Homes cost more than the Eijsden-Margraten average.
The average WOZ value in Gasthuis-Wolfshuis is €455,000, 12% higher than in Eijsden-Margraten (€408,000). Between 2021 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 23%, against a rise of 36% in Eijsden-Margraten. 44% of the homes are owner-occupied, 32 percentage points less than in Eijsden-Margraten (76%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€455,000
▲12% higher than Eijsden-Margraten (€408,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+23%
▼lower than Eijsden-Margraten (+36%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
44%
▼32 percentage points lower than Eijsden-Margraten (76%)
Social housing
0%
▼10 percentage points lower than Eijsden-Margraten (10%)
Private rent
56%
▲43 percentage points higher than Eijsden-Margraten (13%)
Single-family dwellings
50%
▼34 percentage points lower than Eijsden-Margraten (84%)
Built 1965–1974
2%
▼19 percentage points lower than Eijsden-Margraten (21%)
Built 1975–1991
4%
▼18 percentage points lower than Eijsden-Margraten (22%)
Built 1992–2005
2%
▼8 percentage points lower than Eijsden-Margraten (10%)
Average WOZ value
€455,000
▲12% higher than Eijsden-Margraten (€408,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+23%
▼lower than Eijsden-Margraten (+36%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
44%
▼32 percentage points lower than Eijsden-Margraten (76%)
Social housing
0%
▼10 percentage points lower than Eijsden-Margraten (10%)
Private rent
56%
▲43 percentage points higher than Eijsden-Margraten (13%)
Single-family dwellings
50%
▼34 percentage points lower than Eijsden-Margraten (84%)
Built 1965–1974
2%
▼19 percentage points lower than Eijsden-Margraten (21%)
Built 1975–1991
4%
▼18 percentage points lower than Eijsden-Margraten (22%)
Built 1992–2005
2%
▼8 percentage points lower than Eijsden-Margraten (10%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 23% between 2021 and 2025, to €455,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€455,000▲ 12% above Eijsden-Margraten
+23% since 2021
Eijsden-Margraten +36%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€437 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€437/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
213 m² · measured buurt average
WOZ €455,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€147NL median
Water board levy€45–
Property tax (OZB)€44€40
Waste levy€29€27
Sewage levy€29€22
Costs to set aside€290
Maintenance reserve€271–
Buildings insurance€19–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Eijsden-Margraten's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 273rd of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 213 m² (measured average in this buurt) with the average WOZ value here, €455,000.
Levies: Eijsden-Margraten's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Gasthuis-Wolfshuis has the 3rd-highest WOZ value of the 5 buurten in Margraten.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €455,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Gasthuis-Wolfshuis
455,000
52
–
Margraten
378,000
1,591
–
Termaar
532,000
36
–
Groot- en Klein-Welsden
493,000
92
–
Scheulder
430,000
146
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is private rent, at 56% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied44%
Private rent56%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
50% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes50%
Multi-family homes50%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
81% of dwellings were built before 1945, against 20% in the municipality of Eijsden-Margraten.
Before 194581.1%
1945-19649.4%
1965-19741.9%
1975-19913.8%
1992-20051.9%
2006-20151.9%
Explanation
Based on 53 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
Too few residents for a rate per resident: these are counts.
Gasthuis-Wolfshuis has too few residents for a reliable rate per 1,000 residents (under 200), so counts are shown instead of a comparison. In 2025, 19 crimes were registered, against 20 in 2021. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Registered crimes, 2025
19
▼down from 20 in 2021
Home burglary
0
2023–2025
Registered crimes, 2025
19
▼down from 20 in 2021
Home burglary
0
2023–2025
Registered crime per year
19 crimes were registered in Gasthuis-Wolfshuis in 2025 (20 in 2021).
Registered crimes, 2025
19
down from 20 in 2021
Explanation
Too few residents for a reliable per-1,000 figure (threshold 200) — registered crime, not all crime — CBS/Politie 47018NED.
