The population is growing slower than in Dinkelland. Homes cost more than the average in the municipality of Dinkelland, and registered crime per resident is about the same.
The average WOZ value in Rossum is €466,000, 10% higher than in Dinkelland (€424,000). Between 2014 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 75%, against a rise of 71% in Dinkelland. 81% of the homes are owner-occupied, 6 percentage points more than in Dinkelland (75%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€466,000
▲10% higher than Dinkelland (€424,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2014
+75%
▲higher than Dinkelland (+71%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
81%
▲6 percentage points higher than Dinkelland (75%)
Social housing
7%
▼5 percentage points lower than Dinkelland (12%)
Private rent
12%
▼1 percentage point lower than Dinkelland (13%)
Single-family dwellings
85%
=about the same as Dinkelland (85%)
Built 1945–1964
11%
▼2 percentage points lower than Dinkelland (13%)
Built before 1945
10%
▲2 percentage points higher than Dinkelland (8%)
Built 1992–2005
18%
▲1 percentage point higher than Dinkelland (17%)
Average WOZ value
€466,000
▲10% higher than Dinkelland (€424,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2014
+75%
▲higher than Dinkelland (+71%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
81%
▲6 percentage points higher than Dinkelland (75%)
Social housing
7%
▼5 percentage points lower than Dinkelland (12%)
Private rent
12%
▼1 percentage point lower than Dinkelland (13%)
Single-family dwellings
85%
=about the same as Dinkelland (85%)
Built 1945–1964
11%
▼2 percentage points lower than Dinkelland (13%)
Built before 1945
10%
▲2 percentage points higher than Dinkelland (8%)
Built 1992–2005
18%
▲1 percentage point higher than Dinkelland (17%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 75% between 2014 and 2025, to €466,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€466,000▲ 10% above Dinkelland
+75% since 2014
Dinkelland +71%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€358 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€358/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
168 m² · estimated gemeente average
WOZ €466,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€129NL median
Water board levy€45–
Property tax (OZB)€37€41
Sewage levy€30€22
Waste levy€17€27
Costs to set aside€229
Maintenance reserve€214–
Buildings insurance€15–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Dinkelland's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 75th of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 168 m² (estimated gemeente average) with the average WOZ value here, €466,000.
Levies: Dinkelland's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Rossum has the 6th-lowest WOZ value of the 12 wijken in the municipality of Dinkelland.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €466,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Rossum
466,000
922
–
Denekamp
379,000
3,954
–
Lattrop-Breklenkamp
490,000
369
–
Tilligte
471,000
294
–
Agelo
591,000
199
–
Noord Deurningen
365,000
538
–
Ootmarsum
419,000
2,087
–
Weerselo
428,000
1,346
–
Saasveld
501,000
656
–
Deurningen
464,000
809
–
Nutter
516,000
65
–
Oud Ootmarsum
548,000
127
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 81% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied81%
Social housing7%
Private rent12%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
85% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes85%
Multi-family homes15%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
27% of dwellings were built between 1975 and 1991, against 27% in the municipality of Dinkelland.
Before 194510.4%
1945-196411.3%
1965-197417.5%
1975-199127.1%
1992-200517.6%
2006-20157.3%
2016 and later8.7%
Explanation
Based on 941 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
About as much registered crime per resident as the Dinkelland average.
In 2025, 18 crimes per 1,000 residents were registered in Rossum, about the same as in Dinkelland (18). Since 2021 the registered rate per 1,000 residents rose 59%, against a rise of 19% in Dinkelland. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
18
=about the same as Dinkelland (18)
Change since 2021
+59%
▲higher than Dinkelland (+19%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
3.6
▲80% higher than Dinkelland (2.0)
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
18
=about the same as Dinkelland (18)
Change since 2021
+59%
▲higher than Dinkelland (+19%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
3.6
▲80% higher than Dinkelland (2.0)
Registered crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
In 2025, Rossum registered 18 crimes per 1,000 residents, against 18 in the municipality of Dinkelland.
Rossum18
The municipality of Dinkelland18
Explanation
Crime is counted where it happens and divided by the number of residents, so places with many visitors — city centres, nightlife, stations — score higher.
The largest category in Rossum is 'Theft and burglary': 7.3 per 1,000 residents in 2025, against 5.6 in the municipality of Dinkelland.
