The average WOZ value in Lilboscherveld is €399,000, 21% higher than in Echt-Susteren (€330,000). Between 2024 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 5%, against a rise of 9% in Echt-Susteren. 74% of the homes are owner-occupied, 3 percentage points more than in Echt-Susteren (71%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€399,000
▲21% higher than Echt-Susteren (€330,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2024
+5%
▼lower than Echt-Susteren (+9%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
74%
▲3 percentage points higher than Echt-Susteren (71%)
Social housing
0%
▼19 percentage points lower than Echt-Susteren (19%)
Private rent
26%
▲15 percentage points higher than Echt-Susteren (11%)
Single-family dwellings
95%
▲12 percentage points higher than Echt-Susteren (83%)
Built 1965–1974
5%
▼17 percentage points lower than Echt-Susteren (22%)
Built 1975–1991
13%
▼11 percentage points lower than Echt-Susteren (24%)
Built 1992–2005
3%
▼9 percentage points lower than Echt-Susteren (12%)
Average WOZ value
€399,000
▲21% higher than Echt-Susteren (€330,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2024
+5%
▼lower than Echt-Susteren (+9%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
74%
▲3 percentage points higher than Echt-Susteren (71%)
Social housing
0%
▼19 percentage points lower than Echt-Susteren (19%)
Private rent
26%
▲15 percentage points higher than Echt-Susteren (11%)
Single-family dwellings
95%
▲12 percentage points higher than Echt-Susteren (83%)
Built 1965–1974
5%
▼17 percentage points lower than Echt-Susteren (22%)
Built 1975–1991
13%
▼11 percentage points lower than Echt-Susteren (24%)
Built 1992–2005
3%
▼9 percentage points lower than Echt-Susteren (12%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 5% between 2024 and 2025, to €399,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€399,000▲ 21% above Echt-Susteren
+5% since 2024
Echt-Susteren +9%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€501 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€501/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
271 m² · measured buurt average
WOZ €399,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€132NL median
Water board levy€43–
Property tax (OZB)€38€35
Sewage levy€28€22
Waste levy€23€27
Costs to set aside€369
Maintenance reserve€345–
Buildings insurance€24–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Echt-Susteren's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 207th of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 271 m² (measured average in this buurt) with the average WOZ value here, €399,000.
Levies: Echt-Susteren's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Lilboscherveld has the highest WOZ value of the 2 buurten in Slek.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €399,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Lilboscherveld
399,000
38
–
Slek
371,000
418
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 74% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied74%
Private rent26%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
95% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes95%
Multi-family homes5%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
58% of dwellings were built before 1945, against 15% in the municipality of Echt-Susteren.
Before 194557.9%
1945-196418.4%
1965-19745.3%
1975-199113.2%
1992-20052.6%
2016 and later2.6%
Explanation
Based on 38 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
Too few residents for a rate per resident: these are counts.
Lilboscherveld has too few residents for a reliable rate per 1,000 residents (under 200), so counts are shown instead of a comparison. In 2025, 7 crimes were registered, against 11 in 2021. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Registered crimes, 2025
7
▼down from 11 in 2021
Home burglary
0
2023–2025
Registered crimes, 2025
7
▼down from 11 in 2021
Home burglary
0
2023–2025
Registered crime per year
7 crimes were registered in Lilboscherveld in 2025 (11 in 2021).
Registered crimes, 2025
7
down from 11 in 2021
Explanation
Too few residents for a reliable per-1,000 figure (threshold 200) — registered crime, not all crime — CBS/Politie 47018NED.
The largest category in Lilboscherveld is 'Traffic': 3 in 2025.
Traffic3
Theft and burglary2
Vandalism and public order1
Violence and threats1
Fraud and scams0
Environmental0
Other and withheld0
Explanation
Too few residents for a reliable per-1,000 figure (threshold 200). Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2024, police in Lilboscherveld registered 8 traffic accidents, of which 2 with injury and none fatal.
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2024
03 · Living environment
Green space is below the Echt-Susteren average.
Agricultural land is the largest land use in Lilboscherveld, covering 87% of the area, against 67% in Echt-Susteren. Green space such as parks, sports fields, forest and nature covers 9% of the area, 8 percentage points below the 17% in Echt-Susteren.
Key figures
Green (parks, sport, nature)
9%
▼8 percentage points lower than Echt-Susteren (17%)
Agriculture, share of the area
87%
▲20 percentage points higher than Echt-Susteren (67%)
Built-up, share of the area
0%
▼11 percentage points lower than Echt-Susteren (11%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
9%
▼5 percentage points lower than Echt-Susteren (14%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
9%
▼8 percentage points lower than Echt-Susteren (17%)
Agriculture, share of the area
87%
▲20 percentage points higher than Echt-Susteren (67%)
Built-up, share of the area
0%
▼11 percentage points lower than Echt-Susteren (11%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
9%
▼5 percentage points lower than Echt-Susteren (14%)
Land use
9% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 17% in the municipality of Echt-Susteren.