The largest category in Gasthuis-Wolfshuis is 'Theft and burglary': 18 in 2025.
Theft and burglary18
Traffic1
Vandalism and public order0
Violence and threats0
Fraud and scams0
Environmental0
Other and withheld0
Explanation
Too few residents for a reliable per-1,000 figure (threshold 200). Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2023, police in Gasthuis-Wolfshuis registered 1 traffic accidents, of which 0 with injury and none fatal.
2021
2023
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2023
03 · Living environment
Green space is below the Eijsden-Margraten average.
Agricultural land is the largest land use in Gasthuis-Wolfshuis, covering 89% of the area, against 74% in Eijsden-Margraten. Green space such as parks, sports fields, forest and nature covers 8% of the area, 4 percentage points below the 12% in Eijsden-Margraten.
Key figures
Green (parks, sport, nature)
8%
▼4 percentage points lower than Eijsden-Margraten (12%)
Agriculture, share of the area
89%
▲15 percentage points higher than Eijsden-Margraten (74%)
Built-up, share of the area
0%
▼9 percentage points lower than Eijsden-Margraten (9%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
4%
▼5 percentage points lower than Eijsden-Margraten (9%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
8%
▼4 percentage points lower than Eijsden-Margraten (12%)
Agriculture, share of the area
89%
▲15 percentage points higher than Eijsden-Margraten (74%)
Built-up, share of the area
0%
▼9 percentage points lower than Eijsden-Margraten (9%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
4%
▼5 percentage points lower than Eijsden-Margraten (9%)
Land use
8% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 12% in the municipality of Eijsden-Margraten.
Traffic1.2%
Other built-up1.8%
Recreation4.3%
Agriculture88.7%
Forest and nature4%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
Distance to amenities
A primary school lies here at an average road distance of 2600 m.
Distance
Value
Large supermarket
3,000 m
–
GP practice
3,000 m
–
Primary school
2,600 m
–
Daycare
2,600 m
–
Large supermarkets
–
0
GP practices
–
0
Daycares
–
0
Explanation
Average road distance from every address in this buurt to the nearest amenity, and the average count within 1 km — a buurt average, not a distance from one address.
Source: CBS proximity statistics 2025
04 · Residents
The population is shrinking, while it grows in Eijsden-Margraten.
Gasthuis-Wolfshuis has 105 inhabitants (2026), or 33 per km² (90% lower than in Eijsden-Margraten). In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Eijsden-Margraten was 83%, 5 percentage points above the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) had the highest share there: 18% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2021
-9%
▼lower than Eijsden-Margraten (+2%)
Turnout, municipality of Eijsden-Margraten
83%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+0%
▼lower than Eijsden-Margraten (+3%)
Aged 45 to 65
38%
▲11 percentage points higher than Eijsden-Margraten (27%)
Never married
45%
▲4 percentage points higher than Eijsden-Margraten (41%)
Dutch origin
75%
▼8 percentage points lower than Eijsden-Margraten (83%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
18%
▲1 percentage point higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2021
-9%
▼lower than Eijsden-Margraten (+2%)
Turnout, municipality of Eijsden-Margraten
83%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+0%
▼lower than Eijsden-Margraten (+3%)
Aged 45 to 65
38%
▲11 percentage points higher than Eijsden-Margraten (27%)
Never married
45%
▲4 percentage points higher than Eijsden-Margraten (41%)
Dutch origin
75%
▼8 percentage points lower than Eijsden-Margraten (83%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
18%
▲1 percentage point higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population shrank 9% between 2021 and 2026, to 105.
Residents, 2026
105
-9% since 2021
Eijsden-Margraten +2%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 33 residents per km², this buurt is 90% less densely populated than the municipality of Eijsden-Margraten.
Residents per km²33
Dwellings per km²16
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, almost no children were born; almost no one died.
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
38% of residents are between 45 and 65.
