per km² (8% higher than in Gulpen-Wittem). Between 2014 and 2026 the population fell 7%, against a fall of 4% in Gulpen-Wittem. In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Gulpen-Wittem was 84%, 6 percentage points above the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) had the highest share there: 21% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2014
-7%
▼lower than Gulpen-Wittem (-4%)
Turnout, municipality of Gulpen-Wittem
84%
▲6 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+2%
=about the same as Gulpen-Wittem (+2%)
Aged 45 to 65
29%
=about the same as Gulpen-Wittem (29%)
Married
51%
▲4 percentage points higher than Gulpen-Wittem (47%)
Dutch origin
85%
▲1 percentage point higher than Gulpen-Wittem (84%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
43%
=about the same as Gulpen-Wittem (43%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
21%
▲4 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2014
-7%
▼lower than Gulpen-Wittem (-4%)
Turnout, municipality of Gulpen-Wittem
84%
▲6 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+2%
=about the same as Gulpen-Wittem (+2%)
Aged 45 to 65
29%
=about the same as Gulpen-Wittem (29%)
Married
51%
▲4 percentage points higher than Gulpen-Wittem (47%)
Dutch origin
85%
▲1 percentage point higher than Gulpen-Wittem (84%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
43%
=about the same as Gulpen-Wittem (43%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
21%
▲4 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population shrank 7% between 2014 and 2026, to 1,605.
Residents, 2026
1,605
-7% since 2014
Gulpen-Wittem -4%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 207 residents per km², this wijk is 8% more densely populated than the municipality of Gulpen-Wittem.
Residents per km²207
Dwellings per km²99.4
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, 3.1 children were born per 1,000 residents; 6.2 died per 1,000.
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
29% of residents are between 45 and 65.
0 to 15195
15 to 25125
25 to 45295
45 to 65465
65 to 80395
80 and over125
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
51% of residents are married.
Never married570
Married820
Divorced115
Widowed95
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
85% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands1,365
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)175
Outside Europe60
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Education level of residents aged 15 to 75
43% of residents have a havo, vwo or mbo2-4 level education.
Primary, vmbo, mbo1220
Havo, vwo, mbo2-4520
Higher professional, university460
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2024
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Gulpen-Wittem; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 84% of eligible voters in Gulpen-Wittem voted. The largest party was PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) with 21% of the valid votes.
Municipality of Gulpen-WittemThe Netherlands
D66
12.6%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
21.4%
16.7%
VVD
13.8%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
12%
12.8%
CDA
15.3%
11.8%
JA21
5.7%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
4.8%
4.5%
BBB
6.9%
2.6%
Other
7.4%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
Eys has an average of 1.4 cars per household, 8% higher than in Gulpen-Wittem (1.3). 17% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 3 percentage points less than in Gulpen-Wittem (20%).
Key figures
Business services, share of businesses
28%
▲6 percentage points higher than Gulpen-Wittem (22%)
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
18%
▼4 percentage points lower than Gulpen-Wittem (22%)
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
5%
▼4 percentage points lower than Gulpen-Wittem (9%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.4
▲8% higher than Gulpen-Wittem (1.3)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
17%
▼3 percentage points lower than Gulpen-Wittem (20%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2014
+5 pp
▼lower than Gulpen-Wittem (+7 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
95%
▲9 percentage points higher than Gulpen-Wittem (86%)
Lodging, share of addresses
1%
▼7 percentage points lower than Gulpen-Wittem (8%)
Healthcare, share of addresses
0%
▼1 percentage point lower than Gulpen-Wittem (1%)
Residents per km²
207
▼62% lower than the Netherlands (539)
Rented from another landlord
6%
▼8 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Rented from a housing corporation
14%
▼14 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (28%)
Business services, share of businesses
28%
▲6 percentage points higher than Gulpen-Wittem (22%)
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
18%
▼4 percentage points lower than Gulpen-Wittem (22%)
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
5%
▼4 percentage points lower than Gulpen-Wittem (9%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.4
▲8% higher than Gulpen-Wittem (1.3)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
17%
▼3 percentage points lower than Gulpen-Wittem (20%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2014
+5 pp
▼lower than Gulpen-Wittem (+7 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
95%
▲9 percentage points higher than Gulpen-Wittem (86%)
Lodging, share of addresses
1%
▼7 percentage points lower than Gulpen-Wittem (8%)
Healthcare, share of addresses
0%
▼1 percentage point lower than Gulpen-Wittem (1%)
Residents per km²
207
▼62% lower than the Netherlands (539)
Rented from another landlord
6%
▼8 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Rented from a housing corporation
14%
▼14 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (28%)
Business establishments by sector
Zakelijke dienstverlening is the largest sector, with 55 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij10
Nijverheid en energie25
Handel en horeca35
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie5
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed10
Zakelijke dienstverlening55
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg35
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten20
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
17% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 20% in the municipality of Gulpen-Wittem (2025).
Petrol82.5%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)17.5%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 12% to 17% between 2014 and 2025.
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 1,060 passenger cars and 75 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars1,060
Motorcycles75
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
95% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is industrial (2%).
Residential95.2%
Retail1.4%
Office0.5%
Assembly1.6%
Healthcare0.1%
Industrial1.9%
Lodging1.4%
Education0.1%
Other1.7%
Explanation
Based on 809 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
9% multi-family dwellings, against 37% nationally.
This areaThe Netherlands
Multi-family dwellings9%
NL 37%▼ −76% vs NL
Residents per km²207
NL 539▼ −62% vs NL
Rented from another landlord6%
NL 14%▼ −57% vs NL
Rented from a housing corporation14%
NL 28%▼ −50% vs NL
Single-family dwellings91%
NL 63%▲ +44% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025