Traffic2.5%
Built-up0.2%
Other built-up0.5%
Agriculture87.5%
Forest and nature9.3%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
Distance to amenities
A large supermarket lies here at an average road distance of 2200 m.
Distance
Value
Large supermarket
2,200 m
–
GP practice
2,200 m
–
Primary school
2,200 m
–
Daycare
2,200 m
–
Large supermarkets
–
0.2
GP practices
–
0.1
Daycares
–
0.1
Explanation
Average road distance from every address in this buurt to the nearest amenity, and the average count within 1 km — a buurt average, not a distance from one address.
Source: CBS proximity statistics 2025
04 · Residents
The population is shrinking, while it grows in Echt-Susteren.
Lilboscherveld has 95 inhabitants (2026), or 24 per km² (92% lower than in Echt-Susteren). In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Echt-Susteren was 77%, 1 percentage point below the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) had the highest share there: 30% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2024
-5%
▼lower than Echt-Susteren (+1%)
Turnout, municipality of Echt-Susteren
77%
▼1 percentage point lower than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+0%
=about the same as Echt-Susteren (+0%)
Aged 45 to 65
35%
▲7 percentage points higher than Echt-Susteren (28%)
Never married
63%
▲20 percentage points higher than Echt-Susteren (43%)
Dutch origin
75%
▼5 percentage points lower than Echt-Susteren (80%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
30%
▲13 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2024
-5%
▼lower than Echt-Susteren (+1%)
Turnout, municipality of Echt-Susteren
77%
▼1 percentage point lower than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+0%
=about the same as Echt-Susteren (+0%)
Aged 45 to 65
35%
▲7 percentage points higher than Echt-Susteren (28%)
Never married
63%
▲20 percentage points higher than Echt-Susteren (43%)
Dutch origin
75%
▼5 percentage points lower than Echt-Susteren (80%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
30%
▲13 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population shrank 5% between 2024 and 2026, to 95.
Residents, 2026
95
-5% since 2024
Echt-Susteren +1%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 24 residents per km², this buurt is 92% less densely populated than the municipality of Echt-Susteren.
Residents per km²24
Dwellings per km²9.4
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, almost no children were born; almost no one died.
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
35% of residents are between 45 and 65.
0 to 155
15 to 2520
25 to 4525
45 to 6535
65 to 8010
80 and over5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
63% of residents are never married.
Never married60
Married30
Divorced5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
75% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands75
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)20
Outside Europe5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Echt-Susteren; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 77% of eligible voters in Echt-Susteren voted. The largest party was PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) with 30% of the valid votes.
Municipality of Echt-SusterenThe Netherlands
D66
11.8%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
30%
16.7%
VVD
13.6%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
8.3%
12.8%
CDA
14.7%
11.8%
JA21
5.9%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
5.3%
4.5%
BBB
3%
2.6%
Other
7.3%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
Lilboscherveld has an average of 1.2 cars per household, 8% lower than in Echt-Susteren (1.3). 15% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 4 percentage points less than in Echt-Susteren (19%).
Key figures
Cars per household (2025)
1.2
▼8% lower than Echt-Susteren (1.3)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
15%
▼4 percentage points lower than Echt-Susteren (19%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2024
+6 pp
▲higher than Echt-Susteren (+2 pp)
Industrial, share of addresses
32%
▲27 percentage points higher than Echt-Susteren (5%)
Residential, share of addresses
86%
▲2 percentage points higher than Echt-Susteren (84%)
Assembly, share of addresses
2%
▲1 percentage point higher than Echt-Susteren (1%)
Multi-family dwellings
5%
▼32 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (37%)
Private rent
26%
▲12 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (14%)
Single-family dwellings
95%
▲32 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.2
▼8% lower than Echt-Susteren (1.3)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
15%
▼4 percentage points lower than Echt-Susteren (19%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2024
+6 pp
▲higher than Echt-Susteren (+2 pp)
Industrial, share of addresses
32%
▲27 percentage points higher than Echt-Susteren (5%)
Residential, share of addresses
86%
▲2 percentage points higher than Echt-Susteren (84%)
Assembly, share of addresses
2%
▲1 percentage point higher than Echt-Susteren (1%)
Multi-family dwellings
5%
▼32 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (37%)
Private rent
26%
▲12 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (14%)
Single-family dwellings
95%
▲32 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Passenger cars by fuel type
15% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 19% in the municipality of Echt-Susteren (2025).
Petrol84.6%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)15.4%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 9% to 15% between 2024 and 2025.
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 65 passenger cars and 5 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars65
Motorcycles5
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
86% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is industrial (32%).
Residential86.4%
Assembly2.3%
Industrial31.8%
Other4.5%
Explanation
Based on 44 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
24 residents per km²: 96% less densely populated than the Dutch average.
This areaThe Netherlands
Residents per km²24
NL 539▼ −95% vs NL
Multi-family dwellings5%
NL 37%▼ −86% vs NL
Private rent26%
NL 14%▲ +86% vs NL
Single-family dwellings95%
NL 63%▲ +51% vs NL
Owner-occupied dwellings74%
NL 57%▲ +30% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026