0 to 1510
15 to 255
25 to 4525
45 to 6540
65 to 8025
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
45% of residents are never married.
Never married45
Married45
Divorced10
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
75% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands75
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)15
Outside Europe10
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Eijsden-Margraten; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 83% of eligible voters in Eijsden-Margraten voted. The largest party was PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) with 18% of the valid votes.
Municipality of Eijsden-MargratenThe Netherlands
D66
16.4%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
18.3%
16.7%
VVD
16.5%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
11.7%
12.8%
CDA
17.6%
11.8%
JA21
6.1%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
3.3%
4.5%
BBB
2.8%
2.6%
Other
7.2%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
Gasthuis-Wolfshuis has an average of 1.0 cars per household, 23% lower than in Eijsden-Margraten (1.3). 25% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 5 percentage points more than in Eijsden-Margraten (20%).
Key figures
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
40%
▲34 percentage points higher than Eijsden-Margraten (6%)
Industry and energy, share of businesses
0%
▼13 percentage points lower than Eijsden-Margraten (13%)
Culture, recreation and other services, share of businesses
0%
▼12 percentage points lower than Eijsden-Margraten (12%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.0
▼23% lower than Eijsden-Margraten (1.3)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
25%
▲5 percentage points higher than Eijsden-Margraten (20%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+11 pp
▲higher than Eijsden-Margraten (+7 pp)
Lodging, share of addresses
71%
▲67 percentage points higher than Eijsden-Margraten (4%)
Residential, share of addresses
25%
▼64 percentage points lower than Eijsden-Margraten (89%)
Healthcare, share of addresses
0%
▼2 percentage points lower than Eijsden-Margraten (2%)
Private rent
56%
▲42 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (14%)
Multi-family dwellings
50%
▲13 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (37%)
Owner-occupied dwellings
44%
▼13 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (57%)
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
40%
▲34 percentage points higher than Eijsden-Margraten (6%)
Industry and energy, share of businesses
0%
▼13 percentage points lower than Eijsden-Margraten (13%)
Culture, recreation and other services, share of businesses
0%
▼12 percentage points lower than Eijsden-Margraten (12%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.0
▼23% lower than Eijsden-Margraten (1.3)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
25%
▲5 percentage points higher than Eijsden-Margraten (20%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+11 pp
▲higher than Eijsden-Margraten (+7 pp)
Lodging, share of addresses
71%
▲67 percentage points higher than Eijsden-Margraten (4%)
Residential, share of addresses
25%
▼64 percentage points lower than Eijsden-Margraten (89%)
Healthcare, share of addresses
0%
▼2 percentage points lower than Eijsden-Margraten (2%)
Private rent
56%
▲42 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (14%)
Multi-family dwellings
50%
▲13 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (37%)
Owner-occupied dwellings
44%
▼13 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (57%)
Business establishments by sector
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij is the largest sector, with 10 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij10
Nijverheid en energie0
Handel en horeca5
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie0
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed0
Zakelijke dienstverlening5
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg5
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten0
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
25% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 20% in the municipality of Eijsden-Margraten (2025).
Petrol75%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)25%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 14% to 25% between 2021 and 2025.
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 60 passenger cars and 10 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars60
Motorcycles10
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
25% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is lodging (71%).
Residential25%
Office1.4%
Assembly1.4%
Healthcare0.5%
Industrial2.4%
Lodging71.2%
Sports0.5%
Other2.4%
Explanation
Based on 212 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
33 residents per km²: 94% less densely populated than the Dutch average.
This areaThe Netherlands
Residents per km²33
NL 539▼ −94% vs NL
Private rent56%
NL 14%▲ +300% vs NL
Multi-family dwellings50%
NL 37%▲ +35% vs NL
Owner-occupied dwellings44%
NL 57%▼ −23% vs NL
Single-family dwellings50%
NL 63%▼ −21% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026