RossumDinkelland
Theft and burglary7.3
Dinkelland 5.6▲ +30% vs Dinkelland
Traffic6.0
Dinkelland 5.4▲ +11% vs Dinkelland
Fraud and scams3.4
Dinkelland 3.5≈ Dinkelland
Violence and threats0.9
Dinkelland 1.8▼ −50% vs Dinkelland
Vandalism and public order0.0
Dinkelland 1.4▼ −100% vs Dinkelland
Environmental0.0
Dinkelland 0.0
Other and withheld0.0
Dinkelland 0.7≈ Dinkelland
Explanation
Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2024, police in Rossum registered 19 traffic accidents, of which 6 with injury and none fatal.
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2024
03 · Living environment
Residents rate their health above the Dinkelland average; green space is above the Dinkelland average.
An estimated 82% of adults in Rossum rate their own health as good, 2 percentage points more than in Dinkelland. Fewer adults are overweight (50% against 53%), fewer feel lonely (34% against 37%) and fewer smoke (12% against 14%), but more drink excessively (12% against 10%). Agricultural land is the largest land use in Rossum, covering 76% of the area, against 79% in Dinkelland. Green space such as parks, sports fields, forest and nature covers 20% of the area, 6 percentage points above the 14% in Dinkelland.
Key figures
Self-rated health (estimated)
82%
▲2 percentage points higher than Dinkelland (80%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
20%
▲6 percentage points higher than Dinkelland (14%)
More figures
Overweight
50%
▼3 percentage points lower than Dinkelland (53%)
Lonely
34%
▼3 percentage points lower than Dinkelland (37%)
Smokes
12%
▼2 percentage points lower than Dinkelland (14%)
Excessive drinking
12%
▲2 percentage points higher than Dinkelland (10%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
20%
▲8 percentage points higher than Dinkelland (12%)
Agriculture, share of the area
76%
▼3 percentage points lower than Dinkelland (79%)
Built-up, share of the area
2%
▼2 percentage points lower than Dinkelland (4%)
Self-rated health (estimated)
82%
▲2 percentage points higher than Dinkelland (80%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
20%
▲6 percentage points higher than Dinkelland (14%)
More figures
Overweight
50%
▼3 percentage points lower than Dinkelland (53%)
Lonely
34%
▼3 percentage points lower than Dinkelland (37%)
Smokes
12%
▼2 percentage points lower than Dinkelland (14%)
Excessive drinking
12%
▲2 percentage points higher than Dinkelland (10%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
20%
▲8 percentage points higher than Dinkelland (12%)
Agriculture, share of the area
76%
▼3 percentage points lower than Dinkelland (79%)
Built-up, share of the area
2%
▼2 percentage points lower than Dinkelland (4%)
Health
An estimated 82% of adults rate their own health as good, against 80% in the municipality of Dinkelland (2024).
This areaThe municipality of Dinkelland
Good self-rated health
81.5%
79.5%
Smokes
12.3%
13.7%
Excessive drinking
11.7%
10.3%
Overweight
50.5%
53.4%
Lonely
34%
36.6%
Anxiety or depression feelings
35.5%
36.6%
Meets physical activity guideline
53.8%
53.3%
Explanation
An RIVM model estimate (small-area estimation from the 2024 Health Monitor for Adults and Elderly), not a direct tabulation — even a buurt that was not itself surveyed gets an estimate. Figures cover adults aged 18 and over.
Source: RIVM/CBS Gezondheidsmonitor Volwassenen en Ouderen (kleine-gebieden-schatting) 2024
Land use
20% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 14% in the municipality of Dinkelland.
Traffic1.8%
Built-up1.5%
Other built-up0.2%
Recreation0.3%
Agriculture76.1%
Forest and nature20%
Water0.2%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
04 · Residents
The population is growing slower than the Dinkelland average.
Rossum has 2,320 inhabitants (2026), or 90 per km² (41% lower than in Dinkelland). Between 2014 and 2026 the population stayed about level, against a rise of 4% in Dinkelland. In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Dinkelland was 88%, 10 percentage points above the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, CDA had the highest share there: 23% of the vote, against 12% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2014
+0%
▼lower than Dinkelland (+4%)
Turnout, municipality of Dinkelland
88%
▲10 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+9%
=about the same as Dinkelland (+9%)
Aged 45 to 65
28%
▲1 percentage point higher than Dinkelland (27%)
Married
46%
▲2 percentage points higher than Dinkelland (44%)
Dutch origin
95%
▲5 percentage points higher than Dinkelland (90%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
51%
▲3 percentage points higher than Dinkelland (48%)
CDA, share of the vote
23%
▲11 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (12%)
Population growth since 2014
+0%
▼lower than Dinkelland (+4%)
Turnout, municipality of Dinkelland
88%
▲10 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+9%
=about the same as Dinkelland (+9%)
Aged 45 to 65
28%
▲1 percentage point higher than Dinkelland (27%)
Married
46%
▲2 percentage points higher than Dinkelland (44%)
Dutch origin
95%
▲5 percentage points higher than Dinkelland (90%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
51%
▲3 percentage points higher than Dinkelland (48%)
CDA, share of the vote
23%
▲11 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (12%)
Population per year
The population held steady between 2014 and 2026, at 2,320.
