We're pulling the figures from public sources. This usually takes a few seconds.
Area and its neighbourhoodsCBS key figures for districts and neighbourhoods
Residents and householdsCBS
Homes and WOZ valueCBS · Kadaster BAG
Housing marketNVM market overview
Municipal leviesMunicipal budgets · CBS
SafetyCBS and Police
HealthRIVM Health Monitor
Land use and amenitiesCBS land use · proximity statistics
Road safety and electionsRijkswaterstaat · Kiesraad
Comparing with the municipality and the countryRankings and comparisons
District · Eijsden-Margraten
Living in Sint Geertruid
The population is growing slower than in Eijsden-Margraten. Homes cost more than the average in the municipality of Eijsden-Margraten, and registered crime per resident is lower.
Homes cost more than the Eijsden-Margraten average.
The average WOZ value in Sint Geertruid is €425,000, 4% higher than in Eijsden-Margraten (€408,000). Between 2014 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 70%, against a rise of 72% in Eijsden-Margraten. 81% of the homes are owner-occupied, 5 percentage points more than in Eijsden-Margraten (76%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€425,000
▲4% higher than Eijsden-Margraten (€408,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2014
+70%
▼lower than Eijsden-Margraten (+72%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
81%
▲5 percentage points higher than Eijsden-Margraten (76%)
Social housing
7%
▼3 percentage points lower than Eijsden-Margraten (10%)
Private rent
12%
▼1 percentage point lower than Eijsden-Margraten (13%)
Single-family dwellings
85%
▲1 percentage point higher than Eijsden-Margraten (84%)
Built 1992–2005
5%
▼5 percentage points lower than Eijsden-Margraten (10%)
Built 1965–1974
18%
▼3 percentage points lower than Eijsden-Margraten (21%)
Built 1975–1991
24%
▲2 percentage points higher than Eijsden-Margraten (22%)
Average WOZ value
€425,000
▲4% higher than Eijsden-Margraten (€408,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2014
+70%
▼lower than Eijsden-Margraten (+72%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
81%
▲5 percentage points higher than Eijsden-Margraten (76%)
Social housing
7%
▼3 percentage points lower than Eijsden-Margraten (10%)
Private rent
12%
▼1 percentage point lower than Eijsden-Margraten (13%)
Single-family dwellings
85%
▲1 percentage point higher than Eijsden-Margraten (84%)
Built 1992–2005
5%
▼5 percentage points lower than Eijsden-Margraten (10%)
Built 1965–1974
18%
▼3 percentage points lower than Eijsden-Margraten (21%)
Built 1975–1991
24%
▲2 percentage points higher than Eijsden-Margraten (22%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 70% between 2014 and 2025, to €425,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€425,000▲ 4% above Eijsden-Margraten
+70% since 2014
Eijsden-Margraten +72%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€376 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€376/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
170 m² · estimated gemeente average
WOZ €425,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€144NL median
Water board levy€44–
Property tax (OZB)€42€37
Waste levy€29€27
Sewage levy€29€22
Costs to set aside€232
Maintenance reserve€217–
Buildings insurance€15–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Eijsden-Margraten's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 274th of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 170 m² (estimated gemeente average) with the average WOZ value here, €425,000.
Levies: Eijsden-Margraten's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Sint Geertruid has the 2nd-highest WOZ value of the 6 wijken in the municipality of Eijsden-Margraten.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €425,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Sint Geertruid
425,000
876
–
Eijsden
399,000
4,205
–
Gronsveld
386,000
1,400
–
Margraten
393,000
1,933
–
Cadier en Keer
444,000
1,918
–
Mheer - Noorbeek
414,000
1,395
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 81% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied81%
Social housing7%
Private rent12%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
85% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes85%
Multi-family homes15%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
29% of dwellings were built before 1945, against 20% in the municipality of Eijsden-Margraten.
Before 194528.9%
1945-196413.1%
1965-197417.9%
1975-199124.1%
1992-20055.1%
2006-20155.7%
2016 and later5.2%
Explanation
Based on 883 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
Less registered crime per resident than the Eijsden-Margraten average.
In 2025, 20 crimes per 1,000 residents were registered in Sint Geertruid, 13% lower than in Eijsden-Margraten (23). Since 2021 the registered rate per 1,000 residents fell 23%, against a fall of 5% in Eijsden-Margraten. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
20
▼13% lower than Eijsden-Margraten (23)
Change since 2021
-23%
▼lower than Eijsden-Margraten (-5%)
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
20
▼13% lower than Eijsden-Margraten (23)
Change since 2021
-23%
▼lower than Eijsden-Margraten (-5%)
Registered crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
In 2025, Sint Geertruid registered 20 crimes per 1,000 residents, against 23 in the municipality of Eijsden-Margraten.
Sint Geertruid20
The municipality of Eijsden-Margraten23
Explanation
Crime is counted where it happens and divided by the number of residents, so places with many visitors — city centres, nightlife, stations — score higher.
The largest category in Sint Geertruid is 'Theft and burglary': 8.0 per 1,000 residents in 2025, against 8.4 in the municipality of Eijsden-Margraten.