Residents, 2026
2,320
+0% since 2014
Dinkelland +4%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 90 residents per km², this wijk is 41% less densely populated than the municipality of Dinkelland.
Residents per km²90
Dwellings per km²35.9
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, 10.7 children were born per 1,000 residents; 4.3 died per 1,000.
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
28% of residents are between 45 and 65.
0 to 15350
15 to 25305
25 to 45485
45 to 65660
65 to 80415
80 and over110
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
46% of residents are married.
Never married1,060
Married1,075
Divorced80
Widowed110
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
95% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands2,210
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)60
Outside Europe50
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Education level of residents aged 15 to 75
51% of residents have a havo, vwo or mbo2-4 level education.
Primary, vmbo, mbo1350
Havo, vwo, mbo2-4900
Higher professional, university500
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2024
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Dinkelland; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 88% of eligible voters in Dinkelland voted. The largest party was CDA with 23% of the valid votes.
Municipality of DinkellandThe Netherlands
D66
9.5%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
17.7%
16.7%
VVD
18.2%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
4.1%
12.8%
CDA
22.6%
11.8%
JA21
9.2%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
4.4%
4.5%
BBB
10.1%
2.6%
Other
4.4%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
Rossum has an average of 1.6 cars per household, 7% higher than in Dinkelland (1.5). 20% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 3 percentage points less than in Dinkelland (23%).
Key figures
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
23%
▲8 percentage points higher than Dinkelland (15%)
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
16%
▼3 percentage points lower than Dinkelland (19%)
Business services, share of businesses
17%
▼3 percentage points lower than Dinkelland (20%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.6
▲7% higher than Dinkelland (1.5)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
20%
▼3 percentage points lower than Dinkelland (23%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2014
+1 pp
=about the same as Dinkelland (+2 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
93%
▲5 percentage points higher than Dinkelland (88%)
Lodging, share of addresses
1%
▼2 percentage points lower than Dinkelland (3%)
Healthcare, share of addresses
0%
▼2 percentage points lower than Dinkelland (2%)
Social housing
7%
▼21 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (28%)
Multi-family dwellings
15%
▼22 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (37%)
Owner-occupied dwellings
81%
▲24 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (57%)
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
23%
▲8 percentage points higher than Dinkelland (15%)
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
16%
▼3 percentage points lower than Dinkelland (19%)
Business services, share of businesses
17%
▼3 percentage points lower than Dinkelland (20%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.6
▲7% higher than Dinkelland (1.5)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
20%
▼3 percentage points lower than Dinkelland (23%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2014
+1 pp
=about the same as Dinkelland (+2 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
93%
▲5 percentage points higher than Dinkelland (88%)
Lodging, share of addresses
1%
▼2 percentage points lower than Dinkelland (3%)
Healthcare, share of addresses
0%
▼2 percentage points lower than Dinkelland (2%)
Social housing
7%
▼21 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (28%)
Multi-family dwellings
15%
▼22 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (37%)
Owner-occupied dwellings
81%
▲24 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (57%)
Business establishments by sector
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij is the largest sector, with 75 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij75
Nijverheid en energie45
Handel en horeca50
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie15
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed20
Zakelijke dienstverlening55
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg40
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten20
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
20% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 23% in the municipality of Dinkelland (2025).
Petrol80.4%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)19.6%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 19% to 20% between 2014 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
20%▼ 3 percentage points below Dinkelland (23%)
+1 pp since 2014
Dinkelland +1 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 1,355 passenger cars and 120 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars1,355
Motorcycles120
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
93% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is industrial (1%).
Residential93.4%
Retail0.2%
Office0.1%
Assembly0.8%
Healthcare0.1%
Industrial1.4%
Lodging1%
Education0.1%
Sports0.4%
Other3.1%
Explanation
Based on 1,007 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
90 residents per km²: 83% less densely populated than the Dutch average.
This areaThe Netherlands
Residents per km²90
NL 539▼ −83% vs NL
Social housing7%
NL 28%▼ −75% vs NL
Multi-family dwellings15%
NL 37%▼ −59% vs NL
Owner-occupied dwellings81%
NL 57%▲ +42% vs NL
Single-family dwellings85%
NL 63%▲ +35% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026