Sint GeertruidEijsden-Margraten
Theft and burglary8.0
Eijsden-Margraten 8.4≈ Eijsden-Margraten
Vandalism and public order3.5
Eijsden-Margraten 1.9▲ +84% vs Eijsden-Margraten
Fraud and scams3.5
Eijsden-Margraten 3.4≈ Eijsden-Margraten
Traffic2.0
Eijsden-Margraten 6.6▼ −70% vs Eijsden-Margraten
Other and withheld1.5
Eijsden-Margraten 0.9▲ +67% vs Eijsden-Margraten
Violence and threats1.0
Eijsden-Margraten 1.8▼ −44% vs Eijsden-Margraten
Environmental0.0
Eijsden-Margraten 0.1≈ Eijsden-Margraten
Explanation
Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2024, police in Sint Geertruid registered 8 traffic accidents, of which 2 with injury and none fatal.
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2024
03 · Living environment
Residents rate their health above the Eijsden-Margraten average; green space is above the Eijsden-Margraten average.
An estimated 74% of adults in Sint Geertruid rate their own health as good, 1 percentage point more than in Eijsden-Margraten. Fewer adults are overweight (51% against 53%), fewer feel lonely (40% against 41%) and fewer report anxiety or depression (41% against 42%), but more meet the physical activity guideline (46% against 45%). Agricultural land is the largest land use in Sint Geertruid, covering 77% of the area, against 74% in Eijsden-Margraten. Green space such as parks, sports fields, forest and nature covers 19% of the area, 7 percentage points above the 12% in Eijsden-Margraten.
Key figures
Self-rated health (estimated)
74%
▲1 percentage point higher than Eijsden-Margraten (73%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
19%
▲7 percentage points higher than Eijsden-Margraten (12%)
More figures
Overweight
51%
▼2 percentage points lower than Eijsden-Margraten (53%)
Meets physical activity guideline
46%
▲1 percentage point higher than Eijsden-Margraten (45%)
Lonely
40%
▼1 percentage point lower than Eijsden-Margraten (41%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
41%
▼1 percentage point lower than Eijsden-Margraten (42%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
18%
▲9 percentage points higher than Eijsden-Margraten (9%)
Built-up, share of the area
3%
▼6 percentage points lower than Eijsden-Margraten (9%)
Agriculture, share of the area
77%
▲3 percentage points higher than Eijsden-Margraten (74%)
Self-rated health (estimated)
74%
▲1 percentage point higher than Eijsden-Margraten (73%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
19%
▲7 percentage points higher than Eijsden-Margraten (12%)
More figures
Overweight
51%
▼2 percentage points lower than Eijsden-Margraten (53%)
Meets physical activity guideline
46%
▲1 percentage point higher than Eijsden-Margraten (45%)
Lonely
40%
▼1 percentage point lower than Eijsden-Margraten (41%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
41%
▼1 percentage point lower than Eijsden-Margraten (42%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
18%
▲9 percentage points higher than Eijsden-Margraten (9%)
Built-up, share of the area
3%
▼6 percentage points lower than Eijsden-Margraten (9%)
Agriculture, share of the area
77%
▲3 percentage points higher than Eijsden-Margraten (74%)
Health
An estimated 74% of adults rate their own health as good, against 73% in the municipality of Eijsden-Margraten (2024).
This areaThe municipality of Eijsden-Margraten
Good self-rated health
74.1%
73.2%
Smokes
11.7%
12.2%
Excessive drinking
6%
5.8%
Overweight
50.7%
53.2%
Lonely
40.3%
41.2%
Anxiety or depression feelings
41.2%
42%
Meets physical activity guideline
46.1%
44.8%
Explanation
An RIVM model estimate (small-area estimation from the 2024 Health Monitor for Adults and Elderly), not a direct tabulation — even a buurt that was not itself surveyed gets an estimate. Figures cover adults aged 18 and over.
Source: RIVM/CBS Gezondheidsmonitor Volwassenen en Ouderen (kleine-gebieden-schatting) 2024
Land use
19% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 12% in the municipality of Eijsden-Margraten.
Traffic1.2%
Built-up2.8%
Other built-up0.1%
Recreation0.8%
Agriculture77.4%
Forest and nature17.8%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
04 · Residents
The population is growing slower than the Eijsden-Margraten average.
Sint Geertruid has 1,970 inhabitants (2026), or 127 per km² (63% lower than in Eijsden-Margraten). Between 2014 and 2026 the population rose 1%, against a rise of 5% in Eijsden-Margraten. In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Eijsden-Margraten was 83%, 5 percentage points above the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) had the highest share there: 18% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2014
+1%
▼lower than Eijsden-Margraten (+5%)
Turnout, municipality of Eijsden-Margraten
83%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+8%
▼lower than Eijsden-Margraten (+9%)
Aged 45 to 65
29%
▲2 percentage points higher than Eijsden-Margraten (27%)
Married
48%
▲2 percentage points higher than Eijsden-Margraten (46%)
Dutch origin
87%
▲4 percentage points higher than Eijsden-Margraten (83%)
Higher education (hbo, wo)
40%
▲1 percentage point higher than Eijsden-Margraten (39%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
18%
▲1 percentage point higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2014
+1%
▼lower than Eijsden-Margraten (+5%)
Turnout, municipality of Eijsden-Margraten
83%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+8%
▼lower than Eijsden-Margraten (+9%)
Aged 45 to 65
29%
▲2 percentage points higher than Eijsden-Margraten (27%)
Married
48%
▲2 percentage points higher than Eijsden-Margraten (46%)
Dutch origin
87%
▲4 percentage points higher than Eijsden-Margraten (83%)
Higher education (hbo, wo)
40%
▲1 percentage point higher than Eijsden-Margraten (39%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
18%
▲1 percentage point higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population held steady between 2014 and 2026, at 1,970.
Residents, 2026
1,970
+1% since 2014
Eijsden-Margraten +5%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 127 residents per km², this wijk is 63% less densely populated than the municipality of Eijsden-Margraten.
Residents per km²127
Dwellings per km²56.3
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, 7.5 children were born per 1,000 residents; 7.5 died per 1,000.
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
29% of residents are between 45 and 65.
0 to 15295
15 to 25185
25 to 45430
45 to 65565
65 to 80395
80 and over90
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
48% of residents are married.
Never married825
Married950
Divorced110
Widowed90
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
87% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands1,710
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)175
Outside Europe90
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Education level of residents aged 15 to 75
40% of residents have a higher professional (hbo) or university (wo) education.
Primary, vmbo, mbo1350
Havo, vwo, mbo2-4540
Higher professional, university600
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2024
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Eijsden-Margraten; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 83% of eligible voters in Eijsden-Margraten voted. The largest party was PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) with 18% of the valid votes.
Municipality of Eijsden-MargratenThe Netherlands
D66
16.4%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
18.3%
16.7%
VVD
16.5%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
11.7%
12.8%
CDA
17.6%
11.8%
JA21
6.1%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
3.3%
4.5%
BBB
2.8%
2.6%
Other
7.2%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
Sint Geertruid has an average of 1.5 cars per household, 15% higher than in Eijsden-Margraten (1.3). 18% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 2 percentage points less than in Eijsden-Margraten (20%).
Key figures
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
14%
▲8 percentage points higher than Eijsden-Margraten (6%)
Business services, share of businesses
19%
▼5 percentage points lower than Eijsden-Margraten (24%)
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
12%
▼5 percentage points lower than Eijsden-Margraten (17%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.5
▲15% higher than Eijsden-Margraten (1.3)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
18%
▼2 percentage points lower than Eijsden-Margraten (20%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2014
+6 pp
▼lower than Eijsden-Margraten (+8 pp)
Lodging, share of addresses
6%
▲2 percentage points higher than Eijsden-Margraten (4%)
Healthcare, share of addresses
0%
▼2 percentage points lower than Eijsden-Margraten (2%)
Retail, share of addresses
1%
▼1 percentage point lower than Eijsden-Margraten (2%)
Social housing
7%
▼21 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (28%)
Multi-family dwellings
15%
▼22 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (37%)
Owner-occupied dwellings
81%
▲24 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (57%)
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
14%
▲8 percentage points higher than Eijsden-Margraten (6%)
Business services, share of businesses
19%
▼5 percentage points lower than Eijsden-Margraten (24%)
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
12%
▼5 percentage points lower than Eijsden-Margraten (17%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.5
▲15% higher than Eijsden-Margraten (1.3)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
18%
▼2 percentage points lower than Eijsden-Margraten (20%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2014
+6 pp
▼lower than Eijsden-Margraten (+8 pp)
Lodging, share of addresses
6%
▲2 percentage points higher than Eijsden-Margraten (4%)
Healthcare, share of addresses
0%
▼2 percentage points lower than Eijsden-Margraten (2%)
Retail, share of addresses
1%
▼1 percentage point lower than Eijsden-Margraten (2%)
Social housing
7%
▼21 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (28%)
Multi-family dwellings
15%
▼22 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (37%)
Owner-occupied dwellings
81%
▲24 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (57%)
Business establishments by sector
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg is the largest sector, with 60 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij40
Nijverheid en energie40
Handel en horeca35
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie5
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed5
Zakelijke dienstverlening55
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg60
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten45
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
18% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 20% in the municipality of Eijsden-Margraten (2025).
Petrol81.8%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)18.2%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 12% to 18% between 2014 and 2025.
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 1,265 passenger cars and 140 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars1,265
Motorcycles140
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
88% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is lodging (6%).
Residential88.1%
Retail1%
Office0.7%
Assembly2%
Healthcare0.4%
Industrial3.7%
Lodging6.2%
Education0.3%
Sports0.3%
Other2.4%
Explanation
Based on 1,002 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
127 residents per km²: 76% less densely populated than the Dutch average.
This areaThe Netherlands
Residents per km²127
NL 539▼ −76% vs NL
Social housing7%
NL 28%▼ −75% vs NL
Multi-family dwellings15%
NL 37%▼ −59% vs NL
Owner-occupied dwellings81%
NL 57%▲ +42% vs NL
Single-family dwellings85%
NL 63%▲ +35% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026